Monday’s campaign round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* After coming up short in Iowa, and struggling in New Hampshire, Mitt Romney hasn’t had too much good news lately, but he at least has one victory under his belt: on Saturday, he won the Wyoming Republican caucuses.

* Former Sen. Bill Bradley (D-N.J.), a presidential candidate in 2000, endorsed Obama yesterday. “Barack Obama is building a broad new coalition that brings together Democrats, independents and Republicans by once again making idealism a central focus of our politics,” Bradley said in a statement released by Obama’s campaign. “Because of his enormous appeal to Americans of all ages and backgrounds, Obama is the candidate best positioned to win in November…. His movement for change could create a new era of American politics — truly a new American story.”

* Hillary Clinton has been relaying a story in several recent campaign events about bringing together Catholic and Protestant women in Northern Ireland, an anecdote that’s obviously intended to boost her credibility on foreign policy. The Boston Globe reports that the details of the story suggest Clinton may be exaggerating.

* There’s an interesting labor dispute underway. AFSCME, which is backing Clinton, is hitting Obama on points unrelated to labor issues. In response, members of AFSCME’s executive board sent a letter to the union’s leadership, calling the Obama attacks “fundamentally dishonest.”

* Mitt Romney has a new strategy: he’s a Washington outsider, unlike John McCain. He told a New Hampshire audience yesterday, “Americans are not looking for Washington insiders. This is a time of choice for our party.” It’s also the basis of a new ad.

* Obama’s Secret Service protection has increased this week, “amid fears over the safety of the man seeking to become America’s first black president.”

* As if there was any doubt, Fred Thompson announced late last week that he wouldn’t compete or campaign in New Hampshire. He did, however, show up for both New Hampshire debates over the weekend.

* John Edwards has a new campaign metaphor: “‘I am Seabiscuit!’ Edwards proclaimed in a packed warehouse in Manchester, a reference to the legendary undersized racehorse that delighted a nation in 1938 by beating champion thoroughbred War Admiral.”

* CNN talked to one “leading Republican strategist” who sounded very nervous about the new Democratic frontrunner: “I think Barack Obama is a potential Robert Kennedy or Reagan figure…. [I]n terms of raw political horsepower, he is the most electable of any of the Democrats and potentially more electable than Bill Clinton. If he ran the right campaign he could appeal to a substantial number of Republicans and Independents.”

I think Barack Obama is a potential Robert Kennedy or Reagan figure…. [I]n terms of raw political horsepower, he is the most electable of any of the Democrats and potentially more electable than Bill Clinton.

That “leading Republican strategist” is absolutely right. They should be scared, especially with the current crop of GOP contenders.

  • “‘I am Seabiscuit!’ Edwards proclaimed…

    Who is Red Pollard then?

    Mitt Romney has a new strategy: he’s a Washington outsider, unlike John McCain.

    Where have I heard that strategy before…

    The Boston Globe reports that the details of the story suggest Clinton may be exaggerating.

    Allow me to place my hands on the sides of my face in a Culkinesque show of feigned surprise.

  • I seem to remember Kucinich using the Seabiscuit simile four years ago when the movie of the same name came out.

    It didn’t help him.

  • Obama’s Secret Service protection has increased this week, “amid fears over the safety of the man seeking to become America’s first black president.”

    Sure it wasn’t over fears of Bill O’Reily?

    “‘I am Seabiscuit!’ Edwards proclaimed in a packed warehouse in Manchester…

    Okay, now I really don’t know who to support.

    “Because of his enormous appeal to Americans of all ages and backgrounds, Obama is the candidate best positioned to win in November…. “

    Okay, let’s try a play on words here. Obama may be the best positioned to win, but is he positioned to win best. Is Obama going to have a mandate to make changes that America needs, or his he going to have a mandate to be the first Black president. Because frankly I think America needs to change its policies far more then to change the color of its politicans.

    If Obama wins, is he going to find a Congress that says “hey, we let you be President, isn’t that change enough?”

