Lieberman calls it a ‘shake-up’; staff calls it a ‘resignation’

About a week ago, Hartford Courant columnist Kevin Rennie said that [tag]Joe Lieberman[/tag], in anticipation of losing his [tag]primary[/tag] fight against [tag]Ned Lamont[/tag], planned to “shake up his campaign [tag]staff[/tag]” before launching his independent Senate campaign. Spin from the Lieberman camp suggested the senator wants to replace his team with “pungent veterans who will take the fight to Lamont.”

I’ve learned, however, that the spin isn’t the whole story.

Two independent sources have confirmed that some Lieberman aides decided well in advance of yesterday’s primary that if the senator abandoned the [tag]Democratic[/tag] [tag]Party[/tag] for an independent campaign, they would resign in protest. Given yesterday’s results and Lieberman’s announcement, that’s exactly what’s about to happen.

The staff “shake-up,” in other words, isn’t necessarily Lieberman cleaning house — it’s Lieberman losing staffers who won’t work for someone who isn’t a [tag]Democrat[/tag].

It may prove to be part of a pattern, as the senator’s Dem allies keep [tag]Lieberman[/tag] at arms’ length — while embracing [tag]Lamont[/tag].

Indeed, it’s important to remember that Lieberman’s Dem ties are, from his perspective, key to his success in November. But if there is a fissure in the party, Lamont’s chunk is much bigger, and likely to grow even more in the coming weeks.

This morning, for example, Reid and Schumer made good on their promise.

Democratic Leader Harry Reid and DSCC Chair Chuck Schumer issued the following joint statement today on the Connecticut Senate race:

“The Democratic voters of Connecticut have spoken and chosen Ned Lamont as their nominee. Both we and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) fully support Mr. Lamont’s candidacy. Congratulations to Ned on his victory and on a race well run.
“Joe Lieberman has been an effective Democratic Senator for Connecticut and for America. But the perception was that he was too close to George Bush and this election was, in many respects, a referendum on the President more than anything else. The results bode well for Democratic victories in November and our efforts to take the country in a new direction.”

Feingold offered his enthusiastic support; Hillary Clinton’s PAC gave Lamont $5k; Obama’s PAC did the same; Lieberman ally Chris Dodd has vowed to “help in any way I can to secure [Lamont’s] victory in the general election this fall”; Ted Kennedy has pledged his “enthusiastic support”; and Barbara Boxer, who campaigned for Lieberman last month, has now said she’ll campaign for Lamont.

Lieberman is convinced that he’ll be able to maintain a significant amount of his Dem support over the next three months. As his friends, colleagues, and staff stay with the party and the choice of the party’s voters, Lieberman may find fewer and fewer progressive allies between now and November.

So, other than Lanny Davis, what ‘Democrat’ works for Lieberman now?

Maybe he can recruit Ney’s or DeLay’s old campaign staff 😉

  • it’s Lieberman losing staffers who won’t work a someone who isn’t a Democrat.

    Let’s hope they come work for Lamont. That’d be quite a statement.

    (Why accept help from campaign-losers? The impression is that Joe screwed this pooch on his own, rather than by mistakenly listening to his staff — website people excepted, of course.)

    The only way I see for Lieberman to salvage his reputation at this point is to campaign for Lamont. You heard it here first!

  • “The only way I see for Lieberman to salvage his reputation at this point is to campaign for Lamont.” – Allen K.

    But, but, Ned lied about how good a buddy Joe is to Boy George II. And it was a big lie. You know, that kind of big lie (nudge, nudge, wink, wink). How could Joe endorse Ned now?

    Nope, Joe has painted himself into a corner. Maybe Karl Rove can loan him some campaign staff to ‘take the fight to Lamont’. Somehow, other than that, I don’t see where Joe is going to find anyone. Clearly, he hasn’t been able to find someone to run his web site 😉

  • Considering the ridiculous campaign that Lieberman ran, why would anybody in their right mind hire anyone from that disaster. I figured that they would be treated like horses that survived a train wreck and just shoot the ones that weren’t killed in the initial crash.

