Number 2 with a bullet

So, what have we learned about Dick Cheney’s shooting incident over the last half-day or so? A few things of interest.

* Though it’s hardly an impeachable offense, Cheney technically didn’t have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. (As Think Progress put it, “Cheney was hunting illegally.”) The Vice President’s office has since sent a $7 check to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, which is the cost of an upland game bird stamp.

* Cheney aides have been working overtime to tell reporters that the entire shooting was Harry Whittington’s fault, but hunting safety experts insist that the shooter is responsible for knowing his surroundings and avoiding hitting other people. “We always stress to anybody that before you make any kind of a shot, it’s incumbent upon the shooter to assess the situation and make sure it’s a safe shot,” said Mark Birkhauser, president-elect of the International Hunter Education Association and hunter education coordinator. Birkhauser added, “Every second, you’re adjusting your personal information that it is a safe area to shoot or it’s not a safe area to shoot.”

* The VP’s office released a statement to the press about the faulty hunting license. Putting this in context, Cheney’s first public announcement was not to alert reporters to the accident, or to express sympathy for his shooting victim, but rather to address a $7 game bird stamp.

* There’s some confusion surrounding the access given to the local sheriff’s office. The New York Times reports today that the Secret Service contacted the sheriff shortly after the shooting occurred and that the chief deputy spoke to Cheney on Saturday night. The Dallas Morning News reports that the VP “was not interviewed on Saturday.”

* The Texas sheriff’s office has concluded that “there was no alcohol or misconduct involved in the incident.”

* Karl Rove spoke directly with ranch owner Katharine Armstrong, the witness who was effectively deputized to be the communications staff for the Vice President, within 90 minutes of the shooting.

* De facto spokesperson Armstrong is a registered lobbyist for an engineering and construction firm that has done extensive work in Iraq.

* A New York Times editorial said, “[W]hat might have been a one-day gag on late-night TV is now a running story, and an excellent reminder that this administration never met a fact that it didn’t want to suppress…. The vice president appears to have behaved like a teenager who thinks that if he keeps quiet about the wreck, no one will notice that the family car is missing its right door…. [T]he White House, in trying to cover up the cover-up, has once again demonstrated that it would rather look inept than open.”

* A Washington Post editorial notes that there are some fairly serious questions to which the “White House has no satisfactory answer; neither does the vice president’s office.” The Post added, ” Neither Mr. Cheney nor the White House gets to pick and choose when to disclose a shooting. Saturday’s incident required immediate public disclosure — a fact so elementary that the failure to act properly is truly disturbing in its implications.

* Bush, reflecting on a 1994 incident in which he accidentally killed an endangered killdeer during a dove shoot, wrote in his autobiography, “”Karen [Hughes] and I looked at each other. What now? ‘We confess,’ we both said, almost simultaneously.” Bush called every reporter who had been on his hunting trip and held a press conference. The lesson of the shooting, Bush wrote, is that “people watch the way you handle things; they get a feeling they like and trust you, or they don’t.”

* The late-night comedians had a field day with the story last night. The Daily Show was particularly, ahem, on target.

* And my personal favorite comes by way of Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who as you’ll recall, was told by Cheney to “go f***” himself. Yesterday, Leahy said, “In retrospect, it looks like I got off easy.”

of course the shooter is responsible. but has anyone in the bush administration every taken responsibility for something that was bad?

  • I know there has been some concern expressed that this actually helps the WH by taking press, um ,off-target, away from Iraq, Katrina, the budget, leaks, etc. but it seems to me all we have to do is keep our, um, sights on the framework we were discussing last week: Corruption, Cronyism, and Competence (or lack thereof) — and perhaps we add a 4th “C” for “Cover-up”. There is the almost too easy – but I’ll take it anyway – angle that Cheney is an incompetent hunter who has to have domesticated game brought to him and still hits his buddy instead.

    But it is the pathetically stupid handling of the information that touches on almost all of the “Cs,” and has the added benefits of making Cheney the subject of late-night jokes AND is viscerally graspable for even the least policy-wonkish among the public. WaPo’s editorial was a, um, powerful blast, and makes a nice jumping off point. The “cover-up” aspect — Cheney’s effort to, um, put a silencer on it — is useful as there is an almost socially-embedded conventional wisdom post-Watergate that “it is always the cover-up that gets you in trouble.” As a result, when people see what appears to be a cover-up, they assume they are, um, on the scent of trouble. (Which is to say the Terrible Texans couldn’t have, um, shot themselves in the foot much worse had they tried. Then again, with Cheney’s aim. . . )

    Ok, I’ll stop and keep some powder dry before I run completely out of ammunition. But I really think we should lock and load on this. This may be just the smoking gun we need for people to really understand how the 4Cs of this administration play out in literally every situation, large as a war or small as, um, birdshot.

    (forgive me, i haven’t had my coffee yet this morning)

  • I haven’t heard the NRA weigh in on this yet. Didn’t they coin the phrase “Guns don’t kill people . . . ” Also, is Cheney a member of the NRA? If so, they should revoke his membership for the careless use of a deadly weapon.

