McCain plays media critic — and then forgets what he said

Newsweek sat down with John McCain on Friday morning, just two-and-a-half days after delivering his widely-panned “lime Jell-O” speech near New Orleans, and asked him about some of his media criticism.

Newsweek: Want to back up a little bit and talk about press coverage. One of the things that you mentioned in your speech in New Orleans was that you felt that the media hadn’t recognized or had overlooked some of the attributes that Hillary Clinton had brought to the race. And I wondered–

McCain: I did not [say that] — that was in prepared remarks, and I did not [say it] — I’m not in the business of commenting on the press and their coverage or not coverage … My supporters and friends can comment all they want about the press coverage, and that’s their right. They’re American citizens. I will not because I believe it’s not a profitable enterprise for me to do so. I can’t change any of the coverage that I know of except to just campaign as hard as I can and try to seek the approval of the majority of my fellow citizens.

It is something that the American people will judge, and I won’t complain about it and I won’t praise it. I will just run my campaign and hope that the American people will make a judgment.

That’s a rather emphatic denial, isn’t it? McCain sounds like he’s actually given this some thought. He knew it was in his prepared remarks, but McCain also insisted that he deliberately omitted that part of his written speech because he wants no part of media criticism right now.

Funny story: McCain did say what Newsweek claimed he said, and McCain apparently didn’t remember his own speech, just a couple of days after delivering it.

It’s right there in the video, less than a minute into the speech: “The media often overlooked how compassionately [Hillary Clinton] spoke to the concerns and dreams of millions of Americans, and she deserves a lot more appreciation than she sometimes received.”

John Cole concluded, “He is either lying, or he does not remember what he said.” My money’s on the latter. It seems unlikely McCain would blatantly lie about a much-scrutinized speech that we all watched. It’s more likely McCain wasn’t paying attention to the words on the teleprompter, was just going through the motions, and quickly forgot what he’d just told a national television audience.

It doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in the guy, but that’s probably what happened.

As long as we’re on the subject, there was also this interesting exchange in the same interview:

Newsweek: There was a report raising questions about statements you made in the past about the wiretapping program and what your advisers say [today]. Have you changed your thinking on wiretapping?

McCain: Of course not. My position has been exactly the same. I have always said the president should obey the law. I still believe the president should obey the law.

This just isn’t true. McCain’s position not only changed, he reversed course completely.

McCain has always played fast and loose like this with details and facts, and he could get away with it in 2007 when his “major” competitors were underwhelming Republicans like Romney, Giuliani, and Huckabee. But it’s general election time — and the fact that McCain can’t (or won’t) pick up his game should make Republicans nervous.

It was probably an honest mistake. He may have meant to skip that part, but he was too busy concentrating on smiling and all the other things his speech coach told him.

  • As the Jetson’s dog Astro was prone to say: “Wrut row Retson”. Apparently the man in the Edgar suit is not only a crazed war monger, he’s prone to forgetfulness. Not a good attribute if he’ll go wanting to find the key to the nukes…”…now, where did I put those damed keys. I’ve got to bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran…?”

    Man-o-man. Hey maybe this is a good thing…

  • Well, honestly, if you had given that speech, would you want to then go back and watch it?

  • Franklin says..he was too busy concentrating on smiling and all the other things his speech coach told him…

    …and also wondering if this made him look creepy or sincere…creepy dude, creepy..

  • “What? Who? Where? Why? When?”

    These are usually questions asked by folks who want answers, but in this case it is usually the opening of another John McCain is real old joke.

  • Is it just me, or is McCain having these ‘senior moments’ on a weekly basis? From the Iraq-Iran confusion, the “supported every investigation” into the Katrina fiasco, and others, it’s a bit worrisome for his candidacy. These are things he should know cold. That he’s confused as to his actions in the past gives one pause – maybe he’s just getting his sea legs or it could be a sign that he really is too old for the job.

  • This argument is a little too nuanced for me. McCain has the text of his speech on his website and now he is denying the content? It does not matter if this is what he said during the speech; this is what he claims he said. Of course the video of the speech is also widely available so it is not that difficult to check out what he really said if you can stand watching through the delivery. If you want to argue that McCain simply forgot what he said (talk about the soft bigotry of low expectations) then you have to defend that he has no problem his “people” changing the text sent to the press. I predict that the internet and the ability to archive information and make it freely available to the public will not be kind to McCain.

  • Wow, that is really bad. At what point do these mistakes start to get attention despite the media trying to cover it up? Did anyone see MTP yesterday? I can’t believe how they all bend over backwards to understand what he is TRYING to say… as if Obama would ever get that kind of benefit of the doubt – and no, I don’t believe he has gotten favorable press coverage overall. Just look at the Jeremiah Wright fiasco.

