Meet the new head of USAID

Randall Tobias’ tenure as administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) turned out to be rather embarrassing for the president. Tobias not only pushed an ineffective “abstinence-only” policy, drawing the ire of public health officials around the world, but he also had an unfortunate association with a DC “escort service,” which he used for “massages.”

With Tobias having resigned, the Bush White House was given an opportunity to make a more reasonable, sensible, consensus choice for USAID. Instead the president nominated Henrietta Holsman Fore, who also takes over as acting administrator pending Senate confirmation.

The confirmation hearings should be interesting. For example, she might have trouble explaining a speech she gave at Wellesley University in 1987. Here’s how a Feb. 12, 1987 New York Times article covered that speech:

A Wellesley College trustee’s remark that blacks preferred pushing drugs to working in a factory has precipitated an emotional debate on this bucolic campus already grappling with charges of racial insensitivity

The trustee, Henrietta Holsman, a 1970 graduate of Wellesley who runs a manufacturing concern in Los Angeles, resigned from the board last weekend after apologizing for her comments, which also cast aspersions on the work ethic of Hispanic and white employees. But in a letter to the college newspaper, Ms. Holsman reiterated her statement that she had trouble keeping black assembly-line workers from going “back to the street to earn more money” selling drugs.

In her lecture, Ms. Holsman also said she had found Hispanic workers to be lazy, white workers resentful of having to work with machines, and Asians, while very productive, likely to move on to professional or management jobs.

Granted, these remarks, while obviously offensive, were 20 years ago. Perhaps she’s shown a greater commitment to, and respect for, diversity since then?

Perhaps not.

In a July 13, 2005 letter, Fore promised Obama that she “would work with the Congressional Black Caucus and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus in identifying the best practices that can be used to strengthen diversity in the State Department” [AP, 7/19/05]

But as Raw Story reports, CBC members confirm that the committee has not had any contact with Fore in the past two years. Although Fore met with Latino legislators on two occasions, the content of the meetings was not disclosed. Additionally, the “State Department’s own accountability reports show little change in the make up of the workforce since Fore took over in 2005.”

Another step backwards for the Bush administration and the GOP on race relations.

As soon as I read CB’s headline, I knew I was going to hate reading this post. This administration definitely has a talent for finding the post reprehensible people to fill major policy positions.

And even though these comments were said over two decades ago, Republicans are not fine wine and definitely do not improve with age.

  • I’m willing, given the length of time elapsed since ’87, to say that the remark should be allowed to pass. Would like to see some personal growth, though, and being a Bushie kinda precludes that….

  • She made these remarks in 1987 and the ReThugs still blame everything wrong in the world on Clinton. So, operating by their rules Ms. Holeman Foreskin should be tarred and feathered during her confirmation hearings.

    The fact this fuckwit would be working directly with other countries (many of which are populated by brown people) is just further proof that BushBrat is Worst. President. Eva!

    Looks like Congress will need to re-think its Memorial Day recess.

  • Once again, we see the hand of an evil genius in the way BushCo has gone about neutering government agencies through appointments. Don’t like the UN? Send a chief negotiator who doesn’t believe in negotiating. Don’t like science? Appoint ideologues to censor them. Don’t like the CPB? Install someone who doesn’t believe in its mission. Don’t like giving aid to poor nations and people of color? Appoint someone with a record of racial bigotry to head the agency responsible for it.

    Sorry, but anyone accomplished enough to be a Wellesley trustee should have known not to say what she did in 1987 — even if she did believe it. By themselves, stupidity and bigotry are bad enough, but combined… jeez.

  • “Ms. Holsman reiterated her statement that she had trouble keeping black assembly-line workers from going “back to the street to earn more money” selling drugs.

    In her lecture, Ms. Holsman also said she had found Hispanic workers to be lazy, white workers resentful of having to work with machines, and Asians, while very productive, likely to move on to professional or management jobs.”

    Shorter version:
    Blacks are drug-peddling thugs, Hispanics are lazy, whites are dumb (won’t work with machines) and Asians are uppity (won’t stay down in their place; want to improve themselves).

    Who better, then, to deal with all sorts of people who need aid? Equal opportunity offence offered, without prejudice, to everyone unlucky enough to have to work for a living…

  • Equal opportunity offence offered, without prejudice, to everyone unlucky enough to have to work for a living… — libra
    Indeed… you’d think that would be bad enough, without having to resort to the race card.

  • I don’t know this lady but I wouldn’t be surprised that she isn’t really as much a racist as she’s an exploiter… She doesn’t care about the color of your skin, as long as you work for the absolute minimum wage required, without any questions asked. The fact that she complained that people leave because they want to make more money, or they want to move up the ladder, says it all… Isn’t that what a lot of Republican corporate do-gooders are all about?

  • Bruno has it. I wonder what wages she paid at her “factory” (read sweatshop, maybe?)?

  • Comments are closed.