Meet your new FCC indecency advisor

For all the political fights over controversial figures getting high-profile jobs in the Bush administration (Bolton, Rice, Gonzales, etc.), it’s worth noting that some of the hires are relatively anonymous, but equally scary. For example, meet Penny Nance, the newest member of the Federal Communications Commission team.

Throughout Bush’s first term, the Republican base was never fully satisfied with FCC Chairman Michael Powell. His interests were corporate in nature, and he tended to treat “decency issues” as an afterthought. With his departure after the election, Bush tapped Kevin Martin to head the agency and the right was thrilled. Now we’re seeing why.

A woman who has for years helped lead the grassroots war against indecent broadcasting has joined the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to advise the agency’s new chairman, Kevin Martin, on policy matters.

Anti-pornography attorneys hope Penny Nance will be instrumental in helping commissioners enforce prohibitions against broadcast indecency. She will work as a special adviser in the Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis.

Pat Trueman of the Family Research Council said the move shows Martin is committed to keeping objectionable content off the public airwaves.

“He was committed before he was named chairman, when he was an FCC commissioner, and he is today,” Trueman said. “This is further evidence of his commitment — that he would reach out to someone who’s been a leader in the effort to protect families, and the fight against indecency on television, and bring that person on staff.”

Indeed, the entire GOP base is ecstatic with the choice. Which leads to the question, who is Penny Nance?

Nance is the president, founder, and principal lobbyist for a right-wing group called the Kids First Coalition, which seeks rid the airwaves of content Nance finds morally objectionable and, in a bit of a non sequitor, ban abortion. She’s also served as a board member for the ultra-conservative Concerned Women for America.

And how did Martin come to learn of Nance’s work? After the far right was upset about CBS airing the “Victoria’s Secret Lingerie Show,” Nance organized a meeting between the FCC, the Southern Baptist Convention, the Parents Television Council, the Family Research Council, and Bill Bennett’s Empower America. Martin was apparently impressed by what Nance had to say.

And now, Nance will have the ear of the FCC’s chairman on a full-time basis. James Dobson and his group are thrilled.

“She has been very vocal and active on a number of pro-family issues over the past few years,” said Daniel Weiss, Focus on the Family Action’s media and sexuality analyst. “Just the creation of this office is a positive sign. The whole point of having a public liaison is to foster a greater working relationship with various people on the issues.

“It has added importance because it’s someone like Penny, who has such a history of activism and efforts to protect families already.”

The FCC’s power isn’t as vast as some would like, but expect a whole lot of whining about the need for milder, milquetoast-ish television programs between now and the end of Bush’s term, with Nance leading the way.

Isn’t the FCC just for the public airwaves? That’s a small piece of the viewing world. I mean, sure, some kooky right wing anti-abortionists masquerading as decency police doesn’t sit well with people who value freedom, but she can’t kill nudity on cable, or anything like that. I mean, we live in a country that has porn stars selling socks (although in fairness, the American Apparel way is to show and photograph sexy, non-model, “normal girls�, which is better for girls’ self esteem than anorexic models).

I think there needs to be a balance, and if we give some nut-bags a chance to show how prudish they are, it will do a good job of delineating that edge of the scale. But, having said that, the “Focus on the Family Action’s media and sexuality analyst” sounds like pseudo science a la creationism Intelligent Design.

  • If you squint hard enough, this can look like a good thing, because when you argue that the FCC should keep CBS from showing lingerie models in prime time, you have to take the position that the airwaves used by the broadcasters are a public trust, and that they should be using them to benefit the public. When that argument takes hold, other things naturally follow, like the Fairness Doctrine.

  • Yes, thank God they have no jurisdiction
    elsewhere. But I did read something scary
    about that, too. Can’t remember the source.

    Also, their evangelical efforts, if successful,
    could be the end of network prime time
    television. These people comprise, what,
    maybe 20% of the population?

    But I am so sick and tired of this group
    dominating our culture and politics in
    America. Talk about the tail wagging the
    dog. It’s an unholy alliance – the Repigs
    can’t win without them, and have to bow
    to their will. And so the whole country
    gets dragged down by them.

  • I’ll believe the F.C.C. is really interested in “decency” when it starts sanctioning those networks that selectively refuse to carry certain advertisments on the bogus “controversial issue” petard. For example, the U.C.C. ads saying that all visitors are welcome in their houses of worship, or AARP’s ads on preserving Social Security, both of which had some over-the-air networks refuse them while at the same time airing controversial issue-oriented ads sponsored by the Right Wing Noise Machine.

    Eadie, I loved your link on the “porn socks.” What does it say about the hypocrites when they want to stop what we can choose to listen to on our radio or watch on our TV AND cable — yes, the F.C.C. does have some jurisdiction in that arena, too — yet Mary Carey, probably the most well-known (and well-endowed, too) porn star of our day, and she is treated as a rock star at the recent Rethug fundraiser at which Bush was the keynote speaker?

    It will be interesting with Nance and Martin “policing” our morality. Which reminds me of the ancient Chinese curse: “May you live in interesting times.” Most progressives would indeed say we are cursed with Bush in charge!

  • I am a liberal, but I am getting a little tired of TV.
    How many references to spanking, lesbians, or whatever do we need on sitcoms. It’s like you can not watch more than 10 mins of public TV w/o some sort sexual innuendo. Sorry, I love my freedom, but watching survivor with my mother and having some dumbass make a blatant sexual innuendo is just getting old. I am tired of it. If that’s what you want, get cable, get the dish, get whatever you want.

    Now that being said, why can’t dems step up and say, too much. No, we have to wait around for Bush to appoint some nut job who will invariably control public campaign commercials. And it sounds like we religion is going to get the big ‘go ahead’ with this appointee.

  • Comments are closed.