    John McCain: Here’s to you, poor people!
    McCainonomics 101.
    John McCain: Your retirement is too secure as it is, don’t you think?
    John McCain: Here’s to you, OH, PA, MI!
    John McCain: Can’t poor sick children just get a job already?
    John McCain: 100 more years of war!
    John McCain supporting our troops by keeping them uneducated.
    Who knows better how you should act with your own body, why of course, John McCain!
    4 more years of Bush/McCain policies! They’ve worked so well so far!

  • Like Ted Stevens, McCain hasn’t yet mastered all those internet tubes. Too bad Strom T is dead. Would’ve made a great a-one-ana-two Repo ticket.

  • What a whore Politico’s Jonathan Martin is — he transmits the deception just the way the McCain campaign wants it transmitted:

    I missed this, but McCain apparently killed a line at the start of his speech Tuesday in which he was to say of Hillary Clinton that, “The media often overlooked how compassionately she spoke to the concerns and dreams of millions of Americans, and she deserves a lot more appreciation than she sometimes received.”

    Who are you going to believe — McCain’s media fluffers or your own lying eyes?

  • This is just plain weird: many thought McCain was reaching out to Hillary supporters with these comments in his speech. Now he’s denying them?

    Second thought: McCain had better have more barbeques for the press if he wants to avoid more scrutiny! /snark

  • If I were a reporter, I’d have a video clip of every quote of McCain’s that I planned to ask him about. That way, during the interview, when he said “I never said that” I could then play the clip and asked him why he denied it. I’m sure the responses would be entertaining.

  • What MsJoanne said (no. 11). I’ve been waiting for someone to bring up a procedural way that Hon. Sen. McCain could fail to get the nod in Minn-St. Paul; but the GOP doesn’t want to go near this and the Dems want it to be Senator McCain.

    More generally, when will a reporter insist that Mr. McCain is flat out wrong when he pulls this malarkey? I’m waiting for him to well and truly flip his lid when (if?) this finally happens, and happens some more.

  • Steve M (#12) said: What a whore Politico’s Jonathan Martin is — he transmits the deception just the way the McCain campaign wants it transmitted:

    I missed this, but McCain apparently killed a line at the start of his speech Tuesday in which he was to say of Hillary Clinton that, “The media often overlooked how compassionately she spoke to the concerns and dreams of millions of Americans, and she deserves a lot more appreciation than she sometimes received.”

    Who are you going to believe — McCain’s media fluffers or your own lying eyes?

    Someone is surprised that a right wing shill working for the right wing shill operation known as “The Politico” acts like a right wing shill?????

  • My position has been exactly the same. I have always said the president should obey the law. I still believe the president should obey the law. – McCain

    To me this sounds like Bushspeak. He may be consistent, but only a very literal and deceptive way. It may also be similar to Bush in that he wants you to think he is for or against something, while interpreting the law in a way he would never admit to, until solid proof is shown that he has broken the law as normal people interpret it.

  • jhm (16): I’ve been waiting for someone to bring up a procedural way that Hon. Sen. McCain could fail to get the nod in Minn-St. Paul

    We’re talking Republicans here. By “procedural way”, I assume you mean extortion followed by an excuse such as a medical emergency.

  • Haven’t these clowns masquerading as journalists ever heard of a follow-up question? Something like:

    “But Senator… you did say it. May we play the tape for you?”

  • Stacy6 said:

    If I were a reporter, I’d have a video clip of every quote of McCain’s that I planned to ask him about. That way, during the interview, when he said “I never said that” I could then play the clip and asked him why he denied it.

    Stacy, that is so freaking logical. And so easy to do. I can’t understand why reporters don’t do that.

  • ** John McBush won’t surrender South-Iraqi-Nam to North-Iran’s Sunni gooks **

    John, the Navy declared you mentally fit in 1999, but PTSD wasn’t a big deal to them then, or now.

    Twenty percent of service members returning from Iraq suffer PTSD. None has endured what you endured. Five years in a North Vietnamese prison cell subjected to disabling tortures, it must also have created still festering psychological wounds.

    Little yellow men in black pajamas. Those “gooks” haunt you don’t they John? Beach Boys’ tunes pop up in your head singing ‘Barbara Ann’ as ‘Bomb Iran.’ No one can presume to question your authority on military issues. Can they John? You know-it-all. Your hair-trigger smart ass replies, your well-documented temper tantrums, your mood swings.

    Perpetual war. Viet Nam never ends does it, John? Kill the gooks! Bomb Hanoi! Never surrender! There’s light at the end of the tunnel. America love it, or leave it. Cambodia’s next. Forty years drop away like napalm, don’t they John? For you, it’s still 1968.

