McCain’s message to far-right critics: ‘Calm down’

John McCain is not oblivious to his predicament: he’s the first presumptive Republican nominee in the modern era to ascend despite opposition from the party’s far-right base. Indeed, after a month of contests, McCain has done quite well without the support of conservatives and traditional GOP voters, much to the party’s consternation.

Going forward, the Arizona senator would clearly love to spend the next nine months with a united Republican machine behind him, but that’s obviously a tall order — hard-line conservatives like Rush Limbaugh, Rick Santorum, Tom DeLay, Ann Coulter, and James Dobson appear to loathe everything about him.

Today, McCain had a message for them: “Calm down.”

Boosted by his big night, John McCain asked his loudest conservative critics Wednesday to “calm down” and support his Republican presidential candidacy….

McCain was referring primarily to radio talk show hosts and other pundits of the right when he appealed for unity now that he has a leg up in the nomination race.

“I think they’ve made their case against me pretty eloquently,” he said, adding wryly, “if that’s the right word.” He asserted that the pundits’ conservative hero Ronald Reagan — and his — reached across the aisle to Democrats just like he wants to do as president.

“I do hope that at some point we would just calm down a little bit and see if there are areas that we can agree on for the good of the party and for the good of the country,” he said.

For what it’s worth, I doubt the anti-McCain contingent wants to be told to “calm down.” Indeed, as far as I can tell, when hysterical people are having a fit, the last thing they want to hear is the person they’re mad at telling them to “calm down.”

I’m curious, though, what McCain’s next move might be.

A few months ago, it looked as if the Democrats would pick a nominee fairly quickly, while a divided Republican party would fight on through the spring. Now, the landscape appears to have been reversed. It’s unexpected, but this offers McCain an opportunity: now he has time to convince angry right-wing leaders that he’d be a reliable ally in the White House, while Dems fight it out amongst themselves.

But this is risky, too, isn’t it? For decades, GOP candidates have followed an overly-simplified adage: run to the right during the primaries, run to the middle during the general election.

And yet, McCain seems to be in a position in which he’s poised to do the opposite. He’s let Romney and McCain fight it out on the right, but now that he has what appears to be an insurmountable lead, he has to double-back — assuring Limbaugh and Malkin that he’ll be a conservative Republican if elected.

This, of course, would be a welcome development for Dems, who want to convince Americans that McCain’s reputation as a moderate is completely unfounded. The more he moves to the right to heal the party’s rifts, the easier it will be for the Democratic nominee to pick up independents who want a break from eight years of Republican failures.

There’s one possibility that would be the most fun of all: McCain could forget about pleasing the base and just Sister Souljah the whole lot of them. The senator may do the math and figure that the unhinged far-right that takes Coulter, Dobson, and Limbaugh seriously isn’t worth the effort, and their attacks make him appear more moderate anyway. In this scenario, he blasts them all as “agents of intolerance,” figuring there are more votes in the middle than the right-wing. (This would increase the chances of the far-right running some kind of third-party candidate, which would be even more hilarious.)

It should be interesting.

And yet, McCain seems to be in a position in which he’s poised to do the opposite. He’s let Romney and McCain fight it out on the right

That’s quite a subtle strategy!

  • “He’s let Romney and McCain fight it out on the right…”

    You meant to say Romney and Huckabee, I assume?

  • Gee, you might think that the only thing that could unite them behind McCain is some kind of opposition candidate that they hate even more. Luckily, we don’t have a candidate like that to choose from… oh wait…

  • McCain seems to be winning with thirty-some-odd percent of the vote in each contest he wins. I don’t think that he’s won a plurality in any of them. He may just decide to dump the 28 percenters (Who will probably never vote for him anyway) and run as the “change” candidate on the Republican side. If he takes on Huckabee as his VP choice then the general election may not be the walk in the park that the Democrats expect.

  • I’m curious, though, what McCain’s next move might be.

