McCain tries running on family legacy

A few months ago, there was quite a stir over whether Reagan employed a divisive Southern strategy in 1980, starting his campaign with a speech supporting states’ rights in Philadelphia, Miss. — the same town where three civil rights workers had been murdered. With that in mind, I was a little surprised to see that John McCain was kicking off a major campaign tour yesterday in Meridian, Miss., not far from Reagan’s kick-off point.

Another instance of the GOP’s Southern Strategy? It’s possible, but a closer look suggests McCain picked the Mississippi town for family-history reasons.

Sen. John McCain kicked off his “biographical tour” Monday morning, seeking to connect key moments in his life to his policy agenda. The first stop was Meridian, Miss., home to McCain Field, a naval air station named for his grandfather and namesake, John Sidney McCain, who was a four-star admiral. Mississippi is also the ancestral home of the McCain family, though as the son of a naval officer, the future senator moved frequently and had no real childhood home.

To say that McCain was laying it on thick would be an understatement. His campaign is billing this as a “biographical tour,” but if yesterday was any indication, McCain is actually making this a “look-who-I’m-related-to tour.”

He seems to be the first candidate in recent memory to make family history highly relevant to his campaign. In yesterday’s speech, McCain noted, “Many McCains left here as young men to pursue careers in what has long been our family’s chosen profession — the United States armed forces … We trace my family’s martial heritage back to the Revolution. A distant ancestor served on General Washington’s staff, and it seems my ancestors fought in most wars in our nation’s history. All were soldiers — both Henry and Bill McCain were West Pointers — until my grandfather broke family tradition and entered the Naval Academy in 1902. He was succeeded there by my father, then me and then my son.”

And, in case anyone missed all of these subtleties, the McCain campaign released a new web video about the senator’s family history, with an emphasis on those who became military leaders.

Restrained it is not.

I’m not quite sure what to make of all of this. Voters may very well take into consideration McCain’s military service in the 1960s when deciding who to support, but it’s hard to imagine anyone factoring in McCain’s lineage — the senator has every reason to be proud of his family history, but it’s not quite as relevant to the country as, say, McCain’s healthcare plan.

Ed Kilgore had a very sharp post on this, noting that he couldn’t recall “any major speech by a president or presidential candidate that was devoted so thoroughly to the subject of the speaker’s own family background — not just the immediate family … but the Family Heritage.”

McCain’s insistence on establishing a distinguished pedigree is counter-intuitive as well. The current president of the United States, after all, went to inordinate lengths to create a public persona remote from his actual aristocratic background as grandson of a U.S. senator and son of a president. Another president who often touted his own military service — John F. Kennedy — did so in no small part to provide a common link to Americans who might otherwise dwell on his father’s wealth and political connections. FDR’s polio, and TR’s cowboy-hunter-soldier machismo, offset their elite backgrounds. And most American presidents and presidential candidates have talked about their ancestors mainly to stress their humble roots, and thus accentuate their own accomplishments. In the Meridian speech and elsewhere, John McCain seems to be visibly struggling, even today, to live up to his family’s martial tradition. It’s all pretty remarkable.

The theme of the callow young man achieving maturity and then complete identification with his patrimony is as old as the Biblical story of the Prodigal Son…. Maybe this is all ephemeral, and at some point John McCain will abandon the biographical message to focus on policy issues. But Democrats need to understand what he’s trying to do in presenting himself as the embodiment of the Prodigal Son seeking to lead the Prodigal Nation back to its heritage of greatness, and react accordingly.

Good point. I’d just add that watching the campaign’s new web video and reading yesterday’s speech, I also kept thinking about McCain’s first general-election TV ad, which emphasized that he’s the “American president America has been waiting for.”

I’m reluctant to over-analyze all of this, but if Republicans are anxious to define Obama as “foreign” — unusual name, Kenyan father, international relatives — McCain bragging, excessively, about his family history may be a subtle way for the GOP candidate to argue, “I’m an American through and through, unlike some people I won’t mention.”

