Monday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* AP: “The Pentagon on Monday announced upcoming deployments of more than 42,000 troops, including 25,000 active duty Army soldiers who would be sent to Iraq beginning in the fall to replace troops scheduled to come home by year’s end. The deployments would maintain a level of 15 brigades in Iraq, or roughly 140,000 troops — the number military leaders expect will remain on the warfront at the end of July, once the currently planned withdrawals are finished.”

* Recent developments with the EPA are the biggest scandal no one seems to know about: “The head of the Environmental Protection Agency reversed himself on whether to grant California’s request to impose a 30-percent reduction in vehicle tailpipe emissions by 2016 after talking to White House officials, a report released Monday said…. The report said Johnson reversed himself and had initially planned to grant the waiver. Johnson ‘was very interested in a full grant of the waiver’ in August and September, said Jason Burnett, an associate deputy EPA administrator. Later Johnson shifted to supporting a partial grant of the waiver and then ultimately reversed himself, denying it on Dec. 19, Burnett said.”

* Big ruling from the Supreme Court: “The Supreme Court today upheld Congress’s most recent attempt to prosecute those who would promote child pornography, ruling that the law did not violate free speech guarantees.”

* Encouraging news on Ted Kennedy: “Senator Edward Kennedy, the head of one of America’s legendary political families, ‘is not in any immediate danger’ and will undergo tests in the coming days after suffering a seizure yesterday, his doctor said. ‘Preliminary tests have determined that he has not suffered a stroke and is not in any immediate danger,’ Larry Ronan, Kennedy’s primary care physician at Massachusetts General Hospital, said in an e-mailed statement.”

* Oh my: “A soldier used the Quran — Islam’s holy book — for target practice, forcing the chief U.S. commander in Baghdad to issue a formal apology on Saturday.”

* House Minority Leader John Boehner told George Stephanopoulos yesterday that his leadership post is secure, as is Tom Cole’s role atop the NRCC. That he was even asked suggests rumors of Republican discontent are pretty strong.

* I wonder about the legality of something like this: “One of Sen. Hillary Clinton’s top financial supporters offered $1 million to the Young Democrats of America during a phone conversation in which he also pressed for the organization’s two uncommitted superdelegates to endorse the New York Democrat, a high-ranking official with YDA told The Huffington Post. Haim Saban, the billionaire entertainment magnate and longtime Clinton supporter, denied the allegation. But four independent sources said that just before the North Carolina and Indiana primaries, Saban called YDA President David Hardt and offered what was perceived as a lucrative proposal: $1 million would be made available for the group if Hardt and the organization’s other uncommitted superdelegate backed Clinton.”

* The Bush gang seems more than a little peeved about this: “The White House on Monday sent a scathing letter to NBC News, accusing the news network of ‘deceptively’ editing an interview with President Bush on the issue of appeasement and Iran.”

* Thank you, Gov. Sebelius: “A bill requiring Kansas voters to show photo identification in 2010 elections was vetoed today by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. The measure — HB 2019 — was similar to a measure she threatened to veto during last year’s legislative session. Last year’s measure failed, but this year’s version passed through the efforts of the Republican majorities in the House and Senate. Sebelius is a Democrat. In her veto message, the governor said the bill created a roadblock that prevents citizens from voting.”

* Absolutely fascinating report on a test to measure the Bradley Effect and socially-desirable results.

* I remember a time when Geraldine Ferraro was a serious, respected trailblazer in the Democratic Party. It’s a genuine shame to see how far she’s fallen in such a short time.

* On a related note, as much as I admire Sean Wilentz’s scholarship, I can’t imagine what he’s thinking when he praises Fox News’ campaign coverage.

* Can you imagine being the only kid in your graduating class?

* And finally, if you haven’t see The Real McCain 2, take a minute to check it out. It’s a little too long for TV, but as web videos go, it’s pretty devastating.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

A bill requiring Kansas voters to show photo identification in 2010 elections was vetoed today by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius.

I still believe she’d make a mighty fine V.P.

  • This article should tell us something about propaganda and the true nature of some more of the “good guys” we have supported.

