At first blush, this report in the New York Sun seems to have very little relevance to the presidential campaign.
Republican or Democrat, will make a Syrian-Israeli peace agreement a priority only if the two sides, meeting now in Turkey, make substantial progress before the inauguration.
That is what a foreign policy adviser to Senator Obama told Syria’s foreign minister last month while on a visit to Damascus. While the trip was not connected to the Obama campaign
, Daniel Kurtzer nonetheless provided Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem with some advice of his own.
“I urged him to move ahead in the Israel-Syria negotiations as much as possible so that whoever is the next president would not start from too far down the track,” Mr. Kurtzer, a former American ambassador to Israel, said yesterday in a phone interview. “I did not say anything about Obama or McCain. I said whoever is the next president is not going to want to inherit a process that isn’t going anywhere.”
Kurtzer was in Damascus for a law conference, he wasn’t representing Obama in any way, he isn’t even a paid member of Obama’s staff, and he’s in no way authorized by anyone to engage in any kind of official diplomacy a foreign government. He’s just a former ambassador with some friendly (and fairly obvious) words of advice for Syrian officials.
Nevertheless, a McCain campaign source told Greg Sargent the Republican campaign is poised to jump on this as evidence of … well, something nefarious. Indeed, it appears that Rudy Giuliani will help lead the outraged mob, which will denounce “an Obama campaign Middle East adviser” traveling to Damascus “for meetings with Syrian officials.”
If the McCain gang really wants to go down this road, let them. It’ll give the Obama campaign an opportunity to remind everyone how ridiculous McCain’s policy towards Syria has been.
There are two possible approaches here. The McCain campaign could try to argue that Obama is trying to conduct diplomacy before getting elected. This, of course, would be ridiculous — Obama didn’t send Kurtzer, Kurtzer doesn’t represent Obama, and Kurtzer isn’t engaged in diplomatic work. If that’s the charge, it’s just rather silly.
It’s more likely, though, that the McCain campaign will insist that Obama and his advisors support diplomacy with a state sponsor of terror. I actually hope they do make this argument.
Talking to Syria is not exactly new. In 1990 and 1991
, Syria was considered a state sponsor of terrorism, but then-Secretary of State James Baker made 16 trips to Damascus, the last of which paid real dividends — “Syria changed 25 years of policy and agreed for the first time in the history to sit at the table with Israel, which is what Israel wanted at the time.” McCain did not denounce H.W. Bush for engaging Syria, nor did he condemn Baker for the trips.
More to the point, McCain personally supported engagement with Syria, despite his belief that the country is a state sponsor of terrorism.
After the invasion of Iraq there was much talk among conservatives about invading Syria. Then Secretary of State Colin Powell was heavily criticized for taking a trip to Syria to talk to its leadership. Newt Gingrich said
, “The concept of the American secretary of state going to Damascus to meet with a terrorist-supporting, secret-police-wielding dictator is ludicrous.”
What did John McCain have to say about the trip? Despite the fact that John McCain believed that Syria was a “state sponsor of terror
,” was “harboring terrorists,” and were sending “Syrians in to fight Americans,” he thought it was worth talking to them, saying that Powell’s trip was “appropriate.” […]
McCain is directly contradicting himself by attacking Senator Obama on his plan to confront Iran at the negotiating table. A pattern is emerging. While McCain claims to be a deep foreign policy thinker with positions carefully developed from his quarter century in Washington, the reality seems to be that his positions — when not outright crazy — are often knee-jerk and contradictory — often dictated by what his temperament is at that moment or influenced by how the political winds are moving.
Administrations from both parties have talked to Syria. Israel is talking to Syria. The Bush administration has backed away from its opposition to talking to Syria. Obama wants to talk to Syria.
And then, there’s John McCain, to the right of everybody, including one of his own former personas.
The McCain gang really wants to talk about Kurtzer? Great. Let’s use this as an opportunity to talk about McCain’s foreign policy incoherence and dramatic flip-flops.