Maybe we could temporarily suspend the 22nd Amendment for just one cycle…

The Washington Post’s E. J. Dionne Jr. had a fine column today about moderates and self-identified independents abandoning the GOP, using the latest Democracy Corps poll for data, but there was one tidbit that jumped out at me.

[I]n an amusing but revealing question, the pollsters asked how Americans would vote in a contest between Bill Clinton and George W. Bush if the Constitution were changed to allow them to run in 2008. Clinton beat Bush, 53 percent to 43 percent — a rather decisive judgment on our two most recent political legacies.

Go ahead, try and deny how much you’d love to watch that race. I dare you. If they put the debates on pay-per-view, it’d be worth millions.

And as long as we’re dealing with an imaginary campaign, I say Clinton would pick up Florida, Ohio, a few southern states (Arkansas, Tennessee), and a couple of western states (Nevada, Colorado) to win this one in a walk.

I’d give up ever seeing Episode 3 RotS if I could have that match up instead. To watch Clinton humiliate Bush is like a political wet dream.

  • It’s nice to dream but the real question is, how much will Bush’s blunders help the Dem’s in the mid-term elections?

  • i’m home in bed from surgery, so i have lots of time and lots of movies. one recently viewed flick comes to mind re: clinton/bush debate.

    jackass: the movie.

    except that bush is such a coward, he’d never step on the same floor as clinton.

    oh, and he doesn’t have the guts to ride a shopping cart down a hill either…

  • Comments are closed.