Monday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The de-Baathification law passed in Iraq might not be quite as encouraging as once thought. Spencer Ackerman explains that the measure is basically “phony”: “The Sunnis are outraged: one Sunni parliamentarian calls the law “a sword on the neck of the people.” But the Shiites throw their hands up and say What do you want from us? It took us over a year of arduous compromise to get to this point. That’s as far as we can go!

* I’ll have more on this tomorrow, but John Solomon, who’s been doing some pretty awful work for the Washington Post is moving on … to the far-right Washington Times. Given the quality of Solomon’s work, and the journalistic standards of the Moonie newspaper, it’s an unusually good match.

* The Hill: “Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) is strongly criticizing the EPA’s failure to produce documents regarding its decision to reject California’s effort to curb greenhouse gas emissions. The lawmaker, who chairs the Committee on Oversight and Government Affairs, had asked EPA for the documents in December and requested that their delivery begin on Jan. 10.”

* In related news: “Both Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and House sleuth Henry Waxman (D-CA) have set their sights on EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson, who made the unprecedented and arbitrary decision (over the unanimous recommendation of the staff) to deny California’s petition to limit greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks. They both requested documents related to the decision. But Johnson is apparently having real trouble getting all those documents together…. [Waxman] says that the committee will be interviewing a host of EPA employees about Johnson’s decision. If the reports are correct, all of them will be telling Waxman about how they told Johnson there was no legal justification for blocking California’s law and he overruled them anyway.”

* AP: “The chief of the U.S. military said Sunday he favors closing the prison here as soon as possible because he believes negative publicity worldwide about treatment of terrorist suspects has been ‘pretty damaging’ to the image of the United States. ‘I’d like to see it shut down,’ Adm. Mike Mullen said in an interview with three reporters who toured the detention center with him on his first visit since becoming chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff last October.” Mullen added, however, that he’s “not aware that there is any immediate consideration to closing Guantanamo Bay” from the Bush administration.

* Who spun the Strait of Hormuz incident? Cernig has a great post on the subject.

* Whether you’re in Michigan or not, you’re likely to enjoy this short video, explaining why Dems should vote for Mitt Romney in tomorrow’s Michigan GOP primary. Tag line: “Michigan, do you want this primary season to be over? Or do you want this primary season to be hilarious?”

* On a related note, Kevin asks a very good question about Dems and Romney: “Would Romney really be worse than, say, McCain or Giuliani from a liberal perspective? That’s hard to believe, frankly. But that’s what Hugh Hewitt thinks, and his fealty to the conservative cause isn’t really open to question. So who’s right?”

* AP: “The nation’s intelligence chief says that waterboarding ‘would be torture’ if used against him, or if someone under interrogation was taking water into his lungs. But Mike McConnell declined for legal reasons to say whether the technique categorically should be considered torture. ‘If it ever is determined to be torture, there will be a huge penalty to be paid for anyone engaging in it,’ the director of national intelligence told the New Yorker in this week’s issue, released today.”

* WaPo: “In its first couple of weeks after it returns tomorrow, the House is likely to take up contempt-of-Congress resolutions against White House Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet E. Miers for their refusal to appear before Congress for questioning about the 2006 removal of nine U.S. attorneys, Democratic leadership aides said.”

* Part of the flap regarding BET’s Robert Johnson going after Barack Obama has as much to do with the messenger as the message. (I got a note from a friend today that said, “I don’t care what Johnson implied — why is Clinton hanging around with Bob Johnson”?) What’s so offensive about Johnson? Take a look at Jonathan Chait’s devastating profile from 2001 (written before Johnson endorsed Bush’s Social Security privatization scheme.)

* And finally, David Letterman listed the other night the “Top Ten Things Overheard on George W. Bush’s Trip To The Middle East.” There are a few gems in there, but personal favorite was #3: ‘That’s not a kitty, sir, it’s a Sphinx.’

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

‘If it ever is determined to be torture, there will be a huge penalty to be paid for anyone engaging in it,’

That would be the idea, yes.

  • Even better than Letterman’s Top 10 was this beauty right below the list — David Letterman: “Bush would like to settle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He’s so confident about doing this that he is already unfurling the ‘Mission Accomplished’ banner.” That says so much.

  • “The chief of the U.S. military said Sunday he favors closing the prison here as soon as possible because he believes negative publicity worldwide about treatment of terrorist suspects has been ‘pretty damaging’ to the image of the United States.

