McCain’s lobbyist army

John McCain’s website tells visitors, “Too often the special interest lobbyists with the fattest wallets and best access carry the day.” It sounds like a compelling sentiment from a one-time reformer, and might even be impressive, just so long as you don’t peek behind the curtain.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) took a break from the presidential campaign trail in March to fly to a posh Utah ski resort, where he mingled with hundreds of top corporate executives assembled by J.P. Morgan Chase for its annual leadership conference.

McCain’s appearance at the Deer Valley event, arranged by J.P. Morgan Vice Chairman James B. Lee Jr., a top McCain fundraiser, put him in a room with the chief executives of companies such as General Electric, Xerox and Sony. It was, Lee said, “a chance for him to let them see him for who he is and possibly decide to support him.” The effort paid off: J.P. Morgan executives have donated $56,250 to McCain’s campaign, two-thirds of which came after his Utah appearance. And his visit there was quickly followed up by dozens of smaller private meetings with corporate executives in New York City arranged by leading Wall Street figures. […]

As a presidential candidate this year, McCain has found himself assiduously courting both lobbyists and their wealthy clients, offering them private audiences as part of his fundraising. He also counts more than 30 lobbyists among his chief fundraisers, more than any other presidential contender.

It’s certainly an awkward disconnect, isn’t it? McCain is a “reformer,” who rails against “special interests” and their “undue influence.” Ever since that Keating 5 unpleasantness a while back, McCain has positioned himself as the Republicans’ leading advocate of campaign-finance reform, denouncing colleagues who offer special access to donors in order to fill their campaign coffers.

And yet, there’s McCain, giving powerful corporate lobbyists and their clients high-priced private schmooze sessions at exclusive retreats.

If McCain’s persona was in line with his conduct, he’d probably be a more impressive candidate.

For that matter, let’s also not forget that McCain not only surrounds himself with lobbyist fundraisers; he’s also surrounded himself with lobbyist staffers.

John McCain, who made his name attacking special interests, has more lobbyists working on his staff or as advisers than any of his competitors, Republican or Democrat.

A Huffington Post examination of the campaigns of the top three presidential candidates in each party shows that lobbyists are playing key roles in both Democratic and Republican bids –although they are far more prevalent on the GOP side. But, all the campaigns pale in comparison to McCain’s, whose rhetoric stands in sharp contrast to his conduct.

“Too often the special interest lobbyists with the fattest wallets and best access carry the day when issues of public policy are being decided,” McCain asserts on his web site, declaring that he “has fought the ‘revolving door’ by which lawmakers and other influential officials leave their posts and become lobbyists for the special interests they have aided.”

In actual practice, at least two of McCain’s top advisers fit precisely the class of former elected officials he criticizes so sharply. On March 7, 2007, McCain named ex-Texas Representative Tom Loeffler, who has one of the most lucrative and influential practices in the nation’s capital, as his campaign co-chair. In the same month, McCain named former Washington Sen. Slade Gorton, now a heavyweight lobbyist, as his honorary chairman for Washington state.

Loeffler’s client list includes PhRMA, the drug industry association; Southwest Airlines; Toyota; and Martin Marietta. Gorton represents, among others, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp., Weyerhaeuser and Fidelity National Financial.

In addition, David Crane, now the campaign’s senior policy advisor, was a senior executive at The Washington Group, a firm with 2006 billings of $10.4 million and 52 clients, including Delta Airlines, the Association of American Railroads, and the governments of Panama and Bangladesh. And Charlie Black, who is now a campaign spokesman appearing on McCain’s behalf on radio, television, and as a “spin-doctor” after debates, is chairman of BKSH & Associates, with lobbying billings of $7.6 million in 2006, representing J.P. Morgan, Occidental and General Motors.

All told, there are 11 current or former lobbyists working for or advising McCain, at least double the number in any other campaign.

As is usually the case with McCain, the rhetoric doesn’t match the reality.

Sure, McCain is bad.
I could be outraged if many Democrats didn’t “schmooze” lobbyists and corporate types too.

Obama’s got lots of new individual donors.
Hopefully enough that he has a prayer of not needing to serve the corporate interests he took money from (They all did. except the longshots like Gravel and Kucinich)

That said, it’s McCain’s unfathomable support for the Iraq quagmire that gets me so puzzled. He lived through Vietnam. How can he support this carbon copy?
I figured he was doing it to get defense company money, but it never showed up. Was I right?

  • I am sure that McCain is the only one that is guilty of this right? I am also sure that McCain is the only one that you have the numbers on right at this moment when it comes to schmoozing also am I right? Of course I am and BTW you could not have picked a better blog name if you had tried, because it truelyy fits you.

  • Hello there:

    Please keep in mind that Senator McCain gave huge amounts of time in Town Hall formats to people who have zero influence – in terms of money. I have attended several town halls and have consistently left better informed – and often with a list of books (or places to find additional information) that he recommended during his discussions with voters – and they were discussions. None of his town hall formats called for the business of handing out questions in advance. He answered a broad array of questions – including the unusual questions that seem to waste time. He clearly communicated his concerns about our national security situation from his very first town hall, and all of his recommended literature (and cross references within) form a sound base for his most of his conclusions. He also talked about areas where he considered himself weak, but was willing to address that. It took courage to talk to so many of us – for so long. Please keep this in mind when you think that he is willing to commuicate only with those who pay.

