McCain campaign scrambles after advisor’s ‘nation of whiners’ remarks

Following up on an earlier item, former Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas), described as John McCain’s “brain” on economic matters, and the man whose financial deregulation efforts make the market meltdown possible, told the far-right Washington Times that the economy is great; Americans just don’t realize it.

Gramm said we’re in the midst of a “mental recession,” adding, “We have sort of become a nation of whiners…. You just hear this constant whining.”

Shortly thereafter, Obama campaign spokesperson Bill Burton was hammering McCain: “One of Senator McCain’s top economic advisors may think that when people are struggling with lost jobs, stagnant wages, and the rising costs of everything from gas to groceries, it’s merely a ‘mental recession’. And Senator McCain may think it’s sufficient to offer energy proposals that he admits will have mainly ‘psychological’ benefits. But the American people know that our economic problems aren’t just in their heads. They don’t need psychological relief – they need real relief – and that’s what Barack Obama will provide as President.”

The McCain campaign, on the defensive, eventually distanced itself from Gramm’s comments.

“Phil Gramm’s comments are not representative of John McCain’s views. John McCain travels the country every day talking to Americans who are hurting, feeling pain at the pump and worrying about how they’ll pay their mortgage. That’s why he has a realistic plan to deliver immediate relief at the gas pump, grow our economy and put Americans back to work.”

A McCain campaign official told Greg Sargent that the campaign is concerned enough about the controversial Gramm quotes that McCain will personally “address Gramm’s comments to reporters on his plane today.”

There are two big problems with this.

First, while the McCain campaign came to realize that Gramm’s remarks pose a real political headache, that wasn’t the campaign’s initial response.

[I]n an initial statement published by Politico and then, seemingly, removed from its site, a McCain campaign aide actually stood by Gramm’s remarks, saying the interview as a whole was merely meant as a preview of the Senator’s economic agenda.

“Mr. Gramm was simply saying that we are laying out the economic plan this week,” the piece quoted a “McCain official” as saying. “The plan is comprehensive, providing immediate near-term relief for Americans hurting today as well as longer-term solutions to get our economy back on track, secure our energy future and deliver jobs, prosperity and opportunity for the next generation. We’re laying out that plan this week with an emphasis on the critical importance of job creation, and it’s been a great success so far.”

Only after the fallout from Gramm’s statement did the McCain campaign fully backtrack…. The two statements – the first one issued to Politico and the one offered to the press list this morning – are diametrically different. And they seem to reflect recognition, by the McCain camp, that Gramm’s remark on the economy is simply un-spinnable.

And second, while one assumes that McCain will continue to insist that he appreciates just how much working families are struggling, and doesn’t agree with Gramm’s remarks at all, there’s McCain’s own record of rhetoric to deal with.

In January, McCain said the problems with the economy are in our heads: “A lot of this is psychological. A lot of it’s psychological. Because I agree the fundamentals of our economy is still strong.”

And in April, McCain said, “[A] lot of our problems today are psychological.” He said he intended to give voters “a little psychological boost,” in lieu of a meaningful policy.

And in June, McCain said he’s still focused on the “psychological impact” of various policies.

For that matter, let’s not forget that McCain’s policy record reflects this elitist thinking. Because McCain believes our systemic economic problems are psychological, it leads him to oppose minimum-wage increases, and support hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts for the very wealthy.

It’s relatively easy for McCain to distance himself from Gramm’s comments about our psychological, but if reporters aboard McCain’s plane can put down the barbecue and donuts long enough, maybe they can press the Republican candidate this afternoon on his own out-of-touch record.

Yeah, it’s really going to give me a psychological boost to know that the bloated oil companies are getting a tax break and not passing it on to me, while every good thing those tax dollars are meant to do go undone and our infrastructure gets even more dilapidated. Bloody genius, that McCain…he must think we’re as stupid as he is.

  • Of course, this crosses Graham off the list for any Administration post, as everyone immediately speculated about Clark, right?

    I’m joking.

  • Maybe we should all be asking “this” question:

    Why is Phil Gramm such a whiny little bitch when it comes to facing the problems that he helped to create?

    Then there’s the McPhony meme: Don’t worry; be happy.

    …and the band…played…on……………………………

  • “Because I agree the fundamentals of our economy is still strong.”

    Well, yes, but is our children learning this?

  • … saying the interview as a whole was merely meant as a preview of the Senator’s economic agenda.

    McCain’s economic policy: Quit whining already!

    I’ll remember this as I put food on my family.

  • I’m starting to wonder just what happened to McCain in that POW camp. Was he actually bayoneted and tortured, or was it all just psychological?

  • I have a suggestion for all you “whiners” out there that are struggling economically:

    Y’all should all get jobs at the oil companies. Their profits have been soaring the last few years

  • Senator McCain,

    How could you be such close friends with Senator Gramm ALL THESE YEARS and not know that he held these RADICAL views? Do you really expect us to believe that in all the years you have known him, he NEVER made a comment like this before? What about that “Enron loophole” Senator Gramm engineered? You didn’t know about that either, huh? I’ll bet you’ve even had your KIDS around him too!

    Sad the way that the “guilt by association” game comes back around so quickly, eh?

