McCain shouldn’t count on too much support from state GOP committees

And I thought Republican committees at the federal level were in trouble.

At a time when the GOP presidential nominee will need more assistance than ever, a number of state Republican parties are struggling through troubled times, suffering from internal strife, poor fundraising, onerous debt, scandal or voting trends that are conspiring to relegate the local branches of the party to near-irrelevance.

In some of the largest, smallest, reddest and bluest states in the nation, many state Republican organizations are still reeling in the aftermath of the devastating 2006 election cycle, raising questions about how much grassroots help the state parties will be able to deliver to presumptive GOP nominee John McCain.

The state party woes are especially ill-timed since McCain will face a Democratic nominee who may be considerably better funded and organized, and since Republicans will be facing an energized Democratic party that is shattering primary election turnout records.

Saul Anuzis, chairman of the Michigan Republican Party was surprisingly candid about the state of affairs for state affiliates: “After 12 years of being in power, you tend to get fat and lazy, and in some cases arrogant with respect to your positions. There is no doubt that we have had people who have gotten caught up in both illegal activities and immoral activities and none of that helps the party as a whole. If you go back to 2006 most people would agree that not only did we lose our brand, that we damaged our brand significantly. We are clearly rebuilding.”

Of course, “rebuilding” in the midst of a competitive presidential campaign is a little tricky.

Some of the more dramatic problems for the party are occurring in huge states such as California and New York — where state GOP committees seem to have all but run out of money — but realistically, both are considered “blue” states.

Consider, though, the trouble facing state parties in some more competitive states.

In New Hampshire, where the state GOP has been driven by a dispute between moderates and conservatives, the state Democratic party took in four times as much money as its Republican counterpart in 2007. At the end of the most recent reporting period in February, the state GOP reported just $64,000 cash on hand to the Democrats’ $159,000.

In Arkansas, where Republicans lost the governorship in 2006 and are outnumbered in the state House and Senate by 3-1 margins, state GOP Chairman Dennis Milligan said he is facing defections and malaise.

“Independent conservative individuals just said they were fed up and they said there is no difference [between the two parties],” Milligan said. “We have sent out the message that we are now different. We know it did not fall down in one day and it won’t be rebuilt in one day.”

And in a handful of reliably “red” states, matters aren’t much better.

Even in some of the reddest states in the nation, Republicans have faced dispiriting news. As if Democratic Gov. Kathleen Sebelius’ easy 2006 re-election victory wasn’t insult enough in heavily Republican Kansas, she won with a running mate who was more than a little familiar to the state GOP — Mark Parkinson, the former state Republican chairman, who switched parties to run as her lieutenant governor.

Just four years earlier, Parkinson had exclaimed that “any Republican who supports Kathleen Sebelius for governor is either insincere or uninformed.” Sebelius is now frequently mentioned as a prospective vice presidential nominee.

Most recently it was the Alaska Republican party airing its dirty laundry. Just over a week ago, at the state Republican convention, the lieutenant governor shocked his party colleagues by announcing a primary challenge to veteran Congressman Don Young, who is under federal investigation. The state’s senior senator, Republican Ted Stevens, is also under federal investigation.

At the same event, GOP Gov. Sarah Palin, who is at odds with the state party, called for changes in leadership in the wake of a series of scandals that have tainted the party. An attempt to oust GOP Chairman Randy Ruedrich fell just short.

There’s time for the state parties to get back on track, and it’s not altogether clear how much the McCain campaign plans to rely on state GOP affiliates for support anyway.

But all things being equal, this isn’t how the Republican Party wanted to enter the ’08 cycle.

There’s time for the state parties to get back on track…

You know what? I feel so sorry for these shlubs that I think I will volunteer to help them!

And whaddayaknow, every time they need me to do something I might just screw it up, because I know that the Republican party rewards people who screw up!

And I’m pretty sure their news letters will be entertaining.

  • “If you go back to 2006 most people would agree that not only did we lose our brand, that we damaged our brand significantly.”

    I never hear Democrats talking about their “brand,” only Replicans. They try to sell their party as if it were soap or toilet paper because they don’t stand for anything except gaining and holding power. No wonder they’ve reached “near-irrelevance.”

    (Replicans was a typo, but it was almost Freudian. I liked it, so I left it there. Maybe it will morph into Reptilians.) 🙂

  • I know this is going off on a tangent, but reading this post it just hit me. . . the problem with this alleged new-style post-partisan Democrat like Sebelius picking a Republican Lt. Gov and having him change his party affiliation (but likely not any of his actual positions) is that if Obama were to pick her for VP or any other Cabinet post, she now has given someone who is, in fact, a Republican the inside track to take the Governor’s seat.

