Lies, damn lies and then, well, more lies

Guest Post by Morbo

It drives me crazy that some fundamentalist Christians insist that their dogmatic faith bestows upon them a superior form of ethics and morality — and then proceed to act like complete and utter sleazeballs.

Fundamentalists claim to worship an awesome God who holds them to a higher standard of behavior. Time and again I’ve heard them sneer at anyone skeptical of organized religion, any person who dares hew to a secular ethic. Without a belief in God, fundamentalists arrogantly insist, there is nothing to stop men from behaving like beasts.

Recently, I had occasion to hear a speech given by David C. Gibbs III, the Florida fundamentalist Christian attorney who represented Terri Schiavo’s parents, Robert and Mary Schindler. What I heard made me sick.

Gibbs basically accused Michael Schiavo of attacking his wife. Speaking during a right-wing conference in Washington, D.C., Gibbs asserted that no one knows why Terri Schiavo collapsed 15 years ago. Initial suspicions that she had a heart attack or suffered from an eating disorder were ruled out, he claimed.

“The third leading theory — and as you can see, the first two seem to be sort of eliminated — is that there was some form of foul play, that some form of strangulation or violence occurred, and again at the hand of the husband possibly, that actions were taken that caused her for about five minutes to not have oxygen reach into her brain.”

Gibbs asserted that Michael Schiavo then denied his wife any therapy and eagerly sought to collect a $2 million malpractice award he had won on Terri Schiavo’s behalf. Terri Schiavo, Gibbs said, was allowed to die even though she desperately wanted to live.

“Terri Schiavo was as alive as any person sitting here tonight…,” he told the crowd. “I mean, completely animated, completely responsive, desperately trying to talk.”

Note the especially sleazy use of words here. There might “perhaps” have been “some form of strangulation.” Gibbs tried to couch his language, but his meaning was clear. There is no way anyone hearing his speech could have come to any conclusion other than that Michael Schiavo attacked his wife and then sought to profit from that vile deed.

Michael Schiavo, Gibbs asserted, “just wanted to keep the cost down. He wanted to use the money to hire lawyers to kill his wife.” He assailed “all the deprivation and abuse she suffered at the hands of her husband.”

(Gibbs spoke at a conference titled “Confronting Judicial Activism.” It was a far-right nutfest. For more on this cavalcade of crackpots, who, unfortunately, have the ears of some powerful people, see Michelle Goldberg’s excellent piece in Salon. I recommend a stiff drink first.)

I don’t claim to be an expert on the Schiavo case, but I don’t have to be to realize that if Michael Schiavo had strangled his wife for five whole minutes, with his bare hands or some type of rope or belt, there would have been evidence of that. The police would have investigated. No credible authority has ever asserted that foul play occurred.

Two years ago, a court-appointed guardian prepared a report on Terri Schiavo’s case. The guardian, Jay Wolfson, a professor of public health and medicine at the University of South Florida, pointed out that the reason for her slip into unconsciousness remains unknown but noted that there was some evidence of a potassium deficiency, perhaps brought on by unusual dieting practices. Apparently, Terri Schiavo had taken to drinking huge amounts of iced tea in lieu of eating, in an effort to keep her weight down.

The report noted that Michael Schiavo was a loving and caring husband. Far from denying Terri treatment, he once traveled with her to California to try an experimental therapy whereby electrodes were planted directly into Terri’s brain in attempt to revive her.

During the height of the frenzy, various right-wing creeps on the internet accused Michael Schiavo of all manner of crimes and abuse. That’s to be expected. After all, if you give 1,000 monkeys modems and a few hours, several of them will produce Ann Coulter columns. But to hear an attorney intimately involved in the case spread this trash about was jarring. It took things to a new, unwelcome level.

Let’s be clear: Gibbs essentially accused Michael Schiavo of cold-blooded murder and presented no evidence to back it up. He led the crowd to believe that Terri Schiavo could have been cured when in fact a phalanx of experts testified that her cerebral cortex had withered away.

That’s ethical? That’s moral? That’s an example of a superior ethical system?

