Obligatory headline: Bye bye, Bayh

Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) had, for all intents and purposes, already been running a presidential race for months. He had 15 trained, funded campaign aides, and as of a week ago, visited New Hampshire seven times. When Bayh noted two weeks ago that he was poised to create an exploratory committee, his presidential campaign was a foregone conclusion.

At least, it was. Bayh has decided to scrap his plans and skip the race.

Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana will not seek the presidency in 2008, saying he believes the odds of a successful run were too great to overcome.

“At the end of the day, I concluded that due to circumstances beyond our control the odds were longer than I felt I could responsibly pursue,” Bayh said in a statement Saturday. “This path — and these long odds — would have required me to be essentially absent from the Senate for the next year instead of working to help the people of my state and the nation.”

Bayh faced very long odds and almost certainly made the right decision skipping the race.

With this announcement in mind, it occurs to me that the Democratic presidential field may not be quite as enormous as expected. As recently as a few months ago, observers could name at least a dozen sure-fire, practically-already-running, credible candidates who would throw their hats in the ring early in the new year. Former Gov. Mark Warner (D-Va.), Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), and Bayh were “obviously” running. Except they’re not.

Who knows, with a little luck we just might be able to keep the ’08 field to single digits.

Bayh’s exit announcement stirred up just about as many juices as the possibility of his candidacy did. Yawn. We’ve always got Kusinich. Will Sharpton?

  • We need him in the Senate more than we need him wasting money on a presidential run. Good decision, Senator.

  • Bayh faced very long odds and almost certainly made the right decision skipping the race.

    I presume that some of the other candidates are not running to win (what probability, in her heart of hearts, did Moseley-Brown give herself?), but to e.g. establish the brand name for future runs. At least, that seems to be the way it works for the Republicans.

  • Sad to say: Indiana is the most northern of Southern (redneck) states.

    I’m not saying that Bayh is a redneck; it’s just that the last time Indiana went Democratic in a presidential race was for Johnson in 1964 (I think). So, Bayh has no foundation to go forth and broadly win the country.

    Yes, (despite protest) Indiana is a Mid-western backwater.

  • I am curious for the real reasons so many have dropped out so early. Is it the money or the gop attack machine? I know there is the pat statements and answers but, I want to know is really why.

  • Well, there has been some speculation as to whether both Warner and now Bayh have stepped aside because they have effectively had their thunder stolen by Obama. Warner dropped out not long after sharing the stage with Obama at Harkin’s event in Iowa. Bayh made his announcement after traveling to New Hampshire, only to find that the entire state had turned its eyes toward Obama. So, with those two, it just might be the Obama factor.

    As for Russ Feingold, I think he probably had in his mind ahead of time that he would run for president if the Democrats did not take the Senate. Right after that victory, he decided that he would have more impact on the national debate as a high-ranking senator than as a presidential candidate, so he turned his attention to that instead.

    Just my speculation!

  • That answer sounds right w/r/t Feingold. Two chicago Dem. Congressmen, Gutierrez and Jackson, both dorpped out of the Mayoral race the day after Dems won controll of the House. And that was their explicit reasons: they could do more in the House majority.

  • Comments are closed.