    There is a web poll on his site that will actually let you help pick his next move:

    1.) It’s too loud, turn it down.
    2.) Hug Bush.
    3.) Consider defecting to the Democrats.
    4.) Sound the whistle on the Straight Talk Express!
    5.) Where am I?
    6.) Bomb Iran.
    7.) Make up a song about option six.
    8.) Find a group of meddling kids to pull off Ann Coulter’s mask revealing the evil kidnapper hidden within.
    9.) Announce Joe Lieberman as his running mate.
    10.) Depends.

  • What Doug said.

    IMO McCain is probably counting on Clinton winning the Dem primary and the lapdog media doing his work for him, dredging up all the Clinton baggage for her to deal with and laying the “maverick” BS on him.

    If Obama wins McCain’s goons will have a real hard time playing the race card, because McCain’s own daughter is colored.

    As for the wingnuts who hate McCain, I don’t care what they say, if Clinton is there to vote against they’ll show up at the polls.

  • Your hilarious scenario would prove interesting inasmuch as the far-right is always good at threatening to find and endorse a third-party candidate to keep the potential candidates in the ass-kissing line. In fact, they’re usually pretty smug when they issue these kinds of threats, because NOBODY ever pushes them away. The threat’s always been enough. Look, McCain is the presumptive nominee; I want to see prominent neo-cons saying “I am, without a doubt, going to run for President if that man is my party’s nominee, because then it won’t be my party anymore anyway.” That hasn’t happened. Hell if he hadn’t been so eager (for him, anyway), this would’ve been the time for Fred Thompson to have been “drafted” into a third party. That babyish need to have a father figure who looks and sounds stereotypically “presidential” (as opposed to, you know, someone who can do the job) would’ve drawn at least some support. Worst case scenario, they would’ve split the Republican Party which is facing an uphill battle anyway, the Dem candidate gets in The White House and the GOP, humbled, returns to the far-right eager to make nice and never have dinner late on the table ever again. That opportunity is blown, but there still could be, SHOULD be, far-right blowhards swearing that they’re throwing their hat in the ring. The Bloomberg tow-in-the-water approach was hogwash, mainly because at the time, Mitt looked more like The Guy. Mods who would’ve voted for McCain, would just switch over to the Dems had Mitt been the designated nominee. Mods have that option in a Mitt scenario, but the neocons have NO options in a McCain scenario. Not yet anyway. And unless/until someone comes out and throws the gauntlet down, don’t anyone believe a word of the chickensh!t crying coming from the neocon circles. They’ll fall in lockstep (you know, like jackboots) behind McCain, because they want to win and he’s their best chance.

  • It’s about time the GOP pulled back from the lunatic fringe of haters and realized what McCain stands for is true Conservativism. Many don’t realize Reagan himself was originally a Dem who became disillusioned with FDR, that’s the true Reagan legacy, he was a centerist who believed in one America. Does anybody besides me remember where they were when the announcement was made that the hostages were being released? How about when the words were uttered “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall…”

    McCain has the power to bring us more such moments, because he understands America, not just Dobsons corner of it, not just Limbaugh’s audience, not only the Dems like Kennedy who are flocking to Obama because they are sick of the machine they built themselves… we need a President over all of America… and McCain is that candidate!

  • McCain could forget about pleasing the base and just Sister Souljah the whole lot of them. The senator may do the math and figure that the unhinged far-right that takes Coulter, Dobson, and Limbaugh seriously isn’t worth the effort, and their attacks make him appear more moderate anyway. In this scenario, he blasts them all as “agents of intolerance,” figuring there are more votes in the middle than the right-wing.

    Unlikely at this point. I’m sure McCain can do the math and see that without the far-right fringe he probably doesn’t win at all against either Clinton or Obama. With the rabid base turning out for him he might stand a shot – provided he can keep the illusion of moderation around him and can convince the rabid right that he’s for unending war in Iraq while convincing the rest of the country that he’s for “Peace With Honor” or whatever slogan his ad guys come up with to sell “unending war in Iraq”.

    Without the base, though, the enthusiasm on the Dem side is going to overwhelm him. Even with an ugly campaign to depress Dem voter turnout. He actually does need at least a portion of that crowd to come over to his side and actively work to get him elected. Sadly, Clinton as the Dem nominee probably will help “convince” a number of them to help him out. But also sadly, I suspect that the idea of a black man as president would “convince” a different (but probably equally large) subset to help him out too.

