Meet the Alliance Defense Fund

The WaPo ran a solid front-page feature today on the legal arm of the Taliban-wing of the Republican Party: the Alliance Defense Fund. It’s worth reading, in large part because the ADF a) isn’t as widely known as it should be; and b) is pretty scary.

These courtroom fights and dozens of others pending across the country belong to the portfolio of the ambitious Alliance Defense Fund, a socially conservative legal consortium. It spends $20 million a year seeking to protect what it regards as the place of religion — and especially Christianity — in public life.

Considering itself the antithesis of the American Civil Liberties Union, the Scottsdale-based organization has used money and moxie to become the leading player in a movement to tug the nation to the right by challenging decades of legal precedent. By stepping into the nation’s most impassioned debates about religion in the public sphere, the group aims to bring law and society into alignment with conservative Christianity.

Gary McCaleb, who directs the ADF’s litigation team, said the group’s work is critical because “the fundamental ability of Christians to speak their minds on the issues of the day” is at stake. Considering that no one, anywhere, has made any effort to restrict Christians’ ability to talk about issues, one has to wonder what on earth he’s talking about.

Coherent or not, the ADF is not to be taken lightly. As some friends of mine recently explained, the ADF was founded in 1993 by a coalition of 30 religious right leaders, including James Dobson. The legal group’s current head, Alan Sears, is perhaps best known for leading Reagan-era Attorney General Edwin Meese’s Commission on Pornography.

In all in all, the ADF takes what you’d expect from a far-right legal group — and then pushes the envelope a little further. The group didn’t just worry about the non-existent “war on Christmas”; it committed 800 lawyers to the fight. Sears doesn’t just condemn gays, he was the first religious right figure to assert that the cartoon character SpongeBob Square­Pants might be gay and criticized the 1959 movie ‘Some Like It Hot’ for promoting cross-dressing.

But before you dismiss the ADF as fringe extremists, keep in mind that they’re training legions of lawyers to push the group’s agenda.

To change the equation, the alliance hired Reagan-era prosecutor Alan Sears. He later brought in corporate lawyer Jeffery Ventrella. Mostly under Ventrella’s watch, the ADF has schooled more than 800 outside lawyers, each promising to donate 450 hours to the cause.

Ventrella runs an annual summer seminar, which this year brought 100 law students to Scottsdale. The idea, according to ADF documents, is to train them in “a distinctly Christian worldview of law” before they head to clerkships and other influential posts, “perhaps even Supreme Court justices.”

Some of them met recently at a training session in Chicago. Lawyers and preachers jotted tips as ADF speakers explained that prayer is not always enough: Protecting the faith sometimes demands lawsuits and clamor.

“I was looking for a way to reconcile my faith and my professional life. The ADF helped me be not a Christian and a lawyer but a Christian lawyer,” said Chicago litigator Melanie Jo Triebel, who says that the “Christian side of the debate” has not been effective enough.

Indeed, the ADF created a “National Litigation Academy,” which offers lawyers lessons — for free — on how to be a more effective far-right litigator. In exchange, the attorneys pledge 450 hours of pro-bono time “to the Body of Christ.” The group also sponsors Blackstone Legal Fellowships where law students “receive intensive training in Christian worldview principles and how they apply to the study and interpretation of law.”

The Alliance Defense Fund isn’t necessarily a household name, but chances are you’ve heard about its handiwork. And with 1,000 or so lawyers getting ADF training, you’ll likely be seeing more and more of the group’s efforts in the coming years.

Is this group a representative group of Christians? By that I mean do they include Catholics, Protestants, Orthodox and others in their group, or are they strictly a group of fundamentalist “born again ” Christians? I am increasingly distressed at the hijacking of the designation “Christian” to include only the latter.
Robert

  • “the attorneys pledge 450 hours of pro-bono time “to the Body of Christ.” ”

    I wonder if we can contact them, say we are persecuted Christians, and take up all their time with trivia?

    “Attorneys pledge”. Or more correctly “[Right-wing self-serving conservative egotistical] Attorneys pledge”. I wouldn’t expect no 450 ‘hours’ from any of them. They’ll report working hours working on this like the lawyers from ‘The Firm’ movie did.

