Maliki gives up on timetables

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Kamel al-Maliki in November 2006:

[Maliki] told ABC News today that he is moving to disarm militias in Iraq, and expects his forces to be ready to take over from the U.S. command in June, 2007.

“I can say that Iraqi forces will be ready, fully ready, to receive this command and to command its own forces, and I can tell you that by next June our forces will be ready,” Maliki said in an interview with Charles Gibson. […]

“Are you saying to me that the al-Sadr brigades should be disarmed and you will set about to do that?” Gibson asked Maliki.

“Definitely. And the government is doing that with all militias, with no exception. There will be only the arms for government troops,” he said.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Kamel al-Maliki yesterday:

[Maliki] told ABC News he does not want to set any timetable for a U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq, a major shift in his position.

“Anything specific I can not give, neither us nor the U.S. government can set up a timetable,” Maliki said. […]

In Thursday’s interview in his office in the heavily protected Green Zone Maliki said he wouldn’t rule out U.S. troops still being in Iraq in five years time. (emphasis added)

Remind me again about all the “progress”?

Also, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates had some comments yesterday that clearly broke with the standard White House talking points.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said Thursday that he was discouraged by the resignation of the Sunnis from Iraq’s cabinet and that the Bush administration might have misjudged the difficulty of achieving reconciliation between Iraq’s sectarian factions.

In one of his bluntest assessments of the progress of the administration’s Iraq strategy, Mr. Gates said, “I think the developments on the political side are somewhat discouraging at the national level.” He said that despite the Sunni withdrawal, “my hope is that it can all be patched back together.” […]

He acknowledged that when the Bush administration decided to send the additional troops, “We probably all underestimated the depth of the mistrust and how difficult it would be for these guys to come together on legislation, which, let’s face it, is not some kind of secondary issue.”

He was referring to the failure of Iraq’s Parliament to pass legislation distributing oil revenue, setting a timetable for provincial elections and easing employment restrictions on former Baath Party members — measures that the Bush administration considers crucial for reconciliation between Sunnis and Shiites.

This week, perhaps more than any in months, the White House its allies have claimed the momentum in the debate over Iraq. It looks like the Defense Secretary didn’t get the memo.

Nour al-Maliki. Summa Cum Laude graduate of The Gee Dubya Bush International School of Leadership.

WTF? Why don’t we just give him our fucking army and start building up a new one? That seems to be what he wants.

  • I’m in depression. I thought we had a lock on incompetence with the Decider. Evidently it metastasized into Iraq.

  • Four years over there and Gates is afraid the admin “might have misjudged” or probably “underestimated.” No. Bush dove into a no-win situation he didn’t understand and didn’t want to understand. Bush cannot admit he was wrong and failed our nation miserably. He wil sacrifice our blood and treasure just to keep the final judgement from being rendered during his term. And impeachment is off the table?

  • Bush will reinstitute the draft before he leaves office… Rumsfeld coined the term “long war” back in 2004, I believe.

  • Robert Gates – Master of the Understatement.

    By his measure, I guess New Orleans was a little messy after Katrina, Manhattan was a little discombobulated after 9/11 and the Holocaust was somewhat troubling.

    And the migraine these people give me is just a little headache.

    I think that every time people from the administration, the Pentagon or the GOP speak, they should require an on-site translator, sub-titles or a Bush-speak-to English dictionary at one’s side, so everyone will fully understand exactly what they are “really” saying.

  • Take out the oil distribution legislation and everything else would get done in a hurry.
    Can’t Bush just order them to stay in session till he gets the legislation he requires?

    After all, these are our timetables not Iraq’s. What we think or demand they do. Why is there no mention of a national energy policy to get electrical power nationwide immediately. with all efforts focused on that effort? How about a national gasoline distribution program?
    Food distribution?
    Bush might just annex Iraq as a state and consider everyone there an illegal alien immigrant to get the oil. He’s tried everything else.

  • Oops?!?…Whats up with this? Prior to your site “makeover” had not encountered oops…

    Have now landed on oops four times…

    Who does your site set-ups? Team Bush/Cheney?

  • Comments are closed.