McCain will get his ‘fair share’ of media scrutiny — someday

That John McCain is getting a free ride from the media hardly seems controversial anymore, so it was encouraging to see the Washington Post’s Shailagh Murray concede yesterday that reporters haven’t subjected the Republican nominee to the kind of scrutiny he deserves. (via ThinkProgress)

St. Paul, Minn.: Hi Shailagh — thank you for taking my question and for chatting with us. Does that fact that Sen. McCain has had access to his wife’s private jet for free undercut the widely reported view that his campaign was limping along, broke and on life support, followed by his amazing rise from the ashes to where he is now — essentially tied with both the Democrats? Will we see more scrutiny of his campaign finances and practices, or will Obama/Wright continue to suck up all the oxygen?

Shailagh Murray: This is driving Democrats crazy right now, but just wait. Once the primary battle is over, Sen. McCain will get his fair share of scrutiny.

Satyam added that the WaPo’s Howard Kurtz is also aware of the problem: “We don’t have unlimited resources, but I think we need to be covering McCain as vigorously now as in the fall. I mean, it’s not like he’s laying on a beach somewhere, he’s out there campaigning. One pet peeve of mine is when reporters don’t cover an issue because the candidates are avoiding it, thus allowing them to set the agenda.”

If all of this sounds kind of familiar, there’s a good reason.

Reading Murray’s take, I was reminded of a similar online chat with the Washington Post’s Lois Romano last October, when she was asked when the media might start scrutinizing Rudy Giuliani’s record of wildly exaggerating his record.

“He hasn’t been really challenged on every word yet. That will come. Right now, there are so many people in the race trying to get footing, and the media is trying to illuminate facts about all of them. As the field starts to winnow, you will see more and more scrutiny of what candidates say and do, and what they have done or said in the past.”

I find all of this rather odd. Reporters will scrutinize Republican candidates once the campaign begins in earnest. Scratch that, once there’s a GOP frontrunner. Or maybe once there’s a GOP nominee. Or perhaps after there’s a Democratic nominee.

I realize that the Clinton-Obama race has plenty of drama and personality, but major news outlets have plenty of reporters covering McCain every day. This is the point at which candidates are defined with impressions that will remain with voters for the rest of the year. Why not start scrutinizing him now? Isn’t that what this period is for?

Instead, we’re told, voters should “just wait.” Once the Dems have a nominee, reporters will start to scrutinize McCain — as if the Democratic nomination fight has some relevance to the media’s ability to question McCain’s mistakes, gaffes, and woefully ridiculous policy proposals.

It’s one of the more frustrating side losses of the prolonged Democratic fight — the media allows the Clinton-Obama confrontation to suck up all the oxygen, leaving McCain to screw up with impunity.

Though, I have a sinking suspicion that if the Democratic race was already over, news outlets would find some other excuse to give McCain a pass.

Of Course they will (when pigs fly)

Media today is controlled by a few large corporations that work together to support the Rebulican party. The examples sited in this post barely scratch the surface. Sure the media report on McSame, on page 27 right after the scandel of the local dog catcher. But anything to run down Democrats is on page 1 above the fold.

Blogs may wildly exagerate events, but they have truth as a basis. Thanks CB for keeping on top of all this.

  • Be patient. If he makes it to a second term, they promise they’ll start looking into him more closely. Just like with Bush!

  • The lame-ass media, esp. teevee/cable news, has no time to scutinize McCain. They’re too busy sensationalizing Jeremiah Wright. Who, for the most part, is Right.

    I’m so disgusted by events of the past few days.

    Why on earth do we let the Lamestreetmedia/cable news:
    1) tell us what the news is
    2) frame that news so narrowly and unfairly that it is 180 degrees from the truth
    3) let their pundits tell us what we all believe without even asking us

    Notice how Wright blasted the media the other day. Oh boy, that made him an even bigger target. Woe be unto you that criticize the sacred “free press”.

