‘My 15 minutes of fame has extended a little longer than 15 minutes’

[tag]Barack Obama[/tag] was in [tag]New Hampshire[/tag] yesterday for his first swing through the first primary state, and like everyone else, I was anxious to see how it went. Granite State voters aren’t easily impressed, they’ve seen plenty of buzz-worthy politicians come and go, and after a couple of generations of vetting would-be presidents, they’ve come to expect quite a bit.

With this in mind, I was a little surprised at Obama’s visit yesterday. If it was any indication of what’s to come, he’s likely to be a very major player in ’08.

Illinois freshman Sen. Barack Obama, borne aloft by a popularity bubble that seems to float higher by the day, did nothing to deflate it Sunday on his first trip to New Hampshire.

Neither did he move any closer to a declaration of candidacy for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, for which the New Hampshire primary will be a key early test. In appearances here and in Portsmouth, he was content to play with the notion and tease the expectations of overflow, adoring crowds.

[tag]Obama[/tag] said he was flattered and humbled, but also wary.

“I am suspicious of hype. The fact that my 15 minutes of fame has extended a little longer than 15 minutes is somewhat surprising to me and completely baffling to my wife,” he said at a news conference between events. “And I think what’s going on is people are very hungry for something new. I think they are interested in being called to be a part of something larger than the sort of small, petty, slash-and-burn politics that we have been seeing over the last several years. To some degree, I think I’m a stand-in for that desire on the part of the country.”

If anything, expectations keep setting very high bars for Obama, and he keeps managing to clear them, at least so far. At a book-signing in Portsmouth, 750 tickets sold within 24 hours, and 1,000 people showed up. In Manchester, at a state party celebration, 1,500 tickets were sold, and 1,700 people showed up. “We originally scheduled the Rolling Stones,” Gov. John Lynch said, “but we canceled them when we figured out that Senator Obama would sell more tickets.”

This just isn’t normal.

Everywhere he went, Obama was relatively non-committal about the immediate future, but he nevertheless laid out what sounded like the beginnings of a campaign theme: “America is ready to turn the page,” he said. “America is ready for a new set of challenges. This is our time. A new generation is prepared to lead.”

Locals, whom I expected to be tepid with their praise, seemed genuinely surprised.

“In all my history, nobody’s ever had a crowd this big, this early,” said Charles Campion, a veteran party strategist based in Boston, as he watched Democrats assemble Sunday afternoon in Manchester.

“I’ve never seen anything like this before this early,” said Mike Ballantine, a computer programmer from Nashua, as across the room Obama was surrounded by more than 100 people, many holding up his book and hoping for an autograph. “I mean it’s amazing. Really amazing.”

It is, indeed, but Slate’s John Dickerson, who was part of a massive media contingency following Obama yesterday, no one can live up to the expectations that we’re seeing now.

If he decides to run, Obama faces the difficulty of any politician campaigning against politics as usual — he can’t act politically or he ruins his brand. Running for president is exhausting, brutal and chaotic even if you’re using the old playbook. Obama is suggesting he will go through that slog under a new set of rules that include a higher standard of candor for himself and greater fairness towards his opponents than has ever been practiced in electoral history. It’s audacious and perhaps impossible.

Obama is a smart enough politician that he knows he has become too popular too fast. He knows that he benefits from being in the first stage of political courtship where he can get away with sweeping and grand generalities. “I am suspicious of the hype,” he said at his press conference. He downplayed the fuss over his potential candidacy, saying he is just the flavor of the moment and a mere “symbol or stand-in for a spirit that says we are looking for something different — something new.” It’s wise for him to temper expectations for his candidacy. If voters stay in such a deep state of affection, they may get disappointed some day when he doesn’t walk on water.

As it stands, if Obama wasn’t considered a top-tier contender before, he is now. And if he wasn’t considered a very likely candidate before, we can probably assume he’s going to throw his hat into the ring early in the new year.

Okay, would someone like to actually quote policy issues from his speaches.

I DON’T GIVE A F**KING DAMN ABOUT THE HYPE!

Why is this always about the horse race and never about the future?

  • “Why is this always about the horse race and never about the future?”

    (in Simpson long hair hippy voice) Thinking about the future and the who/what/where/when/why is for squares (like us), man…

    The MSM just chases the thrill (however cheap it may be) because it gets the most eyeballs.

