McClellan doesn’t have answers

White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan hosted his first formal press briefing in a month today. I’ll give you one guess what the press corps wanted to discuss.

There was, however, one exchange that stood out.

Q: Scott, there’s already a line of discussion going on about the funding of projects prior to this, whether projects in New Orleans, in particular, were under funded because of the Iraq war or for other reasons. Is there a — do you find any of this criticism legitimate? Do you think there is any second-guessing to be done now about priorities, given that the New Orleans situation was sort of obvious to a lot of the experts?

McClellan: As I indicated, this is not a time for politics. This is a time for the nation to come together and help those in the Gulf Coast region. And that’s where our focus is. This is not a time for finger-pointing or playing politics.

There’s some merit to the argument — a family stranded on top of a building right now probably isn’t thinking about the Army Corps of Engineers’ budget — but I’m afraid McClellan is missing the point. This isn’t about politics; it’s about some semblance of accountability.

When a catastrophe hits, it’s not unreasonable to ask a few fundamental questions, such as, were we prepared? Did our leaders prioritize well? Were the leaders’ decisions effective? Was the crisis itself preventable? One man’s “finger-pointing” is another man’s drive to understand how and why events have unfolded as they have.

The Q-and-A at the White House today didn’t get any better.

Q: I’m talking about policy. I’m talking about the SELA project, for instance, is one some people cite where they felt they needed $60 million in the current ’06 fiscal year, they were given $10 million, those types of projects. And a lot of —

McClellan: I’m sorry, which project —

Q: SELA — Southeast Louisiana flood control —

McClellan: Flood control has been a priority of this administration from day one.

Well, actually it’s pretty obvious now that this was not the case at all.

Even though Hurricane Katrina has moved well north of the city, the waters may still keep rising in New Orleans. That’s because Lake Pontchartrain continues to pour through a two-block-long break in the main levee, near the city’s 17th Street Canal. With much of the Crescent City some 10 feet below sea level, the rising tide may not stop until it’s level with the massive lake.

New Orleans had long known it was highly vulnerable to flooding and a direct hit from a hurricane. In fact, the federal government has been working with state and local officials in the region since the late 1960s on major hurricane and flood relief efforts. When flooding from a massive rainstorm in May 1995 killed six people, Congress authorized the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, or SELA.

Over the next 10 years, the Army Corps of Engineers, tasked with carrying out SELA, spent $430 million on shoring up levees and building pumping stations, with $50 million in local aid. But at least $250 million in crucial projects remained, even as hurricane activity in the Atlantic Basin increased dramatically and the levees surrounding New Orleans continued to subside.

Yet after 2003, the flow of federal dollars toward SELA dropped to a trickle. The Corps never tried to hide the fact that the spending pressures of the war in Iraq, as well as homeland security — coming at the same time as federal tax cuts — was the reason for the strain. At least nine articles in the Times-Picayune from 2004 and 2005 specifically cite the cost of Iraq as a reason for the lack of hurricane- and flood-control dollars.

Newhouse News Service, in an article posted late Tuesday night at The Times-Picayune Web site, reported: “No one can say they didn’t see it coming. … Now in the wake of one of the worst storms ever, serious questions are being asked about the lack of preparation.”

In early 2004, as the cost of the conflict in Iraq soared, President Bush proposed spending less than 20 percent of what the Corps said was needed for Lake Pontchartrain, according to a Feb. 16, 2004, article, in New Orleans CityBusiness.

Indeed, as Nico at Think Progress noted, in 2004, the Army Corps of Engineers requested $11 million for the Lake Pontchartrain and Vincinity Hurricane Protection project (the levee system that broke); Bush’s budget gave it $3 million. In 2005, the Army Corps said it needed $22.5 million; Bush’s budget gave it $3.9 million. In 2006, Bush wanted to give it even less.

Now, if McClellan wants to defend these budget decisions, he should do so — but “flood control has been a priority of this administration from day one” doesn’t make much sense in light of what we now know.

This is not a time for finger-pointing or playing politics.

