Lives that could have been saved

It’s horrifying to think about, but the Pentagon has determined that troop deaths in Iraq could have been prevented with body armor that was already available but not purchased.

A secret Pentagon study has found that as many as 80 percent of the marines who have been killed in Iraq from wounds to the upper body could have survived if they had had extra body armor. Such armor has been available since 2003, but until recently the Pentagon has largely declined to supply it to troops despite calls from the field for additional protection, according to military officials.

The ceramic plates in vests now worn by the majority of troops in Iraq cover only some of the chest and back. In at least 74 of the 93 fatal wounds that were analyzed in the Pentagon study of marines from March 2003 through June 2005, bullets and shrapnel struck the marines’ shoulders, sides or areas of the torso where the plates do not reach.

Thirty-one of the deadly wounds struck the chest or back so close to the plates that simply enlarging the existing shields “would have had the potential to alter the fatal outcome,” according to the study, which was obtained by The New York Times.

Research from the military’s medical examiner led to this conclusion back in June 2005, but did not begin buying additional plates until September.

Indeed, even culling the information has been tragically mishandled.

The Pentagon has been collecting the data on wounds since the beginning of the war in March 2003 in part to determine the effectiveness of body armor. The military’s medical examiner, Dr. Craig T. Mallak, told a military panel in 2003 that the information “screams to be published.” But it would take nearly two years.

The Marine Corps said it asked for the data in August 2004; but it needed to pay the medical examiner $107,000 to have the data analyzed. Marine officials said financing and other delays had resulted in the study’s not starting until December 2004. It finally began receiving the information by June 2005.

It’s literally nauseating.

I agree wholeheartedly. The soldiers in Iraq didn’t need a study. They’ve been begging for this armor for years. One word from the Pres would have provided that armor if he was paying attention.

  • Come on. There’s a war on. You think the military has an extra $107k lying around to finance this stuff?

  • Imagine if you were a family member or friend of a Marine killed in Iraq. What would you be thinking and feeling now? Remember the families of 9/11 victims who had to face the fact that, a month earlier, Bush had ignored a warning about Al Qaeda? Remember how they became primarily responsible for setting up the 9/11 Commission? Will the country react in the same way to the needless loss of up to 80% of the Marines who were killed?

  • Well, which one of Bush’s “pioneers” got the $107,000 in his tax return?

    Why, the economy wouldn’t be working as wonderful as it is, dadgummit, if King Bush hadn’t stuck to his guns about leaving no bazillionaire behind, don’t you know? What sort of candy-ass liberals are you anyway? Don’t you know it’s only the stupid who fight our wars? The smart guys are all back home “playing all-day pool volleyball with ambitious secretaries.”

    This reeeeaaaaaally pisses me off. I keep waiting for these assholes to “bottom out” and the truth is, they have no bottom.

  • I think this is a huge story – one thing that’s been perceived as consensus vis-a-vis Iraq is the need to support the troops with any and all means possible – and Dubya and his crowd blow it with the body armor…

    Senator McCain (who chairs a Senate committee) generally plays nice with Dubya these days because he wants the Republican nomination in 2008, but this must make him sick to his stomach…he could ally himself with the Dems and investigate this if he has the courage to do so…

  • Somebody with connections had a big inventory of inferior armor they needed to get rid of first. It’s important to rotate out that old stock and then get the better stuff in the pipeline.

    We’re not in a real war. It’s a fraud war with real dead people and corruption out the wazoo.

  • Where are the Dems? Where are you? Time to raise a fuss! This is something the average person can understand, and the bushies have NO EXCUSE for people still not having armor. They just couldn’t possibly have a single reason after all this time that they haven’t provided it yet. They could’ve created a factory to build it themselves by now. There’s NO EXCUSE. I want to see Harry Reid and Kennedy and Pelosi and whoever on the news yelling “Bush is killing your kids and he doesn’t care.”

    [I was so riled up that I misspelled “orange” on my first try. Arrgh!]

  • I wonder what small fraction of the millions that Halliburton subsidiaries and Custer Battles misappropriated from their reconstruction contracts would have paid for all the body armor needed?

    For all these creeps and their friends in the administration, this war was just a chance to grant themselves “tax relief” they believe is theirs by right.

    The conservatives who handed managment of this war and this country to these jerks in the White House without even thinking twice or looking back are going to yell back that the Democrats should have done something–

    well Bush is the Commander in Chief!!!

    The buck is supposed to stop there.

    But it sure as hell doesn’t.

    Instead, it stops at the homes of all the servicemen’s grieving families who received autosigned “Killed In Action” letter from a SecDef who could barely give a shit.

    Conservatives would be a lot more useful becoming the critical, dissenting voice in America that they’ve told liberals we’re not allowed to be during wartime. Who checks out to make sure that this Bush guy isn’t a jerk who’s swindling all of us? It sure as hell isn’t the average Republican, or the average Republican activist.

    Shame.

  • The dems aren’t supposed to be handling management of the war. The President is supposed to be.

    But he sure as hell isn’t.

    You want to know what he is managing?

    One guess, come on.

    He’s managing a rich-boy looting spree. I’m sure they’re all thanking God they got that estate tax taken care of.

  • What can you expect from a trio of morons who never saw action themselves – Bush, “five deferments” Cheney and Rumsfeld. I get so angry when I think of Rumsfeld’s statement that “you go to war with the army you have.” Unfortunately, we went with the Secretary of Defense we had. And far too many men, women and children have died as a result. This administration has far too much blood on its hands.

  • The next Dem or MoveOn.org ad just writes itself, doesn’t it?
    Rummy saying ” you go to war with the army you have” and the revelation that 4/5 of Marine deaths could have been avoided with armor.

    Rummy basically said those people don’t deserve armor, and hasn’t lifted a finger to get them more.

    I ask again: Where is the Dem leadership on this one?

  • Comments are closed.