    I mean, I’d like to see him repudiate the rabid right and try to run a campaign without them. But he’d lose. And McCain has never in his political career chosen principles over longer-term political victory, so I don’t see why he would now.

  • bullfrog (8) True conservative? Would that be when he was for a comprehensive immigration reform, or when the polls told him to denounce it? When he was for the Law of the Sea, or when he was against it? When he co-sponsored the Dream Act, or when he voted against it? When he gave his name to McCain-Feingold, or now? When he spoke out against a continued presence in Somalia and demanded a timetable for withdrawl, or now? Or do you merely define “conservatism” like the National Journal, where it seems to mean aligned with the whims of the Republican party at any given moment? I’m not even sure he passes with that definition.

  • Romney turned Olympic from millions of lost to $100 million profit. That’s not just saying. That is the results!
    Search youtube about McCain, you would find a lot of damaging videos including POW records. Nobody is perfect. I am looking at the person who is best for our country right now.

    Romney’s lost is due to the Washington style dirty political tricks. First in Florida to layout wrong charge before election. If McCain and Huckabee are coordinating, it should be unlawful. Since the election is not supposed to be two candidates coordinating against one candidate.

    After Huckabee’s Iowa win, Huckabee told McCain, “Now it’s your turn to kick Romney’s ass”

    Before Huckabee’s surprising turnaround at the convention, McCain delegates told FOX News they had been instructed by the campaign to throw their support to Huckabee.

    If this is the way politics works, then next time any candidates could send a few more of their sorogates as candidates to meddle their way to victory. McCain and Huckabee are complete disgrace and dishonest. If they are nominee, they will never be a president, because democrats can play dirty tricks with more intelligence than these two loosers.

  • Clearly, McCain has to perform oral sex on Vice President Cheney while a Saudi Prince provides the cigar. And he’ll have to promise to kill Saddam again while wiretapping Democratic party leaders and offering no-bid contracts to coal and chemical companies and GD Searle Pharmaceuticals.

    For starters.

    And no, this isn’t satire anymore.

  • There’s an amazing parallel between Ronald Reagan and the Prophet Mohammad (BBHN). After their deaths there was a struggle for who gets to define what they actually stand for.

    McCain is in one group who claim to know the Prophet Ronald’s true teachings. This is the Shiite equivalent, because it’s based on the views of his widow Nancy Reagan (stem cell research, etc.). Much like the family of Mohammad claimed to know his true teachings.

    Then there is another group based on his White House staff, lead by James Baker, who claim they know the true teachings of the Prophet Ronald. They are the parallel to the Sunnis. Notice that James Baker was instrumental in getting BGII elected in 2000.

    So both sides claim the Prophet Ronald, and like all religious schisms, the people they hate the most are each other (rather than pagans like us who don’t revere Reagan at all).

  • Kevin Hayden @ 12, I’d add that he needs to promise to sow the US/Mexico border with anti-personnel mines, issue shoot-on-sight orders to the Border Patrol, swear that he will devote the entire US Special Forces to capturing Osama bin Laden and that he will personally waterboard OBL on network television.

  • I will not…I repeat, can not support John McCain…The Republicans have committed suicide. The Democrats are nothing but Anti-American Communists/Socialists and the Republicans are trying to copy them by being Democrats-Lite. I will go to the Constitution Party or the Libertarian Party and sadly watch as the rest of America deteriorates from within. Maybe we will wake up one day…Freedom has never been so close to slipping from our grasp. The Founders would be ashamed for us.

  • Romney friend Jane at 11 said: ” Search youtube about McCain, you would find a lot of damaging videos including POW records. Nobody is perfect. I am looking at the person who is best for our country right now.”

    Wow, with friends like you. . .