    Let’s hope that they get picked up the GOP…

  • This is why I can not stay away from politics. It is just too damn interesting.

    I have been on all the major left blogs and no one has said this so hopefully I can be the first.

    Good riddins’ Joe from the Democratic Party, you will not be missed. And all you R’s, quit calling him a democrat, he is an Indy.

  • Well, if Poor Friendless Joe needs friends and money…there’s always K Street!!!

    Darth Lieberman—Dark Lord of the Reich….

  • Well now that Joe has officially abandoned the Democratic Party, then he should be stripped of any Senate Committees he is on and banned from any party meetings, etc. You screw your party, and we screw you back.

  • Lieberman is a lousy democrat, but I can understand his feeling that he can shape a following out of his particular set of political beliefs. Except for the war part, he’d be better than a Republican. I also think any Democratic politico who steps to his side of the line will go down with him.

  • Lance writes:

    “Somehow, other than that, I don’t see where Joe is going to find anyone. ”

    Droopy Dog could always hire Kathy the big breasted purple dinosaur’s (Harris) ex-staff as most of them are looking for work (soon after they realize they’re dealing with a total wackadoo.)

  • I know this is off topic and I don’t mean to suggest that Carpetbagger or anybody else forego ad revenue, but that obnoxious picture of Karl Rove with the stars around his meathead is staring out of the margin of just about every damn left leaning blog page, resulting in that visceral retching reaction every time. Could you ask the friggin’ Fudge Report to come up with something slightly less nausea-inducing for their ads? Even the boy emperor’s face would be preferable to Karl’s swollen mug. Damn!

  • I like Schumer’s framing. “this election was, in many respects, a referendum on the President more than anything else”

    It was a referendum on Bush (and the Republican culture of corruption). And surprise surprise, politicians like Joe who rubberstamp unpopular bullshit get punished at the ballot box.

    but this part…

    …the perception was that he was too close to George Bush…

    The perception?

    This election was not about perceptions. It was about dead people, tens of thousands of them, and trillions of wasted dollars. It was about the Democrats like Joe who continue to enable the lunatics who drove our nation into the ditch. This was a warning to all the beltway bobbleheads who continue to seek compromise with the most evil administration we have ever suffered under. The Democratic voters are tired of “centrist” compromises with evil people. We want the Republicans out of power, and put on trial in many cases. We want to make the name USA stand for something good again. Joe and the other enablers have let the Republicans soil our good name, and he finally paid the price.

    Do your job, Democrats, or you’re next. Refuse to stand and fight this evil regime and you will end up out on your asses with Joe Blowmentum.

  • Lieberman ironically has no idea of how real political power works. People like winners – Lamont – and shift resources and loyalty accordingly. How can Lieberman protect national (and Democratic voter) interests if he’s so selfish or naive to not understand basic party politics? You lost Joe – therefore, become a lobbyist.

    I’m sure Rumsfeld is worrying about a sudden replacement.

  • Ol’ Joe was “pungent veterans,” huh? Maybe that is part of his problem.

    Main Entry: pun·gent
    Pronunciation: -j&nt
    Function: adjective
    Etymology: Latin pungent-, pungens, present participle of pungere to prick, sting; akin to Latin pugnus fist. . .
    1 : sharply painful
    2 : having a stiff and sharp point
    3 a . . . CAUSTIC . . .
    4 a : causing a sharp or irritating sensation; especially : ACRID
    b : having an intense flavor or odor

    I understand he wants new staff, but will bringing in a bunch of old, caustic, smelly pricks really help with the voters?

  • “I understand he wants new staff, but will bringing in a bunch of old, caustic, smelly pricks really help with the voters?”

