McCain thrives when voters don’t know his issue positions

NPR noted in February, “Many Republican voters seem to believe, incorrectly, that the current Republican front-runner, Arizona Senator John McCain, supports abortion rights.”

It’s not just Republican voters. McCain has been hailed for so long, by so many news outlets, as a “moderate” willing to break with GOP orthodoxy, a lot of voters just assume he must support reproductive rights. Some even go so far as to hear McCain’s pro-life rhetoric, and assume he doesn’t really mean it.

So, what happens when Americans learn that McCain is unwavering far-right Republican on the issue? Kevin noted a new poll of battleground states from Greenberg Quinlan Rosner:

* Once balanced information about Obama and McCain’s respective positions on choice is introduced, Obama gains 6 points overall, with his lead in battleground states expanding from a net 2 points (47-45 percent) to a net 13 points (53-40 percent).

* The issue of choice moves the swing vote and generates crossover support. Obama gains 13 points among pro-choice Independent women (who make up 9 percent of this electorate) and 9 points among pro-choice Republican women (who account for 5 percent of this electorate). When these groups are combined, this movement equates to a gain of 1.6 points overall in the general election race against McCain.

* Choice can also help Obama consolidate his base — Obama gains 6 points among Democratic women after balanced descriptions of the candidates’ positions on choice is introduced.

* Despite the fact that the national focus seems to be on the economy, among pro-choice Independent women, pro-choice Republican women, and liberal to moderate Republican women, the issue of abortion produces a larger advantage for Democrats than the economy, the war in Iraq, or health care. Moreover, among these three groups critiques on McCain’s anti-choice position are the strongest attacks against him, trumping attacks on the economy, the war, and special interests.

If accurate, this not only suggests plenty of lingering confusion about McCain’s position on the issue, but more importantly, a significant drop in McCain’s support after people learn what he actually believes. The goal, then, is just to let voters hear about McCain’s stated position on the issue.

Kevin added:

This kind of stuff is more than normally tricky, since you can almost always get a fair number of people to change their view by reading some carefully chosen critiques of whatever issue you’re polling about. Still, in this case GQR’s statement was fairly straightforward: Obama believes abortion is a personal decision and supports Roe v. Wade, while McCain is pro-life and wants to overturn Roe v. Wade. All by itself, that produced a 6-point swing.

Abortion is unlikely to be a major issue in this year’s election, but it’s not a big effort to simply make sure that voters know McCain’s actual position: He thinks abortion should be illegal, and if he becomes president he’ll do his best to appoint Supreme Court justices who think so too.

Quite right. I’d just add that McCain’s ideology on this issue extends beyond just reproductive rights.

He voted against requiring health care plans to cover birth control (3/22/03).

He voted against comprehensive, medically accurate sex education (7/25/06).

He voted against international family planning funding (3/14/96).

He voted against funding to prevent teen and unintended pregnancies (3/17/05).

He voted against public education for emergency contraception (3/17/05).

And he voted against restoring Medicaid funding that could be used for family planning for low-income women (3/17/05).

This just isn’t a record most voters are going to be comfortable with, that is, once they hear about it.

THANK GOD WE HAVE A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS!
AS IF GW BUSH HAS NOT MADE ENOUGH MISTAKES,
THIS ONE TAKES THE CAKE!
DRILLING ANYWHERE NEAR THE “FAULT” LINES WILL
ONLY CAUSE MORE AND MORE UNDERGROUND SHIFTING,
AND IF WE THINK WE HAVE MAJOR WEATHER PROBLEMS
NOW, HE WILL HAVE US “WEARING SUNAMIS”!!
IF NO ONE CARES ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT, AND ONLY
ABOUT “OIL” THEY WILL BE DRAWN INTO THIS MENTALITY
OF DESTROYING ALASKA, AND CAUSING THE PLATES TO
SHIFT.
BEFORE YOU VOTE FOR ANYONE WHO WOULD AUTHORIZE MORE
DRILLING, HERE AT HOME, FIND A GOOD GEOLOGIST, AND ASK
HIM/HER WHAT THEIR RESEARCH SHOWS WILL HAPPEN, IF WE
DRILL OFFSHORE, CLOSE TO THE USA?