    Grave by mass grave, South Korea is unearthing the skeletons and buried truths of a cold-blooded slaughter from early in the Korean War, when this nation’s U.S.-backed regime killed untold thousands of leftists and hapless peasants in a summer of terror in 1950.

    With U.S. military officers sometimes present, and as North Korean invaders pushed down the peninsula, the southern army and police emptied South Korean prisons, lined up detainees and shot them in the head, dumping the bodies into hastily dug trenches. Others were thrown into abandoned mines or into the sea. Women and children were among those killed. Many victims never faced charges or trial…

    …initial evidence suggests most of the National Guidance League’s 300,000 members were killed…

    …Commission investigators agree with the late Lt. Col. Edwards’ note to Washington in 1950, that “orders for execution undoubtedly came from the top,” that is, President Rhee, who died in 1965…

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,356539,00.html

  • I’m amazed that anything NBC news does would bug the Bush thugocracy. It must have been a mistake, one they won’t make again especially after Gillespie’s letter.

  • * On a related note, as much as I admire Sean Wilentz’s scholarship, I can’t imagine what he’s thinking when he praises Fox News’ campaign coverage.

    I don’t know whether Fox’s campaign coverage has been more favorable to Clinton — and if it has been, what the Voice of the GOP’s motives were. But I will admit that sometimes when MSNBC is in the middle of a “Lockup” marathon (Who over there has the men-behind-bars fetish, anyway?), and CNN in into it’s third straight hour of celebrity gossip, I have tuned in to Fox to get my news fix.

  • “The Pentagon on Monday announced upcoming deployments of more than 42,000 troops, including 25,000 active duty Army soldiers who would be sent to Iraq beginning in the fall to replace troops scheduled to come home by year’s end. The deployments would maintain a level of 15 brigades in Iraq, or roughly 140,000 troops — the number military leaders expect will remain on the warfront at the end of July, once the currently planned withdrawals are finished.”

    Almost all of whom will be stop-lossed and just enthusiastic as can be to go fight, not to mention that 30-35% of them suffer from untreated PTSD (with the Army’s “treatment” confined to medicating them to the point they’re “deployable”). More than a few of them – who know how bad off they are – are afraid of what they might do over there, as a drag on their comrades and a potential war criminal to Iraqis. But that’s not the kind of news about America’s brave troops that the media wants to report or that Versailles-on-the-Potomac wants known.

    Recent developments with the EPA are the biggest scandal no one seems to know about: “The head of the Environmental Protection Agency reversed himself on whether to grant California’s request to impose a 30-percent reduction in vehicle tailpipe emissions by 2016 after talking to White House officials, a report released Monday said…. The report said Johnson reversed himself and had initially planned to grant the waiver. Johnson ‘was very interested in a full grant of the waiver’ in August and September, said Jason Burnett, an associate deputy EPA administrator. Later Johnson shifted to supporting a partial grant of the waiver and then ultimately reversed himself, denying it on Dec. 19, Burnett said.”

    This is right up with the so-called “decision” on the polar bear, where they said they have no idea what’s causing the ice to melt and if someone ever could prove it was greenhouse gases they’re nothing they could do – even though in Massachusetts v. EPA” this Supreme Court says they have the power under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions as pollution. Their argument in turning down California is that they have this power but they can’t use it till they get done “studying” it. Question: Why do Republicans hate the Earth? Could it be they really are invading space aliens intent on destroying life on earth so they can colonize?

    Haim Saban, the billionaire entertainment magnate and longtime Clinton supporter, denied the allegation. But four independent sources said that just before the North Carolina and Indiana primaries, Saban called YDA President David Hardt and offered what was perceived as a lucrative proposal: $1 million would be made available for the group if Hardt and the organization’s other uncommitted superdelegate backed Clinton.”

    Haim Saban is a well-known Hollywood Pig, who (according to tales that make their way around) made his billions by proving that some anti-Semitic slurs about how Jews make money have at least a one very limited example in fact. Stuff like this proves the stories are true. Actually, I guess since he’s stopped being Reform and become Conservative you can’t call him a pig anymore.

