McCain enters the belly of the beast — and comes out alive

The buzz before John McCain’s appearance at the Conservative Political Action Committee’s annual conference yesterday focused on organizers’ efforts to prevent attendees from booing the senator. It wasn’t entirely successful — McCain heard a smattering of boos before he spoke, and plenty more when he brought up immigration policy.

But that was more the exception than the rule. In fact, the Arizona senator told the far-right crowd most of what it wanted to hear (which, coincidentally, is what Dems who want to characterize McCain as too far to the right wanted to hear as well).

…McCain did his best to offer the crowd the red meat it craves. He vowed to lower taxes, appoint judges “of the character and quality of Justices Roberts and Alito,” and reject “big government” solutions to health care, like the ones being offered by the Democratic candidates. He also hammered away on his own support for the current military effort in Iraq, declaring, “I intend to win the war.” As for his differences with movement conservatives, he promised mainly to listen respectfully to those the ideologues represented in the room.

“We have had a few disagreements,” McCain said. “And none of us will pretend that we won’t continue to have a few. But even in disagreement, especially in disagreement, I will seek the counsel of my fellow conservatives. If I am convinced my judgment is in error, I will correct it. And if I stand by my position, even after benefit of your counsel, I hope you will not lose sight of the far more numerous occasions when we are in accord.”

Time’s Michael Scherer talked to one attendee who said after the speech that he still couldn’t bring himself to vote for McCain, but Scherer said he “represented little more than a small, albeit vocal, fringe.”

Yep, as it turns out, much of the virulently anti-McCain contingent could be won over after all. It took one speech, in which the senator reminded them that they agree with him more than they disagree with them.

I tend to rely on far-right blogs as a barometer of conservative thought, and the animosity towards McCain has been consistent and fierce for months.

And wouldn’t you know it, many leading far-right sites, which have gone out of their way to blast the Arizona senator, sang McCain’s praises after his CPAC speech.

* Hugh Hewitt: “It was a strong appeal to conservatives’ strongest suit –their deep patriotism and their admiration of his sacrifices and service…. November’s vote will be a referendum on whether to pursue victory or accept retreat in the war. Senator McCain has Governor Romney’s support in that campaign, and he should have the support of all conservatives as well.” (He added that the speech was “superb.”)

* Tammy Bruce: “[W]hile it was no kumbaya moment, I was more impressed than I thought I would be.”

* Mary Katharine Ham: “He’s hitting the right notes, I must say, confronting his problems head-on and ginning up some excitement over protecting the country against the likes of Hillary and Obama.”

* Ed Morrissey: “That was an excellent speech. McCain genuinely reached out to conservatives in a heartfelt manner.”

* Ramesh Ponnuru: “All in all, a good speech.”

* John Hawkins: “I am hearing McCain’s speech as he’s giving it and I am liking it.”

* Kathryn Jean Lopez: “This McCain speech would not have been given today, if it weren’t for folks like Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Andy McCarthy, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham. Can I thank them on behalf of America?”

That last one was my particular favorite, because it was an example of the right taking credit for McCain’s conservative beliefs, which the right insisted didn’t exist yesterday morning.

As Steve M. concluded, And just like that, with one speech … I think McCain is back in many wingnuts’ good graces.”

This is hardly a surprise. They’re conservative, McCain is conservative. They want another four years of Bush tax cuts and Cheney foreign policy, and McCain wants to give them another four years of Bush tax cuts and Cheney foreign policy.

Of course they’re going to return to the fold once a GOP nominee emerges.

Lets face it, we will too.

  • * Kathryn Jean Lopez: “This McCain speech would not have been given today, if it weren’t for folks like Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Andy McCarthy, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham.”

    I think Lopez was right. Not that these people are responsible for McCain’s protean beliefs, but because they made the hot headed maverick kneel down and beg. You will obey the almighty screechers!

  • Man, cant you just feel the HATE they have for Democrats?

    “…conservatives’ strongest suit –their deep patriotism…”
    “…protecting the country against the likes of Hillary and Obama…”

  • “McCain heard a smattering of boos before he spoke, and plenty more when he brought up immigration policy.”

    Why wonders I does McCain never, in these venues, say “My support for President George W. Bush’s immigration policy”. The wingnuts always complain that he didn’t support “Bush’s tax cuts”. How can BGII be good on one thing (unquestionable, in fact) and bad on the other?

    L’Orange said: “Man, can’t you just feel the HATE they have for Democrats?”

    The greatest hate always come from fear, and the war profiteers and high capitalists who have been looting this country for the last seven years, along with the Bushite criminals who’ve trashed our country’s laws and freedoms, thought that they had a permanent lock on the White House and Congress (Rove said they would, after all). Now that it appears that the Democrats are going to gain control and start prosecuting them, they have to whip up their base to prevent this.

