Monday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The news we were hoping for: “The fight goes on. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) cloture vote failed 48-45 just now, well short of the 60 votes necessary. In the end, four Dems crossed over to vote with the Republicans: Sens. Mark Pryor (D-AR), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and Mary Landrieu (D-LA). Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) was the lone Republican to vote with the Dems. Now we’re on to the question of whether an extension will be passed. We’ll have more on that in a moment.”

* Bloodshed in Iraq: “Five U.S. soldiers were killed Monday when their patrol was hit by a roadside bomb and then came under small arms fire in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul, the U.S. military said. Iraqi army and police also reported fighting had broken out in the Haysuma neighborhood, a known al-Qaida stronghold in eastern Mosul, Iraq’s third-largest city, which is 240 miles north of Baghdad.”

* The incomparable Lee Stranahan’s latest clip offers the Giuliani campaign a new message: highlight all the disasters he’s been involved with, and tell voters it’s evidence of disaster-management abilities.

* Two interesting new political magazines launched today: The Root, created by the Washington Post to provide “thought-provoking commentary on today’s news from a variety of black perspectives”; and The Washington Independent, a “nonpartisan news and commentary site dedicated to covering topics of national importance. Launched in January 2008, the site aims to combine the best of the old and new media by combining the reporting, accuracy and fairness of traditional journalism with the speed, voice and community of the Web.”

* On a related note, Spencer Ackerman (recently of TPM Muckraker) has an interesting piece at the new Washington Independent about the CIA and the Bush administration’s torture policies: “[D]espite innumerable statements from the Bush administration about the value of the CIA’s interrogation program, U.S. interrogators are still mostly in the dark — in the dark not only about al-Qaeda, but about how to effectively elicit vital national-security information from the detainees in its custody.”

* There are 10,000 agents in the FBI. A grand total of 50 of them speak Arabic (that’s .005% 0.5%). As Matt Yglesias noted, “Suppose that instead of deciding to spread our scarce language assets thinner by invading Iraq, the Bush administration had done something much cheaper like a $15 billion per year effort to massively boost America’s base of people who speak Arabic, Turkic languages, Urdu, etc.? Wouldn’t that have been more helpful?” Actually, yes.

* Not a good sign: “Sales of new homes plunged by a record amount in 2007 while prices posted the weakest showing in 16 years, demonstrating the troubles builders are facing with a huge backlog of unsold homes. The Commerce Department reported Monday that sales of new homes dropped by 26.4 percent last year to 774,000. That marked the worst sales year on record, surpassing the old mark of a 23.1 percent plunge in 1980.”

* The NYT notes today, “Mr. Bush has spent years presiding over an economic climate of growth that would be the envy of most presidents. Yet much to the consternation of his political advisers, he has had trouble getting credit for it.” This is wrong for a variety of reasons. Most notably, Bush has presided over weaker growth than any president in five decades — hardly the stuff of “envy.”

* Here’s an odd twist: one of Bush’s SOTU guests is apparently ineligible to enter the country legally. One wonders if Tom Tancredo will send the Capitol Police after him, just on principle.

* “60 Minutes” had a really interesting report last night on George Piro, who was the front man for a team of FBI and CIA analysts who were responsible for interrogating Saddam Hussein while he was in U.S. custody. Among the insights: Piro didn’t need torture to acquire information, and Saddam Hussein had no interest in a relationship with Osama bin Laden.

* John Solomon, now the head of the far-right Washington Times, is still defending the bizarre brand of journalism he utilized at the Washington Post: “All the stories the liberal blogs have attacked have never been questioned by my own editors. They stood by them. The blogs point to no factual errors but complain that I highlighted something they didn’t care for or preferred that I would have focused on something else.” Predictably, this is false, too.

* Asked if the Bush administration has been good for his career, Keith Olbermann said, “Honestly? No. I’m an American citizen, I think this has been a disastrous presidential administration. I would have given what I have, in terms broadcasting success in the nature of this newscast, I would have easily said … if I were given the choice of this or some responsible presidency in the last four years or eight years? I would have taken a responsible presidency.”

* Clip and save for future use: “Sen. John McCain told a crowd of supporters on Sunday, ‘It’s a tough war we’re in. It’s not going to be over right away. There’s going to be other wars.’ Offering more of his increasingly bleak ‘straight talk,’ he repeated the claim: ‘I’m sorry to tell you, there’s going to be other wars. We will never surrender but there will be other wars.’ McCain did not elaborate who the United States would be fighting.”