  • If you combine Danp’s and Lance’s comments, it’s easy to understand the conservative angst with this Republican primary and election. Conservatives were supposed to kick-ass on foreign policy and not let wars drag on forever and sap our economic and military might. Conservatives were supposed to be the poster kids of American exceptionalism and not watch as our national prestige goes down the tubes. Conservatives were supposed to be good with the economy and not have the end of yet another republican presidency end in a recession. Conservatives weren’t supposed to be corrupt, incompetent and shouldn’t let the government keep expanding under their regimes — and Bush did all three.

    Their myth is gone and Reagan is dead and the newest generation of voters so hyped on Obama weren’t even born when St. Ronnie left office. Fact is no one knows what the hell conservatism stands for anymore and the term is ripe to be recast as a pejorative, just as liberal was transformed into a dirty word when it stood for the shenanigans of the Jim Wright era.

  • I think the Hillary Hatred is overstated. Slate (XX Factor) wrote about a poll yesterday showing that among those identifying themselves as “born again Christians” HRC was the leading candidate, followed by Obama, and then the Repubs start showing up. As Hanna Rosin, an editor at The Atlantic, also wrote on the XX Factor blog:

    I have been operating under the assumption that vast swaths of red America hate Hillary. But she won in Tennessee and Oklahoma. She won among less-educated white men. She cleaned up with women. That, combined with that Barna study I cited yesterday saying born-agains prefer Hillary to all other candidates. Is Hillary hatred no more?

    Again, I’d love to see new polling on her negatives – the last polling I saw several months ago suggested the hate meme might be overworked, and I am betting that her debate performances, apparent red state acceptance, etc. have helped her improve since then. As long as Bill doesn’t do anything to really stir the hornet’s nest, I’m not sure Hillary has the same power to polarize that she once did.

  • It breaks down like this…Choices”

    Obama and Hillery…socialist power hungry scum
    McCain and Huckabee…neo-con-power hungry scum

    American freedom lovers=doomed….Way to fall for the lies people.

  • Romney is not a politician so he doesn’t have the slick delivery others do. The politicians have messed things up…including McCain. We need a change and I think Romney’s the one. He can work with world leaders and will impress them instead of yelling at them with four-letter words like McCain.

    Romney took no pay from Massachusetts and only $1 from the Olympics. He’s spending his own money on the race. I believe he wants this job not for power or money, but to be of service to our country. I support him.

    Mitt Romney’s successful business experience, successful Olympic experience, and successful state governing success set him above all other candidates. His vision of using economic strength to combat terrorist and his Apollo plan for energy independence are also set him above all other candidates. He is a real leader who can lead American to build a strong economic and therefore a strong nation! Hope American people will elect Mitt Romney, the only competent candidate, to be our president.
    How could any moderates and liberals backs war monger McCain. McCain wants to bomb Iran and stay in Iraq for 100 years and promised for more wars. McCain says he wants interest rates to be ZERO out of complete ignorance for how interest rates affect the economy. I’d like to see him say that to retirees on a fixed income. McCain want 20 million illegal immigrants to stay permanently and legal immigrants who can vote do not support it. How could this country be secure if he is in power??? If McCain is nominee, as a republican I would rather vote Clinton than McCain. As least we know Clinton has some intelligence and lead the booming economic. McCain will lead this country to a total ruin with his lack of intelligence and no executive experience. Mitt Romney is an expert in economics and finance and is the man we need as president.

    If anyone can rescue the economy at this point, it would have to be Mitt. The US is $53 trillion in debt, that is $400K per household. The dollar is becoming useless and the Euro is now becoming the credible currency. Along with the national debt, most citizens are also deeply in debt. Tommorow the market is likely going to take a dump. If we don’t have a good economy you can forget foreign policy, fighting wars, or healthcare, funding for top education. The economy needs to be front and center, not religion, steriotypes and other trivial things.

    It’s time to remind the public about the Keating 5. Here the banks are falling appart and the economy is going into recession and we want to reward a slime ball like McCain who was wrapped up with Charles Keating, the guy who tanked Lincoln Savings & Loan, driving a previous recession? Go figure. Given what this did to the economy in the early 90’s, McCain should have just taken a baseball bat to the knee caps of the American people. Mitt is too kind to this power hungry geriatric sellout!
    John McCain has allowed countless billions of American dollars to be siphoned out of this country into Mexico alongside the countless billions of taxpayer dollars spent on health care, education, welfare, crime and mortgage bailouts for illegal aliens. John McCain, in his support for illegal immigration, has allowed Al Qaeda terrorist to use Mexican drug smuggling tunnels to enter the United States and plot to attack Fort Huachuca in southern Arizona. This litany of positions contrary to conservatism and American interests could go on and on.

