Monday’s political round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* The fourth debate for the Democratic presidential candidates — the first “official” debate sanctioned by the DNC — will be tonight in Charleston, S.C. As you may have heard, the questions are coming by way of regular people, who submitted content via YouTube. The debate starts at 7 pm ET and will be moderated by CNN’s Anderson Cooper.

* As an extension of the increasingly apparent enthusiasm gap, the WSJ notes that Dem candidates are outraising Republican candidates, not just at the presidential level, but also at the House and Senate level. All told, Democratic congressional candidates have outraised their GOP counterparts by a stunning $100 million — $388.8 million to $287.3 million — in the first six months of 2007.

* Mitt Romney got into a little trouble over the weekend for holding up a supporter’s hand-written sign that read, “NO TO OBAMA OSAMA AND CHELSEA’S MOMA” [sic]. After the story quickly made the rounds on the blogs over the weekend, Romney was asked about the sign at a town hall gathering in Iowa. “You know what? Lighten up slightly,” Romney said.

* Speaking of Romney, a senior strategist for the Massachusetts governor penned a new memo, which was quickly leaked to reporters, explaining why Giuliani has lost his edge and should no longer be considered the GOP frontrunner.

* And if Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) is gearing up for a re-election campaign in Nebraska, he has a funny way of showing it. The two-term incumbent raised only $387,215 in the last quarter, as compared to state Attorney General Jon Bruning, who’s willing to face Hagel in a GOP primary, who raised $723,688 in the same period.

“You know what? Lighten up slightly,” Romney said.

I gotta say, Romney’s got a point with this one. How can he disagree with the sign? He’s actively campaigning for the chance to oppose Obama or Clinton; and I should hope that everyone is against bin Laden. Since the sign didn’t say “Osama = Obama” or such nonsense, I say give Romney a pass on this and hit him with something more substantial.

If anything, I’m more offended by the atrocious spelling. What morans.

  • Hagel doesn’t need to do shit to win. He owns the voting machines in Nebraska.

    Giuliani is not the frontrunner. Romney is. It’s going to be Clinton vs. Romney in the general.

  • So, according to Clark Willard “Romney” Griswold, it’s okay to make the anti-democratic slur of lumping Democratic Presidential candidates in with international terrorists.

    You know what, Mittens? Frighten up slightly. Disgusting pig.

  • According to the WSJ article, “Democrats Lead By $100 Million In Money Race,” the “big money” is going to the Democrats. Is “the writing on the wall” for the Republicans for 2008? Let’s hope.

  • I guess the debates are only for the wealthy? Those who can afford cable ? Maybe poor people without cable don’t vote? ..the debates should be on stations that ALL citizens have access to.

    Curious: Does anyone else see a problem with this?

  • The Romney sign thingy is just another example of the current Republican culture of irresponsible actions, then deflection of accountability. I do disagree with Grumpy @#1, as I see this incident as yet another way to sling reckless imagry upon the American citizenry. Romney needs to apologize for allowing such a photo op. -Kevo

  • I guess the debates are only for the wealthy? Those who can afford cable ? Maybe poor people without cable don’t vote? ..the debates should be on stations that ALL citizens have access to.

    Curious: Does anyone else see a problem with this?

    Comment by Evergreen

    Silly, you’re confusing today’s New Democratic Party™ with the party of days gone by. You know; the party that stood for the poor, the underprivileged and the working man. That’s so passé. The New Democratic Party™ stands for…, um it stands for…, it’s strongly in favor of…., while it vehemently opposes…

    Okay, once the New Democratic Party™ gets its trotters on the levers of power and its snout buried in the trough you’ll see some real changes. You betcha’.

  • Just start referring to Candidate Romney as “Mitler Rommel” on every occasion. If he objects, tell him to lighten up slightly.

  • KB (Re #8) – too obsure.
    Hitler Romney
    25 wives Romney
    25 underage wives Romney
    Kitten killer Romney. Sorry, that was Bill Frist
    Puppy killer Romney, yeah, that’s the ticket.
    Child molestor Romney.

    Hey, I like this “lighten up” bit.

  • Evergreen and Dennis,

    I’m not sure it is fair to blame the Dems (or CNN) on this one. If I recall correctly, several presidential elections ago some of the “major networks” started balking about carrying debates (and presidential addresses and pretty well anything else that didn’t involve advertising revenues, public interest provisions in their broadcast licenses be damned). The Dem candidates have no way to force that issue.

    So it may be that in this case cable coverage, rather than being a bad thing, is the only way the debate gets covered at all.

    Now that may raise a perfectly valid issue about the public interest obligations of broadcasters. . .

  • Comments are closed.