Monday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Huge news out of Detroit: Thousands of United Auto Workers walked off the job at General Motors plants around the country Monday in the first nationwide strike against the U.S. auto industry since 1976. UAW President Ron Gettelfinger said that job security was the top unresolved issue, adding that the talks did not stumble over a groundbreaking provision establishing a UAW-managed trust that will administer GM’s retiree health care obligations. Gettelfinger complained about ‘one-sided negotiations.’ ‘It was going to be General Motors’ way at the expense of the workers,’ Gettelfinger said at a news conference. ‘The company walked right up to the deadline like they really didn’t care.'”

* On a related note, Digby mentioned, “GM says it needs to cut costs. Perhaps it would like to work with the Democrats and the Unions to get universal health insurance. It would be good for their workers, good for the country and good for the bottom line.” Absolutely — GM’s healthcare costs topped $5 billion a couple of years ago. Imagine what would be possible for Corporate America if we moved away from an employer-financed system?

* More tragedy near Baghdad: “A suicide bomber struck a reconciliation meeting of Shiite and Sunni tribal leaders and senior provincial officials in Baqouba on Monday, killing at least 15 people, including the city’s police chief, security officials said.”

* Last week, Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell told a Senate panel that FISA restrictions made it impossible to quickly eavesdrop on Iraqi insurgents who kidnap U.S. troops. It was a bizarre claim to make, especially under oath, and the evidence that McConnell was repeating a falsehood continues to pile up.

* The New York Times’ public editor, Clark Hoyt, did his own investigation into MoveOn.org’s “Betray Us” ad, and found that the progressive group was mistakenly charged a lower rate. Hoyt’s analysis did not, however, address the charges that the NYT editorial board’s opposition to the war in Iraq led the paper to “subsidize” MoveOn’s message.

* NBC and CBS both turned down Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice this month for Sunday morning appearances. “I expected we’d just get a repetition of the administration’s talking points, which had already been well circulated,” says Bob Schieffer, host of CBS’s “Face the Nation,” who questioned two senators instead. Ouch.

* WaPo: “A Pentagon group has encouraged some U.S. military snipers in Iraq to target suspected insurgents by scattering pieces of “bait,” such as detonation cords, plastic explosives and ammunition, and then killing Iraqis who pick up the items, according to military court documents.”

* As part of an apparent effort to mollify nervous Republicans, Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey assured conservative activists such as Leonard Leo and Ed Meese that he’ll support keeping Guantanamo Bay open and can understand CIA use of “enhanced” interrogation techniques against al Qaeda suspects.

* The Quote of the Day award goes to Matt Stoller: “I’m a little worried about upcoming fights over funding for Iraq, inasmuch as they might distract us from discussing the Moveon ad.”

* The unintentionally-hilarious Quote of the Day award goes to Bill O’Reilly: “I respect dissent on the Iraq war.” As recently as two weeks ago, O’Reilly told his audience that critics of the administration’s policy are “actually hoping for defeat.” (I’m sure he meant that respectfully.)

* Leader of the Free World? “Dozens of world leaders are to gather at the United Nations on Monday for a full agenda of talks on how to fight global warming, and President Bush is skipping all the day’s events but the dinner. His focus instead is on his own gathering of leaders in Washington later this week, a meeting with the same stated goal, a reduction in the emissions blamed for climate change, but a fundamentally different idea of how to achieve it.”

* I can’t help but enjoy seeing a conservative like Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) denigrate civil liberties — until he’s facing legal trouble, at which point he’s practically an ACLU member.

* Alan Greenspan’s thoughts on the war in Iraq are even stranger than his support for Bush’s tax cuts.

* Shortly after scandal-plagued Rep. Jerry Weller (R-Ill.) announced that he would retire at the end of this term, a Weller aide pushed a reporter down a flight of stairs. I know House Republicans live in a culture of corruption, but this is ridiculous.

* Some NYC officials are threatening to punish Columbia University for allowing Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak on campus. Asks Glenn Greenwald, “Is there anyone who fails to see how dangerous and improper this is — not to mention unconstitutional — that government officials threaten and punish universities for hosting speakers whom the officials dislike?”

* And finally, given the reaction on Fox News and in some other Republican circles to Democratic presidential candidates appearing at Yearly Kos, I wonder what the defense is for the Bush White House inviting the DC chapter of the right-wing website FreeRepublic.com over for a picnic?

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

“…that the progressive group was mistakenly charged a lower rate.”

This must just be a simple coincidence!

  • President Bush is skipping all the day’s events but the dinner.

    Can’t skip dinner.

    Some NYC officials are threatening to punish Columbia University for allowing Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak on campus. Asks Glenn Greenwald, “Is there anyone who fails to see how dangerous and improper this is — not to mention unconstitutional — that government officials threaten and punish universities for hosting speakers whom the officials dislike?”

    Yeah, amen.

    I wonder what the defense is for the Bush White House inviting the DC chapter of the right-wing website FreeRepublic.com over for a picnic?