  • “McCain could forget about pleasing the base and just Sister Souljah the whole lot of them.”

    That would be friggin’ beautiful. Cut off the gangrenous limb and move on. Not that I’m a fan of McCain, but wouldn’t it be nice to see any candidate treat the lunatic fringe as the dangerous and unstable freaks that they are?

  • There is nothing wrong to change message or mind. Do you know any candidate or any people who never change mind?
    We need a leader to listen to American people, not a stubborn dictator who does not care what American think.
    Romney’s vision of using economic strength to combat terrorists, to change the heart and mind of the Muslim world so they will reject violence and embrace peace and prosperity. You can not conquer the world with more and more troops and violence.
    If we do not have solid economic to backup, you would have no means to fight. Romney’s Apollo plan for energy independence are also set him above all other candidates.

  • A side note: for the record, Joe Lieberman has said that he will not accept the Vice Presidential nomination even if McCain offers it. So, at least that point is moot.

    My guess is, McCain will have to pick some fundee as VP in order to placate that faction of the base. My hope now is that Huckabee goes on to win enough delegates to force McCain to pick him. Unlike, say, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, who, while a wingnut, can come off as a reasonable guy (and thus dupe the American public,) Huckabee is visibly off his rocker. His presence on a McCain ticket might energize the bible thumpers, but it’ll scare off the independents in droves.

  • Hi Zeitgeist,

    Aren’t Charles and Jane just fascinating reads? They really need to spend more time reading the site and getting a sense of our community before they drop in and lay down comments.

    That is, if they actually expect to persuade anybody.

    Charles, Jane, we’re PROGRESSIVES here. You aren’t going to sell us on Romney or Ron Paul that way. You aren’t even going to convince us that both Obama and Clinton are the Anti-Christ.

    One or the other now…

    Find one thing that sells you candidate with us and maybe you have a chance. But for Ron Paul, we have anti-war, pro-freedom candidates.

    As for Romney, we have pro-economy candidates, and ones who care about the lower classes, not the upper classes.

    Take a breath and try again children.

  • Good points Danp (10), I’m sure HillBilly and Obama will use all of them… since I’m not a McCain fan, I’ll leave it to others to argue it out with you… I voted for Ron Paul, realizing it wouldn’t make any difference, but that’s what my conscience dictated…

    Here’s the fact, Reagan left the Dem’s after the 62 election (previously I said he was disillusioned with FDR, I stand corrected). McCain did something with McCain Feingold and Immigration Reform that Reagan would have done; it’s called “crossing the aisle”. So many of the Rabid Right consider working with the Dems to be a betrayal, when in fact, it’s good governance, putting the needs of the country ahead of the wants of the special interests, and the wingnuts as somebody called them, are a special interest…

    If you’re so incensed about immigration reform, (and many GOP members are) what are your solutions? Ron Paul wants to kick them all out (I disagree with him on that point), Huck wants to ignore them (I live in Arkansas, believe me Huck won’t do anything about this issue), McCain wants to legalize them; I don’t like having criminals among us, but I don’t wanna’ pay 8 bucks per pound for chicken either… if it’s all so cut and dried, why is the problem still here???

    Reagan would point out — that’s a statement about America, people worldwide still dream of living here! We need to work out a plan and quit demanding “all or nothing” solutions that don’t work in the real world.

  • From other site:

    Check my Top Ten Reasons for “supporting” McCain, the big phony:

    1. He promises to catch Osama Bin Laden. Question is, if he does catch him, will he then fine him $3000, grant him amnesty, and give him a lifetime Z-Visa? Probably, but only if Ted Kennedy agrees to it.