    That’s right, we have to keep up appearances. It’s like the drunk parent who beats the shit out of the kids, and doesn’t care what other relatives might say but can’t stand the shame when the neighbours start to talk.

    Of course a cynic might think talk about shutting it down is as sincere as the drunken daddy telling the cops little Tommy burnt his hand on the stove.

    “The nation’s intelligence chief says that waterboarding ‘would be torture’ if used against him

    Translation: Do unto ferriners, but not to me.

  • * AP: “The chief of the U.S. military said Sunday he favors closing the prison here as soon as possible because he believes negative publicity worldwide about treatment of terrorist suspects has been ‘pretty damaging’ to the image of the United States. ‘I’d like to see it shut down,’ Adm. Mike Mullen said in an interview with three reporters who toured the detention center with him on his first visit since becoming chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff last October.” Mullen added, however, that he’s “not aware that there is any immediate consideration to closing Guantanamo Bay” from the Bush administration.

    You could probably say you want the place to be shut down, even if you don’t want it to, let everyone important know you don’t really mean it, and still improve our standing in the world just by saying it– if you’re the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. You know, psywar in place of human rights.

    “The nation’s intelligence chief says that waterboarding ‘would be torture’ if used against him, or if someone under interrogation was taking water into his lungs.”

    How can it be torture if used against an American, but not torture if used against a non-American? Sounds like McConnell has a racial component to his thinking.

  • ‘If it ever is determined to be torture, there will be a huge penalty to be paid for anyone engaging in it,’

    Might be nice to let our agents know in advance whether they are breaking the law or not. Do they have a mechanism in place in which people can safely refuse to waterboard even if given an order to? In other words, what a half-assed way to run things.

    Who cares what Hewitt thinks about anything? What is Robert Johnson’s connection to Hillary, if any?

    When I was young I distrusted authority. Now I’m learning the details about why I was so right to do so.

  • These next primaries will be so important. If Clinton brings Obama down with just the tactics she’s used so far then it’s probably good to know now. As much as we dislike the tactics of the Clintons now, we might like them in November if they work on the Republicans. Realpolitikin’

  • Chris said:

    If Clinton brings Obama down with just the tactics she’s used so far, then shame on us.

    Very mild compared to what the Republicans will use.

  • Dale said:

    “Very mild compared to what the Republicans will use.”

    Oh, and that makes it right? Puhleez.

  • independent thinker said:

    Dale said:

    “Very mild compared to what the Republicans will use.”

    Oh, and that makes it right? Puhleez.

    Right or wrong, Obama will be vetted for the general election.

  • Oh, and that makes it right? Puhleez.

    Dukakis and Kerry took the high road. That makes them good people, but made two Bushes president. I want someone who will go toe to toe with the R’s and not flinch. We can clean the system up once we’re in power, but we can’t do jack for anyone from outside.

  • And on a related note, Rep. Henry Waxman has sternly reprimanded Mr. Whipple, guilty of forcefully squeezing the Charmin against it’s will, and initiated a congressional inquiry. Inside sources say if needed, subpoenas will be issues, but doubt that the Whipple camp will abide.
    Business as usual.

  • damn Bourbon

    citizen pain, didn’t your mom ever tell you that if you bring treats you have to bring enough for everyone? 🙂

  • She did. And I will. But until we can have a few drinks together, You’ll have to fend for yourself. I’d go with Basil Hayden, or 4 Roses.

  • “the House is likely to take up contempt-of-Congress resolutions against White House Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet E. Miers”

    it’s nice to see that at least one house of our legislature might be trying to get something done here. now we’ll see if they’ll take it somewhere, but at least they’re starting

  • Z: I want someone who will go toe to toe with the R’s and not flinch. We can clean the system up once we’re in power…

    Yes.
    I’d I like to recommend Robert Johnson as head of the FCC.
    You scratch my back and I scratch yours..
    Favors do come due you know…
    Looks like Hill has got a truckload to deliver…

    Dale:
    As much as we dislike the tactics of the Clintons now, we might like them in November if they work on the Republicans.

    Don’t forget us Independents.
    I’ve already got my T-shirt idea picked out:

    Sick of the Clintons.
    Sick of the Bushes.
    CHANGE! McCain 08.

    Heck, he is only polling 1-2% points behind her now.
    It is a done deal once the real Clinton vetting/venting starts…

    Also as a touch of irony I had these cool bumper sticker ideas:
    Pierce Bush 2012?
    Chelsea Clinton 2014?
    CHANGE! McCain 08.