    That it’s not prime picnic weather anymore so he’s showing them short shrift?

  • The New York Times’ public editor, Clark Hoyt, did his own investigation into MoveOn.org’s “Betray Us” ad, and found that the progressive group was mistakenly charged a lower rate. Hoyt’s analysis did not, however, address the charges that the NYT editorial board’s opposition to the war in Iraq led the paper to “subsidize” MoveOn’s message.

    Obviously, we might need to have the Federal Government regulate newspaper advertising costs to avoid this sort of problem in the future…. what do you think, JRS Jr?

  • This is indeed a good opportunity for big business (GM, Ford) to help push for national health coverage. All of the companies (and jobs) that left US soil did so to save money. Main one…health care. It is over 40% of employee costs now.

    I find it VERY disturbing to hear all the noise against free speech in this country, whether it be moveon.org or the president of Iran. What in the hell is wrong with this country? The evil people running things want to destroy all questioning voices. People need to wake up and stop this trend. I am sick of media telling me who I want for president in 2008. Since the gutless congress won’t listen to us and throw the bush bums out as they deserve, we need someone like Dennis Kucinich who wants to restore our civil rights. But, there is a media blackout on him. I don’t want Hillary or Obama….I want a real person…I am sick of corporate stooges.

    We are really being screwed and I don’t know what it will take for people to take to the public forum and YELL. I am tired of the apathy and BS I see everywhere. Nobody wants to get involved; apathy is a dictator’s best friend. Since that is what we have these days, I guess they are happy. I’m not.

  • ‘The company walked right up to the deadline like they really didn’t care.’”

    Because they didn’t. The stockholders will be very happy to see them take all these jobs and send them to Mexico, for one-tenth what they pay here. Thank you very much, Bill and Hillary Clinton, for selling us down the river with !@#%$#@!!! NAFTA, you corporate tools.

  • About GM – Universal Health Care is such a no brainer for Big Business, to remain competitive, and to really pump up the bottom line – what is it with these guys? Do the CEOs and CFOs of the big three automakers really care if some Republican Moron calls it Socialized Medicine? Who cares what it’s called.

    About the US Military using bomb parts as bait – and there’s absolutely no chance in hell that Iraqi insurgents will send children out on scavenger hunts? The people who think this stuff up are just evil.

  • Taking the “open thread”, as well as the continuing chatter about the MoveOn ad… Media Matters had an interesting take on this:

    Whether one agreed with the substance of the MoveOn ad or found the wording offensive, there should be something disconcerting about a government body formally condemning private citizens for criticizing the government.

    Last week I was merely frustrated that the (D) leadership would allow this baloney, after failing to get any meaningful change to the Iraq policy. Now I’m *disturbed*, as many of our Dem senators actually voted to condemn us (hey, I’m a member) for expressing an opinion. Maybe this angle has already been discussed here, but it was new to me.

  • “NBC and CBS both turned down Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice this month for Sunday morning appearances. “I expected we’d just get a repetition of the administration’s talking points, which had already been well circulated….” ”

    Wait wait wait wait. You mean to tell me that major news organizations are actually looking for content that is NOT just regurgitated administration talking points?

    I must have fallen asleep and woken up in a parallel universe. Sombody pinch me!!

  • I’m in Dr. Strangelove territory. I LOVE the bomb. We should nuke Iran while we’re debating MoveOn, then fret about the fallout of human rights organizations overplaying the controversy by calling them nuclear warheads instead of the more platable and polite “Bunker Busters”. Clearly, the greatest rhetorical blunder since they called the former Eastern block prisons we use to lock up our off-the-book terrists “gulags”.

    Yeeeeeeehaaaaah!!!!!

    Ride the bomb.

  • Well I was looking at the news on the MSNBC site and once again Bush is pushing to change Social Security. I’m always amazed since he’s running the government that “borrows” $170 Billion from the trust fund each year then tells us there’s no money there. Well Duh. When Bush and co take $170 Billion out and put what Bush calls “worthless paper”, it’s kind of hard to meet expenses.

    I hope the Dems in Congress are more afraid of us than of having Republicans call them names, otherwise Social Security is toast.

  • It doesn’t look like it is up on Media Matters yet, but today Limbaugh said inviting Ahmadinejad to speak at a public event was no different from having Harry Reid or Dick Durbin speak……

    If a dem said this, the wingnuts would be going nuts.