  • Obama must be Black Beauty and Richardson is the Horse With No Name (recognition).

    Don’t have one for Hillary.

  • “I think Barack Obama is a potential Robert Kennedy or Reagan figure.”

    As one of the few people here who actually personally saw Robert Kennedy in action, and who was politically active during his time in politics, and as someone who personally had the opportunity to meet Reagan (when he was Governor here), who didn’t like the man’s politics but discovered the power of his personal charm, I can fully agree with that assessment of Obama. Include in the power of Martin Luther King and you’re getting to the core of the phenomenon.

    Most of you are too young to have ever experienced a campaign built on the politics of hope but I am here to tell you as someone who did participate in those kinds of campaigns that it’s the kind of thing where “2+2=4” is irrelevant – it’s “2+2=22” in action. It cannot be defined, but people “know it when they see it.”

  • “I am Seabiscuit!’

    I would think Obama is seabiscuit – he’s the one who started off with ZERO Union endorsements… Clinton has AFSCME, Edwards has SEIU, Dodd had IAFF…

  • CB quoted:

    CNN talked to one “leading Republican strategist”

    CB, you are straining your credibility with me here. You almost could write, “Mike Huckabee talked to God…” at the beginning of that quote instead. Please, less of these gratuitous “CNN talked to a Republican strategist” quotations from now on.

    For example:

    “A Republican strategist, eager to show his hand to everybody yesterday, said…”

    / snark

  • This year is looking good for Democrats in general, so whoever leads the ticket, even Richardson, is likely to seem to have won with huge coat-tails. However, Hillary would immediately meet entrenched opposition from the right, and Edwards would run into opposition from the establishment. Obama has already demonstrated considerable appeal to many whites, youth, the old, men, women, plus cross-over appeal from some republicans and independents, and he has already been able to signifcantly expand the population of active participants in the Iowa caucuses. Thus if he heads the ticket, he’ll have a pretty solid claim to a mandate for change, and for doing business differently. So, yes, I think he’d have a far better mandate than any of the other candidates.

  • Seriously, though, I’d rather hear what Republican strategists want TV stations to quote them as saying, but I’m just alerting you to how I take it.

  • I will wait on line for as long as it takes to vote for Obama if he is the nominee in November. Having siad that I wish I had more faith in the people of the USA. The rethug smear machine will turn Barack Hussein Obama into the leader of every known and unknown terrorist organization in the world. I hope and prey that I am wrong but I am still not convinced that he can be elected.

  • I agree with Ohioan…wasn’t Sea Biscuit famous for hanging back, running in 2nd for almost the entire race, and the putting on a fevered sprint at the end where nobody could keep up with him?

    If you look at the poll trends in Iowa, NH, and nationally, the candidate that best describes is Obama.

  • “If you look at the poll trends in Iowa, NH, and nationally, the candidate that best describes is Obama.”

    Of course, you compare the black man to a horse. Typical!

  • I’m sorry, but I think we have a long way to go before we fit Obama for the JFK/RFK mantle.

    Please go read Ted Widmer’s article at the Washington Monthly.

  • The “leading Republican observer” (whoever in hell that is) has the same take on Obama as I had while watching his speech Thursday night after his win in Iowa.

    In my case, I may have been seeing what I wanted to see. In the case of the “Republican observer,” I’m sure he wasn’t hoping for a Democratic Reagan (a high compliment coming from a Republican).

    If Democrats want to dream really big, perhaps Obama might be the second coming of FDR who can put together a coalition that will dominate American politics for the next fifty years. It’s a great opportunity for the right Democrat, while the Republicans are stuck in the shambles created by George W. Bush. Think about THAT, Republican observers.

    Suggested slogan for Obama’s campaign: “Not just a manager. A leader.”

    (Was the website down for a while? I had trouble getting in.)

