Obama on Spears/Hilton attack: ‘Is that really what this election’s about?’

As expected, the McCain campaign’s new TV ad, comparing Barack Obama to Britney Spears and Paris Hilton, made quite a splash yesterday. When pressed for a reaction, Obama told reporters yesterday, “You know, I don’t pay attention to John McCain’s ads, although I do notice he doesn’t seem to have anything to say very positive about himself. He seems to only be talking about me… You need to ask John McCain what he’s for and not just what he’s against.”

That’s not bad, I suppose, but as Greg Sargent noted yesterday, “Hearing Obama himself laugh off the ad as childish or babyish would help ensure that McCain just keeps on shrinkin’…”

With that in mind, today’s response at a town-hall meeting on energy in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, seemed quite a bit stronger.

“Given the seriousness of the issues, you’d think we could have a serious debate,” Obama said. “But so far, all we’ve been hearing about is Paris Hilton and Britney Spears. I mean, I do have to ask my opponent, is that the best you can come up with? Is that really what this election is about? Is that what is worthy of the American people?”

The crowd yelled: “NOOOOOOOOOO.”

“Even the media has pointed out that Senator John McCain — who started off talking about running an honorable campaign — has fallen back on predictable political attacks and demonstrably false statements. But here’s the problem. All of those negative ads spending all this time talking about me, instead of talking about what he’s going to do, that’s not going to lower your gas prices….

“It’s politics as a game,” Obama said. “But the time for game-playing is over. That’s why I’m running for President of the United States of America.”

Much better.

As long as we’re on the subject, there’s been some speculation about the choice in celebrities McCain picked for his attack ad, and possible racial implications. Newsday’s John Riley had an interesting piece.

The problem: Anyone with even a vague sense of pop culture knows that Britney and Paris are yesterday’s news. Here’s a link to Forbes’ Celebrity 100. Paris and Britney don’t even make the list any more.

Instead, the top 10, in order: Oprah Winfrey, Tiger Woods, Angelina Jolie, Beyonce Knowles, David Beckham, Johnny Depp, Jay-Z, The Police, JK Rowling, Brad Pitt.

So, they didn’t pick other big celebrities, who were either men, or black, or married.

What they picked was two sexually available white women.

But it must have been a coincidence, because we know John McCain wants to run an elevated campaign focusing on the serious issues that America faces.

Jonathan Chait isn’t going for the racial angle, arguing instead that McCain’s team picked Spears and Hilton because they’re “extremely unpopular celebrities.” Maybe, but McCain having hired the minds behind the “call me” attack ad against Harold Ford might tip the scales a bit.

In any case, the McCain campaign’s spin has become increasingly ridiculous, and even tougher to defend. Leading conservative blogers hate it; McCain allies hate it; and the Obama campaign is mocking it.

So, when McCain spokesperson Nicolle Wallace (a Rove acolyte) appeared on the “Today” show to talk about it, what was her message? “This ad is in some ways a celebration of [Obama’s] celebrity.” Good lord.

But don’t worry, while even McCain’s paid staff is struggling to defend one of the stupidest presidential campaign ads in recent history, there’s still Joe Lieberman.

Lieberman took a different tack, saying the ad simply compares the two candidates in a “creative” way and people should lighten up. “To some extent the appearance of Paris Hilton and Britney Spears — people complain about it — they should just relax and enjoy it,” he said.

“Relax and enjoy it.” Hilton and Spears. Joe Lieberman.

The mind reels.

What did Lieberman say? I couldn’t understand him with McCain’s d**k in his mouth.

  • You can find a racial angle to just about anything if you look hard enough, as this campaign season has surely proven. But come on– Paris and Britney are widely regarded as vapid, superficial celebrities who are famous primarily for their looks. The parallel McCain was trying to draw is obvious, and it’s really a stretch to suggest that it has anything to do with race.

  • Is that a reference to the joke attributed to McCain about just lying back and enjoying being raped by a Gorilla?
    Just asking!
    peace,
    st john

  • In a nutshell. McCain is selling himself as someone who wants to win. Obama is selling himself as someone who wants to succeed.

  • JRD, I’m curious if you felt the same way about the “Call me, Harold” ad? Given that the creative team is the same and we know their history, why should we give them the benefit of the doubt. . . unless the Ford ad also was not racist baiting?

  • (I should note, however, having been hard on Team Obama in several threads the past few days that ‘I approve of this message.’ Good move picking up the screenwriter from The American President 🙂 )

  • Like most things with Republicans, I found the commercial sexist.

    Republicans are always trying to paint Liberals as being weak and effeminate so I am not at all shocked to see that they picked two white women.

