McCain’s top lobbying problem sits atop his campaign

Following up on an earlier item, the McCain campaign has had to get rid of its convention manager, one of its national finance co-chairs, a regional campaign manager, and a senior aide, all within the last week, and all because they were lobbyists discovered to have worked for controversial clients, most notably Burma’s military junta.

But if McCain is just now starting to realize the problems associated with lobbyists with scandalous client lists running his campaign, he may have little choice but to get rid of Charles Black, McCain’s senior campaign strategist and chief political advisor. Black, in other words, is McCain’s Karl Rove. MoveOn.org’s political action fund is running a powerful and accurate ad that’s hard to respond to:

The irony, of course, is that ol’ Charlie was on Fox News this week blasting Obama for his willingness to meet with unsavory characters who run rival nations. Black hasn’t just met with a motley international crew; he’s represented them as their lobbyists and cashed quite a few of their checks.

Black’s client list includes (but by no means limited to) Iraq/Iran’s Ahmad Chalabi, Mobutu Sese Seko, Ferdinand Marcos, Somalia’s Mohamed Siad Barre, Nigeria’s Ibrahim Babangida, and Angola’s would-be dictator Jonas Savimbi.

But it’s the Mobutu connection that may be the most offensive of all.

Black boasts of his lobbying work, “I’m not ashamed of anything the firm did.” Matt Yglesias argues he should be.

There’s no question that helping the Mobutu regime in Zaire was something the American governments of the time were okay with. But anyone who had anything to do with aiding Mobutu and isn’t ashamed of it really needs to get his conscience replaced. I highly recommend Michela Wrong’s book, In the Footsteps of Mr Kurtz: Living on the Brink of Disaster in Mobutu’s Congo. American support for Mobutu was an enterprise that involved a lot of people over a long period of time, so Black’s hardly the only one with something to be ashamed of, but he really ought to be ashamed.

I’d just add two things. First, Black has argued that his work on behalf of thugs and authoritarian tyrants is justified because the dictators were not necessarily rejected by the U.S. government at the time. Except, as Christopher Orr explained, this doesn’t make for much of a coherent explanation: “[C]laiming that you only worked for dictators the U.S. government liked is not much of a defense when a central part of your job was convincing the U.S. government to like them. It’s a little like saying, yes, I made a ton of money defending a series of murderous mafiosi — but remember, I always quit working for them once they were convicted.”

And second, Black and the McCain campaign are arguing this was all in the past, and no longer relevant. “I’m a retired lobbyist,” Black says. It’s worth noting, then, that as recently as March, Black wore two hats at the same time — McCain’s senior strategist, and active lobbyist. In fact, he was doing client work from the back of the McCain campaign bus.

If McCain is serious about cleaning up his house, and getting his internal lobbying mess straightened out, Black is going to have to go.

With nearly six months to go before the election, the stink that attaches to John Sidney McCain III is sure to be noticed in every corner of the United States. It’s so bad that even the mainstream media can’t ignore it forever. What kind of coattails is McCain going to have for Republican congresscritters to ride in on?

It’s not a good year to be a Republican. Not at all.

Keep it coming, Mr. Carpetbagger. We’re looking towards a historic landslide here. The Republican party might even have to go completely out of business like the 19th-century Whigs. (I can dream, can’t I?)

  • The Republican party might even have to go completely out of business like the 19th-century Whigs.

    Actually – the repug party IS THE WHIGS – they became totally unelectable, largely due to corruption, and re-branded themselves REPUBLICAN.

    What many fail to realize is that the economic interests that created dur chimpfurher are not going away – in fact, because we focus on the morons in front of the camera we let the bigger crooks off the hook.

    They regroup, find news tools for their candidates, or even rebrand their party of corruption.

  • I see all the ironies – and horrors – pointed out by the ad, but I don’t think the ad is effective because it appears to be making the same “guilt by association” argument that people simply aren’t buying this year. The ad’s angle is: Black did bad things and is still McCain’s friend. That is not that different from: Wright did stupid things and Obama kept going to his church.

    If this is going to work – and it should – the people discussing this will have to go deeper than guilt by association. I love reading your work on this, CB, and I hope that people will find ways to encapsulate the deep hypocrisy of the McCain campaign in a more effective, visceral way. This ad was effective and nothing if not visceral – but only at showing that Charlie Black has no morals. It does not point out what about this makes McCain himself unelectable. In fact, that suggestions is that McCain can come clean just by firing Black. I don’t think that’s the right road to go down.

  • Sorry, correction: In fact, the suggestion is that McCain can come clean just by firing Black. I don’t think that’s the right road to go down.

  • Let’s not forget that Black was the one who arranged the clearly treasonous “crowning” of Rev. Sun Myung Moon as King of America in a Senate building.

    Charlie Black is a traitor, plain and simple. He should be tried as such, and if found guilty, should be hanged. Crowning a King of America cannot be considered anything but treason.

  • McCain’t is just doing charitable work — running a half-way house for lobbyists, trying to reform them…

  • Superficially getting rid of Black is a minor victory, assuming he doesn’t just go behind the curtain. Really getting rid of a chief strategist does unsettle a campaign, and of course such a person has to be replaced. Constantly disrupting a campaign staff is an effective strategy to keep them off balance, and since McSame is not very balanced to begin with an ongoing staff shakeup would probably unhinge his temper. The MSM will cover for him as they have all along. Corporate American wants McSame and their paid mouthpieces are busy at work.

  • PJ@4.

    Last time I looked, Reverend Wright wasn’t running Obama’s campaign. And I think there is a qualitative difference between a lobbyist, whose job it is to funnel corporate money and influence to a candidate and a pastor who’s a verbal loose cannon. The former is corruption waiting to happen and the latter is simply an embarrassment. Of course, Republican see it the opposite way: lobbyists controlling political campaigns are business as usual, but Wright’s intemperate rhetoric is a threat to the very foundations of our democracy. If American voters fall for that, they deserve McBush.

  • Comments are closed.