Meet your new House Majority Leader

So, Tom DeLay is out and Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.) will be, at least for now, the House Majority Leader. OK, so who’s David Dreier?

Dreier has been in Congress for 25 years and isn’t known for much of anything. He worships free trade and tax cuts, and because his district includes a lot of high-tech industry, Dreier tends to be pretty good on issues like internet regulation. He’s a close ally of the president and was one of the first House Republicans to endorse him in 2000. (Dreier sat next to Bush at a training school for Republican congressional candidates in 1978 — a year in which both of them lost.)

His district tends to be relatively safe for Republicans, though Dreier won re-election last year by only 10 points — his closest race in over 20 years — and California Dems have hinted at making a serious run at his seat next year.

If you’re looking for real scandals with this guy, there isn’t much. He was tangentially connected the Nick Smith bribery scandal from 2003 — there were some reports that Dreier offered to help Smith’s daughter find work as an actress in Hollywood if he voted for Bush’s Medicare bill — but nothing ever came of it.

Ultimately, we’re talking about the kind of guy Republican leaders like — Dreier is a loyal partisan who follows instructions and has little interest in being a maverick. He’s not a close ally of the far-right base — he doesn’t appear with James Dobson or Pat Robertson very often — but he’s huge with the country club/Chamber of Commerce crowd.

With Dreier replacing DeLay, the main difference is that Dennis Hastert will be charged in earnest with the responsibility for keeping the party together. Speculation — which I’ve always believed — was the DeLay was always the real power with the GOP caucus and Hastert more or less worked for him, not the other way around.

With DeLay pushed aside, Hastert will have the power largely to himself.

Post Script: I don’t care about Dreier’s personal life either.

Josh is talking about Blunt trying to inch Drier out. We will see – this could just be whispering at this point.

Looks like the GOP is have some internal power struggles. So sorry….NOT

  • I agree CB, let’s keep Repugs personal lives out of the debate. God knows, THEY would never drag a Dem’s personal life into the public forum….oh, wait…I forgot about Clinton….

    Well, with that being said, it’s time to drag out an old news item relating to Bush being anti-bush (so to speak). Thanks to our liberal media neighbors from the Great White North, boldly going where the U.S. media refuses to go:
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040116/REID16/TPFront/TopStories

    Is that dueling banjos I hear??

  • > Speculation [..] was the DeLay was always the real power with the GOP caucus

    Speculation? This is like writing that there is speculation
    that gravity acts on mass. I don’t think that anyone questioned
    the idea that DeLay is far and away the most powerful person
    in the House. It was DeLay who was twisting arms, making
    threats and promises, to line up Republicans to vote for
    Bush’s Medicare bill. DeLay collects more money that anyone
    else in the House. Many Republicans in the House owe at least
    a part of their electoral success to DeLay.

    The only thing better than DeLay indicted would be DeLay
    indicted, remaining in his job as a posterboy for Republican
    corruption. If it were up to the Democrats, the “DeLay Rule”
    would have remained in force.

  • Hmmm. I have to respectfully disagree. If Dreier is indeed gay that isn’t just his “private life.” By being a closeted gay who is aligned with the GOP’s anti-gay propaganda machine he is contributing to making the life of other gay people who lack his power less free and less safe. It’s not about Dreier’s personal life per se, it’s the hyprocisy as well as the message that the only gays to be tolerated are ones who are quiet and closeted. In other words, the only way its OK to be a gay politician is if you act properly– quiet and ashamed. There fore to behave otherwise is inappropriate and is shoving it in people’s faces.

    We don’t live in a country where a person’s politics are seperated from who they are as a person– a person’s religion, marital status, children, personality, and job are all a big part of how they market themselves. We can debate that it shouldn’t be that way, but being gay isn’t just about sex, especially if you share your life with someone else. It is about who you are.

  • If anyone put Dreier’s personal life at issue, its David Dreier, by being a vocal opponent of gay rights at every opportunity and by having his live-in partner recieve the largest congressional staffer salary of any staffer in Congress. You know, paid for with taxpayer funds. I could care less who or what Dreier does in terms of his personal life but when he spends a great deal of time ensuring other people don’t have equal rights based on who they choose for a partner, guess what? I’m suddenly interested in his private life.

    And the idea that calling Dreier on his hypocrisy somehow implies that there is something wrong with being gay, is just ludicrous (follow the link in the top post).

  • Post Script: I don’t care about Dreier’s personal life either.

    I’m with ZoeKentucky and Stacy on this. When politicians advocate policy that affects people’s personal lives, then there personal life is a factor.

    Screw Drier, screw Dobson, screw the GOP.

  • If Dreier would say anything like “Clinton’s sex life should have been out of bounds” I would endorse the idea of leaving Dreier’s sex life out of the discussion.

    But that ain’t gonna happen, and winning back the Congress ain’t gonna happen if we act like a bunch of pansies.

  • What’s more, the media has played a role in making sure that Dreier never had to answer any uncomfortable questions about his personal life, if they could help it. But that sure wasnt the case with clinton. Not that two wrongs make a right, but Clinton didn’t bank his career on morality and “family values” as Dreier has. In addition, Clinton didn’t use taxpayer dollars to pay Lewinsky the second highest salary for political advisors on the Hill, now did he?

    http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Gay_Republican_eyed_to_become_House_0928.html

  • Comments are closed.