* And finally, Dick Cheney apparently likes souvenirs — he “has a piece of the house where [Abu Musab al Zarqawi] died on display at his residence.” That would be the same Zarqawi the Bush White House repeatedly declined to attack for political reasons, right? Just checking.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

“…highlight all the disasters he’s been involved with, and tell voters it’s evidence of disaster-management abilities.”

That, or it is proof that he is a disaster or three waiting to happen (a disaster magnet? a disaster whore?) and that we do not want him anywhere near the white house.

and the next president should make him an ambassador to a far away place so the disasters happen over there and not over here.

  • Saddam Hussein had no interest in a relationship with Osama bin Laden.

    What a coincidence… George W Bush had no interest in capturing Osama bin Laden.

  • “Dick Cheney apparently likes souvenirs — he “has a piece of the house where [Abu Musab al Zarqawi] died on display at his residence.” ”

    What’s the matter, the ears were already taken? What a freak.

  • If there is a more reprehensible legacy of the George W Bush presidency than imprisoning people indefintely without charging them, denying them legal counsel AND torturing them, please, someone tell me.

  • NYT: “Mr. Bush has spent years presiding over an economic climate of growth that would be the envy of most presidents. Yet much to the consternation of his political advisers, he has had trouble getting credit for it.”

    Gah.

    I can’t believe the Times ran that swill.

    I’m not very familiar with Ms. Stolberg’s writing, but if this is any indication, her capacity for critical analysis is damn close to zero. Choose your metric, Ms. Stolberg — GDP growth, financial market health, job creation, deficit reduction, wage increases — Bush The Lesser comes out looking like a bum.

    She goes on to say “From a strictly economic perspective, it is difficult to blame Mr. Bush for the current crisis.” Wrong again.

    While Bush did inherit the asset bubble-lovin’ Al Greenspan from the Clinton administration, he could’ve sacked him at any time. Bush and his henchmen have very much encouraged the current mortgage crisis and the much larger shaky credit climate that we’re now seeing; Bernacke, true to form (but, admittedly, in a tough, tough spot), refuses to give Wall Street the bitter pill it deserves. Paying billions of dollars for a futile war doesn’t help matters one bit.

    I most certainly do blame the Bush administration for reckless, criminal mismanagement of our economic policy. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a complete dolt, in my humble opinion. Frankly, Ms. Stolberg, the data is on my side.

  • I’ll agree with Stranahan on the principle that GhoulChild’s disaster-management skills are directly related to the disasters he’s been involved in—but only so long as he agrees that the computation includes, by default, GhoulChild’s presidential campaign. You just don’t get more “disasterous” then that. As for 9/11, GhoulChild was only involved in that many, many people died needlessly that day; other than that, he was just a “happenstance bystander.

    John McCain hasn’t even been nominated yet—and he’s already pimping “other wars?” Unpack this a bit, and look at where he’d likely to be able to buy cheap rugs. Iran comes to mind; he won’t worry about the Russian mutual-defense treaties, because Russia (actually, the USSR) propped up the Hanoi regime that dared to shoot down a “gimme” target and made him look like the dunce that he still is. Then there’s Pakistan (gotta get that ObL guy, y’know, to prove I’m more macho than the pet-goat, scared-of-horses-cowboy guy from Texas)—plus he thinks that employing the use of nuclear weapons is something that should be on the table. He’ll probably declare war on Mexico (the ultimate immigration policy), Indonesia (cheap labor to boost the GDP and bitch-slap Chinese imports), Cuba (to secure the Hispanic vote he loses for bombing Mexico into infinity), and the UN.

  • Piro didn’t need torture to acquire information, and Saddam Hussein had no interest in a relationship with Osama bin Laden.

    Bu-but, how can he be sure Hussein was telling the truth if he didn’t torture him?!

    /Jack Bauer Wannabe

  • Today’s installment of Dumber than Dirt, staring Dana Perino…

    Think Progress: During an interview with CNN this morning, previewing President Bush’s State of the Union speech, White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said that the passage of the new [Iraqi flag] law is a sign of political “progress” because the Iraqi parliament was “able to come together and get it done.”

    Digby: Officials in Iraq’s mostly Sunni Muslim Anbar province are refusing to raise Iraq’s new national flag, which the parliament approved earlier this week.

    “The new flag is done for a foreign agenda and we won’t raise it,” said Ali Hatem al Suleiman, a leading member of the U.S.-backed Anbar Awakening Council, “If they want to force us to raise it, we will leave the yard for them to fight al Qaida.”

    According to unconfirmed reports Perino was overheard mumbing over and over, “Cuban Missile Crisis was not the Bay of Pigs.”