  • Let’s remember that Scarlett Johanson also became controversial for her “relationship” with Obama. It’s not just Harold Ford, Paris and Britney. Also, remember Karl Rove’s reference to Obama’s “beautiful date” at the country club.

    Not a brunnette in the bunch.

  • Imagine how much uglier this would be if McCain were running against Hillary Clinton.

  • I agree that the ad was stupid but not racist. Come on, folks, they’re handing us this election on a platter, let’s not screw it up by screaming “race card” until they actually play a race card (which they will, and when they do THEN we need to point it out, clearly and calmly, so that no one misses it)

    Obama’s questions “is this really what we’re going to talk about?” cuts the throat of the media morons, and that will resonate.

    Keep that up.

  • The McCain campaign has become the “Seinfeld” campaign – it’s about nothing. There’s not even a wacky Kramer to make things more enjoyable. It’s nothing, its rambling, its incoherent.

    At best, it pulls out enough words and symbols to keep people who react to the dog-whistles paying attention, but that’s it. It’s honestly substanceless.

    In fact its a tradgety that his numbers are as high as they are, but I expect that’s a mix of people not wanting to vote for Obama for various negatives, the fact the media hasn’t called McCain on his tactics (but may be finally doing so), and that some Republicans voters are so-brand dedicated that a candidate could eat a baby on television and he’d still get 30% of the vote.

    I have note elsewhere I think McCain has no idea what to do so is trying to maintain, and hope his flailing pushes him somewhere into getting 50.0001% of the electoral votes. Because he has nothing else.

    One thing that makes me wonder – after running such a horrible campaign, after selling out, could McCain be any kind of leader at all? No vision, no substance, no leadership, he’s a small pathetic figure flailing for attention. He makes George Bush look presidential.

    Hell, at this rate I’m starting to appreciate Bush. That hurts.

  • The Dogwhistle Chorus™ is just beginning.

    Of course the ad is a racist dogwhistle. Both Hilton and Spears are Republicans, by the way, each well known for their sexual antics and eroticised image. Comparing Obama to them is a straight shot at the racist reptilian brain, a way of implying that the black man is coming for your white women.

    As to other explanations for using these two, that’s what makes it a dogwhistle. You can point to other supposed justifications for your racist ploy, even though it’s obvious what you are really trying to do.

  • JRD said:
    “You can find a racial angle to just about anything if you look hard enough, as this campaign season has surely proven. But come on– Paris and Britney are widely regarded as vapid, superficial celebrities who are famous primarily for their looks. The parallel McCain was trying to draw is obvious, and it’s really a stretch to suggest that it has anything to do with race.”

    JRD is correct. You will know when we really want to do a ‘Harold Ford’ on ‘His Arrogance’. We will have blonde white women rubbing themselves against him physically and point out that all that black men want, besides being criminals, is to have sex with white women.

  • Now that’s what I’m talkin’ about! There’s really no need to stoop. It’s baiting but not race-baiting. The formula: tie an image to the candidate which demands a retort, then douse him with the whole can of shit.

    But this time it just won’t play in Peoria, bitches.

    Keep on rising, Barack.

  • I think that ad is a two-fer. My first reaction was “here we go again; it’s ‘Harold, call me’ time”. But the choice of those two in particular… They’re the kind who give the basis to all the blonde jokes — dim-witted beyond belief. If Obama can be branded as both an idiot (he’s like them) *and* a potential defiler of white womanhood, all the better.

  • DragonScholar said:
    “One thing that makes me wonder – after running such a horrible campaign, after selling out, could McCain be any kind of leader at all?”

    You forget that McCain does not speak for the McCain campaign.

    We have precedence for this. If Cheney can pull the strings on the Bush puppet, why can’t we have a president that skips the middle man and has lobbyists directly pulling the puppet strings?

  • Lieberman took a different tack, saying the ad simply compares the two candidates in a “creative” way and people should lighten up. “To some extent the appearance of Paris Hilton and Britney Spears — people complain about it — they should just relax and enjoy it,” he said.

    Has LIEberman been hanging out with “Claytie” Williams? Seems I’ve heard that “relax and enjoy it” rape joke (if you really want to call it a joke) line before. Hey Joe, I don’t want to relax and enjoy it.

  • Haven’t we heard “relax and enjoy it” before in this campaign…?

    You know, that fundraiser. With the rape joke?

    Strange.

