New fuel standards are a bit of a joke

The good news is the federal government established new fuel standards for small and large trucks yesterday, including SUVs. The bad news is the new standards are terribly weak.

The Bush administration will require auto makers to build more [tag]fuel-efficient[/tag] sport-utility vehicles, minivans and pickup trucks, but standards finalized yesterday are no stricter than proposed last year despite rising gasoline prices.

The rules issued by federal highway officials are mostly a victory for auto makers, since environmentalists had argued that the rules should be increased even more, given government formulas for fuel-efficiency that take rising gas prices into account.

The new [tag]CAFE standards[/tag] were originally shaped by a formula driven by gas prices. As the Wall Street Journal noted, the administration originally crafted a plan based on prices ranging from $1.51 to $1.58 a gallon over the lives of the affected vehicles. But as prices have increased, the “cost-benefit calculation required by law would justify increased fuel-economy targets.” So, the ever-clever administration simply changed the formula so it wouldn’t have to create stricter fuel standards.

The [tag]Union of Concerned Scientists[/tag] estimated that the new CAFE standards would only save two weeks of gasoline a year over the next two decades.

“Gas prices went up, we had two hurricanes and the president admitted we were addicted to oil, and yet we couldn’t get anything more out of them?” said David Friedman of the Union of Concerned Scientists. “To me, it defies logic.”

Perhaps, but it doesn’t defy expectations.

“To me, it defies logic.”

That’s about the best you can say of the Bush Crime Family’s administration.

  • Well, if the government won’t force automakers to make more fuel efficinet cars, and automakers won’t do it themselves, then we are left with the obvious recourse. Make fuel efficiency your top priority when buying a car. If enough people stop buying the gas guzzling SUVs (I’m sorry, there is absolutely no reason why anyone needs a Lexus SUV) and opt for more practicle cars, automakers may actually notice this market trend. I know this is idealist thinking, but I tend to believe that companies will listen when you hit them in the wallet. Go on to the automaker’s websites and inquire about plans for fuel efficient and alternate fuel cars. I am told Volkswagon makes a Jetta diesel/hybrid for the European market. Why don’t we have this here? We have the Jetta TDI (diesel fuel) and we know that the American market can support hybrid vehicles. Why haven’t American automakers come out with a decent hybrid?

  • The Union of Concerned Scientists estimated that the new CAFE standards would only save two weeks of gasoline a year over the next two decades.

    Actually I am all for the waste.

    If I had the money… I’d buy a city block somewhere, fill it up with Stupid Urban Vehicles, and idle their engines 24/7/365.

    Yep… just idle them in place.
    Pay some folks to continuous fill the tanks.
    And idle them away.

    Face it:
    We have a culture that tolerates–nay, WORSHIPS waste.

    If I had George Soros kind of money I’d rub this culture’s nose in its own behaviour.

    Hell… I might even call it an experiment in art.

    In other words: Flaunting the joys of waste.

    Yes people…
    I am wasting gasoline and creating bad air…
    So what?
    What are you going to do about it?
    Take away my freedom to waste?

  • Here’s the kicker: According to NPR yesterday, the new standards don’t apply to passenger vehicles.
    So what’s the point of ‘new standards’ if Hummer’s can continue getting 6mpg as we enter the new stone age?

  • Forgive me, but CAFE requirements are the wrong way to solve the problem. A gas tax is a far better way to get people to buy and DRIVE fuel efficient cars.

    If I buy a huge SUV that I drive for about 2,000 miles a year then I don’t waste much gas. Maybe I have the SUV because no other vehicle can do the job for me. If I buy a Ford Focus and drive it 12,000 miles a year then I am doing a pretty good job of saving gas.

    A gas tax would convince people to drive less. A CAFE requirement convinces people to buy smaller cars. Those goals are similar but they are not the same.

  • How do our emissions standards compare with other industrialized nations? Ford, GM, and Chrysler each built prototype diesel electric hybrids that got in the 70-80mpg range. Unfortunately they were never produced because they couldn’t meet air pollution standards running on American diesel fuel with its high sulfur content.

  • Stop the presses! Ain’t you heard the good news? Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) and now GM say we can “drive on corn forever”! And Barak Obama is going to help both of them in their mission. Only problem is we need about four more earths to accomplish the mission. Now, when are the corn state senators going to start promoting imports of ethanol produced from sugar cane?

  • Hey, if you guys _really_ gave a damn, you’d be pushing for the corn and the biodiesel. Hybrids cost a bundle (environmentally) to produce (and dispose of), and have you tried to buy a hybrid _part_ outside of a major metro area? Oh wait… Y’all only leave the Blue areas for vacations…

    Hint, campers: Rent something for your next driving vacation, because if something on that status-symbol (you know, here the word “symbol” really works…) buzzmobile you’re driving breaks, you’re gonna wait until they ship the part. _If_ a diesel breaks, darn near any truck mechanic can at least get it so you can limp home.

  • It’s worse than this.

    This federal standards may now supersede California’s more stringent standards against tailpipe emissions. So now automakers can create even more pollution without following the rules of the most populous state in the country. This from the party of state’s rights.

  • Comments are closed.