Obama tells Nebraskans ‘we’re not gonna settle any more’

Sen. [tag]Barack Obama[/tag] was in Nebraska on Saturday campaigning for Sen. [tag]Ben Nelson[/tag] and Democratic gubernatorial candidate [tag]David Hahn[/tag]. From what I hear, Obama was very well received.

“This is our moment to lead,” he told 900 [tag]Nebraska[/tag] Democrats at the party’s annual Morrison-Exon Dinner. “Enough of the broken promises,” Obama declared. “Enough of the failed leadership.”

When President [tag]Bush[/tag] said in his 2000 campaign he was against nation-building, Obama said, “we just didn’t know he was talking about this one.”

Nebraska is, of course, one of the most solidly Republican states in the country and one of only four states in the Union in which Bush’s approval rating is still above 50%. And yet, Nebraskan Dems couldn’t wait to see this liberal lawyer from Chicago. At the party’s annual dinner, the audience included a sizable overflow crowd. Earlier, Obama addressed an “enthusiastic crowd” of 1,000 people at a Baptist church near Omaha.

“I’ve had enough of folks not telling the truth, manipulating intelligence, fudging numbers,” he said. Bungling their way to “three-dollar-something gasoline,” he added.

While as much as a trillion dollars may be spent on the war in [tag]Iraq[/tag], Obama said, investments are lacking at home in “neighborhoods where rats outnumber computers and kids can’t walk home safely.”

The Bush administration, he said, has slashed funding for day care and after-school programs, and embraced a policy of “social Darwinism, every man or woman for him or herself.”

Obama told the Democratic dinner audience that, somehow, the administration believes “that if you say the words ‘plan for victory’ and point to the number of schools painted and roads paved and cell phones used in Iraq, no one will notice the more than 2,300 flag-draped coffins that have arrived at Dover Air Force Base.”

Well,” he said, “it’s time we finally said we notice, and we care, and we’re not gonna settle any more.”

First, can someone remind me why Obama can’t run for national office in 2008?

Second, what I like most about this story is the fact that Nebraskans like Ben Nelson, who is probably the Senate’s most conservative Dem, was anxious to campaign alongside Obama in this reliably “red” state. How many national Dems would Nelson want to bring to Nebraska for campaign events? The number of Dems who can receive the same rock-star reception in Nebraska as in New York is quite small. Obama, right now, is near the top of that list.

Obama also has the support of Omaha billionaire Warren Buffett.

“I’ve got a conviction about him that I don’t get very often,” Warren Buffett explained later in an interview. “He has as much potential as anyone I’ve seen to have an important impact over his lifetime on the course that America takes.

  • I agree that he should run, as the Dems need someone with his personal appeal. My parents, who are white, midwestern, former Republicans in their 80s, are big fans.

  • First, can someone remind me why Obama can’t run for national office in 2008?

    Because he’s a gawdawful trimmer, who on a good day triangulates three or for times before breakfast.

    He’s got a better bio and platform manner than Joe Biden. And his original hair.

    But that’s it.

  • The number of Dems who can receive the same rock-star reception in Nebraska as in New York is quite small. Obama, right now, is near the top of that list.

    I’ll bet Wes Clark is on that list. ;-> Clark/Obama 2008!

  • “First, can someone remind me why Obama can’t run for national office in 2008?”

    How about that he’s still a young man with very little experience? Is it too much to ask that a presidential candidate at least offer some promise of the wisdom of age? Can he/she at least be a former Governor, or a person with, at a minimum, one full and distinguished term in the Senate or years in the House, or be an erudite and experienced military or business leader?

    Does making a good speech tell us anything about handling the leadership of this country? By those lights, why Obama and not George Clooney?

    I realize that George Bush was a faux businessman and a governor (of a state that gives the Governor little to do) and turned out to be the worst president of the Republic. But that just proves my point–he was elected despite the fact that he was a demonstrated moron. So be it–we knew what we were getting.