  • Duh, gee. What a surprise. C’mon, people. Was there really any doubt McCain would bend the knee to the ultra-right? This is a man who will literally do anything to be president, including wearing a dog collar for George W. Bush (in the famous hug picture, that’s all that’s missing).
    When it comes to ambition, he’s Lady Macbeth — and makes Romney look like a self-effacing nun. I suggest the Democratic nominee run a series of commercials showing what McCain is willing to do for his ambition: sell out his long-held beliefs, suck up to people he loathes and sacrifice the lives of American soldiers. Remind the American people that with the Republicans, it’s never about what’s best for the country, only what’s best for them.

  • CB may do a post on this later, but I thought some of you might be interested.

    Gay Foe Dobson Endorses Huckabee

    (Washington) James Dobson, one of the nation’s most prominent evangelical Christian leaders, backed Mike Huckabee’s presidential bid Thursday night, giving the former Arkansas governor a long-sought endorsement as the Republican field narrowed to a two-man race.

  • Lance said:
    Why wonders I does McCain never, in these venues, say “My support for President George W. Bush’s immigration policy”. The wingnuts always complain that he didn’t support “Bush’s tax cuts”. How can BGII be good on one thing (unquestionable, in fact) and bad on the other?

    It was because McCain was willing to allow a path to citizenship for all those brown-skinned people, combined with his opposition to torture. The Far Right, demonstrating how much their Christian faith governs their lives, doesn’t just want to deport all 12 million people who are here illegally (plus their children, who were born here and so are American citizens). They want to waterboard each and every one of them before they are kicked out.

    Yeah, the illegal immigrants broke the law — a law that says only 5,500 green cards may be issued to Mexico each year.

  • What L’Orange said: “Man, can’t you just feel the HATE they have for Democrats?”

    After the long, often nasty debate last night in Steve’s previous thread, it is essential to come down to this. The RW base HATES all Dems. They are true believers, and what they truly believe is that Dems are traitors to all that is right and good.

    Obama offers hope, Hillary offers competence (please, Hill and Obama trolls, don’t slam me for that; I know that is simplistic, they’re both good and they both offer plenty).

    The reThugs offer war and name calling and hate for any Dem. And the end game must be to marginalize them, either with statesmanship (to which they seem impervious but the American public clearly is not) or very hardball politics.

  • wvng said:
    The RW base HATES all Dems. They are true believers, and what they truly believe is that Dems are traitors to all that is right and good.

    It’s more than that. With the same fervor that a Muslim declares “There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is His Prophet,” the conservatives True Believers proclaim, “There is no philophy but Conservatism, and Ronald Reagan is It’s Prophet.”

    They hate Democrats because they are blasphemers and infidels. They hate McCain even more because he is a heretic and an apostate — he has rejected the true faith.

  • Bush Signals Support for McCain
    …In a speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference in the morning, Bush plans to say that the nominee of the party will be a strong conservative, according to excerpts released by the White House tonight.

    “We have had good debates and soon we will have a nominee who will carry the conservative banner into this election and beyond,” Bush says in the excerpts. “The stakes in November are high. Prosperity and peace are in the balance. So with confidence in our vision and faith in our values, let us go forward, fight for victory and keep the White House in 2008…”

    That ought to put McCain in solid with moderates.

  • Everyone needs to print out the McCain Hug and post it everywhere. Put a caption like “McCain (heart) Bush” or similar.

    McCain needs to be tied firmly to the worst president ever, because the media will be rolling out the BS “maverick” label and that, if it sticks, will be enough to peel off a lot of idiots who don’t know what McCain’s really been up to all these years.

    I can’t wait to see Obama kick his ass. McCain has done some serious flipflopping and a smart opponent will be able to skin him like a fish.

  • Forty years ago people such as William F. Buckley looked at the wildly liberal but politically naive Democrats and smirked. The worm has certainly turned. “Analysis” and “reason” are the last things you can ascribe to right-wingers today. They’ve become no more than an unthinking cult.

  • The rightwing vs McCain divide seems temporary to me. And even if it does exist, it seems insignificant to me.

    My worry is the people at my workplace for example, who only watch glimpses on the fawning talk shows and are familiar with a soft-spoken war-hero. Both Obama and Clinton have to frame and expose McCain for what he is PRETTY QUICKLY, before he becomes the shapeshifting darling of convenience for casual voters.

  • SteveT wrote: “It’s more than that. With the same fervor that a Muslim declares “There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is His Prophet,” the conservatives True Believers proclaim, “There is no philosophy but Conservatism, and Ronald Reagan is It’s Prophet.”

    Ah, but just like the Sunni-Shia split in Islam, American Conservatism is split between Reagan’s Henchmen and Reagan’s Family. And McCan’t is on the side of Reagan’s family.

