McCain, Giuliani get personal over torture

One would like to think that the Republican Party has advanced to the point in which a debate over torture would no longer be necessary, but we’re apparently not quite there yet. Given the circumstances, I suppose we should be pleased that there are still voices of opposition within the GOP at all.

Rudy Giuliani’s position on waterboarding has been incoherent, even by his standards. Last week, he suggested the torture tactic from the Spanish Inquisition could be utilized fairly, but it was dependent on “circumstances” and “who was doing it.” On Bloomberg TV over the weekend, Al Hunt told the former mayor that John McCain disagrees. Hunt asked Giuliani if he know more about torture than McCain.

“I can’t say that I do but I do know a lot about intensive questioning and intensive questioning techniques. After all, I have had a different experience than John. John has never been – he has never run city, never run a state, never run a government. He has never been responsible as a mayor for the safety and security of millions of people, and he has never run a law enforcement agency, which I have done.

“Now, intensive questioning works. If I didn’t use intensive questioning, there would be a lot of mafia guys running around New York right now and crime would be a lot higher in New York than it is. Intensive question has to be used. Torture should not be used. The line between the two is a difficult one.”

It’s hard to wade through all of this stupidity, but it certainly sounds as if Giuliani is saying he understands torture policy because he used “intensive” interrogation techniques against U.S. criminals in New York City. Indeed, he’s been talking like this for quite a while, boasting about his willingness to use “very aggressive techniques” on criminal suspects.

This not only raises a whole new wrinkle to Giuliani’s policy problems, it also drew a sharp rebuke from McCain.

On the latter point, the Arizona senator said what needed to be said.

The Republican debate over torture has become a debate over resumes, as John McCain warns from personal experience about the dangers of harsh questioning and Rudy Giuliani takes credit for his skill with it as a prosecutor.

“When someone says waterboarding is similar to harsh interrogation techniques used against the mafia in New York City, they do not have enough experience to lead our military,” McCain said Sunday night at a town-hall meeting here. […]

On Friday, McCain, a former POW, criticized pro-torture opponents who “chose to do other things when this nation was fighting its wars.”

For that matter, Giuliani’s comments about the kind of interrogation techniques that he personally approved just screams for some follow-up. What kind of tactics did he endorse, exactly?

Hmmm, something doesn’t look right with that RooDee quote. . .

If I didn’t use intensive questioninghave my team out campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire, there would be a lot of mafia guys running around New York right now and crime would be a lot higher in New York than it is.

Fixed.

  • The Roodee torture plan aka “Ghouliani Time” will forgo such quaint stuff as waterboarding and go to more proven methods such as sodomizing suspects with a toilet plunger and nightstick.

  • Doesn’t Ghouliani realize the irony here? I mean, McCain actually probably experienced some intensive interrogation techniques during his captivity. Rudy’s such an idiot.

  • It’s a measure of what a crappy country we’ve become when major candidates for the presidency openly debate the propriety of the Administration’s using medieval torture techniques. God, what a hell hole.

  • “Doesn’t Ghouliani realize the irony here?”

    Let’s say he does, and what we’re seeing is a variation on the “Hanoi Candidate” theme. Sure, John McCain knows all about torture — but only from the wrong side of it. His personal experiences have disqualified him from understanding how useful, necessary, and downright enjoyable “enhanced interrogation” can be.

  • Two words on Giuliani’s experience with “intensive interrogation” techniques: Abner Louima.

  • Giuliani: I have had a different experience than John. John has never been – he has never run city, never run a state, never run a government. He has never been responsible as a mayor for the safety and security of millions of people, and he has never run a law enforcement agency, which I have done.

    Really. Does that mean, Rudy, that you were “responsible for” 9/11 and thus can be charged with a most egregious failure in your responsibility?

    Ludicrous.

  • “For that matter, Giuliani’s comments about the kind of interrogation techniques that he personally approved just screams for some follow-up. What kind of tactics did he endorse, exactly?”

    Broomsticks in rectums…police brutality, ya know standard operating procedure of shooting first asking questions later. But hey new York is safer now right,..

  • They need to have a real torture challenge for the Republican nomination: let each candidate take turns torturing the others in any way they think is legal and the last one able to stand is the winner. Make it a pay-per-view television event and it also turns into a huge fund-raising tool, winner gets all the money as campaign contributions. I bet you could find a million Republican households willing to pay $2k apiece to watch.

    It’s a win-win for everyone, except maybe the candidates, and even they will try to play macho and pretend they enjoyed it. You know this is what most Republican voters really want to see anyway, no more of these boring wimpy liberal debates.

  • Of course Giuliani used aggressive techinques when he was mayor of New York…remember it was his police officers who rammed a toilet plunger up Abner Louima’s butt and shot Amadou Diallo for carrying a cellphone.

  • maybe we should just take RooDee at face value and critique his anti-terrorism credentials on that basis.

    “Lets assume the preposterous Ticking Time Bomb scenario where blah blah blah. . . how are you going to get the information you need to save three US cities from nuclear annihilation if your interrogators just shot the captive 41 times when he tried to open his mouth to answer?”

  • What interrogation techniques is Guiliani referring to? Did he beat confessions out of suspects? Is he admitting to breaking the law to prove how tough he thinks he is? What the hell does he mean by intensive questioning? Aren’t all questioning techniques used by the police “intensive”?

    Once again Guiliani demonstrates that he doesn’t know what the hell he’s talking about but also that what he is saying makes no sense. How can such an idiot be the republican front runner? Never mind…don’t answer that …it’s too depressing.

  • Why pray tell are we even talking about Guiliani? He is so irrelevant to the political issues yet his name is everywhere. Who cares what he says or thinks. His national prominence is due to all the talk he engenders when he actually says nothing of significance. He is the political Paris Hilton. Her running for president is about as significant as Guiliani running for president. If we would just mention her name as often and quote her dribble as politically significant it would be on the same plane as talking about this megalomaniac.
    Rudy who??? is the level his opinions and rants deserve.

  • I think all these so-called red carpet cowboys need a month’s long retreat at the STFU Dude ranch.
    Or the Louisville slugger of reality upside the head, Capone style. Just a cuff, not so much blunt force trauma.
    I blame their parents.

    If it’s not torture, then I think every candidate who supports it should undergo it as our military specialists go through it in SERE training.

    Captain’s Jerry Coffey and John McCain were tortured at the Hanoi hilton- the VC did not use “aggressive interrogation”. Call it what it is. Why the media soft-balls terminology is proof they are bought and paid for. Giuliani is all talk, let others take care of the action. He’s a flip-flopping ex-democrat now neocon who ran NYC with an iron fist, and no silk glove. He’s a legitimized gangster.
    He became the very thing he prosecuted.

  • Just how long is John McCain going to use his former POW status as the bedrock to his campaign? He has the audacity to call Guliani out on his sleep deprivation comment yet what McCain truly needs to do is look in the mirror. He has made it a personal mission, in the name of re-establishment of relations and later on trade with Vietnam, to “bury” those who were left behind in Vietnam after the war. He accuses Guliani of belittling the service and sacrifice of men who served as POWs, all the while he has done even more incredulous things to those who have yet to return from Vietnam and their families. Sadly, these are the same families who, while McCain was “tied up”, were fighting with Washington to make sure that he and the others were not forgotten. Only to turn around and slap them all in the face with his refusal to address the POW/MIA Issue and then culminating in his treachery during the 1992 Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs.

    He regularly tells POW/MIA families that it is time to move on and get over Vietnam, well, maybe he should take some of his own advice.

  • Comments are closed.