  • It boggles the mind where all the money comes from. The ADF is only one tentacle of the subversive machine that the Republican party has become, and none of them ever seem to want for cash. Certainly there are many wealthy party members, but twenty million *per year* still seems like a huge amount for any single organization.

    I do agree with Lance on the 450 hours thing. They’ll never put in that much time for nothing, just claim they did and reap the benefits of their vile networking to make oodles of cash from other sources. Bastards.

  • “a distinctly Christian worldview of law”

    Kinda like the “distinctly Christian worldview of science (the earth is 5,000 years old, and man was made from dust)”

    or the “distinctly Christian worldview of medicine (anything that gives women control of their body is the work of Satan, and disease can be fought with prayer and a good bleeding)”

  • How exactly is this the antithesis of the ACLU? I’m sure that’s a handy marketing slogan for them, but it doesn’t seem to accurately describe their aims.

  • Is this connected to the Jerry Falwell university debating team? In an article about them he talked of training lawyers for Christ.

  • Darn, CB—I’m sitting here, reading this article, and drinking coffee from my “Folger Shakespeare Library” mug. It’s the one with the nice quote from Henry IV—“The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.”

    You have impeccable timing—and remember, folks—I’m only “quoting the Bard….”

  • “It’s the one with the nice quote from Henry IV—”The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” ” – Steve

    Wouldn’t that be the comment of one of Falstaff’s crew of villians imagining what they will do when their pal Prince Hal takes the throne?

    You don’t think the Bard is suggesting it’s a good idea?

  • short fuse,

    How exactly is this the antithesis of the ACLU? I’m sure that’s a handy marketing slogan for them, but it doesn’t seem to accurately describe their aims.

    If you’ll accept that the ACLU is sincere in stating what they stand for:

    The American system of government is founded on two counterbalancing principles: that the majority of the people governs, through democratically elected representatives; and that the power even of a democratic majority must be limited, to ensure individual rights.

    Majority power is limited by the Constitution’s Bill of Rights, which consists of the original ten amendments ratified in 1791, plus the three post-Civil War amendments (the 13th, 14th and 15th) and the 19th Amendment (women’s suffrage), adopted in 1920.

    The mission of the ACLU is to preserve all of these protections and guarantees:

    Your First Amendment rights-freedom of speech, association and assembly. Freedom of the press, and freedom of religion supported by the strict separation of church and state.

    then it would stand to reason that if the ADF is working for a “Christian worldview of Law” that the ACLU would be pretty much its antithesis.

  • They’re not scary, they’re just a nuisance. They’re pathetic fantasizing creepy-crawly loons. Leave them to seethe in their self-mortifying misery. They’ll never escape their inherent contradictions. Seriously, they’re loons. In the long run.

  • Edo – I agree that ADF is philosophically very far removed from the goals of the ACLU (esp. the separation of church and state) but to be the ‘antithesis’, they would have to argue against freedom of expression, freedom of the press, etc. every single time. That would be weird.

    It’s interesting to me that the ACLU is such a boogeyman to these people. Or is it really necessary to abolish ALL civil liberties in a so-called Christian society?

  • With all those lawyers pledging to donate all that time… I bet they get charitable tax expemption on their money, too.

  • “Or is it really necessary to abolish ALL civil liberties in a so-called Christian society?” – short fuse

    Well, we would certainly have to eliminate the Freedom of Religion, to get rid of the Sihks, Muslims, Buddists, Scientoligists, Wiccin, Jews, Mormons, Jehova Witnesses, Christian Scientists, Catholics…

    … wait a tic, aren’t Catholics the single largest denomination in America?
    Yes, but All the Protestant denominations together outnumber them…

    …okay Catholics, Unitarians, Episcopalians, …

    …Now it gets really interesting. I don’t know what alliances and order the remaining Protestant heresies are going to chop each other up…

    …Methodists, Lutherans, Calvinists. Which leaves us with Baptists. Or specifically, the Southern Baptist Convention. Right?

    I appologize to anyone I’ve left out.

    Athests of course aren’t really a ‘religion’, so they don’t get on the list.

    Religious intolerance is really NOT an idea we want to embrace.

  • Comments are closed.