My inferior secular moral system would not allow me to level such charges against another human being — and not just because I fear a slander suit. I wouldn’t say it because it’s not right. It’s morally wrong to accuse someone of being a cold-blooded murderer when you have absolutely no evidence and are doing it to emotionally manipulate an audience and perhaps make a name for yourself. I could not do that and then get up the next morning and face my family, let alone my own self in the mirror.

And manipulate is exactly what Gibbs did. Gibbs, a well coiffed, good-looking man and gifted public speaker, had this crowd in his pocket. By the time he concluded, some listeners were in tears. The ease of his emotional manipulation said a lot about the crowd. It was not enough for them to simply be angry over the decisions Michael Schiavo made. He had to be turned into a monster, a murderer, an unfeeling, uncaring, money-grubbing killer. In short, he had to be demonized.

Only the most morally and ethically stunted among us would require that such a crude portrait be drawn and served up to them. Only those with the moral reasoning of a child would so eagerly eat it up.

Yet there they sat, sucking it down and asking for more.

I have no doubt that afterwards they went home to do what they always do: Sat in judgment of people like you and me.

To David Gibbs I can only say this: Ask yourself honestly, “What would Jesus do?” And once your answer arrives, if you’re really serious about your faith and not just using it for some ulterior motive, your course of action will be clear: Get down on your knees and beg for forgiveness.

My memory isn’t all that great so when I see someone like Gibbs make outlandlish statements, I try to find a “hook” to remember him and what he stands for. My “hook” for Gibbs is “Fibs.” So – Mr. Gibbs fibs. Seems very appropriate for him although the word “fibs” is probably much too charitable.

  • The reasonable side of my personality says that these folks are allowed to believe whatever they want. There is another side of me that is saying be very afraid.

  • I agree with the be very AFRAID idea. We do not want these crackpot’s in power in our goverment and that is exactly what they want.

  • Is there any reason (his own disinclination aside) that Michael Schiavo can’t sue this guy for slander, libel, defamation, and whatever else he can throw at him? And not only him, but any of the others who echoed this steaming shitpile of lies? Faux News, I’m looking your way. Really, unless Gibbs enjoys some sort of immunity here it’s hard to understand why he would be so frank in his accusations unless he’s hoping that Michael just wants to be done with all this. The truth of it, though, is that as long as this sort of allegation goes unchallenged he’s going to be looking over his shoulder for the rest of his life. Remember Paul Hill? There are people even nutsier than that down there and as long as demagogues like Gibbs can whip them into a frensy by accusing Schiavo of killing his wife it’s only a matter if time before some fruitcake takes things into his own hands.

  • Throughout the entire travesty that was the Schiavo Tv Special it was clear that the only people with a problem were the parents. I do not claim to understand their pain over losing their daughter, but the fact remains that she was long gone and the freak show that followed was solely due to their inability to accept that fact. Now, instead of trying to deal with the loss in a reasonable way, they have managed to turn their delusion into a three ring holy rolling circus of the saints with them as the newly canonized stars. Here’s hoping that some reasonable law enforcement person will bitchslap the annointed mouthpiece for his continuing attempts to profit from this horror show.

  • Many religions are based upon fear. I left, and no longer even admire, the Catholic church because I could not take the hypocrisy. The never ending quest for more power, the competition between religions, the emphasis on almost total control over individual lives, and the constant asking for money – all reasons to doubt the authenticity of organized religion as representing ultimate virtue. I now try to live by the Golden Rule, and greatly admire the spirituality of our native Americans. Respect for others, respect for the earth, and respect for self. After many years of searching for answers, this seems, if nothing else, at least an honest philosophy. And no hypocrisy allowed. The DeLays, the Frists, the Dobsons – these hypocrites scare the hell out of me. But what scares me even worse is the silence of their compatriots who know better, yet enable this attempted evangelical takeover of our American democracy. When the truly good folks no longer speak up, then we got serious problems in the “land of the free”.

  • After all, if you give 1,000 monkeys modems and a few hours, several of them will produce Ann Coulter columns.

    My nominee for the Best Line in a Blog post for 2005.

    Absolutely brilliant! My only issue is that this unfairly denigrates monkeys. (not that you didn’t see that coming…)

  • Comments are closed.