    I remember a time when Geraldine Ferraro was a serious, respected trailblazer in the Democratic Party. It’s a genuine shame to see how far she’s fallen in such a short time.

    Geraldine Ferraro was never more than the “front office – – – – – ” who was affirmatively-actioned into every job she ever had, all at least three levels above her level of demonstrated incompetence.

    On a related note, as much as I admire Sean Wilentz’s scholarship,

    What “scholarship”? His Reagan book is being panned by liberals as well as conservatives. This is the moron who argued in Salon that if the Democrats used the same primary rules as the Republicans, Hillary would have won what she should have won since it was “her turn.” This over-educated under-intelligent hack demonstrates that in at least some circumstances the conservative critique of left-wing academia is right. Were it not for tenure, this halfwit wouldn’t even make it in a box under a freeway overpass. He’s about as committed to truth as Lysenko was.

  • * I remember a time when Geraldine Ferraro was a serious, respected trailblazer in the Democratic Party. It’s a genuine shame to see how far she’s fallen in such a short time. — CB

    Won’t vote for the party’s nominee but… she’s still a superdelegate, right?

  • A soldier used the Quran — Islam’s holy book — for target practice, forcing the chief U.S. commander in Baghdad to issue a formal apology on Saturday.

    How to apologize? I know I know! Use a Bible for target practice!

  • BREAKING: McCain Resigns From His Campaign

    Believing that he has become too much of a drag on his campaign, John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential candidate, and one of the key components of his campaign and id, has stepped down, the latest casualty of a presidential campaign eager to cauterize damage caused by its ties to lobbyists, age and President Bush.

    McCain, who has appeared in most of his commercials and fundraisers, is the highest profile departure from McCain’s inner circle since a summer 2007 shake-up cost McCain his campaign manager and chief strategist.

    “My support for President Bush’s comparison of Senator Obama to Adolf Hitler, because Barack was willing to speak to Iran’s leaders, was the last straw,” said McCain. “Especially when I had already suggested that it was a good idea.”

  • jimBOB said:
    A soldier used the Quran — Islam’s holy book — for target practice, forcing the chief U.S. commander in Baghdad to issue a formal apology on Saturday.

    How to apologize? I know I know! Use a Bible for target practice!

    That wouldn’t be good enough. In Islam, the Qur’an is considered to be a sacred object, more like a consecrated host in the Christian religion. Muslims ritually wash their hands before touching a Qur’an.

    I don’t want to sound like I’m singling jimBOB out. Americans in general are embarrassingly ignorant about most of the rest of the world. It’s no wonder we have no idea why most of the Muslim world hates us.

  • Won’t vote for the party’s nominee but… she’s still a superdelegate, right?

    I thought that was a good question, so I checked–no, she’s not. Nor is John Edwards, I suppose for the same reason. He’s not crazy and churlish, though.

  • * Oh my: “A soldier used the Quran — Islam’s holy book — for target practice, forcing the chief U.S. commander in Baghdad to issue a formal apology on Saturday.”

    I wonder if working out aggressions on the Quran is less or more likely to lead to killing innocent Iraqis?

  • SteveT

    I’m not particularly interested in the question of who has a bigger sacredness-fetish for their ancient gobbledegook text. Both books (Bible and Koran) have a history drenched in blood. It’s long past time for humans to stop using them as an excuse for mindless violence.

  • TOPIC “The White House on Monday sent a scathing letter to NBC News, accusing the news network of ‘deceptively’ editing an interview with President Bush on the issue of appeasement and Iran.”