    Think about some of the biggest stories these folks have discussed the past few years: Natalie Holloway/missing beautiful young blonde white women, the astronaut in diapers, the death of what’s her name the former Playboy centerfold (how did she die? who was the baby’s father? etc. etc.). They’ve become whores for ratings and their right wing corporations. It’s DISGUSTING that this is taking place the the greatest democracy in the world.

  • Phil Ochs says it best:

    “Look outside the window, there’s a woman being grabbed
    They’ve dragged her to the bushes and now she’s being stabbed
    Maybe we should call the cops and try to stop the pain
    But Monopoly is so much fun, I’d hate to blow the game
    And I’m sure it wouldn’t interest anybody
    Outside of a small circle of friends.”

    While this nation and the Constitution are being treated like Kitty Genovese by right wingers, these media types are sitting back saying it’s just so much fun stirring up crap about Jeremiah Wright to call the righties on their BS. They’d gladly ignore the obvious truth while McCain foments a third Bush term and perpetuates the sins of eight years of W because playing the media’s games with Democrats is just so much fun.

    But it’s not just Obama and Hillary that are getting mugged, it’s all of us and by extension the rest of the world that suffers at our warlike and financially reckless whims.

  • I have a sinking suspicion that if the Democratic race was already over, news outlets would find some other excuse to give McCain a pass.

    It’s not just – or at least not only – the reporters. It’s ignorant fascist illiterates like Sam Zell (owner of my local litterbox liner replacement) and the rest of the corporate scum – from Murdoch on down – who think they’ll get a better deal underany Republican (and who hedge their bets by supporting Mrs. Billy-J, since they know what sellouts the Clintons are).

  • McCain will only lose his free pass if he decides to allow the tax cuts for the billionaires who control the corporate media to expire.

    Follow the money.

  • Once the primary battle is over, Sen. McCain will get his fair share of scrutiny.

    Yeah sure, the day after hell freezes over

  • In 2000 we asked when the media would finally scrutinize George W Bush, in May 2007 the media still hasn’t really scrutinized George W Bush. Almost 2 weeks ago he admitted to knowing about and approving war crimes and crimes against humanity. ABC news broke the story on Friday and never returned to it. Keith Olberman talked about it. The National Treasure Helen Thompson asked Dana Perino about it, and then lambasted her collegues in the press for not discussing it. WaPo mentioned it in one paragraph on a very inner page one day and then effing crickets from all the rest.

    So my guess is the media will never scrutinize McCain.

  • Meanwhile we have the GENERAL ELECTRIC SPOKESMAN, the repulsive corporate pimp/ fart/ hemmorid Chris “i am not a cumslut’ Matthews spreading the following filth from with the corporate studios of MSNBC …

    Discussing Obama and Wright, Matthews said to guest Ryan Lizza of The New Yorker: “Let me give you the problem, in a way of putting it in perhaps literary terms. It’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.” Matthews continued, “Who was the bad guy? Dr. Jekyll was the good guy. Mr. Hyde was the bad guy, right?” He added: “So, every time you have a problem with Barack, because you don’t really know him and he seems a little foreign to you, you think of — you think of him as both these guys. They’re different faces of the same guy. Jeremiah Wright, to a lot of people, is Barack Obama. They’ve become the same Chicago character running for president. One is the good doctor, the other one is the monster that shows up at night.”

    The Corporate CumSlut Matthews should be treated just as Mussolini was .. literally dragged out of the protection of his corporate masters studio and into the streets … tied behind a car a drug for some miles, then hung up side down for all to spit on … This corporate , millionaire, pimp is the very essence of what is wrong with the CORPORATE MEDIA that is responsible for the destruction of our once great country ….

  • ” I mean, it’s not like he’s laying on a beach somewhere, he’s out there campaigning. One pet peeve of mine . . . ” ought to be when a professional writer misuses lie and lay. This should be “lying on a beach . . . ” – Yes, I know, some dictionaries are now giving into this usage, but it still sounds like a fingernail screeching across the blackboard to me. It got you an “F” when I went to high school.

