Maybe they should have pre-screened the troops

Perhaps the strangest part of Bush’s speech on Iraq last night wasn’t the address but the reaction. The nearly 800 troops on hand at Fort Bragg, N.C. were eerily silent for nearly the entire event. For a president who thrives on sycophants cheering his every word at carefully-scripted rallies, it must have been unnerving.

There was one moment of mild enthusiasm when Bush said, “we will stay in the fight until the fight is won.” It didn’t generate immediate or sustained applause, but the audience did clap.

But as it turns out, probably the most newsworthy angle to last night’s speech was not the remarks that earned applause, but how that applause was generated.

NBC’s Kelly O’Connell, reporting from Fort Bragg, told [Brian] Williams afterward that the applause appeared to have been “triggered by members of the president’s advance team” and that once they began clapping, the soldiers joined in.

ABC and Fox reported the same thing.

To be fair, the White House advance team may have intentionally been going for subdued event. There was no applause when Bush took the stage because the troops were standing at attention. CNN reported that Bush aides invited a subdued response because they didn’t want to appear to be having a political rally on a military base during a war. Whether this was a description of a pre-determined plan or a post-speech rationalization for a tepid response remains to be seen.

But in either case, when the commander in chief has to rely on aides to coax applause from the troops, it’s the height of embarrassment. It’s also the kind of thing that should prompt some follow-up from the intrepid White House press corps. How about a few questions for Scott McClellan such as, “Were advance team members not satisfied letting troops decide for themselves when to clap?”

I wish Bush the same success with his Iraq war speeches as he got with the Social Security speeches.

Keep talking, Mr. President…PLEASE.

  • What freaked me out during the election was at all of his speeches there was this “whoo–oooop” cheer that was everpresent. It wasn’t clapping, it was something more and it was decidely disgusting.

  • I consumed some, um… numbing compound before the speech so maybe this was a misimpression. I could swear that he was pausing for a reaction at times. Like after he delivered what he thought, or maybe the speech writers thought, were applause lines. But it didn’t happen except that one time, which was kinda weird. Did anyone else have the same impression?

  • CNN reported that Bush aides invited a subdued response because they didn’t want to appear to be having a political rally on a military base during a war.

    If that were true, Bush would simply have delivered his speech from the WH. This president uses the troops as campaign extras more than any other in my memory — and I’m old enough that my memory is pretty long.

  • I saw in some Post article that one of the reasons why there was little reaction was because the soldiers were at attention – and so “spontaneous” outburst would not have been appropriate. Someone with more experience would have to make a comment on that.

  • I think that the 82’s response to the speech speaks volumes. The news media is saying that this was just military reserve: Bullshit!
    I saw a speech that General Jumpin’ Jim Gavin gave to the 82. Hats were flying and grunts were screaming. Military reserve my butt.
    This guy is killing men in the 82 and he simply doesn’t care. The 82 knows this.

  • I wonder what the point of having them stand at attention was if not to supress responses/reactions. I only remember seeing the camera switch to the audience once, but I didn’t watch the whole speech. Was having them stand at attention supposed to be impressive to the TV audience? I doubt it. I also wondered why there weren’t marines behind the president like I’ve seen before. Did they think that would seem too over the top in the use of props? I doubt that too. I think the WH was truely woried about this speech, even when it was at a marine base. So why didn’t they just have it in the oval office?

  • I’m with you, Art.

    The President paused a number of times after some line I guess he thought was particularly witty, apparently expecting applause. Also, if these guys were at attention, the one little bit of applause was a serious breakdown in discipline. I’d have dropped them for 50 pushups.

  • FYI. Rush had on a guy who claimed to have been there last night. He said the troops did not respond because it was common military courtesy (and they were probably instructed that it was) when the commander in chief speaks. I wouldn’t know one way or the other. He didn’t say that they were at attention and Rush didn’t ask. He went on to say that when they did respond, it was bacause Bush said something directly about them.

  • FYI. Rush had on a guy who claimed to have been there last night. He said the troops did not respond because it was common military courtesy (and they were probably instructed that it was) when the commander in chief speaks. I wouldn’t know one way or the other. He didn’t say that they were at attention and Rush didn’t ask. He went on to say that when they did respond, it was bacause Bush said something directly about them.

  • the 82nd Airborne is army, not Marine Corps. They are pretty good troopers but not THAT good.
    It might have been interesting to see GWB make that speech at Camp LeJeune . . .

  • Comments are closed.