  • Please give me a break. I enjoy reading the cb report but this attack to Mc is ridiculous. A candidate is not suppose to talk to CEOs? Ohh he went to a “posh” ski resort. Where do you think JP Morgan hosts conferences? Maybe you forgot who is the only candidate that actually did something for campaign reform. Trully dissapointed.

  • The point is that McCain rails against lobbyists, then hires them. He is a hypocrite, or he has initiated a mystical and unpublicized 12 point program to reform them all.

    Other candidates have hired lobbyists, but they have not spent a career riding the white horse of reform, as has McCain.

    As an aside, Krugman notes that although McCain voted against the Bush tax cuts in 2002 and 2003 on what were presented as principled grounds (deficit spending is not a conservative virtue) , he now says he did it because the tax cuts were not balanced by spending cuts. The cuts were always sold using the Republican fiction that tax cuts increase revenue,so the never required spending cuts. He spent no time rebutting that fiction at the time. He now wants to make the tax cuts them permanent, as if magically they are now virtuous..oh, he’s running for president..Republicans believe in the tooth fairy and revunue enhancement from tax cuts, so he better get in line for votes.

    A hypocrite.

  • There is nothing that McCain hasn’t pandered on, flip-flopped on, out and out lied about, or all those other wonderful traits of being the body politic. For those who are offended, deal with it. Your candidate has done nothing but say one thing to one group and the polar opposite to another. Do you actually listen to what he says or do you just want him as president for whatever reason?

    You’re missing what CB is saying. It’s not the fact that he met these people, it’s who’s doing what for him. Not exactly the most obscure point out there. Bought and owned just as many of the others are (on both sides of the aisle). But to say that you’re not highly leveraged (as it were) when you are, is just one more McCainism (added to his list of many).

    I can’t imagine how anyone could support him. To watch his pandering practically gives me whiplash and I find it patently disgusting. LISTEN to your candidate for goodness sake! If it takes an Einstein to hear his lies, our country is doomed beyond words. Nothing more needs to be said. It’s not like I even have to do any critical thinking…which I know is in short supply in the US of late. Just listen.

  • The point is that McCain consistently claims to be a crusader against influence-for-money politics. According to WaPo, his campaign manager, Rick Davis, says “There’s never been anybody who’s done more to rein in special interests and lobbyists than John McCain.” Yet has there ever been a time when they had more influence than during the first six years of the Bush Administration. So the question has to be, is he part of the solution or part of the problem. You can’t say neither (or “everybody does it) when it is so much a part of his sales pitch. This morning’s WaPo article also list several examples of actions he took that seem to be closely linked to specific donations. So is he really that much different from Bob Ney?

  • John McCain’s website tells visitors, “Too often the special interest lobbyists with the fattest wallets and best access carry the day.”

    Does it have an audio clip that says this in McCain’s wimpy-sounding, patronizing, calculated-to-make-him-sound-like-someone-who-gives-a-shit, tone?

    I should start using that tone with people at counters at stores…

  • McStain’s not a hypocrite. He’s a lying, mendacious, bag of crap. To be a hypocrite, you have to pretend to have principles which you then abandon for expediency.
    He’s NEVER had ‘principle.’
    He’s gonna end up on the Broder-esque “Unity ’08” ticket with Loserman.
    The two deserve one another.

  • Hey, he’s a Republican’t. He has to try and find money SOMEWHERE.

    Of course, all he had to do was invite the press and some real Americans (like Mrs. Perkins) to his meeting with these corporate bosses and it would have been fine.

    Assuming any of them would come…

  • RE: #4 “Maybe you forgot who is the only candidate that actually did something for campaign reform.”

    As I recall, that would be McCain-Feingold. I don’t recall Feingold schmoozing with lobbyists or accepting funds from them. I understand that he isn’t running for President, but wouldn’t that make it more incumbent upon McCain not to accept these funds (or better put, bribes)?

  • I think in this post Steve was trying not to operate with a double standard. If Obama or Edwards went to a posh place to schmooze with CEOs, every news channel out there would cover it and CNN would tsk tsk about it. The truth is that election campaigns are very expensive (and very long) and the money has to come from somewhere and there are always always strings attached. The way to end corporate control over the government is election reform. And that ain’t gonna happen in my lifetime.

  • On #11 He had the courage to push for reform (McCain-Feingold), when many pundits were saying that was political suicide for a republican to do so. Up to this date the WSJ editorial board only write negative things about Mc. because of his stand on campaign reform. Nothing wrong in my book to talk with CEOs when you also talk in town hall meetings to everyone and anyone (and let yourself open to ridicule to the youtube crowd). Of course, unless you think that what America needs is the outdated class war discourse of JE. All the best. Happy new year.

  • Comments are closed.