Meet Curveball

At this point, I’m afraid that veteran CIA officer Tyler Drumheller’s revelations about pre-war intelligence just aren’t surprising anymore. That said, I’d argue that his perspective never really generated the attention it deserved the first it came to the public’s attention. Drumheller should be a household name — it’s his perspective that utterly and completely undermines the Bush gang’s defense for why they got everything pre-war Iraq intelligence wrong.

I mention this, of course, because ABC News has tracked down “Curveball,” the Iraqi defector who told U.S. officials bogus stories about Saddam Hussein’s non-existent arsenal, including WMD, “mobile biological weapons labs,” aluminum tubes, etc. Curveball’s claims were the centerpiece of Colin Powell’s presentation to the United Nations, the crux of which has since been exposed as false. In this new ABC report, the network turns its attention back to Drumheller.

“People died because of this,” said Tyler Drumheller, the former chief of European operations at the CIA, who has written about it in a new book, “On the Brink.” “All off this one little guy who all he wanted to do was stay in Germany.” Drumheller says he personally redacted all references to Curveball material in an advance draft of the Powell speech.

“We said, ‘This is from Curveball. Don’t use this,'” Drumheller says…. Drumheller also says he met personally with the then-deputy director of the CIA, John McLaughlin, to raise questions about the reliability of Curveball, well before the Powell speech.

“And John said, ‘Oh my, I hope not. You know this is all we have,’ and I said, ‘This can’t be all we have.’ I said, ‘There must be another, there must be something else.’ And he said, ‘No, this is really the only tangible thing we have.'”

Admittedly, this isn’t entirely new, but once in a while, I’ll still hear someone claim that there were “intelligence failures,” which led the White House to get the entire basis for the war wrong. What this explanation neglects to mention is that these “failures” were practically intentional. Officials had a source, they were told the source was unreliable, but they believed what they wanted to believe.

As Kevin Drum summarized, “They knew Saddam didn’t have a nuclear program. They knew he didn’t have mobile bio labs. They knew he didn’t have drones. They knew.”

History will not be kind.

I’ll still hear someone claim that there were “intelligence failures,”

What a coincidence. Earlier today, I was reading an on-line chat with the excellent Dan Froomkin. I saw that noted hack John Solomon had also done a chat today, so I took a look. This line jumped out at me:

We had faulty intelligence on Iraq beforehand…

What will it take for Beltway reporters to get their collective head out of their collective ass?

  • I hadn’t realized what damage John Solomon had done to AP’s credibility until I was reading the article today about the surge going fairly well. As I read it, my mind was saying, yeah but do they mention this is traditionally the slow time in the conflict?, are those casualty figures correct this time or is like the time they forgot to count a major percentage?, are they mentioning that many of the insrugents are laying low? I just didn’t trust the article at all, thanks to hacks like Solomon.

  • The Nightline segment on Curveball was excellent. There are lots of pieces that should be easy to assemble now that Dems have subpoena power, pieces that will finally expose the lies that were told to Powell and others to sell the war.

    Drumheller basically says that the deputy director of the CIA is a liar, and that he knew curveball was a fabricator. The dispute between McLaughlin and Drumheller should be easily cleared up once they’re under oath. Drumheller says that McLaughlin’s chief of staff was also privy to things that McLaughlin now denies.

    McLaughlin’s “denial” of Drumheller’s charges on the ABC tape was way too specific and detailed to be credible.

  • It was “intelligence failures” all right. When you have an entire class of people – Christian Republicans – willfully ignorant, utterly lacking “intelligence”, there can’t help but be a “failure”.

  • Using only Curveball to prove the need to attack Iraq shows that Bush relied solely on faith-based intelligence: Bush was praying he could find one guy to give him an excuse to attack. We didn’t have faulty intel, we had an executive branch fishing for excuses to go to war.

  • What this explanation neglects to mention is that these “failures” were practically intentional.

    I have no idea what the word “practical” is doing in this sentence.

  • Comments are closed.