    You Dems really make it too too easy:
    Gun. Foot. Fire.

  • Yes. I’d I like to recommend Robert Johnson as head of the FCC.

    Trust me, he couldn’t do much worse than the unpredictable, gridlocked, manipulated mess Chairman Martin has going on right now.

  • #17: If you think McCain is an agent of change, I have some land inf Fla I can sell you.

    Please. You conservatives are about as bright as Bu$h after a night of cocaine and whiskey.

    And some lovin’ from Jeff Gannon.

  • citizen_pain:

    My three main issues are:

    a) Ending torture.
    b) Treating global warming as a real problem.
    c) Ending the war in Iraq.

    McCain gets me my main two.
    The third one? I get at least 2 more years of war, maybe more with Hillary, and 4 more with McCain.
    But of course with Hillary, anything she says about global warming will be opposed just because she said it. No… LBJ won’t get diddly-squat done. So I actually think McCain is the better deal for a progressive who cares mostly about a and b. Plus with McCain I get to put a boot into the face of this nutso DYNASTY crap. Sick to death of that. So are a lot of people. You’ll see that in November…

  • Zeitgeist, while I agree to some degree that one must be in power to do something, I want someone in power whom I can respect. The old “the end justifies the means” arguement is bunk. If we choose a Dem who will act just like Bush/Rove, then what have we gained? Politics as usual. Different name, same game. Enough is enough.

  • 20:
    a) McCain has flipped, flopped, then fliiped again about torture. I’ve been tortured and it’s inhumane! Waterboarding is OK, fuck the Geneva Conventions!
    b) do you really think he can stand up against the republican corporate fund machine? yeah ok
    c) coming from the guy who said he wouldn’t mind if our presence in Iraq lasted 100 years

    fool

  • Interesting development, as reported on Think Progress:

    Judge tells MSNBC to let Kucinich debate. “A judge in Nevada has just ordered MSNBC to include Rep. Dennis Kucinich in Tuesday’s Democratic Party presidential debate in Las Vegas or he will cancel the forum. Senior Clark County District Court Judge Charles Thompson vowed to issue an injunction halting the nationally televised debate if MSNBC failed to comply. Kucinich had filed a lawsuit seeking to be included just this morning.”

    A re-count in NH and an invite to the debate…Kucinich will not be silenced.

  • And what about Citizen McCain on domestic issues like repairing the near worthless healthcare system? Oh, that’s right, Healthcare Hypocrite McCain doesn’t have to be concerned with the mythical little people on that.

  • McCain will do what he is told as he continues into senility. He doesn’t deal with the issues…he has issues. He won’t get you anything you want…he’ll just make you shut up and take it.

  • Paper ballots are the only way to go. Appoint a bipartisan agency (does that exist anymore?) to do the count.
    As Stalin said: “It’s not he who votes, it’s he who COUNTS the votes “

  • hand counting is just not practical except in limited, narrow circumstances.

    have a Commission made up of the leadership in each party in Congress plus by their selection an equal number of state election officials (usually Secretaries of State). provide funding for each side to hire up to two experts in various fields (likely ballot design and a computer subfield). select a single scantron system to be used nationwide, and establish a uniform set of ballot design standards.

    have the specific machines and system tested, verified and validated pre-election at two levels: state election commissioner and the lowest local elected authority with election responsibilities – in some cases these will be the same party, but in many cases not. have reps designated by any registered state political party in attendence at testing and validation.

    have, as most states permit, poll watchers from each party on the ballot who wants to watch the polls all day. have the tallies sent and received with party reps present. preserve the scantron cards for hand recounts if necessary.

    that ought to be fairly safe, but with the speed of scantron instead of hand counts.

  • …Bu$h after a night of cocaine and whiskey.

    Otherwise known as “Every day.”

    Go ahead, vote for McCain, but you’d better like his Veep too, because McCainiac iz o-l-d.

  • McCain won’t touch the war in Iraq, he won’t do squat against global warming – as long as that squat somehow changes the fortunes of corporate america.

    And if torture is your number one issue? Why the fuck are you voting McCain, when all the Democrats also believe it is wrong?

    You’re an idiot, AO. Total and undeniable.

  • I have to go with Zeit on this one, difficult as printing ballot results at the polls may be, we need to keep a paper record that can be hand counted after a contested election.

    I – trust – Diebold – not – at – all.

  • Comments are closed.