McCain continues to shift with the wind

Update: This post has been updated, expanded, and broken down by category.

What we need, 2006 John McCain insisted, is a comprehensive approach to immigration reform

“Our nation’s immigration system is broken. And without comprehensive immigration reform, our nation’s security will remain vulnerable. That is why we must act.”

No, this is all wrong, 2007 John McCain said. What we really need is to forget about “comprehensive” reform and focus our energies on securing the border.

John McCain spent months earlier this year arguing that the United States must combine border security efforts with a temporary worker program and an eventual path to citizenship for many illegal immigrants.

Now, the Republican presidential candidate emphasizes securing the borders first. The rest, he says, is still needed but will have to come later.

“I understand why you would call it a, quote, shift,” McCain told reporters Saturday after voters questioned him on his position during back-to-back appearances in this early voting state. “I say it is a lesson learned about what the American people’s priorities are. And their priority is to secure the borders.”

Au contraire, says 2008 John McCain. What we really need is a comprehensive approach to immigration reform

“We get in this kind of a circular firing squad on immigration reform in the Congress of the United States, and the lesson I learned from it is we’ve got to have comprehensive immigration reform.”

Maybe we could get all the various John McCains together in a room, let them debate one another on the various issues on which they’re diametrically opposed, and the Republicans can get back to us once they’ve figured out a policy platform.

Maybe now would be a good time for my updated-once-a-month list of McCain flip-flops?

Confronted with the inconsistencies in McCain’s record in March, the senator’s aides told the New York Times that the senator “has evolved rather than switched positions in his 25-year career.” That’s a perfectly sensible spin — when a politician holds one position, and then, for apparently political reasons, decides to embrace the polar opposite position, it’s only natural for his or her aides to say the politician’s position has “evolved.”

But in McCain’s case, the spin is wholly unfulfilling. First, McCain sells himself as a pol who never sways with the wind, and whose willingness to be consistent in the face of pressure is proof of his character. Second, Republicans have spent the last four years or so making policy reversals the single most serious political crime in presidential politics. The dreaded “flip-flop” is, according to the GOP, the latest cardinal sin for someone seeking national office.

And if we’re playing by Republican rules, McCain’s “evolutions” should be a fairly serious problem.

Here’s the updated and expanded list:

* McCain pledged in February 2008 that he would not, under any circumstances, raise taxes. Specifically, McCain was asked if he is a “‘read my lips’ candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?” referring to George H.W. Bush’s 1988 pledge. “No new taxes,” McCain responded. Two weeks later, McCain said, “I’m not making a ‘read my lips’ statement, in that I will not raise taxes.”

* McCain is both for and against a “rogue state rollback” as a focus of his foreign policy vision.

* McCain considered and did not consider joining John Kerry’s Democratic ticket in 2004.

* In 1998, he championed raising cigarette taxes to fund programs to cut underage smoking, insisting that it would prevent illnesses and provide resources for public health programs. Now, McCain opposes a $0.61-per-pack tax increase, won’t commit to supporting a regulation bill he’s co-sponsoring, and has hired Philip Morris’ former lobbyist as his senior campaign adviser.

* McCain has changed his economic worldview on multiple occasions.

* McCain has changed his mind about a long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq on multiple occasions.

* McCain is both for and against attacking Barack Obama over his former pastor.

* McCain believes Americans are both better and worse off than they were before Bush took office.

* McCain is both for and against earmarks for Arizona.

* McCain believes his endorsement from radical televangelist John Hagee was both a good and bad idea.

* McCain’s first mortgage plan was premised on the notion that homeowners facing foreclosure shouldn’t be “rewarded” for acting “irresponsibly.” His second mortgage plan took largely the opposite position.

* McCain vowed, if elected, to balance the federal budget by the end of his first term. Soon after, he decided he would no longer even try to reach that goal.

* McCain’s campaign unveiled a Social Security policy that the senator would implement if elected, which did not include a Bush-like privatization scheme. In March 2008, McCain denounced his own campaign’s policy.

* In February 2008, McCain reversed course on prohibiting waterboarding.

* McCain used to champion the Law of the Sea convention, even volunteering to testify on the treaty’s behalf before a Senate committee. Now he opposes it.

* McCain was a co-sponsor of the DREAM Act, which would grant legal status to illegal immigrants’ kids who graduate from high school. Now he’s against it.

* On immigration policy in general, McCain announced in February 2008 that he would vote against his own legislation.

* In 2006, McCain sponsored legislation to require grassroots lobbying coalitions to reveal their financial donors. In 2007, after receiving “feedback” on the proposal, McCain told far-right activist groups that he opposes his own measure.

* McCain said before the war in Iraq, “We will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” Four years later, McCain said he knew all along that the war in Iraq war was “probably going to be long and hard and tough.”

* McCain said he was the “greatest critic” of Rumsfeld’s failed Iraq policy. In December 2003, McCain praised the same strategy as “a mission accomplished.” In March 2004, he said, “I’m confident we’re on the right course.” In December 2005, he said, “Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.”

* McCain went from saying he would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade to saying the exact opposite.

* McCain went from saying gay marriage should be allowed, to saying gay marriage shouldn’t be allowed.

* McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but then decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks.

* McCain used to oppose Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy, but he reversed course in February.

* On a related note, he said 2005 that he opposed the tax cuts because they were “too tilted to the wealthy.” By 2007, he denied ever having said this, and insisted he opposed the cuts because of increased government spending.

