‘Mission Accomplished’ — redux?

For reasons that defy comprehension, congressional Republicans are so optimistic about the Middle East, they thought it’d be a good idea to put aside $20 million for a DC celebration of winning the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Seriously.

Even as the Bush administration urges Americans to stay the course in Iraq, Republicans in Congress have put down a quiet marker in the apparent hope that V-I Day might be only months away.

Tucked away in fine print in the military spending bill for this past year was a lump sum of $20 million to pay for a celebration in the nation’s capital “for commemoration of success” in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Not surprisingly, the money was not spent.

Now Congressional Republicans are saying, in effect, maybe next year. A paragraph written into spending legislation and approved by the Senate and House allows the $20 million to be rolled over into 2007.

Even if we put aside the notion of using 20 million tax dollars for what would likely become a massive propaganda-fest, how delusional do congressional Republicans have to be to expect “victory” in Iraq and Afghanistan to be so close, they can already start planning the post-war party?

As Harry Reid’s office put it: “If the Bush administration had spent more time planning for the postwar occupation of Iraq, and less time planning ‘mission accomplished’ victory celebrations, America would be closer to finishing the job in Iraq.”

And here’s the kicker from the NYT article: “Democrats called attention to the measure, an act that Republicans are likely to portray as an effort to embarrass them five weeks before the midterm election.”

Ya think?

$20 Million set aside for a victory celebration? Such attention to detail! What a tightly run Congress the Republicans have!

They might have to turn that money over to the Taliban in Afghanistan. In Iraq? Well nobody is winning in Iraq.

  • $20 million buys an awfully big ‘Mission: Accomplished’ Banner.

    Maybe they could even buy Dubya a fake plane converted to Big Wheel-style pedal controls to go along with his play flight suit.

  • They could have asked the oil companies and the Saudis to part with $20 million — an extremely small percentage of their war dividend. But, like Osama, prolonging the wars is in their best interest too.

    Wonder if that $20 million can be reallocated toward the inauguration of the new Democratic president in Jan. 2009?

  • CB and you other folks are still clinging to the reality based media.

    Its all about bread and circuses. Nothing else counts.

  • Yup. God forbid we spend that cash on equipment for the troops. Or maybe, I don’t know, some sort of emergency financial aid fund for families who are struggling because one of the income earners can’t seem to get out of the Middle East. Hey, what about using the money for improved arms? Prosthetic ones that is.

    Goddamn, we’ve become every single stereotype people have about the US. Vain, shallow, borish, violent, stupid has a sack of shit.

    Now I must clean my monitor because Ryan V caused an iced tea eruption.

  • “Democrats called attention to the measure, an act that Republicans are likely to portray as an effort to embarrass them five weeks before the midterm election.”

    I don’t know. The word “embarrass” suggests Republicans might be capable of feeling shame or remorse or the ability to accept responsibility for their many catastrophes.

    On the other hand, when did they turn into a bunch of whiny ass babies? “Waah! The mean Democrats are playing … politics!”

  • How DARE we try to embarrass them? This proves that we were wrong all along – They did have a plan for victory!

  • “..how delusional do congressional Republicans have to be to expect “victory” in Iraq and Afghanistan.. “ ‘Totally’ springs to mind. Furthermore, CB puts “victory” in inverted commas suggesting, correct me if I’m wrong, that ‘victory’ is oxymoronic in the context of Iraq and Afghanistan. That I would agree 100% with.

    Unfortunately, I find tagged on the words “.. to be so close, “ which throws me back in a quandary again. I feel helpless here. Of course, why should anyone care? But if anyone does care, is it possible to enunciate what “victory” in Iraq, or Afghanistan, would look like if it ever occurred. I mean, how would we recognize it?

    Sorry for being a nuisance, but I’d absolutely love to see a definition of this magic “victory” — which I’ve never yet seen though, believe me, I’ve searched.

  • Maybe this is the October Surprise. A $20 million dollar campaign rally across the US where George says”we won” and brings the troops home. Maybe Frist just sprang some details a wee bit early with his “Taliban are OK’ remarks the other day.

    Bet those vets who are injured and hit with benefits cuts or those who have been stop lossed will be the first out to see what kind of parades $20million buys … at their expense.

  • That’ll teach me to read from latest to earliest , not the other way around… And post my comments after I’ve read *all* messages from CB đŸ™‚ I noticed the same article in NYTimes, but tacked my comment onto another thread. Lesssee if I can bring it back to here…

    Every time… Every time I think this WH has reached the outermost edge of bizarre, they come up with something else to top the previous “totally unbelieveable” record. They don’t have enough money to equip the Army. They don’t have enough *Army* to spread around… But they’re holding 20mil in reserve for triumphant victory parades???

    Whatever next? We build an Arc de Triomphe on the outskirts of DC? So that the Chimperor can drive under it, in an armored Humvee, dragging Saddam by the neck behind the vehicle?

    I can hardly wait for the fall of *this* “Roman Empire”…

  • Comments are closed.