Loose nukes

Looking back, it’s still hard to fathom. In late August, an Air Force bomber accidentally flew six cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads from North Dakota to Louisiana — with the power of 60 Hiroshimas — and no one realized the nuclear-armed missiles were missing for more than a day.

The breathtaking incident raised questions about whether the flight was, in fact, an accident, or whether this might be part of some hyper-aggressive posturing towards the Middle East. How does a bomber inadvertently fly across the United States with six nuclear warheads? Was this human error? A bureaucratic mix-up? Or something more sinister?

The Washington Post has a detailed front-page analysis today of what transpired and concludes that this really was an accident. An incredibly serious, jaw-droppingly dangerous accident.

Just after 9 a.m. on Aug. 29, a group of U.S. airmen entered a sod-covered bunker on North Dakota’s Minot Air Force Base with orders to collect a set of unarmed cruise missiles bound for a weapons graveyard. They quickly pulled out a dozen cylinders, all of which appeared identical from a cursory glance, and hauled them along Bomber Boulevard to a waiting B-52 bomber.

The airmen attached the gray missiles to the plane’s wings, six on each side. After eyeballing the missiles on the right side, a flight officer signed a manifest that listed a dozen unarmed AGM-129 missiles. The officer did not notice that the six on the left contained nuclear warheads, each with the destructive power of up to 10 Hiroshima bombs.

That detail would escape notice for an astounding 36 hours, during which the missiles were flown across the country to a Louisiana air base that had no idea nuclear warheads were coming. It was the first known flight by a nuclear-armed bomber over U.S. airspace, without special high-level authorization, in nearly 40 years.

The episode, serious enough to trigger a rare “Bent Spear” nuclear incident report that raced through the chain of command to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and President Bush, provoked new questions inside and outside the Pentagon about the adequacy of U.S. nuclear weapons safeguards while the military’s attention and resources are devoted to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

You think?

This really is one of those keep-you-up-at-night kind of stories.

Three weeks after word of the incident leaked to the public, new details obtained by The Washington Post point to security failures at multiple levels in North Dakota and Louisiana, according to interviews with current and former U.S. officials briefed on the initial results of an Air Force investigation of the incident. […]

“I have been in the nuclear business since 1966 and am not aware of any incident more disturbing,” retired Air Force Gen. Eugene Habiger, who served as U.S. Strategic Command chief from 1996 to 1998, said in an interview.

A simple error in a missile storage room led to missteps at every turn, as ground crews failed to notice the warheads, and as security teams and flight crew members failed to provide adequate oversight and check the cargo thoroughly. An elaborate nuclear safeguard system, nurtured during the Cold War and infused with rigorous accounting and command procedures, was utterly debased, the investigation’s early results show.

The incident came on the heels of multiple warnings — some of which went to the highest levels of the Bush administration, including the National Security Council — of security problems at Air Force installations where nuclear weapons are kept. The risks are not that warheads might be accidentally detonated, but that sloppy procedures could leave room for theft or damage to a warhead, disseminating its toxic nuclear materials.

Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), co-chairman of the House Bipartisan Task Force on Nonproliferation, said a couple of weeks ago, “Nothing like this has ever been reported before, and we have been assured for decades that it was impossible. The complete breakdown of the Air Force command and control over enough nuclear weapons to destroy several cities has frightening implications not only for the Air Force, but for the security of our entire nuclear weapons stockpile.”

Apparently, this mistake was akin to pulling an inside straight. One former National Security Council staff member with detailed knowledge told the WaPo this was “a breakdown at a number of levels involving flight crew, munitions, storage and tracking procedures — faults that never were to line up on a single day.”

A former Air Force senior master sergeant described this was “one of the biggest mistakes in USAF history.” Is this an inopportune time to wonder if, perhaps, the president’s policies of stretching and over-burdening the military contributes to mistakes like these?

It was obviously an innocent nuclear mistake, a “failure of imagination,” if you will. Also, it’s a shame that some of the Minot servicemen have perished lately because of “accidents.”

  • Here are my questions:

    The AGM-129 missiles were being transported to be mothballed. If so, why were they attached externally to a B-52? Why weren’t they carried internally by a C-17 cargo plane?
    It would seem to me to be a far safer way to move these kinds of weapons across the US.

    And is it commonplace for the Air Force to fly combat aircraft over populated centers with external ordnance attached? Even if it’s inactive, don’t you still run the risk of losing one in the air due to a mishap?

    I ask these questions because Omaha was one of the cities they flew over. So it makes me a tad bit nervous.

    Also, having grown up with my backyard literally in the flight path of Offutt Air Force Base, I have seen literally thousands of US and NATO aircraft flow over my house, including F-111s, B-52s, F-15s, F-16s, F/A-18s, F-14s, F-4s, and even some Luftwaffe Tornados and Royal Air Force Vulcans from way back when.

    Never once did I see one of those aircraft carry any weapons that was at least visible.

  • I’m not buying it, not for a second. It took them, what, 3 weeks, to come up with this “failure at every step on every level” scenario. I’m willing to suspend disbelief, heck I even pay to do it every Saturday night except during football season. But I can’t buy this. This is George W Bush’s America, and everything he looks at turns to shit (reverse Midas) I accept that people make screwups, massive screwups. And under the Fucktard in Chief they are more massive and more screwed up than ever. But seven massive screwups at the same time, the same place on the same day? Nah. Not. Buying. It. Evah.

  • Wha?

    I think I’m a bit speechless.

    I’m trying to figure out how this makes things better.

    On the one hand, I want to believe them that it was an accident, because I really, really don’t want them to be repositioning nukes in preparation for launching a nuke assault on a foreign power (like, oh, let’s say “Iran” for the sake of argument).

    OTOH – this fits the standard pattern for the Bush administration – when given a choice of excuses, one that makes you look incompetent and/or stupid and one that makes you look nefarious, choose to look stupid. For 7 years they’ve chosen stupid over nefarious every single time.

    The USAF just rolled out the “Alberto Gonzoles” defense here – we didn’t do anything wrong, we’re just too stupid to know what we were doing. That doesn’t fill me with confidence on any dimension.

  • I am afraid I can believe this was an incredible “accident”. You must remember that you are dealing with an adminstration that has raised incompetence to levels that were once unthinkable. I think this is yet another example of how stretched and broken the military has become under Bush.

    Also, I know this has become an endless refrain, but can you imagine the reaction among the Repubs and the media if an incident such as this had happened under Clinton? There would have been at least a half-dozen Congressional inquiries going within a week.

  • Nope, sorry, don’t buy it. Too much coincidental incompetence. If this was an accident, we need to disband the Air Force, cause it is broke.

  • You cannot pull a missile-carcass without seeing its dataplate.

    You cannot eyeball six wing-slung “anything” and see twelve.

    No bomber pilot “mounts up” without checking what his “mount.”

    And given the fundie-freaks that USAF is riddled with, I cannot believe for one instant that this was not an attempt to give Armageddon “a little nudge….”

  • Comments are closed.