Rep. Virgil Goode (R-Va.) appeared to have weathered the storm. Last week, Goode made headlines for a blatantly bigoted letter to supporters in which he insisted Muslims represent a threat to “traditional” values, which is why, he said, we should pass massive immigration reform in order to keep more Muslims out of the country.
After his written remarks sparked widespread criticism, Goode refused to apologize. Indeed, he appeared on Fox News arguing, ” I wish more people would take a stand and stand up for the principles on which this country was founded,” though he did not elaborate on exactly which “principles” he was referring to.
Fortunately for Goode, interest in his comments died down. Unfortunately for Goode, he renewed interest in his anti-Muslim animus this morning with a USA Today op-ed. (via TP)
Let us remember that we were not attacked by a nation on 9/11; we were attacked by extremists who acted in the name of the Islamic religion. I believe that if we do not stop illegal immigration totally, reduce legal immigration and end diversity visas, we are leaving ourselves vulnerable to infiltration by those who want to mold the United States into the image of their religion, rather than working within the Judeo-Christian principles that have made us a beacon for freedom-loving persons around the world.
You’ve got to be kidding me.
The context of all of this — the controversy and the USAT op-ed — is Goode’s concern about Rep.-elect Keith Ellison (D-Minn), Congress’ first Muslim, and his decision to use a Koran in his ceremonial swearing-in photo-op.
From this, Goode believes Americans should be concered about “infiltration”? Goode does know that Ellison’s family has been in this country for over 200 years, right?
To its credit, USA Today’s editorial board set the record straight.
Tolerance and religious freedom are at America’s heart. So is the nation’s embrace of people from all countries and cultures.
Several million Muslims live in the USA. It is to the nation’s credit that one of them will join Congress this week. And if Goode is worried about Muslim immigrants, he’s about 260 years too late in Ellison’s case. Ellison traces his ancestors to Louisiana in 1742.
Goode and other critics could learn something from the man whose actions they’ve vilified. Asked about the controversy on CNN last month, Ellison refused to be drawn into a battle over different holy texts.
“Let’s focus on the text that binds us together,” Ellison said. “That’s the Constitution. That’s a great document.”
Amen.
If Goode were capable of feeling shame, now would be a good time for it.