Too cynical?

I think he would rather run on his Granddad’s war record than his own, considering granddad McCain was a great leader of men and little Johnny was the punk kid who wouldn’t grow up during his own military service.

  • With all the talk of ‘the imperial presidency’ and ‘monarchial powers,’ I’m not surprised that McCain is appealing to the aristocratic notion of lineage.

  • I’m not quite sure what to make of all of this. Voters may very well take into consideration McCain’s military service in the 1960s when deciding who to support, but it’s hard to imagine anyone factoring in McCain’s lineage — the senator has every reason to be proud of his family history, but it’s not quite as relevant to the country as, say, McCain’s healthcare plan.

    This is a gift!

    Anything that gets people looking at “Ace” McCain’s military career prior to Oct. 26, 1967 when he was shot down will help the Democrats.
    http://www.usvetdsp.com/jan08/mccain_military_record.htm
    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=119707

    Progressives need keep asking, “Why did McCain’s fellow pilots call him “Ace”?” and “What really happened on the U.S.S. Forrestal?”

    Raise those questions over and over until the corporate-controlled media can’t ignore them anymore!

  • How, exactly, is he running on his Granddad’s record? His family, including him, has a long history of serving this country, and nothing can change that fact.

  • As for his own military service in the 60s, I have mentioned this to several people and they just say it reminds them of how old he is. I mostly talk to older senior citizens because of my grandmother, and they aren’t real fond of someone their age presumably with their memory problems in the White House. It isn’t an advantage for him even with his own generation as far as I can tell.

  • The theme of the callow young man achieving maturity and then complete identification with his patrimony is as old as the Biblical story of the Prodigal Son

    Hey wait, I thought Bush was the Prodigal Son. Do we have another fatted calf?

  • Funny. My father served in the same squadron as John McCain in Vietnam. My dad is about 5 years his junior and was a pilot at the same time McCain was an instructor. My father – an ardent and stubborn-as-hell Republican, former Marine and Naval Aviator – says that McCain was a major-league a**hole and routinely abused his flight students from the back of the aircraft (military attack and fighter aircraft have front-to-back seating) by smacking them over the heads with their clipboards and screaming obscenities at them through the intercoms. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

    The funny part? My dad told me this story back when I was a senior in college – in 2000 – as McCain ran against Bush and took on much more of a reformer mantle. Back in January, just short of our FL beauty contest, he said he couldn’t handle McCain as a president and was thinking about voting for Obama, should he get the nod. My guess is that he’ll actually sit it out, but I had to needle him good, as it looked like he’d have to choose between his “good buddy” and a black dude (dad’s a bit of a racist).

    McCain may want to tread lightly on the military issue. My father told me that many of his compatriots in Vietnam were none too sad to be losing Lt. Cdr. McCain to enemy fire (sad, but true, according to him), as he was NOT beloved by his fellow aviators.

  • You’re right. It’s a dog whistle to all those who think only a 100% white male with ancestry going back to the Mayflower is a “true Amurrican” qualified to be President.

    What a steaming pile of crap. How is an ancestor who fought in the Revolutionary War going to help McCain solve the problems of the 21st century? How does a long family history of following orders make McCain a leader who can inspire a nation? And how does his own military history as a hot shot pilot who never commanded anybody or anything other than the jets he crashed prepare McCain to do the hard work necessary to bring this nation together in a common cause, ie. repairing the damage caused by his beloved master, Bush?

    It’s all smoke and mirrors, folks. Just like the Straight Talk Express and Saint Maverick. I worked in Hollywood for a long time and if you wrote this bullshit in a screenplay, they’d laugh you out of town.

  • It may just be southern strategy. Down here knowing where your people are from and who your daddy knew is a pretty common electoral bid. The “he’s one of us” vote is a pretty big block in the South.

  • Jeremiah Wright served his country, too, and even assisted during an operation on President Johnson. John Kerry was trashed for his service. Funny how selective we have become about whose service is honorable and whose is not. If Bush had been a Democrat (that’s laughable!) he never would have survived the National Guard debacle politically.