    I was googling around trying to find info on the FOX general manager of WTVT Robert Linger who was recently caught by undercover officers “wipping it out” in a porno store in Tampa and I happened across this in the comments of a 2007 SFGate article,
    The end of journalism as we know It?–the Ross Report
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/foreigndesk/detail?blogid=16&entry_id=19055

    ORGANIC CONSUMER ASSOCIATION, March 7, 2004

    Faculty Evaluator: Liz Burch, Ph.D.
    Student Researcher: Sara Brunner

    ——————————————————————————–

    In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States. (emphasis mine)

    Back in December of 1996, Jane Akre and her husband, Steve Wilson, were hired by FOX as a part of the Fox “Investigators” team at WTVT in Tampa Bay, Florida. In 1997 the team began work on a story about bovine growth hormone (BGH), a controversial substance manufactured by Monsanto Corporation. The couple produced a four-part series revealing that there were many health risks related to BGH and that Florida supermarket chains did little to avoid selling milk from cows treated with the hormone, despite assuring customers otherwise.

    According to Akre and Wilson, the station was initially very excited about the series. But within a week, Fox executives and their attorneys wanted the reporters to use statements from Monsanto representatives that the reporters knew were false and to make other revisions to the story that were in direct conflict with the facts. Fox editors then tried to force Akre and Wilson to continue to produce the distorted story. When they refused and threatened to report Fox’s actions to the FCC, they were both fired.(Project Censored #12 1997)

    Akre and Wilson sued the Fox station and on August 18, 2000, a Florida jury unanimously decided that Akre was wrongfully fired by Fox Television when she refused to broadcast (in the jury’s words) “a false, distorted or slanted story” about the widespread use of BGH in dairy cows. They further maintained that she deserved protection under Florida’s whistle blower law. Akre was awarded a $425,000 settlement. Inexplicably, however, the court decided that Steve Wilson, her partner in the case, was ruled not wronged by the same actions taken by FOX.

    FOX appealed the case, and on February 14, 2003 the Florida Second District Court of Appeals unanimously overturned the settlement awarded to Akre. The Court held that Akre’s threat to report the station’s actions to the FCC did not deserve protection under Florida’s whistle blower statute, because Florida’s whistle blower law states that an employer must violate an adopted “law, rule, or regulation.” In a stunningly narrow interpretation of FCC rules, the Florida Appeals court claimed that the FCC policy against falsification of the news does not rise to the level of a “law, rule, or regulation,” it was simply a “policy.” Therefore, it is up to the station whether or not it wants to report honestly.

    During their appeal, FOX asserted that there are no written rules against distorting news in the media. They argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves. Fox attorneys did not dispute Akre’s claim that they pressured her to broadcast a false story, they simply maintained that it was their right to do so. After the appeal verdict WTVT general manager Bob Linger commented, “It’s vindication for WTVT, and we’re very pleased… It’s the case we’ve been making for two years. She never had a legal claim.”

    Posted By: sonofabastard | July 31 2007 at 05:46 PM

  • Thanks, Maria @11. Being ‘puter-illiterate, I wouldn’t know where to begin a check but figured someone here would know.

  • Anyone see Clinton today, bragging about Karl Rove’s opinion that she’s stronger?

    It was bad enough, but she looked awful — seems to have aged 20 years in the last week — and sounded worse, with the Arkansas twang brought out in full force. Ugh.

  • Well what do ya know – shillary is now relying on kkkarl rove!!!!!

    Clinton: Karl Rove analysis supports me as strongest candidate

    At a campaign stop in Prestonburg, Kentucky, Sen. Hillary Clinton said that an election analysis by a firm led by Karl Rove supports the argument that she is a stronger Democratic candidate than Sen. Barack Obama.

    Said Clinton, “There’ve been a lot of analysis [sic] about which of us is stronger to win against Sen. McCain, and I believe I am the stronger candidate. And just today I found some curious support for that position when one of the TV networks released an analysis done by — of all people — Karl Rove saying that I was the stronger candidate. Somebody got a hold of his analysis and there it is.”

    ============================================================
    3 comments:

    1. Shillary doesn’t care who she gets in bed with – even traitor kkkarl “the math” rove.

    2. bush-clinton-bush-clinton criminal cabal really is just more of the same – she has enabled chimpy throughout the treason, war crimes, and crimes against humanity – she is just more of the same.

    3. She is a lying liar, just like her 2 biggest advocates – rush limpballs and kkkarl

  • shillary probably has decided she can hid behind kkkarl and his dishonest talking points and blatant racism. She needs to be held fully responsible for this – she is not a progressive or liberal and a poor choice for the democrats.

