Meet the new team; same as the old team

Yesterday, in a rather odd conclusion, Time’s Mark Halperin concluded that John McCain had “won the week.” Noting all of the many problems McCain had this week, I, among others, argued that this analysis didn’t make any sense at all.

What I’d neglected to remember, however, was that this was supposed to be the week that the McCain campaign “rebooted.” There’s a new campaign manager, a new political director, a new field director, a new campaign structure, and a revamped message. Forget about that unfocused, directionless Republican campaign we’ve been watching; this new, more professional, campaign operation would show a team firing on all cylinders.

Or not.

This was supposed to be the week John McCain unveiled his new campaign, more disciplined and acutely focused on the economy. The goal proved elusive: The presumptive Republican nominee spent the week cleaning up after controversial statements by himself and his surrogates, and trying to counter any impression that he overlooks the pain of struggling Americans.

McCain seemed to call Social Security a “disgrace,” was struck wordless on video when asked whether insurance companies should have to pay for birth control and, perhaps most damagingly, had to deny his own advisor’s assertion that, when it comes to the economy, America has become “a nation of whiners.”

Through the week, that dissonance undercut McCain’s effort to showcase his plans for the nation’s foundering economy. And it handed Barack Obama an opening to display sympathy for stressed Americans of the very sort who have cast a skeptical eye on the Democrat’s candidacy.

There was no green backdrop for any of his speeches, but that’s about the only thing that went according to plan.

The WSJ noticed the same problem.

After a rocky three months, John McCain’s presidential campaign embarked this week on a clear mission: present a tightly focused economic message, replacing the blurry, often-conflicting signals Sen. McCain had been sending voters.

Everything the campaign could plan for was carefully choreographed. Events, once thrown together with little more than a flag and a microphone, were thoughtfully staged, including a rug with the campaign logo and soft lighting on the candidate. The Arizona Republican, not known for his oratorical skills, delivered his scripted speeches with confidence and accuracy. His top economic advisers were methodically dispatched to host conference calls and appear on cable networks.

Then came the questions.

Now, some of McCain’s mishaps just happened to coincide in one week. We didn’t know Phil Gramm was going to pop off about how dumb Americans are about their own economic conditions. We didn’t know Fiorina was going to implicitly denounce her own candidate’s position on health insurance and birth control. Incidents like these could have happened any time, but they happened to converge in one week. That’s not the campaign’s fault, necessarily.

But the broader problem is with the candidate and his agenda. The political establishment made it seem as if a new team would make McCain a better candidate. That’s nonsense — you can slap a coat of paint on a rusted, broken-down car, but the underlying problems will remain.

Indeed, most of this week’s problems highlight the fundamental flaws with McCain and his pitch. When his “economic plan” was panned, it was because the plan was ridiculous. When withdrawal talk came out of Iraq and put McCain on the defensive, it’s because his war policy is backwards. When he described the structure of Social Security as a “total disgrace,” McCain was saying what he actually believes.

I don’t doubt that Steve Schmitt is a better campaign manager than Rick Davis. But unless Republicans are prepared to swap nominees, too, there’s only so much Schmitt can do.

What Schmidt would need to do – given that the blunders that followed the McCain camp around all week came not just from the candidate but also from his most trusted people – is to do a root and branch clear out of the likes of Gramm, Fiorina etc. But you do that and who’s left?

As for the candidate himself, well it’s an oldie but a truism: you can’t polish a turd.

  • The McCain campaign likes to say that judgment is important. True that. What kind of judgment does it show when in the middle of a severe economic downturn caused by greed, engendered by deregulation and fueled by managerial incompetence, McCain chose a poster boy for deregulation and a woman who caused her company’s shares to lose 78% of their value as his economic advisers?

  • Just imagine McCain staffing and managing the most complex bureaucracy in the history of man, and you’ll realize why not voting in November is playing with complete, unmitigated disaster. You think BushCo was incompetent? Ha!

  • You know the problem right now with being in the MSM reporting on the McCain campaign?

    Everybody just assumes you suck McCain’s C&*K!

    But, it’s pretty small so we know that cannot be true.

  • McCain did win the week.

    And the reason is the leftwing blogoshpere. These dumbfuks have decided the world will be better off with John McCain because Obama doesn’t do everything some blogger wants.

    Well, dumbfuks, this is the same reason Bush beat Gore, because you only know how to lose.