  • So Dead-Eye Dick has a souvenir from the house where the American Air Force killed a 5 year old girl (who happened to be in the house with Zarqawi). Talk about one sick bastard.

  • A quick math correction. 50 out of 10,000 is 0.5%, not 0.005% (1% of 10,000 is 100). 1 in 200 still seems too few, though.

  • Another math innumerate in the journalistic world…sigh.
    50 out of 10,000 is not .005%, but .5%

    Percents for the rest of us.
    go to google
    type: 50/10000 *100 (the *100 is to get percentage)
    The answer is .5

    Try it.

  • So, the FBI has a total of 50 Arabic speakers. That certainly has to be enough to cover the 256,000.000 Arabic speakers in this world.

    The FBI, NSA and who knows who are supposed to be monitoring the bad guys to keep us safe – right? If there are so few Arabic speakers in their employ then how effective can they be -even if the NSA employs ten times as many Arabic speakers (Doubtful) as the FBI. A cynic or a skeptic might say that they’re actually monitoring us because that’s all they really can effectively do.

  • So, the FBI has a total of 50 Arabic speakers. That certainly has to be enough to cover the 256,000.000 Arabic speakers in this world.
    Dennis-SGMM, @13

    There’s a simple solution to this; insist that they all speak English when being wiretapped and/or interrogated.

  • ‘……like a $15 billion per year effort to massively boost America’s base of people who speak Arabic, Turkic languages, Urdu, etc.? Wouldn’t that have been more helpful?” Actually, yes.’

    How many linguists were fired because the were gay? The last number I saw was around 35. That was a year ago. So instead of 55 out of 10,000 they could have had at least 90. One of those 35 that were fired may have been the person that averted a terrorist attack. Imagine that your hatred for gay people is stronger than your desire for your fellow American’s safety. Can you imagine that? You would rather children die than have a gay linguist among the ranks. Pitiful.

  • Ah, the cunning use of flags! One of my favorite Eddie Izzard bits.

    I say, that’s jolly well done mate.

  • here’s another interesting one from President Musharraf’s response in the Pakistani daily paper:

    …..the president Musharraf has presented his stance clearly. His furious reply to the suggestion of the conditional dispatch of the U.S. forces in tribal areas was that Americans were already stuck in Afghanistan, so how could they die in the tribal areas and what magic wand did they possess to settle the situation there.”

    Interesting that we don’t hear that response here in the “American media” or did I miss that one? Seems like Musharraf isn’t the puppy dog Cheney pretends he is.

  • In the end, four Dems crossed over to vote with the Republicans: Sens. Mark Pryor (D-AR), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and Mary Landrieu (D-LA).

    If we get more than 62 Democratic Senators, can we expel each of them for a good one elected (of course Joe Lie goes first)?

    I’m all in favor of letting them stay in office, and in favor of reaching out and working with them on a bipartisan basis when necessary, but only with them identified as the Republicans they are. Obviously when push comes to shove they go squish – they can’t be trusted for the serious stuff.

  • There are 10,000 agents in the FBI. A grand total of 50 of them speak Arabic (that’s .005% 0.5%). As Matt Yglesias noted, “Suppose that instead of deciding to spread our scarce language assets thinner by invading Iraq, the Bush administration had done something much cheaper like a $15 billion per year effort to massively boost America’s base of people who speak Arabic, Turkic languages, Urdu, etc.? Wouldn’t that have been more helpful?” Actually, yes.

    This of course assumes that anyone who could pass the IQ test low enough to join Fools & Buffoons, Inc. would have the ability to understand anything they heard. Perhaps since they all speak English, they might start looking toward Timothy McVeigh Land for the domestic terrorists they should really be worrying about, since these fine folks think it would be wonderful to ally with Osama and kill all the Jews and their liberal allies. When a nuke gets sent to the US, someone with blue eyes and blond hair and a native accent will be there to meet it, not some guy moonlighting in a 7-11. That’s word from an ex-FBI counter-terrorism agent (who is “ex” because his superiors didn’t like his fixation on “those people”) and a former CIA counter-proliferation specialist.

  • So Agent Piro was able to break Saddam Hussein by telling a few lies, stroking Saddam’s ego and rationing baby wipes. That’s how effective interrogation is done.

    Reminds me of a friend’s uncle, Charles F. Marshall. He was a US Army interrogator during WW2. He would get German officers to snap by taking them to the enlisted men’s mess – once they realized the average American private ate better than the average German general they didn’t see much point in clamming up.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Marshall

    Beatings and torture are only going to get someone to tell you what they think you want to hear. We need native speakers. People who not only speak the language, but have lived the culture. Not sadists, thugs and translators.

  • Comments are closed.