What has to be the dumbest “controversy” of the year — whether it’s wrong to sing the national anthem in a language other than English — unfortunately continues to percolate. Monday, the Senate passed a resolution (S.RES.458) “affirming that statements of national unity, including the [tag]National Anthem[/tag], should be recited or sung in [tag]English[/tag].” The measure, championed by Sen. [tag]Lamar Alexander[/tag] (R-Tenn.) and 12 of his Republican friends, passed on a voice vote.
Now the House is getting ready to dig in, thanks to a new measure introduced by Rep. [tag]Jim Ryun[/tag] (R-Kan.).
U.S. Representative Jim Ryun (R-KS) introduced a bipartisan resolution, H. Res. 783, affirming that statements or songs that symbolize the unity of our Nation, including the National Anthem, the Oath of Allegiance sworn by new United States citizens, and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States, should be recited or sung in English, the common language of the United States.
Rep. Ryun stated, “Our nation was built on the belief that all citizens have the freedom to say what they believe, to pray the way they want to, and to live their lives without the government infringing on these rights. But just because some things can be said – or sung in different ways, does not mean they should.”
Just for the record, these resolutions are empty gestures. They are non-binding and are not actual laws; they just let lawmakers announce their official opinions. In other words, guys like Alexander and Ryun are picking a culture-war fight just for the fun of it.
And, in case anyone’s forgotten, in 1919, the U.S. Bureau of Education commissioned a [tag]Spanish[/tag]-language version of “The Star Spangled Banner.” The State Department’s website also features four-separate versions of the anthem in Spanish and a performer sang the national anthem in English and Spanish at [tag]Bush[/tag]’s first inaugural.
The sooner this “[tag]Nuestro Himno[/tag]” nonsense ends, the better.