  • …but she looked awful — seems to have aged 20 years in the last week — and sounded worse, with the Arkansas twang brought out in full force.

    That’s what suckin’ up to rush, kkkarl, and dur chimpfurher will do to ya – might as well be sleepin’ with the devil himself.

  • Over the weekend, the usual folks were posting lies about shillary and that she was actually beating Obama. It is getting so tiring – they want to run down anyone that actually knows the truth.

    Here’s the latest:

    Poll: Obama’s national lead over Clinton grows to 16 points

    THE NUMBERS (and not kkkarl’s math)

    Barack Obama, 55 percent

    Hillary Rodham Clinton, 39 percent

    No wonder she has to rely on kkkarl now…

  • darn. little bear had shown such promise throughout the day today, too.

    c’mon, you’ve shown you can be a good contributor and raise the discourse like most of the regulars do without lowering yourself to serial posting, repetitive name calling, etc. so why revert back?

    you’ll find you get more people engaged with you, get more good back and forth, if you keep it up a notch.

  • Don’t need any “tips and tricks” from you – but you think you are important?

    The post asked for “news” and here it is. If you can’t handle that shillary is now using KKKarl rove – that is your problem.

    Most progressives/liberals/dems find this repulsive – but you can’t handle it. Do you really think you are anything more than a little bozo on this bus?

  • Quoting kkkarl rove is divisive – don’t blame me. Pointing it out is news – shillary is rapidly losing support. She is the one that is running the repulsive kkkarl rove-style campaign.

    And now she is actually quoting him – no wonder her numbers nationally are falling.

    Geeeee, its too bad shillary wants to run this type of campaign, isn’t it.

  • jimBOB said:
    I’m not particularly interested in the question of who has a bigger sacredness-fetish for their ancient gobbledegook text. Both books (Bible and Koran) have a history drenched in blood. It’s long past time for humans to stop using them as an excuse for mindless violence.

    It’s fine to talk about what should be, but we ignore what is at our peril.

    One very stupid soldier shooting a copy of the Qur’an will spur many Iraqis to join groups that will attack our soldiers, and it will cause many more Iraqis to be sympathetic to those who attack Americans. The effect will ripple across the Middle East, turning Muslims in other countries who were on the fence about us into America haters. The general’s public apology will reduce the fallout, but won’t eliminate it.

    Sadly, the result of this idiotic act is that more Americans are going to be killed.

  • A soldier used the Quran — Islam’s holy book — for target practice, forcing the chief U.S. commander in Baghdad to issue a formal apology on Saturday.

    How to apologize? I know I know! Use a Bible for target practice!

    How long do you think it’ll take before we hear that Muslims are using Bibles for target practice? And won’t we all be enraged then?

    Well, not all of us. But wouldn’t it be nice if the pissing matches between Christians and Muslims consisted of just shooting at each other’s holy books? That’d be a twofer.

  • A soldier used the Quran — Islam’s holy book — for target practice, forcing the chief U.S. commander in Baghdad to issue a formal apology on Saturday.

    I met this 24 year old boy, and it occurred to me, this speaks to a new, deeply felt patriotism rising in this country in response to Obama. When someone like him, who does not understand their faith, criticizes any display of faith, be it a nativity scene, a display of the ten commandments, or, as in this case, is simply a spontaneous display of his heartfelt devotion, Christian people, especially white, Christian people, feel they are under assault. Yet again, they find elitists wanting rural people, rooted in the earth, to pay a price for the firearms they use for sport.

    This is not born of bigotry, or intolerance of other religions, but a proud, open declaration of their own personal devotion to the One True God.

    This kind of faith is etched in their DNA. They can not turn away from guns any more than they can from God. As people in this country move in from other areas, people who leave Qurans alone, they see that faith diluting, their heritage fading away. Their roots.