    I suspect that how we view news is the same way we view accidents on the highway. Me? I could care less and get super pissed as the morons in front of me slam on the brakes to watch some poor guy change a tire. I’m more interested in why his tire blew out (in case it could happen to me…)

  • It’s also something of an Achilles’s Heel that we liberals want the policy speeches, the position papers, … . Kerry had a ton of position papers, and look where it got him.

    At this point, there’s a politician out there who has charisma like we haven’t seen in a generation. And he’s a Democrat! You won’t hear me complaining about he’s being covered.

  • “Gore/Obama in 2008.” – Mike

    At least that ticket wouldn’t have Joe LIEberman surpressing all the energy in the room.

    Now if we could only wake Al up a little so that he’s not totally overshined by Barack.

    “People are desperate.” – PeterG

    Is Obama the answer to our desperation? After two more years of Bushite misrule, won’t the American People be ready for the Adults to take charge again?

    But than again, the septigenarians on the Iraq Study Group were supposed to be “adults” and their prescription is so convoluted that BG2 is going to duck it like he’s ducked every accountability moment in his life.

  • Likewise, Gore/Obama in 2008.

    I like Obama, and I love the vision that he presents in his speeches. However, he hasn’t had much experience yet, and inexperienced charmers have not had a good record in the White House. (Kennedy would be an example of the pitfalls that come from advancing idealism and charisma over expertise. Bush would be an example of the pitfalls of going with ideology and charisma over expertise.)

    Charisma worries me as it can concentrate power irrationally. However, expertise can be overrated (see Hoover), and if Obama can pull this country together in a constructive manner and heal the damage done by the Republicans and their O’Reillys, Limbaughs and Coulters, then more power to him.

  • While I am a total and unreconstructed policy wonk, let me remind you of some of the wonkiest would-be Democratic Presidents of recent history. Paul Tsongas? Total wonk. Mike Dukakis? Whole premise of campaign was to be “technocratic.” Bruce Babbitt? Wonky – and even had some humor! Gary Hart? Notwithstanding “Where’s the beef?” cheap-shot from Mondale, Hart has white papers that were decades ahead of this time – dozens of ’em.

    And the recent Democrat who won? A small-state governor with charisma and charm to spare.

    Strong communication skills are key – the President has so many demands on his (or her!) time that using the bully pulpit to set a tone and agenda. The success of an administration depends more on the caliber of people the President chooses for the WH and cabinet than on the actual issue competency of the Pres. I trust Barak would choose wisely, and his commuications skills would be downright Clinton-esque in moving the country.

  • He has extraordinary charm and speaks beautifully — there is definitely something to be said for knowing how to say something. He articulates progressive politics in moral and uplifting phrases, and that is something we need.

    However, can he run anything? Can he make decisions and execute them? Can he take the tough stands?

    I keep looking for him during the tough moments, and he’s not there. If he had opened his mouth and made some strong public statements about habeus corpus earlier in the game, opinion might have been swayed; but he waited until a day or two before to come out swinging, when it was much too late.

    Inspiring rhetoric is needed and we don’t get enough of it — but it doesn’t make a President. I think it’s insane to be acting like American Idol voters right now.

    Clark in 2008.

    (Would be perfectly happy with Clark/Obama……)

  • Obama says, People are hungry for change, and Obama is the antidote for the Bush/Delay/Cheney/Folley style of politician.. nasty, crooked, and for the rich.

    I just plain like him when he says “of course I inhaled, isn’t that the point?” or “people wonder what all this fuss is about, especially my wife”.

    I’m not worried that Obama wouldn’t be a great president. I’m more worried that our shabby political practices, shadow special interest government, and racial hatreds will destroy him.

  • I honestly hear liberal nay-saying about Obama as folks trying not to get their hopes up. How can anyone hear him and not be inspired? Obama brings ENERGY to politics. Everyone else looks tired next to him.

    I went to college with Obama and knew him slightly. He’s a thoughtful person, decent in a way we’re just not used to in a politician.

    Doubt it all you want. For me the train’s already rolling.