  • I think McCain can be proud of his military family history, and Obama always graciously grants him that, but he goes on to establish that McCain wants to do some totally insane things, and McCain leans too heavily on military solutions to problems. Since he’s a military man, that’s understandable, but I think we’ve seen how poorly that “solution” has worked of late, and the logical extension of his warmongering is a draft, which someone should ask him if he would support if we were so foolish as to attack Iran (as he joked about doing).

    McCain’s biggest problem is that most Americans are sick of Iraq, and they want out. McCain of course wants us to “stay the course” indefinitely. He’s going to try to scare the people like Bush/Cheney did, so job #1 is to compare McCain’s scare tactics with Bush’s, and to show how poorly McCain has predicted events compared to Obama.

    I think the similarities between Cheney and McCain also need to be routinely and heavily highlighted. They share the same views almost completely, and they’ve been equally inaccurate with their predictions. We need to tie those two together with an iron chain.

    John “100 years” McCain: The American president retarded Americans have been waiting for in America.

  • Little known fact: McCain’s the only recent president to have an older brother who fought in the Revolutionary war.

    /snark

  • dalloway said:
    How does a long family history of following orders make McCain a leader who can inspire a nation? And how does his own military history as a hot shot pilot who never commanded anybody or anything other than the jets he crashed prepare McCain to do the hard work necessary to bring this nation together in a common cause, ie. repairing the damage caused by his beloved master, Bush?

    This is where things get tricky. Democrats — especially people with positions within the Democratic Party — need to tread lightly. Too many people are willing to believe the lie that Democrats hate the military. So saying anything to derisive about military service in general is a very bad idea. So is suggesting that getting shot down a captured in Vietnam was a good thing for McCain’s career.

    Just ask the questions: What was McCain’s record in the military and what happened on the U.S.S. Forrestal?

    Dale said:
    This proves that McCain is not an upstart. He’s just a wet-start.

    Yep. Keep referring to “Ace” McCain and keep mentioning “wet-starts”. We have seven months to get this stuff out.

  • “His family, including him, has a long history of serving this country, and nothing can change that fact.”

    How is finishing fifth from the bottom of the USNA class of 899 “serving this country”? How is getting shot down and captured “serving this country”? How is a prank which killed 167 men on the USS Forrestall “serving this country”? How is being one of the Keating Five “serving this country”? How is having two rpominent home loan lobbyists on your staff “serving this country”? How is hugging Bush, the man who previously accused hiim of fathering a black child, “serving this country”?

  • Big fucking deal. I don’t give a shit what your ancestors did. I care about what John McCain the cranky old flipflopper is going to do.

    For me, when people start bragging about who their ancestors were, usually tells me that this person has nothing what made his ancestors “great.”

  • It’s funny that he neglects to mention that his esteemed ancestors were also slave owners. It seems to me that if you want to bring your lineage to the table, people have a right to look at the bad as well as the good.

    What’s astounding to me is that he’s 72 years old and still wants to talk about older, deader people. Nevermind the potential for a slavery backlash, is he really trying to remind people that he was born before the dawn of time?

  • “He seems to be the first candidate in recent memory to make family history highly relevant to his campaign.”

    Uh–Billary?

  • Les beat me to it; I was just going to ask if anyone seriously thinks Chelsea Clinton will not one day end up in politics. In fact, if the spectacle goes on much longer, we may be treated to the sight of Bill Clinton’s sperm, assembled in chorus and singing in 400-part harmony, “Vote for Hill-a-REEEEEEEE”.

  • Well, if you consider that he must have gotten young Cindy excited enough to marry him, McCain also wet-started his political career.

  • A “biography tour” will only prove just how far the apple rolled away from that tree.

    I would think that this nation would just look at the Bush “dynasty” and realize a genetic connection can mean oh so little passing on leadership skills.

  • It’s easily explained.

