Monday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Rudy Giuliani has been taking quite a few swings at MoveOn.org over the last several days. This afternoon, MoveOn swung back.

* On a related note, Dick Cheney waded into the fight himself today, saying, “The attacks on him by MoveOn.org in ad space provided at subsidized rates in the New York Times last week were an outrage.” The ad space wasn’t “subsidized,” but if Cheney ever managed to levy an honest attack, it’d probably cause a rift in the space-time continuum, so he might as well keep on lying.

* CREW wonders why the Senate GOP leadership stripped Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) of his committee assignments, but not Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska). It’s a good question.

* Speaking of Craig, the ACLU filed a brief on the Republican senator’s behalf today with the Minnesota Court considering Craig’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea over his bathroom sting arrest.

* Happy ending in California: “UC Irvine Chancellor Michael V. Drake and Erwin Chemerinsky have reached an agreement that will return the liberal legal scholar to the dean’s post at the university’s new law school, the university announced this morning. With the deal, they hope to end the controversy that erupted when Chemerinsky was dropped as the first dean of the Donald Bren School of Law.”

* Kevin Drum makes the case that Dems aren’t really all that anxious to end the war in Iraq: “Iraq itself would probably get worse if we pulled out, at least in the short term, and there’s an outside chance that it would get way worse. Dems would get all the blame, of course. And finally, Democrats would no longer have the war as an issue to run on in 2008.”

* David Cole and Jules Lobel on the ineffectiveness of “going on offense” to combat terrorism: “Security rests not on exceptionalism and double standards but on a commitment to fairness, justice and the rule of law. The rule of law in no way precludes a state from defending itself from terrorists but requires that it do so within constraints. And properly understood, those constraints are assets, not obstacles.”

* U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker subtly criticized his boss yesterday on the slow pace of addressing the Iraqi refugee crisis. On this, he’s right.

* Joe Klein explains why Bush deserves far more blame than Petraeus: “The nature of military leadership is congenital optimism; officers are trained to complete the mission, to refuse to countenance the possibility of failure. That focus is essential when you go to war, but it lacks perspective. That’s why civilian leaders — the Commander in Chief — are there to set the mission, to change or abort it when necessary. The trouble is, George W. Bush’s credibility on Iraq is nonexistent. And so he has placed David Petraeus, an excellent soldier, in a position way above his pay grade. He has made Petraeus not just the arbiter of Iraq strategy but also, by default, the man who sets U.S. policy for the entire so-called war on terrorism.”

* David Broder’s praise for Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) doesn’t make a lot of sense.

* Last week, Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell was caught lying to the Senate about a revised FISA law’s role in preventing a terrorist attack in Germany. This week, he’ll return to the Hill to ask House lawmakers to give him even more surveillance authority. These guys have chutzpah, I’ll give them that.

* Scott Bloch and the Office of Special Counsel may soon find their investigation into White House malfeasance coming to an abrupt end — the probe needs an extra $3 million.

* Tom Schaller on white guys: “Those who have been closely following the politics of the Democratic primaries may have noticed that someone is missing…. I’m talking about the white male voter, or at least a certain long-coveted variety thereof. He is variously known as ‘NASCAR dad’ — that shirt-sleeved, straight-talkin’, these-colors-don’t-run fella who votes his cultural values above all else — or ‘Bubba,’ as Steve Jarding and Dave ‘Mudcat’ Saunders affectionately call him… Start looking on milk cartons for Bubba because he has vanished, and not a moment too soon: The Democratic obsession with the down-home, blue-collar, white male voter, that heartbreaker who crossed the aisle to the Republicans many decades ago, may finally be coming to a merciful end.”

* In his new autobiography, former Mexico President Vicente Fox describes George W. Bush as “the cockiest guy I have ever met in my life.” He added that the president’s Spanish skills are at a “grade-school” level and says, “I can’t honestly say that I had ever seen George W. Bush getting to the White House.”

* The Senate is moving forward on a plan to revisit the Military Commissions Act. Good.

* Ron Brownstein is moving from the LA Times to become the political director of Atlantic Media. It’s a nice gig.

* And finally, it’s disconcerting to know that the bathroom in the Minneapolis airport in which Larry Craig was arrested has become a tourist attraction. Said one man who works at a shoeshine near the men’s room, “People have been going inside, taking pictures of the stall, taking pictures outside the bathroom door — man, it’s been crazy,”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

As for Drum’s contention Democrats don’t want to end the war — maybe. But they’re idiots. We’re either going to end the war now, or later when we most likely win control of Congress and the oval office. Or, worse, we make Nixon’s mistake of keeping the thing going.