    As for the media treatment of McCain, I think it’s more the access he grants them than his ideology. They know him, they like him, and it’s pretty damn hard to criticize someone who treats you so well. Just human nature. A brilliant tactic of his. It could cost Obama the election, who is getting tagged as a wonky elitist just as Gore and Kerry were.

  • #13 Notice what McCain did when the NYT article hit re the lobbyist and his cozy relationship with her and her firm: He locked the press out for a few days.

    Then it was like, oh, hey ya’ll come on over and lets talk and eat BBQ. And as far as I know they never asked him about it.

    DISGUSTING.

  • I’m convinced the media will never scrutinize McCain. I had some hope that when McCain started literally and figuratively embracing Bush and the religious right, that the media would finally realize he was just another politician and turn on him like a slighted lover. However, that’s never happened, and at this point I don’t think there’s any revelation that will be enough to make it happen. They’re all caught up in a massive case of groupthink. Even a smart guy like Fareed Zakaria felt he had to begin a column attacking McCain’s proposals to shut Russia and China out of international groups with the mandatory genuflecting to McCain’s supposed honor. McCain deserves credit for standing up to the N. Vietnamese, but that doesn’t mean he’ll make a good president. The media meanwhile never, ever give Obama or Clinton any credit for showing courage in the face of racism and sexism.

  • In case all of you have missed it, nearly all major newspapers have officially endorsed a DEMOCRATIC presidential candidate. It’s also proven that the media is controlled by liberals (except for Fox news).

    Everyone knows about McCain’s transgressions because he’s been in the spotlight for 30,40 years. The Clinton’s have been around for 20 years, and Obama for 10. Their skeletons are just being revealed, and that is news. Everyone already knows that McCain cheated on his wife (so did Bill Clinton), they know he’s a former POW, they know he flip-flops (as do these candidates, the one’s that have set enough policy to do so, anyway), and they know his general views on things.

    You can tell specific organizations are backing specific democratic candidates. CNN? Obama. The NY TIMES? Clinton (they actually said it). etc etc. Once the democratic nominee is decided, they will not attack anyone but McCain – it happens every year.

    That’s why everyone was so angry when Bush won the last time ’round…the media had been reporting for a year that he wouldn’t be reelected.

    It’s amazing that liberals can have almost the entire media at their disposal, but they just aren’t electable because people get bad feelings when they look a little closer.

  • #17 Shane: I believe the papers are currently endorsing one or the other for the Democratic nomination, not for president. That will come later this year.

    And, no, the press is NOT liberal. Many of the people in the press* are liberal, but the corporations that own the airwaves are all too happy with the status quo. (If the media is liberal, why did they not push back on the 2004 Kerry swiftboating story right away when they knew it to be false? Why did they gleefully play Wright over and over instead of researching that that is not who the man is in total? Why did they spread the lie that Obama is a Muslim?).

    *Reminds me of an infuriating quote I heard from Tucker Carlson after bush won in 2004: that he didn’t know any reporters who thought bush was smart or who voted for him. Nice morality there, Tucker. Take your money while spouting off on things you know are false. Good riddance. And, oh, YOU CAN’T DANCE either.

    Hannah, Dancing with the Stars fan

  • I think it’s safe to assume if they’re endorsing a candidate for the democratic nomination, they probably want them to be president as well.

    The media is liberal, aside from Fox news. They gleefully did all of those things you mentioned because controversy = high ratings – they made money off of it. That and it IS newsworthy – what has McCain done other than go on a tour and outline policies? He didn’t lie about sniper fire, go in cohoots on real estate with a crook, and he didn’t go to a church with a racist pastor who obviously thinks it’s still 1847.

    Another reason for the amount of coverage for the democratic nominee is the fact that the MSM has already annointed a democrat (be it Obama or Clinton) as president.

    I’m no proponent of Bush, but he is treated unfairly in the media and the poor performance of a liberal congress is being ignored – everything is blamed on a conservative when liberals have just as much to do with the country’s situation as anyone else. Why is this? Liberal media bias.

  • Comments are closed.