Monday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Last week, the White House agreed to support a Democratic bill that would require Senate confirmation for U.S. Attorney replacements. Apparently, Senate Republicans didn’t get the memo — Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) still “intends to object” to the bill. Whether that means he’ll filibuster the measure remains to be seen. A spokesperson for Harry Reid said the Dems plan to bring the legislation to the Senate floor “as quickly as possible.”

* The Washington Post ran an op-ed today hailing the success of the so-called “surge” policy in Iraq and harshly criticizing reporters who failed to come to the same conclusion. Neither the Post nor the writer happened to mention to readers that the author of the column, Robert Kagan, is the brother of the man who came up with the “surge” idea.

* After Cheney’s recent visit to Pakistan, the media reported that the Musharraf government quickly arrested Obaidullah Akhund, the Taliban’s third in command. It was proof, we were told, that Cheney get-tough style produced results. Now we’re learning that Akhund is free and may not have even been apprehended in the first place.

* “The Army, forced by five years of war to expand its ranks, faces a critical shortage of midlevel officers, interviews and military records show,” USA Today reports. “Those officers — majors and lieutenant colonels — manage troops at war. The Army estimates it has about 13,900 majors and 8,750 lieutenant colonels this year. It expects to have an annual shortage of 3,000 such officers through 2013 as it increases its ranks by 40,000 soldiers.”

* Jurassicpork, a Carpetbagger regular, has the Post of the Day today with a compilation of terrific screen-shots from Fox News. Don’t miss this one.

* An eighth newspaper has dropped Coulter’s column, while some of the editors at papers keeping her column are explaining why.

* Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) still has some unanswered questions for Condoleezza Rice about Iraq and Niger. Good for him for sticking with this.

* The LATimes believes the Dems’ Iraq bill, based on benchmarks and timelines, is flawed because Bush needs the “ability to maneuver” diplomatically. Didn’t we hear this exact same argument before — in 2002 when Congress was debating the Iraq war resolution?

* Halliburton is on the move — from Texas to Dubai. Time’s Karen Tumulty asks, “Is this about tax breaks? Getting beyond the reach of congressional subpoenas? And what about all that sensitive information that Halliburton has had access to? At a minimum, reincorporating in Dubai would mean that Halliburton will be paying less taxes to the U.S. Treasury, even as it collects billions from government contracts.”

* CNN’s Jack Cafferty thinks Alberto Gonzales is a “weasel.”

* Lost in Babylon: “An Iraq War translator’s inside take on America’s failure to communicate.”

* A new attempt to ban abortion, this time in North Dakota.

* And finally, here’s the Bushism of the Day: “I’m a strong proponent of the restoration of the wetlands, for a lot of reasons. There’s a practical reason, though, when it comes to hurricanes: The stronger the wetlands, the more likely the damage of the hurricane.” — Bush, discussing post-Katrina wetland improvements in New Orleans, March 1, 2007

If these items aren’t of any interest, consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Haliburton Does Dubai? I thought Argentenia was the favoured destination of fascist pig dogs.

Wasn’t there a huge stink recently? Something about giving a company based in Dubai responsibility for US ports? Hmmmm.

  • Oh come on, just because Haliburton has been implicated in billions of dollars of fraud, and just because the Democrats just won power, doesn’t mean they’re bugging out to escape prosecution. I’m sure their plans to move go way back… to late 2006.

    This is a great issue to hammer the wingnuts with, it combines their xenophobia and their growing distrust of BushCo.

  • Jurassicpork,

    That was well done and damning.

    Haliburton moving to Dubai? I thought these guys don’t cut and run.

    Cafferty should apologize to weasels. Abu Gonzalez is just a big mass of toe fungus.

  • The Washington Post harshly criticized reporters for NOT coming to the same conclusion.

    (I’m not usually on typo patrol. I assumed I knew what you meant, but that’s quite a difference.)

  • Nice, thorough job by Jurassicpork.

    The cancelation of the Nevada Dem debates provided a glimpse into how fragile and insecure Focks is with it’s contrived facade of legitimacy. It was so damn easy to bring Focks to whining, panty twisting apoplexy. They really wanted to put that feather in their dunce cap. They are desperate to keep up the farce of being fair and balanced. But the cancelation of the debates goes right to the heart of their B.S. The demands for cancelation worked, (with almost no significant dissent,), because no one who’s not on Focks’ payroll could say they’re not a propoganda tool with a straight face.