  • SteveT

    The really stupid thing was invading in the first place with a fictitious justification, and then deciding to keep a foreign occupation army in place indefinitely. You’re right that deliberately shooting at the locals’ holy book is a bad idea for practical reasons, but it’s a minor bad idea compared with the invasion as a whole.

    Be that as it may, I refuse to subscribe to the idea that dishonoring holy texts is something that we ought to agree is beyond the pale. I’m not about to go stomp on a Koran, but I reject the notion that there is some compelling moral reason why I can’t.

    How long do you think it’ll take before we hear that Muslims are using Bibles for target practice?

    I’d be very happy to hear that they were doing it, provided they stopped using U.S. troops for target practice.

    I met this 24 year old boy, and it occurred to me…

    Insane Fake Professor, is that you?

  • I’d be very happy to hear that they were doing it, provided they stopped using U.S. troops for target practice.

    QUORANS ARE USING OUR TROOPS FOR TARGET PRACTICE!!!!!! KILL THEM ALL!!!!!

  • I’ve read over #30 several times and still can’t fathom what the heck you mean, KP. Your writing is obscure to the point of unintelligibility. Care to try again?

    And no, as far as I know faith isn’t etched into anybody’s DNA. It may feel like it because natural selection has primed people to be totally naive and trusting when they’re little kids, which is when religious ideas are generally inculcated. So the brainwashing is generally quite effective, and tends to stick in many adolescents and even adults. Hence the memes continue through the generations, despite their obvious evidentiary shortcomings. But don’t blame it on DNA.

  • Anyone see Clinton today, bragging about Karl Rove’s opinion that she’s stronger? — TR, @18

    Haven’t, don’t watch TV; it took Little Beria to clue me into the details. Sigh… And she was doing so well for almost a week, too. I guess, as with any cure, one has to learn to expect *some* backslidin’ during the process…

  • CB wrote:

    Can you imagine being the only kid in your graduating class?

    Thanks for this item, Steve. I lived in Great Falls (in the byline of the story) for my junion high and part of senior high schooling. It’s amazing what a quarter century can do to a rural population.

  • Faith is born of a long heritage that goes deep to our roots. This is not about racism. It’s about hoods and nooses and burning crosses. Hillary understood this in a way Obama never could, not because of his race, but because of his blood and his genes. And his skin.

  • * I wonder about the legality of something like this: “One of Sen. Hillary Clinton’s top financial supporters offered $1 million to the Young Democrats of America during a phone conversation in which he also pressed for the organization’s two uncommitted superdelegates to endorse the New York Democrat…

    Why wouldn’t it be legal? What the h*ll do you think the senators’ PACs are used for? Coffee? Both Obama and Clinton have spread around the green among SDs and others in Congress – it isn’t just to support their favorite “charities”; then again, maybe it is: themselves!

    What a ludicrous comment: “I wonder about the legality of … this.” And guess what: in an Obama administration, the same things will go on…

    * I remember a time when Geraldine Ferraro was a serious, respected trailblazer in the Democratic Party. It’s a genuine shame to see how far she’s fallen in such a short time.

    To see how far she’s fallen? Really? If you did any more tut-tuting, your damned tongue would be numb! Ferraro still carries weight with an awful lot of people, so I wouldn’t dismiss her or sneer quite yet. And if you don’t believe this, you don’t know Geraldine Ferraro. And, additionally, you ‘diss people like Ferraro and you ‘diss a whole lotta women…

    Grow up. This is politics, not recess in the sandbox!

  • Mabelle: Kindly follow your own advice: grow up. We really don’t need concern trolls here.

    Anyway, *this* woman is in complete agreement with Carpetbagger about Ferraro. Not voting for the dem candidate in November, whoever that may be, is identical to giving McCain the White House. Ferraro has essentially said that she will sell out her country by permitting another four years of Bush unless she’s allowed to vote for Clinton in the general. For any democrat to say that is proof that they’ve fallen pretty damn far.

    And give us some proof that either Obama or Clinton have been buying the super-delegates. Your word alone isn’t worth very much.

  • Ferraro still carries weight with an awful lot of people

    Are you sure it isn’t that she still carries weight with a lot of awful people?

