Meet the new spin doctor, same as the old…

Today was Tony Snow’s first day behind the briefing room podium. How’d it go? Well, after Helen Thomas asked about the NSA monitoring millions of Americans’ phone calls, possibly illegally, Snow gave a rather predictable response.

“What’s interesting is, there seems to be a notion that because the president has talked a little bit about one surveillance program, and one matter of our intelligence gathering, that somehow we have to tell the entire world, we have to make our intelligence gathering transparent.

“Let me remind you, it’s a war on terror. And there are people — I guarantee you — the president is not talking about breaking the law, but al Queda does not believe in transparency. What al Queda believes in is mayhem and the president has a constitutional obligation and a heartfelt determination to make sure we fight them.”

So, al Queda does not believe in transparency — and as far as Tony Snow is concerned, the White House won’t either. Has the Bush gang not learned yet how absurd this comparison is? That there’s no sense in defending our government’s dubious conduct by equating our behavior with our enemies’ behavior?

On the substance, it’s the same kind of straw-man charade we’ve always gotten from the Bush White House. As Snow framed it, the president’s critics want a “transparent” intelligence-gathering process. As proof, he pointed to … no one in particular. Who believes intelligence gathering should be transparent? The president’s critics want a legal intelligence-gathering process that includes checks and balances. Snow, like his predecessors, is more comfortable attacking critics who don’t exist than dealing with legitimate questions.

That said, Snow’s first briefing was a bit of a change of pace. If Scott McClellan were behind the podium responding to the same question, he would have referenced 9/11 at least four times. Snow is to be congratulated for his restraint.

OBL has done so much better than he ever could have thunk. We now measure our conduct in comparison to their conduct. Incredible. Although this is nothing new, really. The whole emphasis and agrandizement of the “War on Terror,” from its name to how we have conducted ourselves, just provides to those who wish to harm this country way too much credibility.

  • but al Queda does not believe in transparency

    So as long as al Qaeda doesn’t believe in it, it’s okay for the president to do? That’s brilliant! You know what else al Qaeda doesn’t believe in? Democracy. And peace. And rule of law. And limits on presidential power – I bet they don’t believe in those either.

  • “The president’s critics want a legal intelligence-gathering process that includes checks and balances. ”

    Too nuanced for the “with us or against us” crowd. Much easier to demonize all critics — best done if you can falsely depict or just plain manufacture their positions.

  • I would hope someone would ask the following to Mr. Snow:

    How many people are believed to be members of Al Qaeda? How many of those are in Iraq? How many in Afghanistan? How many in the U.S.??

    Are we talking about a 100’s of thousands people? 10’s of thousands?? maybe a couple of thousand??

    What is the cost of the war on terror on a per terrorist basis??? And how many of those terrorists have been captured and tried??

  • Re #4

    Do you really want to ask these questions? Those sort of questions can stigmatize you as a terror supporter and provide you a one way ticket to our version of Manzanar.

  • “Transparency” would be like, oh, releasing the name of an active CIA officer engaged in gathering intelligence on Iranian WMDs

  • It has been said that even the most horrific of blizzards—capable of reducing visibility to zero, bringing entire states to a frozen standstill, and impinging the people’s abilities to get on with their lives and routines—begins with but a single snowflake.

    And now we have a particular Snowflake in command of the White House briefing room….

  • I was hoping Tony would say “We are currently babysitting a civil war in Iraq….and just to make the “War on Terror” sound good, yes ..there are a few of those over there too (but less the 10% of the insurgency)”. Yeah right.

    It still is amazing to me what 19 men willing to commit suicide have done to our country after the actual act. Does anybody really believe that they are using their picture-taking cellphones as a line of communication?

    It has given Bushco (especially Karl Rove) free reign on our civil liberties including the unlegal overkill called wiretapping.

    We should all be ashamed of ourselves for letting this happen to us.

  • One man’s demon is another man’s saint. I see a lot of truth with bubba’s comment: Bush has practically deified Osama for his believers. What Osama could never have envisioned is how much collateral damage he caused on 9/11 by unleashing the neocons on an unsuspecting nation. …And where is that Osama guy 4 1/2 years after Bush’s promises to get him anyway?

  • Mr. Snow,

    Your Fox writers never made you look this dumb. Tell Karl to at least cross Scotty’s name out and write your name in on the talking points.

    Good luck on your new gig.

  • Tony, Tony, Tony,

    You are such an ass!

    We don’t want transparency, we want legality and constitutionality. Why should we surrender our freedoms, if, as Boy George II claims, that is what the Terrorists hate the most?

    Keep your actions within the law. If they can’t fit within the constitutional limits, than don’t do the action. How hard is that. You had the tools to stop the 9/11 attacks before PATRIOT and before Hayden’s flights of fancy. If you had been paying attention, nothing would have happened to the Pentagon or the World Trade Center. Just stop going on vacation all the time, moron.

  • Lance nails it. We had the information we needed before 9/11 but didn’t have the organizational sophistication to act on it. So what do we do? Focus on getting more information rather than developing mechanisms to get useful information into the hands of those who can do something with it..

    People should remember that the current spying program has produced thousands of leads on which the FBI has had to follow up. Worse, very few of the leads (if any) has lead to the capture and prosecution of potential bad actors. On a certain level I can understand wanting to do everything possible to protect the country, but even government has to weigh the costs and benefits/effectiveness. And when of the costs of doing business this way also happens to be surrendering of freedoms, it’s all the worse.

  • “We had the information we needed before 9/11 but didn’t have the organizational sophistication to act on it.” – Kurzleg

    Sadly, the Clinton/Gore administration PROVED that they did have the organizational sophistication. They stopped the Millenium attacks! Don’t let anyone ever say that a Gore/Lieberman administration couldn’t protect us from 9/11. Laugh in their face or kick them in the balls (as seems appropriate, of course).

  • Welcome to the Pharmamx.com Family! We invite you to visit us at http://www.pharmamx.com and find our great medicine prices. We provide serious and first class service to all our customers 24/7. If we don’t carry a medicine you need just let us know and we will be more than glad to assist you! To show you our gratitude for past purchases and to offer you one more reason to continue purchasing with Pharmamx.com We are offering a limited time 30% discount include on all our medicines. We will keep on giving you the best price and service in the market. Welcome and enjoy your visit to Pharmamx.com

  • Comments are closed.