LEAVE OUR OWN OIL, WHERE IT IS, AND WHEN THE REST OF THE WORLD RUNS OUT, THEY WILL ALL BE LOOKING TO OUR RESERVES, AND WE WILL ONCE AGAIN BE THE SUPERPOWER WE SHOULD BE….IT ONLY
MAKES COMMON SENSE. WE ARE BUYING AND EXPENDABLE COMMODITY, WITH A WEAK DOLLAR, HOW SWEET IS THAT?

VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE WHO WILL PRESERVE OUR SUPPLIES…

  • If ever there was a reason to refuse to take Public Funding for the General Election it is the need to inform America of McCan’t positions about which they are confused.

    It’s amusing (and I will always point it out) that people consider McCan’t as ‘authentic’ but believe he’s ‘lying’ about his position on abortion and overturning Roe vs. Wade by changing the composition of the Supreme Court.

  • Lance (2) – Bingo! That’s one reason McCain actually benefits from flip-flops. He’d better hope that “free media” strategy works though.

  • It’s worth contemplating the possibility that most of the time inconsistency on issues will still needs to be turned into a character flaw — ‘flip-flopping’ — before it gets any traction at the polls.

    Inconsistency per se isn’t going to bother most people, because they approach the process of selecting a President like they’re critiquing a film performance, and the median-er the voter, the more that is true.

    They’re choosing the best character in the best narrative — using ‘character’ in its dramatic sense.

  • not to get all concern troll-y, but I wonder if McCain’s vehement anti-abortion standcouldn’t be used to his benefit. Are there anti-choicers out there who were going to sit this election out because they don’t believe in McCain who might vote after allwhen they find out just HOW MUCH McCain is in the anti-choice camp? And if so, how much would it balance out (or mayb even negate) the other votes that swing to Obama?

    I only ask because it’s generally believed that the Obama campaign has been run intelligently, and maybe there’s a reason they haven’t talked much about abortion beyond the facts that there’s been enough to talk about with Iraq & the economy & global warming. Maybe the Obama camp feels talking about abortion, no matter how well-thought or heartfelt Obama’s opinion is, ultimately causes more harm than good.

  • My personal policy is to not read comments in all caps.

    With regard to #5 slappy magoo, you may be on to something. IIRC, Obama voted ‘present’ or even an outright ‘no’ on a bill outlawing partial birth abortions, which many moderates consider to be unacceptable. Of course he had his reasons for it on that particular bill, but it *will* be brought up.

  • This is no doubt why even he doesn’t know his positions — to add verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative.

  • Dear American Voters, reporters and political professionals, and let us believe in Family, Friends, Fellows, Faith. Funds, Foundation, Fun, with Fairness & Freedom and without Fear, Favor, and Failure. This is for Mr. Jiulani.

    Hon. Senator McCain and Obama, besides each having many attributes and characteristics. The critical differences between the two of these presidential presumptive nominees are as under:

    1. Presidential “Temperament and Composer”.
    2. Little Washington “insider Versus outsider” experience.
    3. “Vision and mission” for our nation future rather than past.
    4. American policies, ” first U.S.A Centric” than any other country [ ies ] centric.

    In my professional opinion Senator Obama leads in all above qualities.

    The need of our next movement and generation is a change. The Change in ” past Washington and its Leadership”. A change we can believe in and not the seductive, deceptive, and confusing slogan of “leader we can believe in” [? Effexor ?”.

    Our Greatgrand Nation has to address many present and future challenges and start with new clean “Slate and Senator”.

    God Bless America. its diverse people, and our Greatgrand Nation.