    2. McCain claims that he is the only real conservative because when he participated in a spelling bee in grade school, he was asked to spell that very word. McCain proudly remembers yelling out: “conservative, L-I-B-E-R-A-L “

    3. He claims to know everything about the economy but won’t respond to any questions about it. That’s OK because he says that he can always hire managers.

    4. The answer to every question he is asked in a debate, regardless of the topic, is “I’m strong on Iraq.” He says this simplifies things and then proudly claims that he is above answering any of these questions anyway because he (and any legislation he would propose) is the only answer to any problem that could ever arise in America.

    5. The word Amnesty doesn’t exist in his vocabulary. Therefore, there can be no such thing as granting amnesty to anyone.

    6. He claims that Ronald Reagan would strongly support him because, just as Al Gore invented the internet, McCain invented the conservative movement.

    7. If he is elected, McCain promises to finally stop saying “listen, my friends” before responding to any question.

    8. McCain acknowledges that he is no Jack LaLane, but states that his age shouldn’t matter because he will promise to get brain scans once a week, if elected.

    9. McCain promises that he will continue to “reach out” to the most extreme liberal Democrats, like Feingold and Kennedy, so he doesn’t appear to be too conservative.

    10. Finally, my favorite. Bill Clinton says that a Hillary/McCain contest would be the most civil in the history of the US. To prove Bill correct, McCain promises to hold hands with Hillary across the podiums every time they debate. Bill says that’s OK with him because he can go out and chase another fat chick while they’re debating.

    Had enough?? Then vote for Romney!!!! Go MITT!!!!

  • What are all the senator candidates qualifications for pro-economic?
    Did they ever run any company, states or anything? Do they understand how market economic works and how to create jobs, other than handing out your tax money to lazy people to make them more dependent on the government handouts?
    The only candidate who created a lot of jobs in business world is Mit Romney. The only way to help low income people is to offer them opportunities and jobs so that they can unleash their own potential. A couple of handouts do not offer life that people deserves.

  • Just a thought, but if the voters are choosing McCain but the “party stalwarts” with the biggest mouths and the sticks up … well, anyway, these critics from the right don’t want McCain, doesn’t that suggest that they are … oh, how should I put this … out of touch with the mainstream? Yet another bit of Republican irony

  • Has it occurred to you that perhaps Limbaugh, Coulter, etc. know perfectly well how far right McCain is, but they’re attacking him precisely because their condemnation makes him a more palatable mainstream candidate?

  • Jane…Jane…You’re fun. Please keep in mind Romney is the one who wants to “double Gitmo”…backs torture and executive privilege complete with signing statements that allow him to ignore congress or the laws they make. Romney didn’t need to take money from Mass. because he has so much money that pay was not an issue. I guess he just needed a break from taking over corps…laying off the employees and then selling it at a profit. The wealth his father made from the inside knowledge gotten from government rubbed off on his son. A good business man who knows how to make that kind of profit should stay out of government but they can’t help themselves because the insider info and the lobbying to get you business deals through is too much of a temptation. Romney has already admitted he will be dictator CEO of America, who will imprison and torture all people he thinks ‘might’ be a terrorist or terrorist supporter.

    Romney is the one who needs to be regulated. His brand of unregulated capitalism will make certain people billionaires and impoverish the rest of us. If we pay ’em a dime then they ain’t slaves. Of course Romney will reduce military spending by billions while keeping us committed to the civil war in Iraq…I just know he will, ’cause look at the millions he’s made…that must mean he knows how to handle money.
    McCain’s insane and Romney’s a zombie. The GOP choices just suk this electiion

  • ***Charles comment 15*** Here’s a tip for ya’. If you wake up in a room with 99 insane people…who’s really insane. The fact that no one agrees with you and you sound like the bag lady getting her coat back under a bridge from her neighbor’s grocery cart please don’t expect anyone to take you seriously or think you have any insight. Maybe you should take your pet mouse and piece of felt over to another site….Just saying…(democrats are anti-American?)

  • There’s one possibility that one [might?] be the most fun of all: McCain could forget about pleasing the base and just Sister Souljah the whole lot of them.