  • In 1988 I was the editor for the Claremont (NH) Eagle Times. This gave me the opportunity to personally interview most of the presidential candidates that year. On the whole, they were all smart and had some charm. But when Gary Hart came, it was different. The whole place lit up and he made people feel like they were important and that he was glad to meet them (not the other way around). That showed me that some candidates “have it” and some do not. In contrast, the late Illinois Senator Paul Simon may have been the smartest in the group but he had the presence of a life insurance salesman. I’ve never met Obama, but I’m guessing he has “it.”

  • N. Wells @# 10, I agree with your assesment for the most part. (Though I’m an Edwards voter, still.) My only problem with Obama is, you can’t win a mandate without actually asking for one. I don’t see what he’s running on other than hope. And yes I know he has policy proposals and white papers.

    I men Bush barely won 2004 with 51or 52% of the vote, proudlt stated he had a mandate and political capital and he was going to use it to privatize social security. Well the public was having none of that because he didn’t run on that platform. And NO I do not think Obama would try to privatize.

    Edwards is running on ending the occupation, national healthcare and oil dependence and global warming. So if he wins, he can say he has a mandate and he might actually get those things accomplished.

    I sure wish someone would run on restoring the Constitution, gutting the unitary executive, Guatanamo,restoring Habeus Corpus and enforcing all the national and international laws that have been broken over the last 7 years. And then maybe with that mandate we’d see some true justice.

  • I’m sorry, but I think we have a long way to go before we fit Obama for the JFK/RFK mantle.

    The Kennedy boys have a lot of dirt, backroom intrigue, and questionable peccadillos lurking under their legacy — they’re too often falsely mythologized.

    Obama has a long, long way to catch up in the Unseemly Behavior Department, if that’s what you mean.

  • I didn’t see the debate, but it was obvious in all the bits of news within a day or two, every dem presidential candidate was suddenly claiming the be “THE” candidate for change.
    I find this off-putting. Sure, if you’re a Clinton supporter, you can argue that she HAS been in favor of change for years, but the reality is that she’s been the self-labelled “experience” candidate. Obama has been about change from the beginning. Edwards has been about cleaning house. Clinton has been about competency and experience.
    You can’t all of you just suddenly become the “change” cadidate. What I would really like would be if ALL candidates would just decide what their core drivers really are, state them early and often, and STICK to it! Why is it that so many candidates think an election is about HIM or HER winning? It’s about putting your core ideas in front of the electorate and letting them choose. That’s what democratic elections are. If you put your true core ideas out there and the electorate rejects them, well, then that’s the way it ought to be. If every candidate runs around trying to morph constantly into the “persona” that seems to be winning in one particular area, we end up with hollow elected officials. Either that or stealth rogues like junior.

  • It gets more and more interesting… Do you suppose it’s true? I saw it on Free Republic:

    Posted on 01/07/2008 10:35:18 AM PST by doug from upland

    “Spinmaster and Hillary advisor Terry McAuliffe (who is on the witness list in Paul v Clinton) just told Bill O’Reilly that Hillary Clinton will go on his show.

    Bill told McAuliffe that it could save her campaign.

    To even consider it, Hillary is showing that she is completely desperate.”

  • Re: #16 and the article entitled “Ask Not! Why Obama is No JFK”

    …In the aftermath of his trip, [JFK] gave speeches that ridiculed the French (and by extension, the American) position, and proved that he was no simplistic Cold Warrior. In 1957, he continued to chart a maverick’s course with a deeply-informed speech on Algeria that criticized France and the U.S. for trying to sustain an unsustainable conflict against an insurgent population

    And three years later, as president, he kept us on that path to ruin. What a shame he didn’t use his vast experience to steer us away from a path where 50,000 Americans and millions of Vietnamese lost their lives. Maybe he was going to do just that, and that’s why he was killed. We’ll never know. But hopefully Obama has learned a thing or two from the mistakes of the more experienced JFK.

    That article of course is heavily anti-Obama, and even goes so far as to compare Obama to Bush. Not surprisingly it was written by Ted Widmer, a foreign policy speechwriter for President Clinton

    The article is here:
    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2008/0801w.widmer.html

  • Obama has a long, long way to catch up in the Unseemly Behavior Department, if that’s what you mean.