    Party matters!!!! (especially in the long term, where party building matters)

  • Well, how about that—they’ve gone from “Party of the Surge” to “Party in a Purge.” And with all honesty, it couldn’t be happening to a more deserving bunch of deranged doltTHIS is what happens when you build bridges, you Clintonians you! Conservatives get a chance to join reality, they abaondon their old Party in droves—and they take their money and votes with them., bringing them to our side of the bridge, or at the very least keeping them at home instead of feeding the rapacious maw of Bu$h/McCain.

  • The Republicans are have a truly horrendous time raising money compared to previous elections and I am not sure newspeople or even bloggers are paying that much attention to that. Right now everyone is focused on Obama v. Hillary but either one of those candidates is pulling in something like double what McCain is.

  • […] a number of state Republican parties are struggling through troubled times, suffering from internal strife, poor fundraising […] — Politico

    Republicans are supposed to have a better understanding (than we do) of money matters… So why should thy be expected to throw good money after bad? Where’s the profit in that?

  • I don’t know about fundraising, but the Virginia GOP is riven with infighting, as are many local parties. They’ve raised a new generation who are convinced that the only thing voters really care about is no taxes ever (with a sprinkling of hating the gays and the brown people), and they remain convinced of this no matter how many times it proves to be a loser. A GOP candidate for local office confided to a Democratic friend that they’re driving out anyone who dares disagree with orthodoxy about anything.

    Good times — pass the popcorn!

  • Oh, and ET, @6,

    “something like double” of what McCain’s pulling in? He could only *wish* 🙂 Last month, he got 11mil, Hillary 34, and Obama 55.

  • The Oregon Republican Party is also in financial trouble and has had to move its headquarters to much humbler surroundings. This is in addition to not be able to find candidates to run for office (e.g., Oregon Attorney General, Fourth Congressional District, etc.)

  • libra: Among the many metrics supporting Obama’s strengths (# of States, Popular vote, Pledged Delegates) Fundraising seems to get overlooked. He hit One million individual donors in 2008 last month (about 250000 in January, 750000 more in February) when he brought in 55 Mil. THIS month he’s hit 2 million individual donors, mostly making small donoations (that they can repeat multiple times…) That he’s raising this kind of money, from millions of individuals, small donors, during a RECESSION, is amazing to me and speaks volumes about his “electability”. I also think Howard Dean deserves a lot of credit for the success of the 50 State strategy, which I think has already (see Bill Foster in IL) paid significant dividends and I believe will change the face of the country in November.

  • I can’t muster any sympathy for these sociopaths. I want them to fall further. The article in the Politico also interviewed Dennis Milligan, the chair of the Arkansas GOP. Do you remember Dennis Milligan? I do. So of course I took the opportunity to bring it up when I posted about this article. [/blogwhoring]

  • That he’s raising this kind of money, from millions of individuals, small donors, during a RECESSION, is amazing to me and speaks volumes about his “electability” –Chicago Pat, @11

    No kidding. I’ve had to cut down on my smoking, to be able to take my number (shortly after he got past one mil) on his donor roster 🙂

    And I agree… While I think it’s obscene that that that kind of money needs to be raised at all, the fact that he can raise it via small amounts but from an extremely broad base of donors, *does* speak volumes about his appeal. It’s one thing to yammer about your preferences on a blog like this, it’s quite another to put your money where your mouth is.

  • I am having a hard time finding someone to vote for that represents ME.

    I am against amnesty for illegals! I am conservative but not nutty. I respect human rights but believe we should finish the work in Iraq and Afghanistan. I think it is MY responsibility to care for myself, my old people, my mortgage, my retirement, my children’s sexual education and vaccinations.

    I want a candidate that is the BEST—not just a woman, veteran, black, etc…the BEST candidate can be any of those or none. I don’t want to hold my nose to vote. I have to pick the BEST of the EVILS. My stomach hurts…I must be coming down with something…oh, I know it’s apathy for the candidates that remain. The cure—4 years of putting my head under a pillow and hoping that Lady Liberty still stands and a new Candidate appears.

  • Mr. McCain needs to light a fire under his base support; I predict that unless he does get some enthausem from the Republican base he will not come close to winning in November. It does the heart good to se so many people evolved in the Democratic Party and that is exactly what he needs to make happen within his own party.

  • Comments are closed.