    As a (? I never know when to use/not use the indefinite and definite articles; Polish doesn’t have them) strategy, it wouldn’t differ much from the “whistle past Dixie” proposal — which had been so enthusiastically embraced here, on CBR, not too long ago — would it? And it might work for him equally well: just within the realm of possibility, but not giving him any margin of comfort.

    So, I think he’ll go with “choice #1” and continue to pander to the “base” as much as possible. He’s already left himself an “out” in regard to so-called “moderates”, when one of his minions said that his heart wasn’t in it.

    Regarding Jane’s postings (11, 21, 28 & 29). My memory may not be what it used to be 40yrs ago, but I do remember the very same — word-for-word and mistake-for-mistake — drivel posted here a couple of weeks ago. Thus fortifying the idea that not only is Romney a robot, but his shills are robot-clones as well.

  • There’s one possibility that one be the most fun of all: McCain could forget about pleasing the base and just Sister Souljah the whole lot of them. The senator may do the math and figure that the unhinged far-right that takes Coulter, Dobson, and Limbaugh seriously isn’t worth the effort, and their attacks make him appear more moderate anyway. In this scenario, he blasts them all as “agents of intolerance,” figuring there are more votes in the middle than the right-wing. (This would increase the chances of the far-right running some kind of third-party candidate, which would be even more hilarious.)

    Given that doing this would result in the destruction of “Movement Conservatism” as we know it, with lots and lots of the sheeple leaving in disgust and dismay, it would be wonderful. Leave all the unreconstructed Confederates, the freelance racists, the stormtrooper-wannabees stumbling around with a bad hangover.

    Go McCain! Do it!!!

    (I wish)

  • What are all the senator candidates qualifications for pro-economic?
    Did they ever run any company, states or anything? Do they understand how market economic works and how to create jobs, other than handing out your tax money to lazy people to make them more dependent on the government handouts?
    The only candidate who created a lot of jobs in business world is Mitt Romney. The only way to help low income people is to offer them opportunities and jobs so that they can unleash their own potential. A couple of handouts do not offer the life that people deserve.

    Romney turned Olympic from millions of lost to $100 million profit. And he know how to balance government budget.

    Romney buy failed company, restructure them and return it to profitable, so that company can hire more people and create more jobs. He provided thousands of jobs like Sports Authority, Staples, etc. What would senators do with failed company or government? Keep everyone on the job without pay? Since the failed company would have no money to pay, there is no choice but layoff people so that they can return to profit and hire again, even I got layoff before. That’s how market economics works. Do not belittle business leaders like Romney who provide 80% economic for this country. That is what McCain and Huckabeast tried to belittle business people. .

  • Jane, the issue with Romney’s business experience is that the federal government isn’t a business and cannot be successfully run like one. And indeed, his record as governer is a mediocre one.

    The angry conservatives who took over the House in 1994 claim to have done so in part with intent to run the government like a business. The result? Didn’t work. Ironically, in business terms, they formed a union and went on strike, which was ultimately settled by public opinion turning against them. Good job, angry conservatives.

  • I am not angry conservative, but independent and concerned citizen. I will never vote for war monger McCain. If McCain win I will vote for Clinton.
    The government do need to run like business so they do not spend when there is no money left, not to print more money and bankrupt the country.
    The National Debt has continued to increase an average of $1.43 billion per day since September 29, 2006! In Fiscal Year 2006, the U. S. Government spent $406 Billion of your money on interest payments* to the holders of the National Debt. Compare that to NASA at $15 Billion, Education at $61 Billion, and Department of Transportation at $56 Billion. US is facing economic collapse if we do not have the economic genius Romney to fix it.
    Wake up American people!

  • Jane said: “I am not angry conservative, but independent and concerned citizen. I will never vote for war monger McCain. If McCain win I will vote for Clinton.”

    That’s a little better.

    Now, the thing about Romney is that High Capitalists, like him, think they can run economies. Unfortunately, the way they run things gets lots of regular people laid off. So in fact his resume and accomplishments are not positives, but negatives to anyone who’s lived through the last seven years of an MBA Presidency.

    Keep trying.

  • Comments are closed.