    He’s the nephew Iman Hussein and I predict that the Henchmen will do him in come November by just not coming out to vote.

    Really, read up about Islam after the death of the Prophet. The parallels with American Conservatism after the death of Ronald Reagan is just scary.

    And remember, before Ronald died Nancy got him to say that he supported the Brady 3 day waiting Gun Law.

  • we can deride it all we like, but the Right continues to win – and the rest of the world therefore loses – because at the end of the day their internal divisions pale compared to their hatred of “the left” and they come together better than we do.

    if the end results — the justices and judges, the control of the war machine, the competency of the appointees who serve or harm the public — matter at all, we need to determine that our own internal disputes pale in comparison to the need to stop “the right.” in our quest for progressive purity, we get indignant at others on our own side of the aisle and the Republicans laugh all the way to the (Fedreal Reserve) Bank. and while they laugh, too many other people starve, and go without health care, and without shelter, and they die in needless war.

    let this serve as a reminder before anyone on either side of the Democratic nomination process posts “If I don’t get my candidate, I’ll vote for the other side! or I’ll stay home (which has the effect of voting for the other side)!”

  • Technically, staying at home would just cost one vote, whereas voting for the other side would be a two vote difference.

  • I sense no reluctance on the part of Hillary supporters to switch to Obama if he should get the nod. The real (i.e., emotional) division is with some Obama supporters, especially those who (like our trolls here, who use multiple exclamation points in posts) are probably not experienced political junkies but rather converts to the Obama cult. They join other Hillary haters in being irrational, uninterested in “mere” politics, ignorant of policy issues and outcomes, willing to endure another eight years of BushCo and 100 years of quagmire rather than put a check mark by Hillary’s name.

    Any priest, preacher, rabbi or imam will tell you that their biggest problem isn’t with sinners or non-believers. It’s with those believers who are scrupulous in their belief … irrationally excessive in their belief … passionately intolerant of those believers who “fall short” of what they regard as perfection.

    Scrupulous Obama supporters who “can’t stand Hillary” are our biggest danger. We need to find ways to keep them voting with the Democratic Party even if, in their view, the worst should happen and Hillary becomes our nominee.

  • …but rather converts to the Obama cult.

    Ah, Ed I expected better from you.
    You want to talk about a cult?
    Let’s see… we know the smart educated dems are voting for Obama.
    How cool is that?
    Finally we have a cult for smart people!
    Who’d have thought they’d fall into such an easy trap?

    Meanwhile I’d like to suggest to you another cult:

    The bush/clinton ping pong cult.
    It consists of two groups:
    High school educated southerners who push the Bush family over the top.
    And high school educated east and west coasters who push the Clintons over the top.

    The latter is illustrated prime time by wvng at #9:

    The RW base HATES all Dems. They are true believers, and what they truly believe is that Dems are traitors to all that is right and good.

    Especially when you compare it to his post on last night’s thread:

    The way, the only way, to beat the reThugs is to destroy them, to run them out of town.

    There is your cult baby.
    A true believer castigating other true believers.
    wvng is nothing more than a foaming left wing savage…
    Masquerading his hate-’em dead message under phony pragmatism and we’re-right-they-are-wrong idealism.
    He is cultist. No different I assert, then the foamers on the right hand side of the blogosphere whose thoughts he can so wonderfully verbalizes.

    And that my friend, is the cult that is killing this country.
    I’m calling it Bush-Clintonism…
    And I will vote and argue and fund… whomever dares to run against it.

  • oooh ROTF, i am so pleased. between you and the flaming fly-ins lets see where we are. . .

    we have Anne, a former Edwards supporter who was wholly agnostic between Clinton and Obama, that you all have pushed into defending Clinton because her sense of justice appears offended;

    we have memekiller, who was actually leaning Obama, but who by last night was calling any Obama supporter he could find a cocksucker (y’all we’re really at your most effective on that one);

    and now we have Ed, an Edwards supporter who I always thought was leaning Obama, spending today defending Clinton.

    every vote counts, my friend! do we have you on the payroll yet?

    Thanks again and regards,

    Zeit.

  • “Defending Clinton” isn’t that same thing as “wedded to Clinton”. I’m saying that “reviling Clinton” doesn’t set us up very well, post-Convention, should she become the nominee (a real world possibility).

    Personally, I dread the thought of Bill hanging around for eight more years (my complaints are legion, beginning with DADT and ending with his televised lie about not having sex with that woman). I dislike (though I appreciate the politics of) Hillary’s bending the truth whenever it’s expedient.

    But, now that Edwards is gone (I had and have issues with him, too), my choices are down to two. And one of those is not staying home or voting for McCain.

  • But, now that Edwards is gone (I had and have issues with him, too), my choices are down to two. And one of those is not staying home or voting for McCain.

    100% agree.

  • Comments are closed.