  • I think one thing this incident does is it gives a glimpse behind the curtain of the Texas oligarchy that currently runs the country.

    Regular citizens aren’t allowed to even know where Vice President Undisclosed Location is at any given time, but his rich Texas buddies not only know, they are allowed to carry loaded guns in his august presence. When there’s an accident, designated fixer Rove (also a Texan) is on the short list of who finds out immediately, while the rest of us learn it pretty much by accident later on.

    The deputizing of Armstrong is the most revealing bit, though. On paper she’s just some private citizen. In reality, she is a scion of a rich, important Texas family with longstanding business ties to the Bushes and to Karl Rove. She was one of the connected insiders on the Iraq gravy train. That is, she’s one of the club. To them, she’s exactly the sort of reliable loyalist you want to have answering questions about a potentially embarassing incident.

    I don’t even think it was all that much of a conscious conspiracy. Keeping the information “in the family” is just second nature to these people. And under them, the U.S. is taking great strides towards banana repupublicdom.

    BTQ, Leahy gets a gold star from me for that quip.

  • Cheney has faulty intelligence AND sometimes he also doesn’t get accurate information. This incident highlights Dick’s flawed decision making process and totalitarian philosophy of government .democratic Faulty intelligence is a hallmark of Bush Co.
    True intelligence knows what you don’t know..(like where’s Harry?)
    or (who is telling us there were WMDs in Iraq?).
    Ready shoot aim

    .

  • I think Zeitgeist has nailed all the major points, and as someone said over at Kos yesterday, we now have our blue dress.

  • angry young man – has anyone in the bush administration ever taken responsibility for something that was bad?

    No, and they aren’t about to start now. It’s consumate hypocrisy by consumate hypocrites. “Privacy for me, but not for thee. Trust us, if you haven’t done anything wrong, you have nothing to fear from our wiretaps, but stay the hell out of our affairs.”

  • The only way this story could be better in pointing out this administration’s incompetence and willingness to lie and cover-up is if Cheney didn’t actually shoot Whittington at all, but Chimpy did and Cheney is just taking the fall.

    Hmmmm. Where was Georgie on Saturday?

  • here are questions i’d ask mcclellan today:

    1. will the secret service let the president go hunting with cheney?

    2. many hunters have commented that the only way such a thing could happen would be if the shooter were either drunk or reckless. which is it?

    3. this shooting is only the latest in a bizarre series of incidents involving cheney, starting with his utterly inappropriate attire at a holocaust memorial service? is the white house concerned that these events suggest cheney is getting senile?

    btw, who else loves that the press continually refers to cheney as “the shooter”?

  • AYM, I love that the press refers to Cheney as “the shooter” but I think they should take it a step farther, and ask if Cheney acted alone. See if there’s film footage. Have Arlen Specter investigate. Oh, wait, he’s already investigating the White House. Ask if Cheney’s next canned hunt will also feature human prey.

  • Guess I was wrong yesterday when I said Chaney probably didn’t have a hunting license, but no upland game stamp is close enough. It still makes him a poacher. New label for the V.P. I wonder if the Texas wardens usually just issue a warning, or is this special treatment?

  • This just in (AP, NYT):

    WASHINGTON — The man shot by Vice President Dick Cheney suffered a minor heart attack after birdshot moved into his heart, hospital officials said Tuesday, and was moved back to the intensive care unit for further treatment.

    Texas attorney Harry Whittington was recovering and will be monitored for seven days to make sure more bird shot doesn’t move to other organs or move to other part of his body, hospital officials said.

    “However some of the bird shot appears to have moved and lodged into part of his heart in what we would say is a minor heart attack,” said Peter Banko, administrator at Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi-Memorial.

    White House physicians who attended to Whittington at the scene after Cheney accidentally shot him were involved in the treatment, the officials said.

  • “However some of the bird shot appears to have moved and lodged into part of his heart in what we would say is a minor heart attack,” said Peter Banko, administrator at Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi-Memorial.

    A heart attack is when a part of the heart muscle dies, usually from artery failure getting blood to the muscle.

    Getting shot in the heart is not a heart attack! It is GETTING SHOT IN THE HEART!

    Jeez!

  • sick thought, but if he dies, shouldn’t cheney be arrested for manslaughter?

    couldn’t the target’s insurance company sue cheney?

  • IT MAY BE MANSLAUGHTER!

    FROM

    http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/

    “This is what the State of Texas thinks of hunting accidents that injure innocent people if your surname happens to be Hispanic and you’re not the big, white boozehound Vice President of the United States…

    Juan Garza Mendoza, 34, an employee of the ranch, was charged Monday with manslaughter, a second-degree felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison….

    Mendoza had apparently hit Barrera Vasquez while shooting at a feral hog, and immediately contacted authorities after the shooting, Hurd said.”

  • Comments are closed.