On purely political terms, when would you like to see troops start coming home? If things blow up during a withdrawal — or rather, the press no longer keeps a lid on the chaos already underway — better to have Bush own the whole thing. Otherwise, it needs to be the first order of business, in the hopes we can move on to other issues by the time the next election rolls around (or the withdrawal starts around midterms, with the real consequences occuring shortly after the parades).

  • Kevin Drum is projecting his own ethics onto Democrats, and he’s beneath contempt. There isn’t one Democrat, anywhere, who would prolong this stupid war to gain a political debating point. But do you know any Republicans who would prolong the war just to save face?

    Gen. Petraeus has never once in his life uttered the words, “Sir, my mission is impossible. It can’t be done.” You don’t get to be a four-star if you are willing even to admit the possibility of failure. Joe Klein’s point is exactly right. That’s why we are supposed to have civilian control of the military. Now we are seeing what happens when the civilian in control is an idiot.

    I’m looking forward to the McConnell hearings. Let’s get the popcorn ready.

  • What ever happened to the “War Czar?”
    Seems like all parties have basically decided to pretend Douglas Lute doesn’t even exist.
    Did he ever actually begin his stint as “War Czar” or was that just a lot of nonsense from Bush that never materialized.

    Sorry to go off topic a bit, but reading about Petraeus made me remember that once upon a time we were supposed to have a new Commander in Chief of oversee the war.

    Maybe he’s shy… or no longer politically opportune.

  • Scott Bloch and the Office of Special Counsel may soon find that their investigation into White House malfeasance coming to an abrupt end — the probe needs an extra $3 million.

    Sorry Mr. Bloch, but $3M was what was originally allocated for the 9/11 Commission, so you’ll probably have to leave some stuff out of your report, like the collapse of a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper or something.

  • “David Broder’s praise for Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) doesn’t make a lot of sense.”

    It might if he was given a mission to bolster Linds’ media profile in case he’s the next one to get outed by Larry Flynt. Or ‘Craiged’ I guess they’re calling it now.

  • He is variously known as ‘NASCAR dad’ — that shirt-sleeved, straight-talkin’, these-colors-don’t-run fella who votes his cultural values above all else

    I’ve never found that guy particularly straight-talking. More like weaselly.

    Anyway, what;s he trying to start, that Dems are ignoring white guys? Don’t think so. White guys need health care, don’t they? The real story is the GOP ignoring blacks.

  • Crap! Ah! Comment 7 wasn’t me! Some liberal up and stole my name! Jesus!

  • Forcing Bush to end the war now might be difficult, but ending it under Democratic control of the government is not likely to be any easier. (An ending under Democratic control will only make it that much easier for Republicans to fling charges of ‘the Democrats losing Iraq’.)

    Good for the ACLU: I see the issues in the same way as they do (except that I additionally tend to go on at great length about the vileness of hypocrisy). Craig must be about as pissed at being defended by the ACLU as he is at having outed himself. (Being defended by the ACLU is probably even more of a kiss of death for an Idaho republican than being gay.)

  • OkieFromMuskogee says…

    Kevin Drum is projecting his own ethics onto Democrats, and he’s beneath contempt. There isn’t one Democrat, anywhere, who would prolong this stupid war to gain a political debating point.

    Oh please. First of all, Kevin Drum didn’t say that. He said the Dems were too gutless to risk the political downside of ending the war. Still pitiful, but not quite the same thing.

    There are plenty of Democrats — everywhere — who would prolong the war to avoid taking a personal risk. That’s why the war is still going on. You don’t need a supermajority capable of overriding a veto to stop the war. You don’t even need a simple majority. All you have to do is not pass the next war funding bill. Forty-one senators and a filibuster can do that.

  • “Forcing Bush to end the war now might be difficult, but ending it under Democratic control of the government is not likely to be any easier. (An ending under Democratic control will only make it that much easier for Republicans to fling charges of ‘the Democrats losing Iraq’.)”

    This highest form of patriotism any party can embrace is falling on their sword for the good of the nation, when they know the serious media talking heads will be there with the Republicans to punish them for it, as they did Vietnam.

    I fear we are just patriotic enough to make the sacrifices we must to save us from Republican mistakes.

  • I wish Dems would revisit the Patriot Act and get rid of it as well as the MAC and the FISA Protect America (so Bush can’t be blamed for illegally wiretapping Americans or confiscating their financial dealings) Act. They could do away with all three without it affecting anything to do with terrorism. The last terrorist attack (Anthrax killings) should not be a concern now that the US lab that produced it has been destroyed by the FBI so it could not be traced to them. It was given to the only two members in Congress who were planning to prevent the Patriot act from coming up for a vote. So now the congress should be able to get rid of that hideous act without fearing for their lives.