  • I’ll remember this as I put food on my family.

    I know things are bad, but didn’t thing things weret THAT bad. Sorry to hear that you can’t afford plates and bowls.

  • Politico removed a statement embarrassing to McCain? Who among us could have predicted that?

    Not bad work, Burton, but next time you might add something along these lines: Phil Gramm has some fucking nerve calling other people emotional softies. From his recent work with one of the prime villains in the subprime mortgage crisis all the way back to his staunch efforts to defeat universal health care, he’s done his damnedest to keep giving Americans something to whine about.

    Man, the gall of this guy. This is like tying someone up and then admonishing them that they don’t get out enough.

  • If my child ever tells me he is hungry, I will simply tell him “its in your head dear” now just go to bed without dinner, because, I have lost my job and struggling to find another one.

  • As long as you’re not practicing your love with women all across this country.

    And trying to love war widows as best you can.

  • Anybody remember the firestorm the Republicans created when Jimmy Carter talked about a “malaise”?

  • His comments really did seem to tick a lot of people. So much for such comments being directed solely at his base.

    Which highlights an overall point I’ve been making here …. at some point his (or his campaign) message will seep into voters’ minds and will be seen for what it is. This is an example. The media will not be able to help him when he screws up this much. Which is why I keep insisting that the Obama campaign not give in at all to any demands – made by either the McCain campaign or any hosting corporate media outlet – regarding the candidate debate format.

    And kudos to you CB and HuffPo for nailing those Politico folks. Is there any doubt now about whether or not they are nothing more than a propaganda tool of the right-wing?

    Going forward Steve/CB – you really should treat anything that comes from them as if it were coming from Rupert Murdoch’s corporate media conglomerate.

  • I though to advise friends and colleagues to forward this article to any delusional folks they may encounter, say, for example, those busy compiling ‘Obama is an IslumoFascistMuslim/RadicalChristianPreacher/ChicagoBornForeigner/AntiAmurricanUberLibrulCommunist/Scary Black Dude’ emails…

    But I changed my mind as it probably wouldn’t make much difference. Except that we’d all soon receive spam emails claiming ‘Obama called you a whiner and skins baby kittens on live tv, except on a channel you’ve never seen before…but had you seen it, let me tell you! You’d be shocked. Shocked!’

    And two hours later on a local tv station, a guy will appear in a 6pm evening news meet-the-voters piece, claiming, “here in [fill in the blank]-ville, we don’t do that whinin stuff like that there Osama guy says…”

    Reporter (occasionally…), “it’s ‘Obama,’ sir”

    “Yeah, that’s what I said.”

  • If JSMcC*nt throws Graham under the bus, who will be his spokesperson for the economy. JSMcC*nt certainly can’t talk about it.

    I love the fact that the campaign first endorsed his comments before repudiating them. Now that’s professionalism. Expect nasty comments from all the other Republican’ts in three, two, one…

  • geezus crimony .. the guy’s got nine houses .. a wife who spend 500k a month on her credit cards .. kids who spend 50k a month on theirs .. hasn’t pumped a tank of gas in years .. and has the gall to brand obama as an ‘elitist’ ..

    mc cain’t doesn’t know the first thing about middle america .. he’s a child of privilege .. always has been ..

  • Remember when Phil Gramm waged one of the most expensive presidential campaigns in American history (in terms of dollars per delegate)?

    If he continues with whiny comments like this, he should be the front-runner in 2012. He’s just about washed off any taint of compassion and intellectual integrity by now.

  • Well, not knowing very much, and admitting he doesn’t know very much about the economy – this makes sense. Gramm has been telling him for months that our economic troubles were more psychological that real. And I guess if you’re a multi-millionaire on the board of UBS or married to a 100 million dollars…

    McBush just regurgitated what his economic advisor told him.

    The push-back must be surprising.

    and nother gift to Obama.

  • There must be something in the water in Texas that turns their politicians into blathering idiots.

  • Gramm makes a hundred thou a pop from his many lobbying gigs. *His* fundamentals are doing just fine.

  • I worked with a former Senate aide who told me that Gramm was known as “Junkyard Dog” for the way he treated the little people who worked as janitors, waitresses, etc. in the Senate building and other Washington installations. This comment is completely in character.

    Neither he nor his wife are people you would want your kids to play with.

    While we are on the topic of psychological pain, why do the obscenely wealthy need a tax cut? Any pain they feel on April 15 is obviously only psychological because they don’t have to make any real sacrifices.

  • McCain has it right, kind of.

    We, as a nation, are childishly holding on to the delusion we can have strong defense, abundant health care for all (Medicare), great schools, transportation infrastructure and simultaneously maintain one of the lowest tax rates in the world indefinitely.

    Of course, nevermind that supply siders liek Gramm and McCain and Bush are whololy responsible for the psychotherapy of teh better part of the last 3 decades that convinced Americans that living on credit is “normal”. A delusion Clinton didn’t help fix very much, having relied on the prosperity of the internet boom to pull his fat out of the fire before THAT life raft sprung a nasty leak.

    We’re in the first stage of economic recovery (denial).

    Thankfully, the “anger” stage should work in Obama’s favor.

  • Comments are closed.