Maybe McCain forgot about the ‘magic asterisks’

[tag]Reagan[/tag] deification in GOP circles notwithstanding, I think [tag]John McCain[/tag] engaged in some historical revisionism yesterday at a speech to the Economic Club of New York.

Huge federal budget deficits are threatening the economic future for younger Americans and destabilizing the country on the international stage, according to McCain. “No security strategy can succeed without a firm economic foundation,” he said. “Just as we must anticipate and confront outside threats using all instruments of our national power, we must face the very real threats emanating from home that endanger our prosperity.”

[tag]McCain[/tag] cast his call for a renewal of fiscal conservatism through the historical lens of former president [tag]Ronald Reagan[/tag], whom he repeatedly singled out for praise in [yesterday’s] address. He lauded Reagan for “rededicat[ing] our national energies to the principles of personal, political and economic freedom” — tenets, McCain said, that have largely been lost in today’s politics.

I realize the 1980s were a couple of decades ago — and it’s possible McCain looks back at the era through rose-colored glasses — but if Reagan is his model for fiscal discipline, I have a couple of follow-up questions.

It was Reagan, after all, who created the biggest [tag]deficits[/tag] in American history (at least until the current Oval Office occupant came along). For that matter, Reagan strongly embraced the ever-popular “[tag]magic asterisks[/tag],” in which the president would cut taxes without comparable spending cuts, but would balance the budget with information that was yet “to be provided.” And while we’re at it, one might also want to remember that Reagan increased the size of the federal government and raised [tag]taxes[/tag] a few times to stop his deficits from spiraling out of control.

If McCain believes Reagan is the ideal for 21st-century Republicans to follow, maybe the senator could explain which parts of the former president’s fiscal agenda he’d like to emulate.

While comparisons between the Bushies and the Nazis are apt, the Repubs massive defense expenditures and enormous deficits are reminiscent of the Soviets … and we now know what happened to their system. We have our Afghanistan, Iraq may be our Chechnya and we may wind up broke and broken just like the Soviet Union. Does any one else see these signs?

  • Perhaps McCain is trying to move away from the Norquistian concept that all taxation is bad. Reagan raised taxes, you see. Taxes will have to be raised, as any thinking adult knows.

  • Reagan is now a saint of Republican’t church of pseudo-conservatism. And like any quote, can be misquoted or falsely assigned any belief or policy that the current church wants.

    So for McCain, Reagan is a saint of fiscal conservatism, which he did run on in 1980. Not that his campaign positions meant anything. He was also going to rid us of the Department of Education.

  • I think that for many modern Republicans, their recollections of the Regan Administration are no better than mine, and I was 3 and 7 when he was elected.

    If McCain wants to draw comparisons between himself and the former President, he may want to start with a memory problem.

  • doubtful–LOL, good one.

    I think McCain, the maverick, has become McCain, the relativist. He can’t point to the record of the worst president in history so he has to go back to Reagan to capture that Republican glow. Anyone, compared to the Chimp, is excellent. He could use Hoover. But Ronnie looked better on a horse. So yes, don’t we all want to go back to those golden days of Reagan-hood. Oh, God, if only we could turn back the clock to the BEGINNING of the end.

  • I gotta agree with BuzzMon – the next President (which McCain wants to be) is going to have to raise taxes – and somehow or other make it palatable to the “conservatives”. One small point in Reagan’s favor was that when push came to shove, unlike today’s President, Reagan bowed to the financial realities and actually did raise taxes. The same responsible action was used as a weapon against Bush41, and Bush43 is acting like he’s completely learned that lesson by continually pushing tax cuts and leaving tax increases off the table. By coupling St. Reagan with an aura of fiscal responsibility, McCain may be opening the door to a rehabilitation of the idea of tax increases. And if so, good for him.

  • “If McCain believes Reagan is the ideal for 21st-century Republicans to follow, maybe the senator could explain which parts of the former president’s fiscal agenda he’d like to emulate.”

    Um… Reagan was fiscally responsible; didn’t he cut the cost of school lunches by declaring ketchup a vegetable (nutritional equal and taste-wise superior to the hated broccoli)? I’m sure Mr McCain could streamline those school lunches further, given the new scientific evidence: starches contribute to obesity and meats (esp the cheap and fatty ones, such as served in school cafeterias) to all kinds of ills, beginning with heart problems…

  • Maybe Dems need to have their own teleconference with Mr. Maliki. Or does ShrubCo screen his calls?

  • “The same responsible action [raising taxes] was used as a weapon against Bush41” – Andy

    Maybe that is because:

    1). He promised America that he would and could stop Congress from raising taxes, but didn’t.

    2). The first day he signed the tax law, he said he was prepared to take the political hit for making the right decision, the second day he blamed Congress for twisting his arm to raise taxes he claimed to not want.

    I knew he was lying in 1988 when he said he would not raise taxes. That didn’t bother me. What bothered me was the lie that he was not part of the tax increase after he had done it.

    That’s why he lost my vote in 1992.

  • Comments are closed.