    But doesn’t that describe Dan Gerstein perfectly? And all the otherwise-unemployables of the DC punditocracy who supported Mr. Whinerman?

  • If he wouldnt have acted the part of a stupid schmuck he would have beaten Lamont. he barely lost as it was, but he thought he was entiltled to the seat. Let Rove come in and campaign for him, then watch him lose.

  • Maybe someone’s said this already, but this seemed clear just from getting the “Rove/Bush help” item — whoever leaked that to ABC was no longer a loyal Lieberman staffer.

  • To bad Joe just can’t be a true democrat and stand behind Lamont. He can get his seat back when he is appointed by the governor in 2008 when Dodd gets elected president.

  • Seasoned Democrat politicos will only work for Lamont as an entre to a position beyond November, when Lieberman will by most accounts trounce Lamont in the General. Staff positions with progressive legislators supporting Lamont, maybe. The build-out of campaign spin-outs of the Netroots, absolutely. Lieberman will attract prominent Democrat, Independent and even Republican operatives who pick General Election winners. Lamont’s brain trust is bloggers, for goodness sake. It’s dubious and unproven that the “support” lining up among “prominent Democrats” will do any more for Lamont than it did for Lieberman. In fact, Tuesday was evidence that the luminaries of the Democratic Party don’t bring out the voters anymore, which should send shock waves through the Party leadership, and bodes very poorly for Democratic gains in November.

  • Yeah, Fletcher, and if you click your heels together three times and say, “There’s noplace like home,” you’ll find yourself back in Kansas.

  • Pundits (including Lieberman on TV) claim that the big shots in the Democratic Party obviously didn’t have much impact on the election, because in spite of their unanimous support, Lieberman lost the primary. I think they may have had a considerable impact–keeping him from losing by a landslide. When all these luminaries and their donors pitch in behind Lamont and expose Lieberman’s self-righteousness, selfishness and blatant, corrosive infidelity (in the fraternal, not marital sense), I think Lamont will beat Lieberman like a dusty rug.

    (I would like to say “soiled rug”, but it doesn’t seem to work metaphorically.)

    By the way, how does “Landslide Lamont” sound? I think we may get to use that come November….

  • # 22, Fletcher:
    “Seasoned Democrat politicos will only work for Lamont as an entre to a position beyond November, […]”

    Um… Please forgive me — English isn’t my first language and I want to improve it… “Lamont as an entire”?

    In the horse world, “an entire” is an ungelded horse. If that’s what you think Lamont is, you’re probably right. But, in extensio, it also makes Lieberman a… well… a “not entire”… Which may also be true, but I don’t see how it would improve Joe’s chances to the
    “Lieberman will by most accounts trounce Lamont in the General. ” point.

    It seems to me that Americans tend to value (perhaps over-value) the… erm… un-bridled masculinity rather highly.

    “Lieberman will attract prominent Democrat, Independent and even Republican operatives who pick General Election winners.”

    They can *pick* till they’re blue in the face but they can’t make people vote their choices in, can they? As had been shown in yesterday’s primary? To revert to the equine imagery… “You can lead a horse to water…”

  • Libra, I’m fairly certain that Fletcher (#22) meant “entree” rather than “entire”… no horse-y metaphors there, just missing an e in the French equivalent of “entryway”

  • Man…all of his piousness is right out the window. He lost all credibility when he didn’t LOSE with honor.

    After all, dignity is not only preserved in times of calm, but should shine in times of stress.

    “droopy dog” is not very shiny.

  • The referendun as I see it this fall will be on the quote war on terror unquote. The dik has already put this out and the rest of the pack will fall in line behind, as will darth lieber. The debunking has started but Ned needs support so he doesnt fall into the Kerry trap of referring to this bogosity as a real thing. Ned needs to refer to it as it is – a cynical concept designed to disempower the citizenry and force them to forfeit their powers of determinism. He needs a platform big enuf to hand dik his head, goliath style.

  • Comments are closed.