  • JRS Jr & JKap, I think the issue about the rate charged to MoveOn.org by NYT is a little more complicated than CB’s extract and your follow ups suggest. If you read into the article you’ll find this:

    Eli Pariser, the executive director of MoveOn.org, told me that his group called The Times on the Friday before Petraeus’s appearance on Capitol Hill and asked for a rush ad in Monday’s paper. He said The Times called back and “told us there was room Monday, and it would cost $65,000.” Pariser said there was no discussion about a standby rate. “We paid this rate before, so we recognized it,” he said. Advertisers who get standby rates aren’t guaranteed what day their ad will appear, only that it will be in the paper within seven days.

    which clearly indicates that The Times had a slot available for the ad on the Monday requested. The fact that they had room Monday allowed MoveOn.org to get the standby rate. Had there not been room Monday but MoveOn.org was determined to have Monday they could have opted to pay the full $142,083 rate to secure the nominated day. That wasn’t necessary because The Times was able to give them space on Monday anyway.
    The article goes on to quote a Catherine Mathis, vice president of corporate communications for The Times, saying, [my emphasis]

    “We made a mistake.” She said the advertising representative failed to make it clear that for that rate The Times could not guarantee the Monday placement but left MoveOn.org with the understanding that the ad would run then.

    So, it’s a mistake to say they “made a mistake” – because it’s “not guaranteed” for a particular day doesn’t mean that it cannot appear on that day. After all, it has to appear on some day!
    To be honest, I get the impression that the public editor and this Ms Mathis are running scared, or maybe just conservative-leaning themselves.

  • Universal health care will NOT save money. It just switches the cost from corporate profits to corporate taxes.

    If you want to save money, George Bush has the plan for ya.
    Emergency rooms and the new S-CHIP program.

    Now THAT’s deep discount health care!
    A plan to decimate those of Edwards and Clinton! I believe it was developed by the noted out-of-the-box economics experts J. Swift. and M. Antoinette.

  • Speaking of civil liberties, the ACLU filed an amicus brief in support of Craig, “saying Minneapolis airport police violated his Constitutional right of free speech in charging him with disorderly conduct after arresting him in an airport men’s room.”

    No comment from the good Senator as of yet.

    Prosecutors are a bit miffed.

  • Universal health care will NOT save money. It just switches the cost from corporate profits to corporate taxes.

    Wrong.

  • Regarding the NYT:

    I understand Fox News favors right-wing bloviators…
    I understand that Fox News got an exclusive interview with Gen. Betrayus.
    I understand that Dick Cheney made it know that he asks for all TVs in his suite to be tuned to Fox News….

    And I am suppose to get irate because the Times might have given a progressive group a penny ante discount?
    [Insert Cheney expletive deleted here.]

    Regarding the GM strike:

    I hope it goes on indefinitely.
    The world has enough cars.
    Especially… the globally irresponsible sort that GM builds.
    Every day that their assembly lines are idle is a victory for the planet.

  • Re: MoveOn ad
    Even though it was NYT’s mistake in charging the lower rate, MoveOn is going to pay the difference. Wonder if Giuliani — who got the same “sweet deal” will also pony up the extra 77K?

    re UN’s global warming meeting: […]President Bush is skipping all the day’s events but the dinner.

    What is it with this guy and food? He’s supposed to be talking seriously with Merkel and it’s all about the pig he’s gonna have for dinner. He’s talking with Blair (or B-liar, as the Brits called him) and he’s stuffing his face with rolls. He’s talking to a journo and it’s cheese crumbs dribbling oout of his moth… No wonder he’s such a gasbag, full of fart “jokes”.

    JKap, @12,
    What, just taser? Not shoot her with an assault rifle? They must be getting soft…

  • “Universal health care will NOT save money. It just switches the cost from corporate profits to corporate taxes.

    It has already been pointed out that this statement is wrong. But I wish that someone who thinks that the American system of employment-based health insurance makes sense would explain to us why. Here are a few of the “free market” arguments against it (and I’m nowhere near as imaginative as a Cato economist):

    1) It puts American companies at a disadvantage to foreign competitors.
    2) It restricts the free movement of labor in the market. (How many people do you know who would like to change jobs or become self-employed, but can’t because of medical insurance issues?)
    3) It gives so-called “unethical” companies (like Wal-Mart) an advantage over so-called “socially responsible companies.

    Making health care employment-based is about the dumbest national policy that we have. And with the Bush Administration in charge, that’s saying a lot.

  • Universal health care will NOT save money. It just switches the cost from corporate profits to corporate taxes.

    Even if this were true (which it isn’t), it would be good for the corporations! Corporations are rated on profits, not tax liability.

    Of course, even if it wasn’t cheaper, it’d still be good for the rest of us… Healthier employees; less distractions at work or looking for work; more even footing between competitors, even overseas; healthier families…

    I don’t understand why the kicking and screaming.

  • Voyager50, Okie, Crissa @ 18, 22, 23

    Sarcasm. Am I that subtle? Do I understand the conservative mind so well I can emulate it so closely? Why, thank you.

    My snarky follow up was supposed to have indicated that no health care at all is cheaper than universal and that’s all Bush and his backers seem to care about.
    Conservatives would 86 the emergency rooms if they could. That Hippocratic oath thing sure interferes with market forces!!!

    The reference to J. Swift was Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” Google it. It could have been written today and it’s a macabre hoot.

  • Comments are closed.