Louis Beres

I try not to include too many personal anecdotes here on the site, but in this case, I’m willing to make an exception.

In 2001, I attended the Christian Coalition’s annual national conference, covering the event for my employer at the time. While chatting with some reporters in the lobby of the Washington Hilton, a clearly agitated man in his 60s approached me and my boss, telling us that we weren’t welcome. We explained that we had paid for our tickets, just like everyone else in attendance.

Not quite satisfied, the gentleman proceeded to threaten my boss. When I told him that it was probably time for him to be on his not-so-merry way, he put his hand on my chest and told me to stay out of it. I was, needless to say, not amused.

Perhaps he realized that he’d gone too far, or perhaps it was the small crowd that was beginning to watch, but the guy backed off and walked away, muttering. It was, as you might imagine, one of the more memorable moments of my Christian Coalition experiences. I made a mental note about who this man was, in case I came across him again someday.

Though I never saw him again, his name was Louis Beres. This Louis Beres.

After news broke that local law enforcement officials were investigating complaints that Louis Beres, longtime chairman of the Christian Coalition of Oregon, had molested three female family members when they were pre-teens, The Oregonian in Portland went out and interviewed Beres’ family members.

Two told reporters that Beres, indeed, had molested them. All three said they have been interviewed for several hours by detectives.

“I was molested,” said one of the women, now in her early 50s. “I was victimized, and I’ve suffered all my life for it. I’m still afraid to be in the same room with [Beres].”

The coalition led by Beres, 70, champions socially conservative candidates and causes. Its Web site describes the group as “Oregon’s leading grassroots organization defending our Godly heritage.”

First, as a matter of conscience, my heart goes out to those Beres allegedly abused. Second, as a matter of politics, I’ve completely lost count of how many times I’ve seen these kind of horror stories involving “pro-family” fundamentalists.

And third, I can’t remember the last time I had such a schadenfreude-filled moment.

Who could forget stauch conservative Terry Dolan, a gay man who died of AIDS in 1986? Whether it’s child molester Beres or former (?) alcoholic George W. Bush, if I had a dollar for every one of these over-compensating, conflicted wing-nuts, I could retire at 60 years of age.

  • I don’t know what it is about “pro-family” fundamentalists, but their proclivity for depravity is certainly widespread, perhaps universal. I guess part of what makes them weird is that they fulminate so much over something which is really pretty ordinary: is anyone “anti-family”? Why make such a big deal out “pro” unless there’s something weird beneath the surface? Scratch a rabid pro-family guy, uncover a real pervert.

  • If you’re going to use it, get it right.

    That’s what I get for using an online dictionary I’m not familiar with. It’s fixed.

  • Do you ever get the idea that people like this join groups with names like “Christian Coalition” as a form of camouflage, something they can hide behind? The same thing has been suggested of child-molesting priests, so why would one not be able to find kindred spirits among Pat Robertson’s constituents?

  • This sort of thing isn’t even shocking any more; I practically *expect* it.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if some morning I were to pick up my newpaper and find that “man-on-dog” wasn’t an ironic nickname after all.

  • My wife always says: If you want to find out who is hiding dirty little secrets, go to church and see who is sitting up front.

    Why is it that the really BIG sinners always turn out to be the most outspoken better-than-thou moralists??

    Now that’s a study I’d pay to read.

  • That’s the difference between the right wing nutjobs and the left. The left may be kinky, but the right is perverted.

    For those who don’t know the difference:

    Kinky is using a feather.

    Perverted is using the whole chicken.

  • Comments are closed.