Unless it’s the White House doing the finger-pointing or the Republicans playing politics to benefit themselves.

After they’ve exploited everything for five years, McClellan has some nerve.

  • Maybe for once…..I hope and pray these goons will be held accountable for their actions or lack there of. I’m too optimistic, but maybe just maybe this time it”s too big and right here in our backyard.

  • Katrina’s lesson #1 = Don’t be black and poor in America, the government will abandon you every time.

  • ShrubCo translation table (soon to be available through BabelFish.com):

    “Not a time for finger-pointing or playing politics” translation: “We will not be held accountable.”

    “I think about it every day” translation: “I refuse to do anything about it”

    “We value life” translation: “We value American GOP-voting, GOP-funding life”

    “Freedom is on the march” translation: “Big Oil, coming to a country near you”

    Just a sampling, of course.

  • I certainly see this as more than just accountability.

    It is reasonable to expect government to do its job professionally. If the administration has been demonstratively negligent and/or incompetent in the lead-up and aftermath of this disaster, then–given that thousands of lives and the fate of the city are still at stake even at this late date–the proper thing to do is step aside in favor of someone who can do the job and not stuff it up.

  • It is reasonable to expect government to do its job professionally.

    Not according to Norquist and his starve the beast pals.

  • Now they are sending 40,000 National Guards troops into New Orleans, it is interesting to see that we need that many boots to secure an American city and three years ago Rumsfeld sold the Pentagon the theory that 140,000 were more than enough to secure Iraq.

  • This clearly demonstrates the Bushies absolute inability to plan for things they don’t care that much about – post-war Iraq and a national disaster outside of electorally important Florida. Remember all that hurricane aid that dropped on Florida before the last election.

    Unless these guys can figure out a way to make a buck for their pals, they could give a shit. Thank God that some of the neighboring states actually prepared for emergencies and are able to offer a lifeline and show some leadership.

    If this is the Conservative vision of compassion and leadership, wow. Maybe we need to figure out how Bechtel and Halliburton can work with the Carlyle Group to rebuild NOLA. That ought to whet W’s appettite.

  • Edo,
    That’s actually a pretty good point if you take it a bit further.

    New Orleans is the visible manifestation of the GOP vision for America. Which is, starve the government beast by looting the public purse until America resembles Mogidishu or some inner city neighborhood, with anarchy and dilapidated public works. Every man for himself.

    It’s amazing that in one year how much the ability of the Feds to respond to natural disasters has degraded. I can only hope that this isn’t what America intended when it voted for this moron.

  • Interesting take, Mr. Flibble on New Orleans as metaphor for the GOP vision for America. With a little polishing I think you’d have an excellent OpEd piece (or Blog contribution)

    It’s amazing that in one year how much the ability of the Feds to respond to natural disasters has degraded.

    Of course, last year was an election year…

  • That’s a dodge politicians have used since B.C.!

    “This isn’t the time for politics”? It’s always the time for politics if you’re a voter, responsible for the direction your democracy takes. You can be polite if you think that’s warranted, but we really must not let them forget who’s really in charge and who the public servants are. We have to hold leadership accountable or the system will crumble. No dodges allowed.

  • Right you are, PW. I was just going to post
    a like comment. It is not playing politics to
    question our leaders. It is our duty as citizens
    in a representative democracy.

  • Which will be the first major newspaper to call for the resignation of George W. Bush?

    At this point, I think all the “Impeach Bush” energy could be more effectively channeled into “Bush Must Resign” energy.

  • Nah, let’s impeach him anyway. Way more fun than a mere resignation, and much more cathartic.

  • Bush failed, and what about Congress? They were able to meet on A Sunday on the Terry Shiavo affair, but now they are taking their sweet time to react to a real tragedy.

  • Googling “bush resign” finds this link:

    http://www.corante.com/mooreslore/archives/2005/09/01/the_dry_drunk_meme.php

    “Conservatives could easily deflect criticism for the policies they supported by saying the President is mentally ill and it’s all his fault. … So watch for it. Articles in right-wing blogs questioning the President’s stabiity. … Followed by pressure for the President to resign in favor of Vice President Cheney, “for the good of the country,” and an attempt to lay all America’s current problems on the immediate past President.”