    Dems don’t have one damn thing to lose by keeping their distance from Focks. Focks has been far too influential considering that their primary product is lies and viciously slanted ideological commentary. They don’t deserve a moment of trust.

  • At a minimum, reincorporating in Dubai would mean that Halliburton will be paying less taxes to the U.S. Treasury, even as it collects billions from government contracts.”

    A lot of this Halliburton stuff is pure speculation at this point though. All that they have announced is that they will open a corporate headquaters location in Dubai and that the President/CEO will be based out of there instead of Houston. There are legitimate buisness reasons for doing this
    though as with the decline of production in America, the name of the game is in the Eastern Hemisphere and Halliburton has substantial energy business interests there and expects to get most of its future growth there (how much of those interests and future growth are in say, Iraq, would also be speculation).

    They haven’t said anything about re-incorporating or registering in a foreign country. It is actually not unusual for global corporations to have headquarters (or multiple headquaters – and Halliburton plans to keep it’s Houston corporate offices open) in separate countries than where they are officially registered. There seems to be a lot of assumptions and speculation here that is based upon nothing more than assumptions and speculation. Unless and until Halliburton says otherwise, at this point not a whole lot will be different going forward.

  • 2Manchu (no. 10)

    The British East India Company was a Partially-owned subsidiary of the Crown…

    The current US administration is a wholly-owned subsidary of Halliburton.

    Just saying…

  • That new corporate complex in Dubai is going to cost Halliburton a lot of cash. Anyone care to guess how much of it is being paid for with that “misplaced” Iraq reconstruction money?

  • Jurassicpork:

    Don’t know if you know this, but no less than Larry Johnson took your page yesterday and e-mailed it to everyone he knows. With the link. This likely had something to do with your hits and links today.

    Excellent work, BTW. You nailed the futhermuckers with their own nails and hammer.

    Now that you’re a “well-known blogger,” you’re officially a “Wonder Boy.” This means you now have to top yourself tomorrow. Given the rest of the good stuff you have done there to date, I’m sure this won’t be hard to do.

    Keep up the good work!

  • and Fox’s armies of Regent Univerity and Liberty University-trained lawyers of God will be sending the nasty, heavy-handed cease-and-desist to Jurassic (who will think it seems like deja vu!) alleging copyrights in the materials in 3. . . 2. . .1. . .

    wait – it will get better! JP will respond arguing “fair use” and the Faux lawyers will send another round claiming a trademark on the words “fair” and “balanced,” claiming only they know from fair. (and Al Franken will think it seems like deja vu.)

    (to which JP should say “fine, lets find a jury – we can report, they can decide!”)

  • JPork

    I can’t wait to send that to my uncle.

    Might I share what has to be the newspaper sentence of the day? You’d think the opening sentence from this BBC article would take the prize: “Israel has recalled its ambassador to El Salvador after he was found drunk and naked apart from bondage gear.”

    Oh, but the second is far far better: “Reports say he was able to identify himself to police only after a rubber ball had been removed from his mouth.” Reports might also say that the reporter waited his entire life to be able to write that sentence and it’s all downhill from here.

  • AYM

    Re: the S&Mbassador

    My favorite line from the Middle East Times via Americablog:

    Money quote:

    It was the first time Rephael, who had held a technical position in the ministry before his posting to San Salvador, had ever distinguished himself in any way, the official added.

  • It was the first time Rephael, who had held a technical position in the ministry before his posting to San Salvador…

    I’d no idea “bottom” was a techincal position.

    [rim shot]

    Congratulations JP!

  • I’d no idea “bottom” was a techincal position. taio

    Normally it wouldn’t be, but with that much hardware on, it starts to get techincal.

  • To take advantage of the open thread, from an article on Peter Pace’s quote about gays in the military, “Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Monday that he supports the Pentagon’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ ban on gays serving in the military because homosexuality is ‘immoral’ and on par with having an extramarital affair.”

    Well if gay relations are on par with extramarital affairs, Ann Coulter was dead wrong. In Peter Pace’s world, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain are the “faggots” in this election.

  • Comments are closed.