    So that’s no reason to cling to an attractive but, as yet, unseasoned leader. Obama, yes perhaps. But in the future.

  • Nothing against Obama, but are the programs he raises in his speech those which would affect the ordinary Nebraskan? Or are there other programs that have been cut that might affect them more and to which the general red Nebraskan might say “hey, he’s got a point”? I have no idea, just asking.

  • I’m still with Gore/Edwards, but I would gladly accept Gore/Obama. This Fall’s elections should tell us a lot about 2008.

  • Barak has a couple things going for him. 1. He never had to vote on the Iraq war resolution. But he was against the war for the right reasons. This adds to his credence now. 2. In midwest states like Nebraska, Barak’s support for ethanol is a plus and inoculates him partially from his more liberal stances. So, it is probably safe for politicians like Nelson to bring him home.

    But, like many politicians, it is hard to get a straight answer out of him on big issues like social security. He does inspire with his language though.

  • I don’t know why he can’t or shouldn’t run. For my money, there is no one else in the entire Democratic party who generates the same kind of heat and intensity as this guy. He has an aura of personal intergrity and goodness that’s a rarity in politics – especially in this century. Obama on the ticket in 2008 could do a lot to help wash the taste of BushCo out of our collective mouth. If people are really serious about bringing substantive change to Washington, he’s the man.

  • With all due respect, I don’t think Wesley Clark is on that list. As far as I can tell, that list only consists of one name.

    I was actually surprised that Nelson appeared with Obama. After watching most of Nelson’s votes over the past year, I would have expected Nelson to have flown George W in for a fundraising event. A recent poll showed that a majority of Nebraska Republicans are happier with Nelson than with Hagel, whereas a majority of Nebraska Democrats are happier with Hagel than with Nelson.

    It’s also interesting to see the number of times that Buffett and Obama have met over the past two years. I believe this was Obama’s third trip to Omaha since he was elected to the Senate and Buffett met him in Chicago at least once. He’ll have the financial backing if he wants to make a run in 2008.

  • bubba,
    75% of Nebraska’s National Guard have served in Iraq.
    22 Nebraskans have died in Iraq to date
    55% of kids in the Omaha Public School district live at or below the poverty level. Many smaller districts have similar numbers.
    Many Nebraskans, regardless of their politics, are deeply concerned about the rise in fuel prices. Considering how much truckers and farmers (which includes most of my family) have to spend on diesel for their equipment, many will be in the red this year.
    Trust me, Nebraska does have interest in what Senator Obama says.
    A good chunk of Omaha’s economy is tied to the housing industry, so any deflation in that hubble would greatly affect not just the city, but the state.

    While that “one of only 4” fact is still true, a see many here who are starting to think “enough is enough”. Bushco will try to woo them back, with promises of criminalizing gay marriage and abortion, and keeping foreigners out, but I see a lot of people having a reality check when they see their paycheck shrivel up and have to rely on the local food bank for help.

    Hopefully, we don’t get distracted when football season starts….

  • My money’s on Gore/Obama in 2008. Not a lot of money, but some money.

  • I’m still waiting for Obama to emerge — it seems like he’s afraid to lead, which, in a way, makes sense, given his youth and inexperience. Yes, he makes good speeches, and he’s got a really great personal story, and he seems to have hired some smart people. But I have doubts about his political courage, or vision, or whatever you want to call it. I can’t understand, for example, why he went on one of the Sunday talking head shows and dissed Kerry’s filibuster attempt during the Alito confimation debacle. It’s like he’s following the Hillary script — using his celebrity status for . . . what purpose, exactly?

  • How about that he’s still a young man with very little experience? Is it too much to ask that a presidential candidate at least offer some promise of the wisdom of age?

    It is a false assumption that age and wisdom come hand and hand. I’ve met many a fool who was well aged and a number of wise youths.

    I think we should look less at age an political experience and more for integrity, inspiration, and good planning. May the best candidate win.