    Uh, no, that isn’t what I meant at all. What I meant was that Obama’s speeches and rhetoric may take people back to the Kennedys, but it takes more than talk.

  • “Spinmaster and Hillary advisor Terry McAuliffe (who is on the witness list in Paul v Clinton) just told Bill O’Reilly that Hillary Clinton will go on his show.

    Bill told McAuliffe that it could save her campaign.

    Bill O’Lielly would love to save Hillary, because he knows how his listeners love to hate her. The man is a moron, but he knows his listeners and what can get them fired up.

  • Barack Obama’s message of change and unity is based on a lie. Barack Obama is racist against Americans Hispanics as he still condones preventing them race dicrimination charges in Illinois.
    It can be verified Barrack Obama as an Illinois Senator has been placed on
    repeated written notice of ongoing illegal race discrimination against American Hispanics. I ,a Hispanic American, have been denied the right to formally officially file race discrimination “IDHR & EEOC” charges against Hormel Foods Corporation and UFCW at the agencies IDHR & EEOC in Illinois since 2004 when in fact other nonHispanics are allowed to file such charges of Race discrimination. Despite Barack Obama and his office having full knowledge and understanding of this serious situation Barrack Obama a civil rights attorney himself has refused to hold anyone at IDHR & EEOC accountable for their actions regarding the issue of IDHR & EEOC discriminating against Hispanic American complainants and to date Barack Obama is not investigating or even asking for any independant third party to investigate this racial discrimination citing only a separation of powers. It is unconscionable for Barack Obama to have used this device as it regards race discrimination which has effectively empowered IDHR & EEOC to maintain their illegal & discriminatory position and with Barack Obama’s inaction Barack Obama is in fact discriminating against Hispanic American constituents of Illinois. I have been reporting this information on blogs longer than he has been running for president. I wonder how he would have done in Iowa if more poeple knew the truth. And if he is truly open and honest he should tell America himself what is going on in Illinois right now!

  • I’ve got a great new slogan for John Edwards:

    He can produce a cropped image for posters of himself biting Elizabeth’s shoulder, Elizabeth laughing, and Edwards’ eyes kind of playfully turned up towards the camera.

    At the bottom, “DON’T BITE THE BISCUIT!!”

  • Uh, no, that isn’t what I meant at all. What I meant was that Obama’s speeches and rhetoric may take people back to the Kennedys, but it takes more than talk.

    Um, yeah, fraternizing with prostitutes and gangsters?

    Cool. Bring back Camelot.

    I knew what you meant, but it’s important to remember that Obama is no Kennedy in good ways, too. The Kennedys wouldn’t have made it half as far in this media age.

  • I like Obama best of the top three, but I need to call ’em as I see ’em..

    I complained when anyone took a Republican strategist at face value when he said Hil was the most dangerous opponent.

    Same applies to my favorite. Fair’s fair.

    Ignore the shill in the corner.
    I think he’s right, but don’t take HIS word for it.

  • Obama must be Black Beauty and Richardson is the Horse With No Name (recognition).

    Don’t have one for Hillary — Dale, @6

    The Horse You Rode In On?

  • Tom @ 18 –

    Maybe that is my problem with Obama. I worked hard for Hart over Mondale as the agent of change. I worked hard for Dean over Kerry as the agent of change.

    We’re well beyond once bitten, twice shy. I’m now in the “fool me. . .we won’t get fooled again” territory. Give me stern, level, bracing reality. Anything that exceeds it is a pleasant surprise, rather than another political disappointment.

  • Dale (#6) and Libra (#31) —

    C’mon . . . for Hillary? It’s easy! She’s The Old Gray Mare.

  • Whoever turns out to be Seabiscuit, we certainly aren’t short of plausible Republican contenders for the rear end of the horse.

  • Comments are closed.