* In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. McCain not only filed a complaint against the Wylys for allegedly violating campaign finance law, he also lashed out at them publicly. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.

* McCain supported a major campaign-finance reform measure that bore his name. In June 2007, he abandoned his own legislation.

* McCain opposed a holiday to honor Martin Luther King, Jr., before he supported it.

* McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.

* McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.

* McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.

* McCain decided in 2000 that he didn’t want anything to do with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, believing he “would taint the image of the ‘Straight Talk Express.'” Kissinger is now the Honorary Co-Chair for his presidential campaign in New York.

Now, it’s worth noting that there are worse qualities in a presidential candidate than changing one’s mind about a policy matter or two. McCain has been in Congress for decades; he’s bound to shift now and then on various controversies.

But therein lies the point — McCain was consistent on most of these issues, right up until he started running for president, at which point he conveniently abandoned practically every position he used to hold. The problem isn’t just the incessant flip-flops; it’s the shameless pandering and hollow convictions behind the incessant flip-flops.

As Josh Marshall recently noted, “McCain is absolutely gung-ho and certain that he’s right about whatever his position and ‘principles’ are at the given moment. But they change repeatedly.”

What we need is a reform in the way we do LEGAL immigration.

How long should it take to get a visa for your spouse/wife to immigrate to this country?

Does it make any difference if the foreign spouse is fluent in English, graduated from one of the best colleges in the world, and has a high tech job in demand in the US?

Does it make any difference if she is from a visa free country where she can get on a plane and visit the US anytime she wants? However, it is illegal to work here and, if the immigration officer thinks she is lying about why she is coming to the US then she can be banned from entering for five years?

  • Hmm. I thought Republicans didn’t believe in evolution.

    I’m all for leaders having open minds and being able to change their positions based on new information. But, if that “new information” is “if you say this instead of that you’ll get more votes” then it sounds like a $2 flip flop to me.

  • Study: Wright covered more than Clinton

    Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s appearance at the National Press Club last week definitely pushed him back into the spotlight. Last week he “generated more news than both Hillary Clinton and John McCain,” according to a new study by the Project for Excellence in Journalism.

    In the week of April 28 to May 4, Clinton appeared as a significant or dominant newsmaker in 41 percent of the campaign press, with McCain at just 14 percent. However the Wright/ Obama relationship alone factored into 42 percent of stories.

    Will statistics like this cause more media figures to pause before beating the Wright issue to death, as Tim Russert did Sunday with his first 11 questions on “Meet the Press” relating to the candidate’s former pastor.Or perhaps others will follow CNN’s John Roberts, who declared a “Rev. Wright-free zone” in his recent interview with Obama.

    Obviously, the Democratic race is going to get the overwhelming amount of attention right now, and it showed in the party breakdown. Fewer than six percent of 2008 coverage this past week focused mostly on Republicans.

  • Speaking at Wake Forest University today, Republican presidential nominee John McCain reassured his party’s conservative base that he has adopted George W. Bush’s judicial philosophy hook, line and sinker. The same John McCain who once expressed doubts about judges in the mold of Samuel Alito today extolled him as a model for the Supreme Court, all the while chanting the right-wing battle cry against so-called judicial activism.

    For the details, see:
    “Meet the McCain Court. Same as the Bush Court.”

  • I’m sure McFlipflopper will stop “evolving” his positions just as soon as the BBQ stuffed corporate media whores finally get around to asking him where he really stands on that list of issues.

  • Spelling alert: Take out the “f” in your headline, CB.

    Heh.

    One day soon the Say Anything to Win theory of campaigning will become the Do Anything to Win theory and instead of debates we’ll see candidates engaged in various Fear Factorish type stunts to prove their fitness for elected office.

    “My fellow Americans, I stuffed 35 live scorpions in pants. My opponent only stuffed 27 live scorpions in his pants. Clearly a man who can only stuff 27 scorpions in his pants doesn’t have what it takes to be your next president.”

  • Yes, his constant reversals/flip-flops/changes of opinion/flat-out pandering is a tad comical. And yes, it’d be nice the media would actually bring it up every once in a while.

    But think about it this way, folks:

    Remember how Kerry’s “I voted for it before voting against it” kept being played in all those ads? Think back to how everyone knew about it and brought it up at every opportunity.

    Now think of all the ads the Dems can create this fall with McCain essentially doing the same thing on pretty much every single issue.

    They guy is an opposition ad writer’s wet dream — the dude just keeps on handing out huge boxes of ammo they can fire back at him during the general election.

    And no, I’m not always a “half glass full” type of guy. It’s just that, in this case, I think this works to our advantage. Big time.

  • Mr. Benen has criticized McCain for changing several positions. But a study of McCain’s record shows he has held each of those positions before.

  • In keeping up with the news, I’ve noticed many McCain “flip-flops”, but had a hard time remembering them all. I appreciate you maintaining this comprehensive list.

    This is the first time I’ve read The Carpetbagger Report. I’m very cautious in checking out the trustworthiness of media sources and blogs, so I’m glad to see how well referenced your article is, and am especially delighted to see how easy you’ve made it for readers to verify your references via the embedded hyperlinks. Thanks!

  • McCain once solemnly promised us he would never support a war that the American people did not support.

    Since the American people supported, and the law Congress passed authorized, ONLY the ability of Bush to threaten Saddam, provided Bush would honestly try the diplomatic solutiuon, McCain has broken his most sacred promise.

    Not only that, but the war was actually a heinous re-election stunt, and by the way, a federal capital crime.

  • Comments are closed.