    For starters, among Righties, being able to Trace One’s History is a big deal. There are even people here who have been “impressed” that I had an ancestor who crossed the Delaware with Washington in 1776, This phenomenon is even more pronounced among southerners, who are far more aware of family history than anyone in the rest or the country on average. For McCain to point out he’s from Mississippi is also important to the “southern strategy” folks. It’s code for the fact he “gets it,” (white supremacy) just as Reagan did going to Philadelphia Mississippi. McCain’s great-grandfather was the County Sheriff there – there’s no Southerner alive who doesn’t know what that means. Remember Bull Connor? McCain has just proudly proclaimed he’s descended from an earlier Bull Connor – Southern Sheriffs back then were the Enforcers of “the peculiar institution” of Southernism.

    McCain is busy making himself acceptable to all the far righties who have doubted him, and he’s doing it in full view of everyone else, who don’t understand what’s happening since they don’t know what it is. This will be particularly true among the MSM, who will be “suitably impressed” to give him an even bigger break.

  • He is bringing out his proud aristo lineage to run against Obama, the self-made man. Because being self-made is so un-American.

  • …the senator has every reason to be proud of his family history, but it’s not quite as relevant to the country as, say, McCain’s healthcare plan.

    Exactly.

  • Military service is not a prerequisite for being elected President of the United States. Lincoln had none and Grant had plenty. Who was the better President?

  • He’s running ads stressing his grandfather and father were admirals, and today he’s reminiscing about his boarding school days. WTF?

  • The scene: Washington crossing the Delaware. Among the crew Tavis McCain and Cleavis Cleaver. Suddenly, Washington–in some distress–calls on the two young men. Both rush forward–a bit competitively?–to assist the General. After a few moments, Washington admonishes them,. “Hold the bucket steady pissboys. And wait for the shake.”

  • Screw the bio and call 911! I watched his lame ass speech (hard to do and not doze off) this morning and I’m wondering what the hell is that thing growing on the left side of his face? It’s humongous! Looks like his brain has slithered down to his jawbone. Or maybe it’s just a chaw of chewing tobacco?

  • How many of his ancestors left their wives and took up with younger rich girls?

    Is that a family trait too?

  • Gather ’round for some McCain family homework. What about the Senator’s GREAT-grandfather, the first John Sidney McCain. He was sheriff of Carroll County, Mississippi “for a long time,” according to Sen. McCain. Information floating around the internet (“Mississippians for McCain”) indicate that John the First was sheriff in 1899. The New York Times archives from August 1, 1901 and August 4, 1901 show that a horrendous lynching of three apparently innocent black people, including 2 women took place in Carroll County. (Go to the NYT website, go to Archives and google something like “Carrollton lynching Longino.” A mob took them from the Carroll County jail with the apparent connivance of the sheriff while “leading citizens” and even the governor of Mississippi (A.H. Longino) were s trying to get things settled down. The NYT articles don’t give the name of the sheriff. Can anyone confirm or refute that John S. McCain (the first) was sheriff at the time of the lynching?

    If John McCain was the sheriff then, so much for running on the noble heritage of an illustrious family.

  • In January 1886, John S. McCain — whose father had died sometime in 1863, when this individual was about 12 — was a member from District 2, Carroll County, Miss., of the board of supervisors. In 1888 and in 1889, he was the board president. By April term of circuit court in this county, he was sheriff of record. McCain was sheriff until James Somerville was elected sheriff, which was fall 1895 — the first election under the new Miss. Constitution of 1890. Surely, during slavery times, there were slaves on the Waverly Plantation at Teoc. Some stuck with the place during hard times — they did not have to do so, so far as knowledge of some history instructs me. A fellow named W. J. Woodell on Jan. 23, 1900, was elected sheriff; this was after a special election, because the man elected the preceding November, Daniel C. McDougal, died before he could take office.

  • Somehow, the YEAR Senator McCain’s great-grandfather was sheriff of record for the April term of Circuit Court in Carroll County, Miss., got omitted from my first posting here. This was April term, 1890.

  • Comments are closed.