  • There are times when the most important thing a leader can do is inspire the people, but on the whole I prefer competence and experience. Obama has fantastic promise and I look forward to voting for him at some point, but he needs more experience. The best place for him to get this, if not as a governor, would be as VP, ideally for Gore.

  • Obama will be 47 in 2008, Clinton was 46 and Kennedy 43 when elected. Just throwing that out there.

    I get a sense that he is doing a lot of work behind the scenes building a support network. He is careful and doesn’t want to step on toes. But he’s going to have to break from the pack at some point. He is obviously running – but is it for 2008? Maybe not. I hope he’s not building the perfect campaing organization (perfect as the enemy of good).

    But what do I know, I also thought Kerry was going put his campaign into third gear in September.

  • Pearl Jammin’

    With all due respect, I don’t think Wesley Clark is on that list. As far as I can tell, that list only consists of one name.

    Care to elaborate? Why wouldn’t a former 4 star general from nearby Arkansas not be welcome in Nebraska? (honestly I’m not trying to argue, I just am curious)

  • Kerry doesn’t warm me up much.

    Gore/Obama has some appeal

    I don’t see Clark/Obama happening. But Clark might.

    I’m not getting much of a warm and fuzzy feeling for Edwards either.

  • Considering Edwards still probably cannot even win North Carolina, you have to wonder if he really is a contender.

  • I think there are really just three names in the running for the #2 slot on the Democratic ticket in 2008: Obama, Napolitano and Sebelius (sp?). We’re going to have either the first African-American or the first woman VP in 2009…

    …so long as we can figure out a way to keep Our Lady of Triangulation (D-NY) from getting nominated. If that’s the case, she’ll probably run with the most white-bread, old-school, unthreatening guy she can find. Vilsack would be my guess. With all the electricity on the Hillary/Vilsack ticket, you could–I dunno, operate a hand-held fan?

    What I love about Obama is that he articulates the emerging Democratic meta-narrative–that we’re all in this together, and that when we act accordingly as a nation, we succeed–better than anyone else alive. But I’m not sure he’s ready to run for the top job just yet. By 2016, as a sitting or defeated VP, no doubt about it.

  • “I don’t see Clark/Obama happening. But Clark might.

    Care to elaborate? ” – Edo

    I think Wesley Clark will have the sense to start running for the Democratic nomination for president sooner this time, and may believe that he could win best in the general election paired up with Obama. Therefore I’m pretty sure that he would be careful to not attack Obama during the campaign. Not that I expect Obama to run for the nomination in 2008.

  • Ahh…so your assertion is more about Obama than about the ticket. That seems reasonable. Personally, I really like Clark/Edwards.

  • At the risk of throwing out something that’s not really politically correct but I think needs mentioning.

    Given the racist and misogynistic tendencies of this country I wonder if Hillary’s gender or Obama’s race would be a killer from the outset. I hope that no one misconstrues what I trying to get across here. I am pretty impressed with the entire field of possible candidates, and at this point, in comparison to Bush, even Hillary looks great, but I’m trying to look at this from the broader perspective of the country as a whole.

  • Sorry for not getting back earlier, but Wesley Clark doesn’t have “it”. He needs a defining moment, similar to Obama’s speech in 2004 at the DNC, or he needs to do more self-promotion. That may not be his style, so that may just make him a VP at best.

    Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see a large number of people showing up here in Omaha to listen to a Wesley Clark speech, let alone give him a rock-star reception.

  • I agree that Obama needs to be governor or VP (or some other high-profile cabinet post) before running for president. In 2010, he should run for Illinois governor (which he’ll easily win,) and then, depending on who will win in ’08, run for president in either ’12 or ’16. And I think Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer would be an excellent veep choice for Obama. So, I’m hoping for a Richardson/Warner victory in ’08, and an Obama/Schweitzer victory in ’16. Clean up the mess that Bush made!

  • Comments are closed.