    So I will not cry a bit when your kid gets drafted and goes to Iran to fight. I will not cry when you lose your job and your healthcare and John McCain says you should just live on the street.

    So you want John McCain leftwing just so you can say how tough you are on a website. We are so proud of you. You can post on a website.

    Barack Obama has come from nowhere to be the nominee through huge odds because he believes he can fix the problems.

    The leftwing blogoshpere sits at their computer and thinks they are doing something. Yeah, Ok. We are so impressed.

  • Hey, Ken, when you give your new Fuehrer his Heil Obama salute, do you click your jackboots once or twice? I forget if Otto Preminger gave one or two clicks in Stalag 17. Oh and by the way, I would not lift one finger to help elect Obama and the reason is spelled FISA.

  • Thanks Ken…. We needed that, you were directly speaking to “Mary” and her ilk, as well as all those PUMA’s….

    Seems like some people on the left are NO better than those moronic ‘single-issue’ voters on the right.

    “I’m voting for McCain because he’s against abortion”

    is just as bad as…

    I’m not voting for Obama because:
    he’s black
    he didn’t pick Hillary as his VP
    he voted for FISA
    Mary says he’s bad πŸ™‚
    he’s a muslim
    Rev. Wright said bad things
    he went to a madrassa
    etc…

    Grow up and assess the REAL issues..

    Obama is much better than McCain, even if you don’t like half of the stuff he talks about. Show me ONE thing that McCain is better at?

    References and details please.

  • Poor “Marlowe” wants to go pout in the corner because Obama didn’t reject FISA they way he wanted it. Marlowe rather have McCain win (even though he left an out by saying he wouldn’t lift a finger to help elect Obama implying he’s not against Obama)

    Once Obama is elected president and he has a cooperative congress, he’ll be able to revisit FISA and correct the Bush mistakes.

    When he’s president nobody would be ‘forcing’ Obama to use the FISA powers. It’s ONLY the Bush administration and their right wing cronies who desire to abuse the constitution.

    Grow up…. Be a ‘real’ man and vote for Obama, and watch the country change for the better.

  • Mary, Marlowe and their ilk are the reasons why true progressives have a hard time winning elections.

    They will reject their best candidate because he/she doesn’t agree on everything. While the right wing masses will ignore all their candidates short comings and hypocrisy for the sake of winning at all costs.

    Being progressives implies that you have rational thought…. Where is your rational thought? Looks more like the emotional gut reaction seen by so many Rush and Fox lovers.

  • What is with you “purity” folks? I’m sick and tired of people jumping to the wrong conclusion just because someone dares to criticize Obama regarding an issue with which he is clearly on the wrong side.

    Yes there are some people blathering about not voting for Obama now. But guess what? The vast majority of people criticizing Obama over FISA are people like me. We’re still going to vote for him because we know damn well that McCain would be infinitely worse. But we’re not going to close our eyes to Obama’s faults and mistakes, and we’re certainly not going to stop criticizing him for them.

    If you want slavish obedience to your political party and its candidates, join the GOP.

  • But the broader problem is with the candidate and his agenda. — CB

    Who cares about McCain’s *agenda*? What’s important is that he employs twice as many women as he does men and pays them as much — or more — than he does men. Unlike that black HUSSY, er… I mean… HUSSEIN! Mary said so. Repeatedly. Or, maybe she didn’t *say* it, but she sure implied it, and since she implied it more than 3 times, it’s true.

    If you want slavish obedience to your political party and its candidates, join the GOP. — Shade Tail, @10

    You GO girl! πŸ™‚ Exactly so.

  • Note to self…Mark Halperin is an idiot. With all the facts in one hand he tosses them aside and decides his own contrasting opinion must be the truth. He decides McCain won the very week that should have ended his presidential run…just amazing.

    Each “week” it becomes clearer and clearer how totally un qualified McCain is to be president. One would have to be deaf, dumb and blind to continue to support him. He is 100% disabled and it clearly shows that he is not up to the demanding role he covets physically or mentally. He doesn’t understand and easily confuses his own policies.

    He can hire as many managers as he wants to sell us an image he wants us to believe he is but then the real McCain shows up and everytime he speaks the illusion is shattered.