    But it’s 2008 in Iraq. And, blind militarism is all you know. Iran’s next, right Sideshow John? We’re forced to share your disgusting atavistic delusions for 5 more months. John, on the tube you exhibit that befogged glaze of incomprehension, just like Ronnie did.

    Your clouded memory, your non-rational irritability, and unwavering bellicosity amount to a mental health disqualification for high executive office.

    bipolar2

  • The more I learn about John McCain, the more I wonder what he brings to the table other than his POW record. He is another GOP “family values” champion who has a reputation as an adulterous tomcat and treated his first wife like dirt. He says something one day, then flat out denies he said it the next day. He’s a starry-eyed corporation groupie. He brags about his foreign policy experience, but can’t tell the difference between Shiite Iran and Sunni Al Queda, a very vital difference when dealing with the situation in Iraq and throughout the middle east. He has changed his positions on a number of issues over the years with every political breeze, to the point that “Flip Flopper” doesn’t describe him–“Windmill” would be more accurate.

    So what does he offer the American people, in terms of brains, principles, policies and experience? I have no idea.

  • re: presumtive

    The GOP are like adult children tasked with telling “dad” that maybe he shouldn’t drive anymore. It’s a tough assignment but it needs to be done…otherwise someone might get hurt.

  • I’m telling you, the media admiration isn’t going to last too much longer. Sure, they like McCain, but the weaker he looks, the sooner they’ll turn on him. And soon enough, one of them will draw blood and then we’re in for a good old fashioned pecking party.

    Come November, McCain’s going to be wishing he had done a lot worse during the primaries, assuming he hasn’t hit that point already.

  • I think that what’s really going on is that everyone’s afraid to speak of the possibility that McCain has Alzheimer’s disease or some other form of senile dementia. Constantly forgetting what one has said previously, being explosively angry with little provocation, and appearing to change one’s opinion constantly are some of the many symptoms of senile dementia.

  • Whatever it is, it’s not a good sign for the people holding him up. Either he doesn’t read his prepared remarks before he makes them (and doesn’t listen to them when they come out of his mouth) – or he honestly doesn’t remember. Both are equally scary.

    Sounds like someone’s going to have to tell him – without getting screamed at – that when words come out of his mouth, they become HIS words.

  • I’ve been predicting a McCain drop out for months — even picked July 18th (for no particular reason) as the day. But that might be very interesting. Who do they pick as a replacement, and who would do the picking — and how many ballots would it take?

    We can rule out Thompson, Giuliani, Tancredo and Hunter immediately. Thier campaigns went nowhere. There will be a strong push for Ron Paul — who did keep picking up nearly 10% of the votes in every primary — even long after McCain was the ‘presumptive.’ However, I don’t think even Republicans are going to pick someone with the racist, anti-immigrant baggage he has, and he’s certainly someone ‘out of their control.’ But he might make the process take a few ballots.

    I don’t see Romney, though he’ll get some votes and might be the choice of the Republican Superdelegates. But he apparently annoyed a lot of people during his campaign — including all of his opponents — his social ‘flip-flops’ are more blatant than McCains — and nobody’s claiming the media would cover for him, if they could. His religion is a problem for conservative republicans — and also feminists and gays (and somebody will be sure to point out how recent the ‘new Revelation’ implying blacks are equal was). And he has no foreign policy or national credentials at all. In fact, his only real advantage is that he ‘looks presidential.’

    It’s Huckabee that really scares me. Yes, he’s -pretty dumb, and has the same lack of credentials Romney has — and more, since Arkansas is not Massachussets. But he has one thing, an incredible ‘narrative’ that a lot of people will believe — as I really think he will himself. Can’t you hear the opening to his acceptance speech?

    “When I was campaigning, reporters asked me why I kept going when the math made Senator McCain the sure winner. I said then that I didn’t believe in math, I believed in miracles. Well, what Do You Think THIS IS?” And there are enough religious people who will believe it.

    (I think this will also activate the racial factor — not that I think that Huckabee is a racist or would countenance the use of racism in his campaign. He really does have a sense of honor. But there are a lot of people who will be voting for Obama ‘despite his race,’ and many of them are religious. They might take the ‘Huckabee Miracle’ as a sign from God not to vote for the black man. Understand, these religious people are not — frequently — stupid, but their frame of reference is more different than we can frequently imagine.)

    I was going to go into the other non-candidates who might be turned to, but I started this at comment 29, and it has already been interrupted for cat feeding and ordering Chinese food. So, to be continued.

  • Maybe Dick Cheney could be persuaded to stand… that’s a real scary thought. But hopefully there’s a rule against it.

  • Comments are closed.