    I never was that impressed with Geraldine Ferraro. I’m even less impressed with her petulant posing. Console yourself that she is showing toughness or independence; it comes across as petulance to me. But, if you want to rally to petulance, knock yourself out.

    One last thing, Mabelle55, this is CB’s blog, so stuff your screeching about growing up and sandboxes. It diminishes your arguments.

    BTW, CB, thanks for the post about the Federal Courts today. I could not agree with you more. Thanks for the link to Toobin’s article, too. His book, “The Nine” is a good read. The critical matter of our federal courts is the number one reason why the petulance of Geraldine Ferraro and those who would follow her exampel annoys the hell out of me.

  • We need to fight the lying liars – unfortunately, we have a big one hiding as a dem – shillary.

    On the face of it – America should reject a bush-clinton-bush-clinton dynasty. The POTUS isn’t NASCAR – it is time for new people and not the same old power brokers. Americans overwhelmingly want change.

    But hillary has lost a lot of respect and she and her supporters need to hear it:

    *she is lying about popular support

    *she is lying about superdelegates

    *she is lying about what a primary win means – Obama can carry states that shillary won in the primary. We all know this – history shows this.

    *her campaign would have been over without the help of rush

    *she has run the most racist campaign since george wallace – that somehow white uneducated voters are more important that the rest of the democratic base.

    *she has “catapulted” the slime from the republicans

    *she is now using kkkarl rove’s talking points – AND OPENLY ADMITTING IT!

    *she bought her way into the senate and has consistently voted to enable the chimp

    Sorry gang – until she quits enabling mclame by running a negative campaign based on kkkarl rove-tactics, her and her dishonest supporters need to have the truth thrown in their face.

    mclame cannot win an honest election – but they stole 2000 & 2004

    Great Crimes Demand Even Greater Criminality

    shillary is helping the criminal cabal behind dur chimpfurher set up another stolen election by providing the memes that will be used to distract and cover-up the crime.

    Her national reputation is shot – she has lost support in NY too – rightly so.

    We will be able to unify the party when shillary and the most obnoxious of her supporters stop lying.

  • Insane Fake Professor, is that you?

    I wish. I’m not in mercenaryscookbook’s weight class.

  • Oh, sorry. That additional line on my sig was from my last post and doesn’t make sense here.

  • libra: And she was doing so well for almost a week, too. I guess, as with any cure, one has to learn to expect *some* backslidin’ during the process…

    I thought the same thing when I saw this latest weirdness. Until this, I’d pretty much concluded that she’d decided to take Integrity Boulevard and leave Sleazy Alley to the Big Dog. Am sure you all saw the coverage from the past few days in which Bill told audiences that the “Democratic Party” doesn’t care about them or their votes.

    Now it’s Hillary and him against the entire party? Is he on a campaign to finish completely destroying his legacy and seal his place in history as a petulant sore loser? So unpresidential.

    Mabelle: And, additionally, you ‘diss people like Ferraro and you ‘diss a whole lotta women…

    Whyever would that be true? Do you think women are interchangeable? I’m not about to hold any other woman responsible for Ferraro’s bizarre outbursts or her decision to stop being a Democrat at this stage of the game.

  • President Lindsay (33): This is parody. Parker is a columnist for WaPo who recently wrote an op-ed piece on blood equity. Thecarpetbaggerreport did an item on it Sunday.

    I knew I’d seen that KP name somewhere, but didn’t recall where. Parody or not, a person who can’t write even near intelligibly kind of makes either parody or seriousness pretty hard to recognize. The posts are just like a bunch of words and phrases cobbled together. Pretty lame parody, if you ask me. Maybe the jokester should start by writing something serious to get the bugs out, like in a junior college composition class. Or maybe junior high. Leave parody to the big kids.

  • Pretty lame parody, if you ask me.

    Why don’t you read a couple of Kathleen Parker columns first, and then we’ll ask you. Thanking you in advance.

  • I’ve read her recent controversial one. As ridiculous as her ideas are, she does know how to write, unlike her alter ego here.

  • Comments are closed.