  • zeitgeist,

    My memory of the Harold Ford ad may be hazy, but two key points of distinction jump out at me: first, if I remember correctly, didn’t the ad picture Ford with the women and contain a pretty clear narrative of Ford as a liberal playboy? Second, and more to the point, my interpretation of McCain’s ad is consistent with the long-running meme that Obama is flashy and superficial but ultimately lacking in substance, which connects this ad to all of the “pretty words”-type comments that McCain and Clinton made about his rhetorical abilities. It’s just much more plausible– indeed, kind of obvious– that that’s what McCain was going for here.

  • Everything in the U.S. is racial, even when it isn’t. Our history has left us with an ugly racial legacy that is always in the back of everyone’s heads. That’s just the way that it is. However, I don’t think that picking Paris and Britney were concious racist decisions. They’re trying to suggest that Obama is basically the political equivalent. He’s vapid, famous only for being famous, and not that bright. Oh yeah, he’s also not a manly man like the doddering septuagenarian that the GOP has put forth, but a simpering girl without a clue. That’s the subtext of their add. The racist stuff will be along in a day or 3.

  • You are a hoot, Republican POV! The best parody of a racist, amoral, thuggish GOP troll I’ve read in some time. Your portrayal of the archetypical smarmy, vapid, intellectually bankrupt, sleazy power crazed Rovian slime bag Republican is worthy of an Oscar! I look forward to your next performance. How you keep from laughing hysterically while you type, or manage to not lose your lunch on your keyboard, I’ll never know. White women rubbing against Obama! Hoo, boy! Talent, I guess, sheer, unmitigated talent.

  • Hey jimBOB, do you think the “Dog Whistle Chorus” will work on anyone other than the dogs who won’t vote for our guy anyway?

    Seriously, who’s going to say “Gee, I was going to vote for that black guy, but now that I think of it I really don’t like black guys”.

  • “…compares the two candidates in a “creative” way….”

    So—does this mean that I could superimpose Lieberman on images of the Auschwitz chimneys, the piles of rotting corpses, and boxcars full of human beings with yellow stars stitched to their jackets—and “compare him in a creative way” to Adolf Hitler? Because if that is where “Kapo Joe” feels the need to take this election, then that is exactly where I, for one, am more than willing to take it.

  • Racer X, of course they are preaching to the choir, but it still doesnt’ make it okay. It should still be called out as being exactly what it is: racist and sexist.

  • Lay back and enjoy it? Isn’t that what Bobby Knight said back in the 90’s about rape? Lieberman needs better role models.

  • Christ on a bed of rigotini. Why doesn’t McCrank just walk around with a target over his balls so it will be even easier for Obama to kick him.

    The choice of naughty girls makes McCane look particularly out of it. He should know that Amy Winehouse is the train-wreck du jour.

    Finally, the date is July 31, 2008. If he’s willing to go this low now, you just know he’s going to do something that will repulse a lot of swing voters in September.

  • Obama needs to start shooting back immediately with everything he has.

    Presidential campaigns aren’t civil anymore. It’s sad and infuriating, but a smart, fair, and articulate candidate can’t rely on simply making sense. It helps to be able to bloody some noses when you need to – in a way that everyone can see.

    Since yesterday, it’s seeming like 2004 all over again. It starts as a drip of GOP messages that seem ludicrous – even embarrassing for Republicans (Paris Hilton? Swiftboat Veteran’s for Truth? Give me a fucking break!). But for Obama to act like he’s above all makes him look weak like Kerry did. Dem bloggers and commenters everywhere are shocked at the tastelessness of the new ad. C’mon people – what do we know about the team that’s running McCain’s campaign right now? There the exact same individuals who painted McCain himself as a hooker-chaser, a homosexual, and an unstable lunatic. Now their on the same team and it doesn’t matter because they share the same goal of Republican hegemony.These are people without integrity. Winning is everything. I can’t believe the reactions I’m reading from my usual blogs. Nowhere do I see calls for all out war against McCain and his team. This guy is such an easy target (senile, incoherent, wooden, foreign-policy ignorant, out of touch), and so was Bush (petulant, dry drunk, incoherent, arrogant, rock-stupid). Why are Democratic strategists so afraid of calling bullshit for what it is? What fucking use is a code of civility if it makes you lose every four years.

    Obama needs to show that he can draw some blood. Even a fair and reasonable person needs to be able to defend themself from time to time. If he does it right and does it now it could neutralize the Republican’s game plan for the rest of the campaign.

    We believe in you.

  • And I’m not talking about taking the high road. There is no high road.