    Now who voted for the Patriot Act and the MAC and the AUMF and the FISA Protect America Act….All but Dennis Kucinich who actually read the Patriot Act in its entirety before voting against it. That’s right …Kucinich…the only one who knows what the hell he’s doing.

  • The Chemerinsky “reinstatement” may not be exactly what people think it is.

    According to Emptywheel at The Last Hurrah (and she is usually on top of this stuff) quoted from the LA Times on Saturday:

    … Friday, details emerged about the criticism of Chemerinsky that the university received in the days before Drake rescinded the job offer, including from California Chief Justice Ronald M. George, who criticized Chemerinsky’s grasp of death penalty appeals. Also, a group of prominent Orange County Republicans and Los Angeles County Supervisor Mike Antonovich wanted to derail the appointment.

    [snip]

    Michael Schroeder, one of Orange County’s most powerful GOP political players, said a group of 20 prominent Republicans organized against Chemerinsky in recent weeks, believing him to be a “longtime partisan gunslinger” and too “polarizing” for the job.

    Another member of the group, who asked not to be identified, said Drake’s cellphone number was distributed so the protesters could call the chancellor.

    … lynch mob member, Tom Malcom, appears to be trying to undo the damage, by un-un-hiring Chemerinsky if he promises to be a good, silent boy and allows Malcom to babysit his behavior.

    Prominent Orange County attorney Tom Malcolm, a participant in high-level university discussions, said: “I think we are satisfied that if [UCI Chancellor Michael V. Drake and Chemerinsky] have a meeting, they can come to some understanding, and [Chemerinsky] can become a good dean.”

    [snip]

    Any deal would therefore require Chemerinsky to “successfully transition from being a very outspoken advocate on many causes to being a dean of the stature that we expect in a start-up law school,” said Malcom [sic], a prominent Orange County Republican who was going to be a member of Chemerinsky’s advisory board.

    But there is the possibility that at least one member of the Regents was involved. Witness how Gerry Parsky avoids mentioning whether he supported or opposed the Chemerinsky appointment.

    Parsky said Drake briefed him about the search process in that phone call and told him he was leaning toward Chemerinsky. Drake “did not ask my opinion on Chemerinsky and I did not provide it,” Parsky said.

    “The regents support academic freedom and the right of the chancellor to decide on the hiring of a dean based on the academic needs and goals of his individual campus, and the regents do not interfere with these matters,” Parsky said. “And I do not believe we did in this case at all.”

    It appears that Tom Malcolm, self-appointed Chemerinsky baby-sitter, is a member of the Parsky commission for his district. (I assume that’s what the “a member of the U.S. District Court six-person Bi-Partisan Selection Committee appointed by President Bush (2004)” means. Update: Yup, that’s what it means.) It’s one tight little network down in Orange County, so I presume this is a hit job pulled off by the powers that be in the OC GOP.

    Now if this is still operative – and believe me after watching Michael Antonovich for the past 25 years, I have no reason to think otherwise – then “un-firing” Chemerinsky and putting him under the thumb of these unreconstructed John Birch Society not-so-crypto-Nazis and Confederate-loving traitors, then this is far, far worse than firing him was in the first place. Trust me, these guys make unreconstructed Texas traitors like Bob Perry (Swiftboat Liars financier) look like liberal amateurs.

  • The only reason not to want to end the Iraq War on Boy George II’s watch…

    … you can be sure he’d mess that up too.

  • ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    “Like most Americans I admire the integrity and the candor that General Petraeus showed in his hearings before Congress,” Cheney said …

    But Dicky-poo… didn’t you say the insurgency was in its last throes?

    And doesn’t that mean that General Betrayus called you a liar?
    After all… he says it is going to take 10 years to win…

    Last throes Dicky?

    [Insert famous Cheney quote here]

  • Sounds like Chancellor Drake and Chemerinsky were able to tip toe through the broken eggs and come out winners. Kudos to them both….

    Those who caused Chancellor Drake to take the ignoble firing course in the first place should be hunted down and exposed in all their naked corruptness.

    Thanks to sites like TP and CBR that keep us abreast of injustices so we can raise our voices in protest, and maybe play a role in keeping justice and academic integrity afloat.

  • OK first, nothing Broder says makes much sense.

    Second, of course Stevens still has excellent committee assignments while Craig does not. Craig’s “crime” is sex related with homa-sex-ul overtones while Stevens’ is just your garden variety money related corruption. We all know that the GOP has a high level of tolerance for money related corruption.

  • It is true that Americans are lazy thinkers, and need their news in sound bites.
    So, in order for them to not blame the people who solve the problem for the problem, the problem needs to have the real perp written all over it.
    So, from now on, I propose we all call that mess in Iraq the Bush war.
    Once this is firmly established nomenclature, all issues pertaining will fall on Bush and his supporters.

  • Comments are closed.