    Our Greatgrand Nation is needs the CHANGE at every level and for long time.

    I am sure Senator Obama with the help of Senator Clinton and her supporters, can deliver that CHANGE.

    Please stay involved, stay engaged, and stay informed. Please do not allow any seduction, deception, and or confusion by some partisan media and leaders effect your vote [ Psychological Terrorism ]..

    Yours truly,

    COL. [retd] A.M.Khajawall
    Disabled American Veteran
    Forensic psychiatrist, Las Vegas

    PS: Please talk about the ” Presidential Temperament And Caliber ” of our presumptive presidential Nominees. Thanks.

  • McCain had an ad on CNN this morning, touting the fact that he had “broken with President Bush” on green house gas and other environmental issues.

    People seeing the ad would think he’s broken with Bush on all environmental issues, but today he endorsed drilling off-shore, agreeing with Bush.

    This does need to be pointed out.

    And, “Barbie”, please don’t post in all caps. We “get it”/

  • I think the main point to hammer home is that McCain can’t be trusted. He’s convinced many pro-choicers that he’s pro-choice (even though he’s never voted that way), and he’s convinced a lot of anti-abortion folks that he would appoint anti-abortion judges. But would he? Who the hell knows! The man can’t keep his story straight for three minutes, much less four years.

    No one should trust that pandering old coot, and the evidence that he’s untrustworthy keeps building every day. In November the “pro-life” crowd will show up, but not in droves, because in their estimation McCain may well betray them. Nobody wants to vote for someone they think they may regret voting for, the only thing that will drive them is the fear of an Obama presidency, and the more Obama speaks the less they will fear him, even though he’s clearly pro-choice.

  • McCain’s break with Bush on greenhouse gases consists of stopping the use of “pull my finger” jokes in the White House.

  • I think the one thing we can be confident about is that John Sidney McCain would actually appoint judges “Just Like Alito, Scalia and Roberts” just like he has promised.

    Which means an end to Roe, an end to Civil Rights and an end to our Republic.

  • Never fear…McBush is here. Roe vs Wade is a good law that’s bad for our economy and it’s a good change but not the right change and this is not the kind of change we need. Now who wants to vote for the wrong change?…Vote for the right change My friends and that’s how I stand on Pro rights. Now for the SC… I will not appoint activist judges but will nominate judges, just as the democrats have done because I’m willing to work across the isle. This is the kind of change we need because it’s the right kind of change…my friends.

    Do you think I’d lie about lying to you? Yeah, Liars we can trust.

    btw…Obama must not only oppose republican legislators but also the dem leadership that are approving telecom immunity and then lying about it, voting against it after they make sure it has enough votes to pass…Steny Hoyer, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Dick Durbin, Jay Rockefeller have sold all the dems out for corporate “donations”.

    Please donate to pac blue targeting Hoyer to drive him from office. See Glenn Greenwald’s site at salon.com to see why and how to donate. $70,000 raised right off the bat. See how deceitful Hoyer and Pelosi and Reid are acting. Also…why is Obama silent when the FISA give away..er..compromise is the biggest thing the legislature has done since dems took control of Congress. Why is Obama silent???

  • A while back I suggested an ad — Steve, remember the ‘high school gym’ one that you praised in e-mail? I think if we start running this, we’ll make a big point and will start gaining a lot of traction — despite the MSM.

    For those of you who don’t remember it, and who are as unwilling as I am to hunt up one comment made months ago, I’ll try and recreate it.

    It shows a filled high-school gym with a banner “Independents for McCain.” Then it cuts to a large-screen tv showing Sen. Stockdale’s actual positions — in his own words — on abortion, the War, Veteran’s rights, and so many others.

    Each time a particular position is shown, the camera cuts to the audience, where a couple of dozen people react in horror, gather their belongings, and leave the auditorium. By the time it is over there are maybe a half-dozen people left in the auditorium under the banner.

    It WOULD work, believe me.

  • Comments are closed.