I imagine it’s difficult for Dick Cheney’s allies and staffers to defend the Vice President’s penchant for secrecy, but when responding to criticism of Cheney’s proclivity to hide information, they really shouldn’t make things up. Yes, Mary Matalin, I’m looking at you.
Matalin appeared on NBC’s Today show yesterday to defend Cheney when Katie Kouric asked Matalin to respond to this paragraph from an LA Times editorial:
“Never mind the Armstrong Ranch. We wouldn’t know about the NSA program or even Abu Ghraib if Cheney had his way. The vice president has been the single most influential Washington advocate for White House secrecy since 1974, when he persuaded his then-boss, President Ford, to veto the Freedom of Information Act…. We’ll be living with the consequences of Cheney’s tight lips long after this week’s brouhaha fades.”
This was Matalin’s response:
“This is completely absurd. It was the Department of Defense that first revealed the Abu Ghraib situation. That wasn’t ‘uncovered’ and there was no cover-up. This was announced by the administration. This is absurd. The pejorative ‘secretive’ … is a creation of Cheney critics.”
Was Matalin right about Abu Ghraib? Not so much. As the New York Daily News explained today, the scandal was broken “by CBS News and The New Yorker in April 2004 — not by the Defense Department’s blandly vague and widely ignored press release on ‘reported incidents of detainee abuse’ at an unnamed facility.”
Indeed, the administration still hasn’t allowed an independent investigation of the abuses at Abu Ghraib, and as the Wall Street Journal noted yesterday, there is “still no reliable information on the numbers or identities of prisoners who died in U.S. custody.”
Matalin points to Abu Ghraib as a clear example of how Cheney and the administration aren’t secretive? I sometimes wonder if Bush allies like Matalin believe what they tell national television audiences or if they no longer care.