  • Obama seems to have a largish ego, but obviously he’s also smart and awre enough to understand that “his” hype isn’t as much about him as it is the expression of a deeper yearning: to get past the exhausted zero-sum politics of the last 15 years and start addressing the great issues of our time as a fully inclusive American community.

    Contrast that to his putative biggest rival for the nomination: the living embodiment of those politically miserable last 15 years, spun and micromanaged down to the last pronoun, deathly afraid of offending anyone and as far from spontaneous–or even interesting–as a public figure can be. This is not, for me, a difficult choice.

  • (Would be perfectly happy with Clark/Obama……)

    Agreed. Especially as Clark brings unassailable national security creds to the ticket. The real challenge would be using Obama to generate and maintain excitement. Can that be done?

  • I favor Edwards/Obama. If people want hope and politicians who genuinely care about people, that is a winning ticket. I do have to note, though, that no one is pairing him with H. Clinton. As much as I respect her as a senator, she and McCain are a pair and neither gets my support.

  • People ARE desperate and he’s a novelty. People want to see first hand if he has a chance at being the first African American president.

  • Like other posters, I too wonder whether we’ve entered an age of Paris Hilton politics where sex appeal trumps substance and one day everyone wakes up and chucks the celebrity into the garbage heap of history as we’ve tired of them and now want something new.

    But I think there is also a different dynamic at work. The torch appears to be passing quickly from the Clinton/ Bush II generation to the next one that we secretly believe to be less jaded, have less Viet Nam baggage, to be more savvy and able to adapt more quickly to a world that changes faster than ever. The energy is in the Democratic camp. The Repubs are just “more of the same” old, white guys. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good. Embrace our mojo and be happy we have so many candidates worthty of attention.

  • Most of you aren’t old enough to have experienced this phenomenon the last time it happened in American politics,so allow someone who does remember to tell you what you’re seeing: the 1960 JFK campaign.

    Everyone also said that Kennedy had no record of achievement (which was far more true than saying it of Obama right now),and that he was a “lightweight.” But none of that mattered. After the dead hand of the 50s lying across the country’s windpipe, and 16 years of rightwing Republican fatheadedness, Kennedy was a breath of fresh air. He was the kind of campaigner who encouraged people to think of being “all that we can be and not what we are” (to quote an old John Denver song), and people like that. I was a teenager then and did leafletting for the campaign in Denver (eliciting the first political confrontation with my father – of many to come in the following decade) and you really did feel you were working on changing the future to something you really wanted to be a part of.

    Kennedy could have said this back then:

    “And I think what’s going on is people are very hungry for something new. I think they are interested in being called to be a part of something larger than the sort of small, petty, slash-and-burn politics that we have been seeing over the last several years. To some degree, I think I’m a stand-in for that desire on the part of the country.”

    This is what you compare the Obama campaign to. It’s no wonder most people don’t know it. It hasn’t been seen anywhere in America in going on 50 years.

    And it can win.

    I know for someone like me, with the history of political involvement I have had, it would be truly inspiring to be working for the first Black President, and what that would mean to the past 50 years of politics I have participated in.

  • To me, it’s hard to listen to Obama and not get excited, but then there the cynical side of me that says, yeah, he’s a politician. But isn’t pretty much everyone cynical and distrustful of politicians today?

    I think what people see from Obama is a new face, someone who speaks to them (everyday Americans), someone who can relate to many worlds (and is of at least two worlds).

    I do care if the president is smart, inquisitive and can manage things to a degree (Obama at least fits the first two, I don’t know about the management part), but what is more important is that the president hires people who have mastery over areas that the president doesn’t (and that the president listens to and trusts the judgment of those people, and yes, there should be divergent opinions). I care that the president has compassion, cares about science, the environment, ethics, and fairness – that all have a voice in our society and equal opportunity under the law.

    In other words, the opposite of the current WH resident.

    I love Al Gore, and wonder if he could get elected (if he shows his true self, from what I understand… and not get “handled” so much, it would help)… and Obama doesn’t have the experience, esp in foreign affairs, which troubles me. These two together could be pretty dynamic, though, and are my dream team for 2008. Much as I’d love to see a woman pres or VP, I don’t see anyone I like at this point (see HRC).