    Whether it was planned or not by the Obama campaign, the Wes Clark comments in June were brilliant. Hit the man where he’s strongest. That’s the whole Rove/Schmidt/Wallace playbook. Look at how formulaic and reliable it is for their attack yesterday on McCain: run a slimy ad with lots of very subtle, subliminal racial/sexual innuendoes to draw out a response from Obama. At that point any response acknowledging the racial issue (even a meticulous and carefully worded one) is open game for playing the ‘race card’. Its a trap. The high road is the same as not getting in the ring. GOP thinks very hard about how to do this to their opponents. If you’re fighting a scumbag you have to kick his ass decisively.

    Sometimes I don’t think Dem strategists really take proper account of who they’re dealing with. Rove has started whisper campaigns accusing youth-charity humanitarians of being pedophiles. He actively tried to use the federal government to just put Democratic politicians in jail no reason. This is partisan war.

    Obama needs to enlist a team of rabid suggogates to play up McCain’s alcoholism, his wife’s 20 year drug addiction, the fact he abandoned his loving family, that he’s a year away from dropping dead from melanoma, no one really likes him, he has no personality, etc.

    Wipe him off the face of the earth.

  • “So, when McCain spokesperson Nicolle Wallace (a Rove acolyte) appeared on the “Today” show to talk about it, what was her message? “This ad is in some ways a celebration of [Obama’s] celebrity.””

    So they’re moonwalking back on this one…hoo yah!

  • About the race card………. Remember those classy buttons from the Texas Republican Convention that said “IF OBAMA’S PRESIDENT, WILL THE WHITE HOUSE STILL BE WHITE?” – Well, McCain didn’t denounce those, so as current head of the republican party, that must mean he condones. Same for the OBAMA MONKEY dolls, T-shirts, etc. ect.
    If he doesn’t condemn, he condones.
    Ergo, McCain is running a racist campaign.

  • Obama’s questions “is this really what we’re going to talk about?” cuts the throat of the media morons, and that will resonate.

    And while we’re on the subject of Paris Hilton, Barack might want to point out that these poster children for inherited wealth have given lots of money to both him personally and the Republican Party.

    People with inherited wealth like the Hiltons are Republicans, of course. The thing they care the most passionately about is the estate tax. They think of the Democrats as “socialists”.

  • I think the ad was bad, but to this seems to me to actually be playing the race card. The idea that Hilton and Spears were picked because they are unpopular makes perfect sense to me. The two might be old news in terms of how famous they are, but they have pretty much become the archetype of the unpopular celebrity.
    Comparing Obama to Oprah doesn’t quite have the same bite.

    You’re better than this Steve. Don’t bring the race card into something where race is not an issue, especially when race really is brought up by the right in other situations. Don’t be the boy who cried wolf.

  • The way Obama has handled this is, as I’ve come to expect, perfect.. No, the answer is NOT to start firing back with equal slime. Didn’t anybody pay attention to the primaries? What made Hillary’s ‘kitchen sink’ strategy so bad was the way Obama responded to it.

    Look at what is happening now. Every day Steve brings us another report of a Republican condemning McCain’s campaign. He is becoming a joke, and by keeping the focus on the issues, Obama is making him more of one.

    But the first time Obama runs his own attack ad — as contrasted to a ‘counter-punching ad’ or an issue ad that is in reality an attack against McCain’s lack of positions, or his contradictory positions — he legitimizes the tactic and all of a sudden no one will be blasting McCain’s stupidity because ‘they’re both doing it.’ (And it doesn’t matter one bit if Obama’s ad was 100% true, it will still be ‘an attack ad.’)

    To paraphrase a famous sign:

    IT’S THE ISSUES, STUPID

    (By the way, I am listening to my mind here, and not my heart. Yes, I’d love to see Obama throw McCain’s many faults back into his face so hard that he’d need a proctologist to do his dental work. However, I agree with all of you that winning the election is the most important thing — and that this might just be the most important election since 1932 or 1860. And I still think Obama has shown he knows how to win elections, and he’s going about it the right way.)

    Two other things. I agree that there is no reason to find a racial implication here, that it doesn’t matter if there is one, and that the ‘dog-whistles’ won’t work on anyone who would vote for Obama to begin with. Nobody is suddenly going to discover that Obama is black, they’ve already noticed a few weeks ago.

    And, Gridlock (@1), as someone who has had many many many cocks in my own mouth, don’t use homophobic slurs just because you can get away with them against somebody you know we don’t like.

  • I agree with Prup @ 41

    Who cares about it being racist or sexist? According to Republicans it’s only wimpy whiny democrats who always cry about these things, and they can’t take a joke.

    Obama handled it brilliantly. He went along with the ‘joke’ by mocking it, and then asking the pertinent question: IS this what it is all about?

  • I loved when Obama asked if thats all McCains got. He could do so much better… But at least Blitzer is doing some decent reporting now.

  • Comments are closed.