Maybe he’ll go next decade

It seemed like odd timing. The president, just two days before Iraqis go the polls and a day after he delivered his fourth major address on the war, traveled to suburban Virginia for a “roundtable discussion” with hand-picked, pre-screened seniors to talk about Medicare.

Of all the topics to schedule an event like this one, Medicare seemed out of place. The Patriot Act, maybe; the war, definitely. But why Medicare yesterday? As Dan Froomkin noticed, Bush’s roundtable discussion was less about where he was and more about where he wasn’t.

Reporting that President Bush steered clear of the White House’s own Conference on Aging yesterday — making him the first president ever to do so — fell to the regional newspapers and NPR, not the big guys.

It turns out that had Bush attended, he would have been facing a very hostile audience.

So instead, Bush held a photo-op with a hand-picked group of seniors at a swanky retirement home — and it was well covered by the usual suspects.

Indeed, NPR’s Julie Rovner reported that the White House Conference on Aging is a once-a-decade gathering and Bush is the first president not to speak to delegates in the event’s half-century history.

Did Bush decide to skip the event because the Conference on Aging planned to discuss issues unrelated to his policy agenda? No, the future of Medicare was at the top of the conference agenda, but the president felt he’d be better off talking to sycophantic seniors at a high-end, gated retirement community.

At a session on improving Medicare, Robert Binstock, professor of aging, health and society at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, said, “That [Bush] went to speak about Medicare in Virginia today, instead of an assembly of delegates from all over the country indicates that he’s afraid to speak in anything but a controlled environment.”

If there’s another explanation, I’d love to hear it.

i’m confused: is Dan Froomkin part of the white house coverage of the washington post? (sic)

  • Maybe he has something against the Conference on Aging? You know, like he has something against the NAACP and he has something against global warming.

  • Come now, the President is a busy man. He can’t be expected to remember all of these events, can he? Hell, maybe he was being ironic, by pretending to use Alzheimers to explain why he missed the aging conference. But I see no reason to assume the worst, even if it is the most likely explanation.

  • We all know that Bush is afraid to be asked questions except by his followers. Where is some of this Bring It On shit, I guess that doesn’t pertain to himself.

  • Here’s another take on it.

    White House Gags Older Gays

    A telling exerpt:

    Today at a press conference elder advocates challenged the administration for refusing to include sexual orientation, gender identity and other vulnerable populations in its resolutions.

    In addition, critics — including some WHCoA delegates — said rigid conference procedures and vague resolutions are preventing substantive discussion of critical aging issues, such as improving the cultural competency of service providers; providing adequate funding for the implementation of elder care services; and bolstering the economic security of a diverse aging population.
    “The amount of control over this conference is appalling,” said Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

    “It’s outrageous that, in 2005 at the White House Conference on Aging, LGBT issues are not only excluded, but that there is no opportunity to officially introduce these issues into the discussion whatsoever.”

    By contrast, more than 2,200 delegates attended the 1995 conference, which allowed for resolutions to be submitted by delegates and considered on the floor.

  • Sounds like seniors are angry about the failings of the prescription drug benefit – and, remember, this constituency tends to vote…not good for the Repubs in 2006…

  • Comments are closed.