    PS – People at my work today who voted for Bush were disgusted at his incompetence, and were sorry for their votes for him.

  • If we impeach bush, we MUST impeach cheney as well. I can’t imagine anyone in the line of succession who should be prez though. This country is in big, big trouble.

    Did you hear that condi went shoe shopping, to the theater and played some tennis in New York? While people are dying in the south? What the heck??? (scroll down http://www.americablog.org for more)

  • I’ve been puzzling as to how the Bush spin machine will remotely attempt to get some traction on the issue of the Army Corps of Engineers’ cutbacks in New Orleans levee maintenance…typically, they need to blame some lower level staffers within government (aka the Abu Ghraib courtmartials/trials) or to launch an investigation that leaves 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with yet another coat of whitewash…seems to me the problem in New Orleans is so great that at least the head of a cabinet secretary would be offered to Bush’s critics…but that would be Rumsfeld, right???…isn’t he the ultimate boss of the Corps???

    Would Rumsfeld go gently into that good night??? After hanging tough over Abu Ghraib, now he is to resign – shamed for all history – for the tragedy in NOLA? I would think he’d choose to fight this – it would be galling for him to resign simply to salvage the younger Bush’s ass. Ultimately, of course, it’s not his choice…after all, only Cheney has the power to hire and fire…lol.

  • This is not a time for finger-pointing or playing politics.

    As usual, the future patsy that is McClellan is flat wrong. It’s not about playing politics, but now IS the time for finger-pointing.

    Bush dropped the ball, again. He didn’t even try. That’s the worst sort of failure.

    Bush should be declared incompetent and removed from office for this.

  • US Constitution, Article XXV, Section 4:

    “Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.”

    Even if just to raise the issue… can someone in Congress speak to this on record? I think the avenue would be to introduce a bill that would establish a legislative body (per Amendment XXV) to determine if Bush is able, or unable, to discharge the powers and duties of his office.

  • I’ve also been wondering why it is that Fedex can get their planes anywhere in the world overnight, but we couldn’t get the Department of Defense to similarly get C-5A’s cargo planes to Houston and begin immediately launching relief/rescue operations…I assume they’re mostly in Iraq, and if Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld bring them back it’s a tacit admission that domestic security has been compromised all along.

  • Sept. 1: “Now is not the time to point fingers. We must pull together.”
    Sept. 10: “Now is not the time to point fingers. We must pull together.”
    Sept. 20: “Now is not the time to point fingers. We must pull together.”
    Sept. 30: “Now is not the time to point fingers. We must pull together.”
    Oct. 10: “Now is not the time to point fingers. We must pull together.”
    Oct. 20: “Now is not the time to point fingers. We must pull together.”
    Oct. 30: “Now is not the time to point fingers. We must pull together. There’ll be plenty of time to evaluate everything carefully later.”
    Nov. 1: “We’ve been over all that, it’s old news. Move on already.”
    Dec. 1: “We had an accountability moment on this during the last election when the voters backed the president’s flood control policies.”
    And 55% of Americans will buy it. After all, who could have foreseen that there might be a hurricane and that the levees might break, and who expects the government to be able to do anything? And besides liberals are evil and Clinton had a blow job.
    /sarcasm

  • Jon Stewart, approx. one week ago (eerie):

    “The president is riding his bike a lot. He’s running five miles a day. He’s lifting weights — is he preparing for something we don’t know about? Some kind, of oh, I don’t know, every-man-for-himself scenario?”

    link

    So sad, what Bush has done to this country. This is NOT why the Greatest Generation fought and sacrificed in WWII, to have a society the way Bush has (apparently) succeeded in molding it.

  • Why in God’s name did Clinton lend his name to Bush’s calamity? He could raise as much on his own. Now I hope he doesnt keep his mouth shut when he see’s what really happened.

  • Comments are closed.