McCain ‘worries’ that Iraq violence may help Dems

John McCain is worried about violence in Iraq, but not just for the obvious reason.

Republican presidential candidate John McCain said on Friday he fears that al Qaeda or another extremist group might attempt spectacular attacks in Iraq to try to tilt the U.S. election against him.

McCain, at a town hall meeting in this Philadelphia suburb, was asked if he had concerns that anti-American militants in Iraq might ratchet up their activities in Iraq to try to increase casualties in September or October and tip the November election against him.

“Yes, I worry about it,” McCain said. “And I know they pay attention because of the intercepts we have of their communications.”

As Greg Sargent responded, “You know, I keep hearing from Republican pundits and operatives that the specter of terrorism inevitably bolsters the electoral prospects of Republicans. But here McCain says that Al Qaeda would amp up their attacks in Iraq to hurt him. Hard to keep track of this stuff sometimes.”

It is, indeed. I’d just add, however, that I suspect this is an effort to lay the groundwork for future campaign talking points.

McCain, I suspect, is not oblivious to current events, and is well aware that violence and casualty rates in Iraq are rising again. Having staked his claim to the presidency on the so-called “surge” policy, McCain’s already precarious political position gets worse as Iraq’s semblance of stability fades (along with the prospect of progress on political reconciliation).

So, McCain needs an insurance policy. If conditions on the ground in Iraq offer some optimism, he can tell voters, “See? I was right; all we need to do is stay the course and reap the rewards.” If conditions are deteriorating, he can tell voters, “See? I was right; our enemies are acting up to influence the U.S. elections. They’re afraid I’ll win and keep Bush’s policy going indefinitely, so they’re sending a message.”

It’s actually similar to the painful game the White House has been playing for years — good news is proof Bush is right, and bad news is proof that Bush is right. If violence goes down, it means we’re winning and there’s no need to withdraw. If violence goes up, it means our troops are needed and we couldn’t possibly withdraw.

Something to keep an eye on as the campaign progresses.

Sounds like he’s trying to kick the legs out from under this being used as a campaign issue. Unfortunately for him, the Democratic nominee did not vote for and was outspoken against starting this unpopular war and the voters still see it as an important issue.

Besides, if not the war, what’s he going to talk about, the economy?

  • …the prospect of progress on political reconciliation…

    Here’s a “prospect of progress on political reconciliation” for the Iraqi’s–there will be no “prospect of progress on political reconciliation” until the foreign occupier leaves. How’s that?

  • More violence = terrists helping Democrats
    Less violence = terrists waiting for Democratic administration
    Same violence = surge worked, situation stable

  • McCain is a nutbar. The only way to counter his reasoning is to use equally crazy logic. Violence in Iraq decreases when Al-Qaeda sees that the democrats might win. Therefore, if the democrats have the presidency then there will be peace throughout the middle east.

  • I’m glad McCain can frame the increase in violence around how it helps or hurts politicians here in the US and not our service men and women out there in harms way.

  • Gotta hand it to Republicans for being so creative on the campaign scams. Pulling a Reverse Concern Troll is a hell of a maneuver.

    Both the Dem candidates should bust McCain on this by showing that no matter what happens over there in Iraq the Republicans will take it as a sign for more war. And since every circumstance warrants more war there is obviously no longer any goal that can be achieved in Iraq that will be of benefit to the American people. Any time people are advocating war for war’s sake the only goals achieved are for personal financial or political gain, and that’s not worth all the dead and wounded Americans nor the $12Billion a month that would do this nation more good being spent at home or not being spent at all to the benefit of our national debt.

  • What a drama Queen!
    It’s all about him & the Republican’ts. I suppose he means who cares about some nameless, faceless soldiers or Iraqis. Oh no, the GOP might lose some votes!!!

    Can’t feel anything except for themselves.

  • Y’all forget, in a goopers eyes, WE are the terrorists.

    I wonder if how I am feeling of late is how George Washington and the other PATRIOTS felt?

  • “…attacks in Iraq to try to tilt the U.S. election against him.”
    Attacks in Iraq??? But he predicts possible attacks in Iraq for maybe 1000 years. Why is he suddenly so concerned that one of his main political positions might come true?

    Gee, and I thought that the Commander-in-Cheep and McCain were claiming that the danger, and the reason we were to stay in Iraq in perpituity, was to protect us from being attacked over here??
    They wouldn’t lie to us.
    Would they??

  • Comments are closed.