    Or as Driftglass puts it:
    “…to flesh out his flimsy credentials, Senator McSame went right back to the Wingnut Well (out of which he had already fished bleating disasters like John Hagee, Ron Parsley and the mortal remains of Jerry Falwell) to manifest before our very eyes an old, white, Southern, male, dyspeptic multi-millionaire political insider. Who then proceeded to yell at the unwashed 98% of us (who foolishly refuse to live in the opulent comfort afforded by our trust funds or the interest on the interest of our investments) for being insufficiently grateful that the Grand Old Party continues to allowe us to live and labor in their fucking country…” (thanks for the reminder Gramm)

  • McCain’s policies are like snowflake; no two are ever the same—and I thought all McCain trolls knew how to spell “Fuhrer.”

    Isn’t that still on the “Stupid GOPer Twit Club” membership application?

  • We got:
    Hillary supporters
    Obama supporters
    Hillarybots
    Obamabots
    Clinton Haters
    Obama Haters
    Republican trolls
    Brats
    Hillarybots pretending to be Obamabots
    Obamabots pretending to be Hillarybots
    Trolls pretending to be both.
    Republicans pretending to be sane
    Reasonable people who don’t think the FISA thing was a deal-breaker
    Reasonable people who DO think the FISA thing was a deal-breaker
    People mad at Obama who will still vote for him
    People who are mad at Obama but will not vote for him
    People who are mad at Obama but will vote for McCain

  • Joey @ 12 …One would have to be deaf, dumb and blind to continue to support him…

    Are you not describing the ‘base’ of the Republican party in that sentence?

  • What about Obama campaign’s gaffes.

    Michelle Obama 600 dollar earrings. You think the average voter in pennsylvania thinks of paying that money for earrings.

    This shows how fortunate they have come since they got that sweetheart deal to buy that land from rezko while he was still under investigation.

    Obama saved 300,000 from rezko on his home while rezko was still under investigation.

    Obama also got a special loan from a bank where he didn’t have to pay any fees because he is a senator.

    Obama also made a gaffe about speaking spanish.

    Obama is falling like a rock. It was a bad week for Obama the newsweek poll has him dropping.

    Obama also said Bill Clinton is a complication.

    Bill Clinton was the most successful president in the last 40 years.

    Obama has some nerve to talk about a successful president like that.

  • McCain voted against the bush-cheney energy bill. Obama voted for it.

    McCain wants to cap pay for CEO’s.

    Gramm is a moron but he was talking about the nation’s leaders not the citizens.

    He was talking about congress members whining about the competitiveness with mexico.

    McCain said it was a disgrace that younger workers paying into social security won’t get the benefits.

    Why does this site insist of taking things out of context.

    Doesn’t the truth matter anything to you people.

    Why do you insist of insulting the intelligence of your readers by taking everything out of context.

    Is it too much to report the truth instead of propaganda.

  • Let’s be really cynical about this. At absolute worst, Obama loves FISA and can’t wait to abuse its powers. (I don’t believe that for a minute – I think he just made an ill-chosen swerve toward the center, but stick with me here.) He’s still pretty good on nearly everything else, so he’s still worth supporting over McCain. Shortly into his presidency, the remaining Republicans will start screaming like stuck pigs about abuse of presidential powers. Half the democrats will join in out of principle to make a nice bipartisan deal to get back to the constitution, and the remaining democrats will, of course, cave in. Problem solved.

  • “Doesn’t the truth matter anything to you people.

    Why do you insist of insulting the intelligence of your readers by taking everything out of context.”

    I don’t normally use AOL-speak, but rofl.

  • No matter how disappointed any of you are with Obama’s decisions of late…
    No matter how much you were (or still are) a diehard Clinton fan…
    No matter how much Obama might sway from your agenda of choice in the future…

    A vote for McCain is a vote against America.

    A vote for McCain is telling the GOP you can be metaphorically ass-raped time and time again, fooled into voting against your best interests, because they scared you into doing so.

    A vote for McCain is a vote to repeal Roe v. Wade.

    A vote for McCain is a vote for war with Iran, even if the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan aren’t done.

    And a decision to not vote…is a vote for McCain.

    Please, feel free to pass that along

  • Halperin is uninformed and silly. If I hear his name, I know that whatever he says will be questionable. Lost respect for him some time ago.

  • Mark Halperin.

    Maniacally shrill harridan.

    Same thing.

    And jeffie—the door for hillary-is-44-dot-com is the one labeled “vanity”—not “sanity….”

  • daze said:
    Well shut my mouth.

    Dale #14 – Steve keeps a pretty diverse crowd!

    πŸ™‚ Yeah. This is Studio 54 and he’s our Andy Warhol.

  • Comments are closed.