  • Of course Gore can win. He’ll get every vote he got last time, when he won, plus several more. And they’ll count the votes in Florida differently (not to mention reinstating several people to the voter rolls who had been “accidentally” thrown off)

    Obama/Clark? Clark — Rhodes Scholar, former commander of NATO. Obama — has been a Senator for a couple of years.

    Obama will/would be probably unbeatable after he completes his first full term in the Senate. Right now, even the most thoughtful, honest, promising person is not likely to be given the chance for “on the job” training in being a world leader.

  • Is there any better evidence that he gets the hype than this

    “I think what’s going on is people are very hungry for something new. I think they are interested in being called to be a part of something larger than the sort of small, petty, slash-and-burn politics that we have been seeing over the last several years. To some degree, I think I’m a stand-in for that desire on the part of the country.”

    I don’t think so. Bingo!

    I hope he is willing to embarce the opportunity and that he actually has the substance to take advantage of it.

  • “Obama/Clark seems pretty interesting to consider, too…” – Vermonter

    Sorry, no. I don’t think so. A bit too much like “Boy George II/Face Shooter”.

    Just put the more experienced person on top of the ticket and don’t let him use his partner as a shield.

    I think Edwards is the other candidate for Vice President by the way.

    Gore/Clark
    Gore/Edwards
    Gore/Obama
    Richardson/Clark
    Richardson/Edwards
    Richardson/Obama
    Clark/Edwards
    Clark/Obama
    Clark/Clinton
    Clinton/Edwards

    Haven’t I done this already?

  • Obama is a bit disingenuous in speaking about the hype for he has certainly had no small part in helping to create it. The man has all the tools to master political speech that appeals to the people.

    But incredibly difficult policy decisions are facing the country — decisions on the mega issues that grow larger and more complex as we delay confronting them. My guess is that Barak will continue to frame them in a noncommittal fashion that muddies the boundaries dividing us. Whether the country is open to a real visionary and whether Barak is that visionary waits to be seen. Plus, dealing with the aftermath of 8 years of Bush may be too much for any leader to mitigate. Ironically, Bush may be making it easier for someone like Obama to be elected, but infinitely more difficult for him to govern.

  • Gore / Obama. GO!

    I would hope that Obama realizes that this country is in the toilet because of an inexperienced president. Not that there’s any resemblance between Bush and Obama, but they were/are both untested and inexperienced. And having an experienced VP smart guy… we tried that too. Didn’t help.

    Gore will easily take the Dem nomination if he decides to go back into the meatgrinder of politics. He knows that. I hope he realizes that no other Dem is serious about the number one issue we face (global warming) and I suspect he sees that is the unfortunate reality. And really, anyone else who tried to take that issue really seriously would look like a copycat at this late date.

    I think modrate Republicans would vote for Gore in droves, just to make amends for voting for the Chimp in 2000, and Obama would bring in new voters like crazy. We would utterly kill the R’s, and the Dem wave would send them back to the minority status they so richly deserve.

    (Insert quote from Republicans about neutering farm animals to make them behave.)

  • Unless Obama makes a really serious gaffe along the way, I’d say his express train has already left the station leaving the other candidates in his wake.

    Whether we want it or not, whether HE wants it or not, he makes every other candidate look as interesting as a bowl of oatmeal by comparison right now.

    The one knock on Obama people seem to have is that he lacks ‘experience’. Experience at what? Ruining the country, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people around the world? Nope.

    All he’s really guilty of is coming across as a decent, thoughtful human being who can engage and inspire people on a scale not seen since JFK. Gosh, that’s a hanging offense if I ever heard one! /snark

    Just to make it real simple, I plan to vote for the Democratic candidate no matter who it turns out to be. It would not upset me if Obama was on the ticket in either location as long as nothing really bad turns up. So there we go.

  • There are plenty of people out there who can write legislation. There are even more who can get elected to public office. There are, however, very few people who can truly inspire you.

    Obama in ’08

  • Tom Cleaver, in post 17 above, mentioned the similarity to the JFK campaign. Sadly, what I see is similarity to the Bobby Kennedy campaign. We have a candidate that really cares about the people, and those in power, the ones behind the scenes that gave us George Bush, will never let it happen. It will cost them too much money. Obama will be killed before he is ever elected President.

  • I used to think he sounded great, back before he became Senator.
    Now I’m looking for somebody who will actually do something as President.

  • Comments are closed.